Con-Artists The York Press Use Press Association Journalist Liar Andrew Milligan’s Fake News Story About Innocent Man And Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed

The York Press are in financial trouble. They’re broke, the don’t have 2 pennies to rub together, they don’t have a premises or a good reputation. This is linked to them being a bunch of backwards lying reporters from a hick-town that report nonsense that is not true. This is why no one buys their newspaper. The cash-strapped outfit has been around since 1882 and have shown no growth in over 120 years. They are based in an incestial hick-town with some of the lowest levels of intelligence in the UK, says it all really!

The lazy inaccurate copy cat article is written by “Press Association” fiend photographer Andrew Milligan. Milligan is a Scottish snapper who goes horribly wrong when it comes to writing, maybe you should stick to taking pictures on your smart phone Andrew! The nasty swine falsely accuses Ahmed of “voyeurism and sexual assault.” Andrew Milligan, if anyone is guilty of taking pictures of others for the purpose of gratification/ humiliation it’s you. Ahmed faced no such charges.

The clowns at The York Press predictably joined the media circus defaming Adnan Ahmed, falsely reporting fake charges against him. Ahmed is innocent and did not commit sexual assault, he did not commit breach of the peace and he has not been charged with voyeurism. Ahmed was set-up by the media, namely by BBC The Social’s racist journalist Myles Bonnar in particular. The video made by BBC The Social is what prompted police to start a pointless investigation.

Ahmed was never charged with “sexual offence’s,” this is a lie told by The York Press.

Andrew also wrote that Ahmed made no plea, he plead Not Guilty. All these media vultures want to create misery and fear; then spread it and feed off it. Adnan Ahmed is innocent; he did not commit sexual assault, he did not commit voyeurism, he did not commit breach of the peace and he did not behave in a threatening and abusive manner.

Milligan lists “sexual assault” without explaining it. There was NO sexual assault, an alibi with video evidence was presented to court showing Adnan Ahmed was elsewhere at the exact time and date of the false allegation, yet he was still remanded in custody due to the media hype surrounding his legitimate dating business. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER) Following is the actual indictment against Adnan Ahmed who is innocent and has not committed any crimes.

Adnan Ahmed was charged with 14 counts of “section 38, breach of the peace,” for simply talking to people during the day, most of whom gave him their number. Two of these charges aren’t even people, one is a video of Ahmed chatting to women who are “unknown” to the prosecutor and who did not even report or complain about an incident to the authorities. The other one is also “unknown” to the prosecutor, which is a shadow silhouette of an anonymous woman claiming Ahmed spoke to her – this was reported by the media via an online video, and again this anonymous person did not report this to the authorities. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THESE CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)

How can these charges even be considered, or worst still put on an indictment? Furthermore how can the accused defend them? There was no complaint! In reality, they were put on the indictment against Ahmed to run a trial, in order to convict him on legal technicalities by convincing a jury he is of bad character, using his bad-boy image in the media to do so.

The fake sexual assault charges consist of one female saying Ahmed squeezed her leg and another saying Ahmed touched her face. Both of these allegations are said to have happened in broad daylight, on busy city centre streets, fully clothed and the allegations are from over 3 years ago. These individuals didn’t make these accusations until there was a media scandal regarding Adnan Ahmed’s dating business in 2019, before that no accusations were ever made or reported. The accusers even appeared in the news and on social media when the media scandal regarding Ahmed’s dating business initially happened. They did not make these claims in the press or online. In fact their initial online/press statements actually contradict their later police statements. The police had to find these individuals to file a report, they made no police report of there own accord, they only talked online and in the media. The police did so to build a case against Ahmed. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF BOTH SEXUAL ASSAULT CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)

Furthermore, Ahmed was not charged with any of this when he was arrested then remanded in January 2019. The police/procurator fiscal added this to his indictment in April 2019, in order to have a document of charges to justify a trial and prosecution. There is a 3rd charge of sexual assault which is a false accusation by a female Ahmed has never even met before. It is alleged to have took place on 5th November 2018. Ahmed was not there, there is video evidence of this. Ahmed appears in a time stamped video filmed by his girlfriend at the exact date and time of the false accusation. The accuser blatantly lied to the police and contradicted her police statement on Instagram. Ahmed’s girlfriend took screenshots of this and sent the evidence to the police along with the alibi video proving Ahmed wasn’t there. Despite this, police and prosecutors chose to ignore the evidence. Ahmed’s girlfriend is now a defence witness and has to go to court to testify to this, rather than the charge being dropped. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE ALSO, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER)

The authorities would have had to release Adnan Ahmed on bail if they had dropped the charge, which they could have done in January 2019. Instead they added it to the indictment despite Ahmed’s girlfriend’s police statement and alibi evidence. If they didn’t include these charges they would not be able to indict Ahmed – as the other charges are too small to do so. Additionally they can still convict Ahmed of this on a technicality through the jury process because of a Scottish Law called Moorov/ Collaboration – even though Ahmed has never ever met the accuser before. Corroboration is when 2 or more independent parties make a similar complaint.

However, in Ahmed’s case no one who has made an accusation is an independent source, as everyone spoke to each other on social media through the Twitter feed of the BBC The Social video defaming Ahmed’s dating business. Evidence of this has been forwarded to Adnan Ahmed’s lawyer, who will attempt to use this in court if permitted to do so. Hence corroboration/Moorov Law does not apply as there was clearly collusion between all the accusing parties. All accusers also start all their police statements with “I saw the BBC Social video on Twitter….”

Furthermore, the three alleged sexual assault charges we have just explained are written as “or alternatively, section 38 breach of the peace” on Ahmed’s indictment document. Meaning, the mild nature of the false allegations are not even considered concrete “sexual assaults,” they are “breach of the peace” charges trumped up to the bigger charge as an alternative option in order to justify the uncertain element of the bigger charge. This is not justice, it is ridiculous. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF ALL 3 SEXUAL ASSAULT CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)

Adnan Ahmed denies all charges. The York Press know they have acted hastily, yet they still splashed “sexual assault” all over the tabloids (again with no details or explanation of what was involved) in order to pressure prosecutors into convicting him. Adnan Ahmed is innocent, he is a victim of ambush journalism and a corrupt set-up. Never before has a court of law in Scotland dealt with a case like this.

Milligan picked and chose certain parts of the indictment against Ahmed in order to make their fake news stories juicy. They wrote; “it is claimed he pressured one women into giving him her phone number and then sent a message referring to sex.” If a person is pressuring another, why would they ask for a phone number or even “pressure” someone for a phone number just to send text messages. It doesn’t make sense, there is no motive.

These women are independent people who welcomed the interactions, willingly gave their numbers and only came foreword because of he media scandal defaming Ahmed’s dating business. Before that they did not even see it as an issue or a crime. The media claims are false. Every female who gave Ahmed her number did so of their own free will. He did not “pressure” or “force” any of them. There was no text message with the word “sex” in it, that is a fact.

Andrew Milligan continued with his despicable lies writing, “another is said to be approached in a secluded lane,” the “lane” being referred to here is in the Uddingston area. It is joined onto a housing estate, between 2 main roads, leading to a main train station. This supposed incident is said to have happened at 10am, at this time the “lane” is massively populated with people making their was into the city centre for work and adult education. In no way is it a “secluded lane.” Ahmed also has an eye witness in his favour for this alleged incident.

The York Press continued; ”one woman alleged she went to a hotel to get away.” We researched these claims and found that the accuser said she very briefly spoke to Ahmed for less than a minute and she left, then went to a hotel to call a taxi. This woman was questioned about her claim by the public who asked, “why didn’t you call the police?” and “why did you wait until the BBC Social video came out to talk about it?” and “in what way was it scary, you walked away.” This seems to be another case of no actual offence being committed and the accuser having no inclination in her mind that there was a crime until the BBC Social video defaming Ahmed’s dating business went viral. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE ALSO, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER)

In all the incidents on the indictment; either no one thought a crime was being committed until the media scandal (because of how the BBC Social video was designed to portray Ahmed), or people made false accusations to gain some small-time fame, or worst of all no crime was even reported by an actual person – but a charge was added to the indictment anyway (i.e. the “unknowns” to the prosecutor).

Milligan fluffed on; “Ahmed is further accused of filming himself approaching a female,” this is a total lie. Ahmed faces no charges of “filming” anyone. “Filming” is not included on the indictment. The media’s lies are constant and transparent. Journalists did write one true statement about Adnan Ahmed, that is “he denies a total of 18 charges at Glasgow Sheriff Court,” that is because he is an innocent man.

Check out our next blog post here: http://redpillrights.com/clyde-1-falsely-report-aspects-of-adnan-ahmed-trial-not-guilty-claiming-student-felt-uncomfortable-after-being-approached-in-a-glasgow-street/