Corny Clown Carla Jenkins (Glasgow Evening Times) Uses Disgusting Reporting Tactics Writing Bitter Article On “Digital Intimacy” Mentioning Adnan Ahmed Despite Him Having No Links To This Whatsoever!

Dog-hack Carla Jenkins is at again. The overweight, try-hard, bitter joke of a reporter wrote a crappy article titled “digital intimacy – has it gone too far?” on 1st October 2019. Carla Jenkins’ track record of corny and disgusting articles she spews out as some sort of alarmist warped trash is evident from her past work. Sickening clown Carla Jenkins doesn’t care about helping people, the chubby journo only cares about pushing fake news down the throats of anyone unfortunate enough to come across her crazed ramblings. Jenkins gives off the air of a deranged person with “woke” perspectives gathered from confused social media posts and the sinister shallow masks of her gaping insecurities/ inferiority complex. 

Firstly Carla, what was the point of this article? Does the Glasgow Evening Times have no real news to report? Do they feel no responsibility towards the mental well being of the Scottish public? They must not, hiring and publishing the likes of stain Carla Jenkins! Secondly your article is muddled up pointless crap about the digital era being negative because you’re stuck in the past and most likely use it in a negative context (addictive social media use and pushing fake news filth). Cretin Carla pains about print journalism being rejected by the public; well maybe if reptiles like you wrote truthful news instead of click bait defamatory poison; your industry wouldn’t be dying out. Along with more confused ramblings about this non-issue, she wrote some trash about her weird childhood; reptilian Jenkins then mentions dating coach Adnan Ahmed, despite him having no connection to her low-intellect cheesy article and its nonsense content. 

Bitter Carla Jenkins is transparent and a childish moron. The actual reason she mentions Ahmed is because she was called out online for spreading lies about him, which exposed her for the amateur fraud and absolute charlatan that she is. Fraudster Carla mentions Addy Agame in order to dirty his name further by associating him with issues that have nothing to do with him and that are not even issues in the first place. This is a disgusting abuse of journalistic responsibility, ridiculously predatory reporting and sham news – well we expect nothing less from Carla to make up a pointless story just to try to hurt someone’s reputation, hopefully Ahmed punishes jakey Jenkins in civil court for her poisonous tactics! 

Con-artist Carla then wrote about her own ability to cat-fish “a real human” via her phone for a date (unlikely in our opinion) and her strange, awkward Twitter and email messages to strangers online. If anyone is violating digital intimacy/ privacy sounds like it’s creepy Carla Jenkins! Delusional Carla even mentions being “cat fished” by some random person and describes a digital scenario (where she doesn’t even meet this person in person) as a “relationship” – how very strange of you yet again Carla! The madness in Jenkins spills out all over her article, she does not come across as a stable person. However she’s so deluded, she probably believes people don’t see through her deceit. 

Maniacal Jenkins stated; “I reported victim’s reactions to the conviction of Addy Agame.” No Carla you wrote sensationalised fairy stories filled with contradictory lies and about people who don’t exist, defaming Addy Agame and trying to justify his “wrongful conviction” caused by your fake news Scottish media buds in Ahmed’s “trial by media” show-trial. The whole court-case was a farce and is in the process of being overturned by higher courts officials. The articles slimy Jenkins references were exposed as fake news trash and showed her to be a liar. See the following links for full details; 

Predatory Creepy Liar Carla Jenkins (Evening Times) Victimises Addy Agame (Not Guilty!) In Fake News Article;

Game on: Creepy Carla Jenkins and Jerk Jack Aitchison Make Up “Fake Victims” To Justify Wrongful Conviction of Dating Coach Addy Agame Ahmed (Evening Times);

Sleazy Carla continued; “a pick-up artist who filmed himself approaching women in Glasgow and uploaded the footage onto YouTube to teach men how to approach women.” OK, Jenkins – firstly, Ahmed never even referenced himself as a “pick-up artist” on his channel or elsewhere ever, this was done by the Scottish media. In fact Ahmed said the opposite – “I am not a PUA, I’m a dating and life coach.” Secondly, Ahmed didn’t “film himself” a camera man did so. Thirdly, filming anyone in a public place and using it as a teaching/ reporting tool is not illegal Carla you hypocrite – you and your scummy reporter buddies do so on a daily basis. A child could have researched and reported this better than dismal Jenkins! 

Lying hound Carla continued; “convicted of charges similar to harassment and breach of the peace, many of the women felt violated by his presence and complete lack of regard for personal space and privacy.” This is absolute false information. Carla Jenkins should be sacked for being an outright liar and bitter swine. Ahmed was not convicted of “harassment” or anything “similar” to it. We urge readers to ask a legal professional or research a law book to see clearly that Ahmed was wrongfully convicted of “section 38 breach of the peace,” because that is the only way incidents which are not crimes can be somehow looped into being so. Ahmed’s appeal of his wrongful conviction to be overturned includes the following reasons – “no crime to answer in the first place; police investigative methods caused miscarriage of justice; judge’s conduct during trial caused miscarriage of justice; and media interference caused him not to receive a fair trial.” 

Faker Carla Jenkins makes up fake scenarios that are not factual at all; no females said they “felt violated by his presence…lack of regard for personal space and privacy,” this is more sensationalised rubbish – all incidents were non-offensive passing comments/ conversations lasting from 40 seconds to a few minutes max, in broad day-light on city centre streets with countless CCTV cameras around. No one was “violated” or had their “personal space/ privacy” disregarded, your clutching at straws here Carla, you alarmist clown. Following are testimonials from women who have real experience with Ahmed in a dating context;

Monstrosity Carla continued her dishonesty, stating; “many victims said that after he initially approached them, violation of privacy continued in the digital sphere.” This is a complete lie, no one said this, Carla you are full of bull! There was not “many,” there were 2 females who gave Ahmed their social media/ numbers willingly and consensually – and they texted him also. This just shows how unreliable and low Carla Jenkins is as not only a hack but as a human being, you should be ashamed of yourself Carla – you are a bottom feeder and a gutter dweller! 

This dirty geek’s writing is almost as bad as her crap dress sense. Look at her choice of words “victims,” there were no victims, there were no actual crimes recognised under UK Law, there has to be a crime to be a “victim.” Fake “victims” who are glory-hungry idiots, jump on a fake #metoo bandwagon (saying they were simply chatted up) actually take away from real victims who actually have to face the reality of real crimes. The only “victims” in connection to the Evening Times are the people they victimise through their vile trash hate articles.

Weak mousy Carla then spat; “Ahmed a dating and lifestyle coach, said what he did was educational. However, women he had approached told his trial they had been upset and intimidated.” Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.

Carla Jenkins blabbered on; “Ahmed was found guilty at court for acting in a threatening and abusive manner that could cause a  reasonable person fear or alarm.” In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were  skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict will be appealed and overturned in the next few months as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintains his innocence, 13 charges were dropped before the biased jury got a chance to deliberate on them. Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct!

The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, this is not justice, it’s a farce!

It is the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation!

Scumbag Jenkins ended her awful article by stating; “conviction of Adnan Ahmed suggests digital intimacy is only valid when touched with humanity. We are beginning to see when it is not (in Scotland at least).” Yes more confused narrative that has no meaning or point from portly porker Carla Jenkins. Ahmed faced no charges of anything “digital” whatsoever Carla you total idiot. Your attempt at defaming him just makes you look bitterly stupid and now your being further exposed as being a liar yet again. Peanut-brain Carla’s weak attempt to champion “Scotland” as a whole falls on deaf ears statistically – most people in Scotland don’t care about “woke” culture bullshit and overly sensitive politically correct cancel culture; only half-wits like Carla do. She should champion Scotland for all the chip-shops, fast-food chains and booze shops she’s been hammering her whole life causing her chubby physical appearance and damaged mental state to be the way they are! 

Other dating coaches in the UK faced no criminal investigation, huge nationwide media scandals or remand periods in custody or convictions because England practice freedom of speech and see the reality of the videos being for teaching and business purposes. The same goes for the United States who host the biggest “pick-up” company in the world, RSD (Real Social Dynamics). Scotland on the other hand shows it’s backwards and aggressive feminist nature by actually hosting a criminal trial for men talking to women with romantic intentions, simply asking to exchange phone numbers. It is the first time this type of case has been brought into Scottish courts, which has baffled legal experts and is only taking place because of media sensationalism.

Adnan Ahmed has collaborated with London coaches such as Street Attraction and Tom Torero amongst others, as well as American dating coaches such as Mr Locario, Steve the Dean, Afi King, etc. Yet again, no one else in the dating industry has faced legal backlash because they are not based in Scotland. Addy Agame mostly taught clients to visit Eastern Europe to meet women and said to not do so in the UK as the cultural climate was aggressive, radical and hateful towards men.

Speaking of the Evening Times aka Evening Slimes, it’s no wonder the flagging news rag employees bums like Carla Jenkins. Seventeen MPs signed a motion in regards to editors being sacked at Glasgow based Evening Times because of terrible journalism. Parent company News Quest offered scummy Evening Times staff demotions (the opposite of promotion) and less pay. Recently a lack of sales and the falling popularity of the fake news / toilet paper rag ”The Evening Times” aka The Evening Swines led to the dishonest publication making bum journalists redundant and demoting editors to lower positions. If the charlatans at the Evening Times reported the truth instead of exaggerated lies from unreliable sources maybe they would cease their well deserved decline.

Check out our next blog post here: