“Despicable” Scottish Sun Newspaper and “Vile” Glasgow Reporter Christine Lavelle, Lie About Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed
The Scummy Scottish Sun and Sleazy Creep Journo Christine Lavelle Use Words Like “Rape Culture” In Conjunction With Innocent Man’s Name, Adnan Ahmed Has Never Ever Been Involved With Such a Horrible Thing
Let’s get one thing clear straight away. Adnan Ahmed has never been accused of rape, has never raped anyone, has never been charged with rape, nor had he ever promoted or been associated with “rape culture.” This is a disgusting accusation by hypocritical journalist Christine Lavelle.
The Scottish Sun are scumbags, they make a living from spreading lies, fake news and defaming innocent people then pay lawyers to cover their sexist, racist and anti-semetic mistakes online. Sleazy creep journo Christine Lavelle writes falsehoods and publishes false accusations. Christine Lavelle casts a ugly shadow via her writing, which is as awful as oversized forehead and her big chin. Conniving liar Christine Lavelle claims to be a political reporter, but is nothing more than a hollow hateful hack and a scandal fool. Sleaze-ball Lavelle models herself after Tory Ruth Davidson who is an avid supporter and also a clear feminazi.
Clown Christine has blindly wrote about the failings of youth in the UK (via mental health and teen suicide) but stupidity fails to see the obvious links to this with the rise of aggressive radical feminist culture, which she contributes to. Lavelle needs to be put down! The rat reporter scraped through university to write articles about her hatred for men (labelling them political) and about ginger bread men, yes she is the eptiomy of an wierdo journalist toe rag.
The hypocrites at The Scottish Sun advocate for “women’s rights” to sell copies of their toilet paper publication. Until recently, the newspapers page 3 features young women with their naked breasts on display on a daily basis. The Scottish Sun is a total sham. Lying Leech Lavelle starts her trashy article by stating; “politicians and rape campaigners slam Glasgow pick-up artist.” More about these bummy, clout-chasing, publicity hungry politicians and useless campaigners later. Firstly; creepy Christine Lavelle labels Adnan Ahmed as a “so-called pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.”
Reptilian Christine Lavelle uses the words “rape culture” at every given opportunity. It takes a real filthy swine of a person to use those words in conjunction with an innocent man’s name: that goes for every treacherous vile, despicable, sleazy politician and monster campaigner who did so also. The sleazebag Lavelle continued, “Adnan Ahmed’s shocking clips – including a film of a sleeping girl and a sex session audio tape – were promoting rape culture.” Christine is an absolute fool, there were no films the blundering liar doesn’t know the difference between a film and a YouTube video, and there never was any rape or rape culture ever!
Hollow hound Lavelle also said, “a woman can be seen asleep to a condom.” Ahmed is an advocate of safe sex and making sure sex is consensual. Christine Lavelle wrote “sleeping woman next to a condom” to slander Ahmed. Christine – always remember to wrap it up, safe sex is not a bad thing, it’s stops the spread of S.T.I’s. OK Christine, so Addy had consensual sex with these women, some of which is adventurous where a couple films each other, again consensual, then it is used for a dating businesses YouTube channel – with all parties involved permitting it to be shown! Also there is no actual pornographic video and all female participants identities are protected because their actual faces are not shown.
Adnan Ahmed even commented on the consented video content in a statement to the BBC Social in November 2018 which was ignored in order to make a video defaming him and not showing his actual views, here is a link to what Addy actually said to the press; http://redpillrights.com/bbc-social-reporter-myles-bonnar-set-up-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame/.
Crooked Christine Lavelle defamed Adnan Ahmed more saying; “actions of the vile perv who posts online vids of him targeting strangers.” The only “vile perv” in this equation is Christine, who is sensationalising normal male/ female dating behaviour and online video teaching methods to suit her own perverted mind as well as to sell her story. Who do you date Christine (if you date anyone at all)? Family members, cousins, your pets?! Everyone is a “stranger” when they first meet, get your facts right.
“Targeting” is another saucy word in Christine Lavelle’s limited vocabulary that we must define. “Targeting” for what Christine? Conversations on the street in the middle of the day with thousands of people around. If someone was “targeting” people, we imagine they would do so with no witnesses around in a hidden manner.
The reporter goes onto highlight Ahmed’s last and only run-in with the law in 2009, AGame plead guilty right away, rehabilitated from the situation and used his experience to turn his life around and help people who are in similar current circumstances change their lives. Ahmed did not re-offend. The different in Ahmed’s past and present legal issues are startlingly significant. In 2009 Ahmed was guilty and he plead guilty straight away, he never faced any sexual charges or charges involving women. in 2019, Ahmed aka AGame is innocent, he maintains his innocence and has plead not guilty all the way.
The newspaper claimed YouTube had taken down two videos highlighted by BBC The Social for violating policy on sex and nudity. The videos were removed because BBC The Social reported them as offensive and YouTube complied. Christine Lavelle’s idiotic ambush journalism tactics has no basis of truth, she did not investigate the facts properly and didn’t actually view the videos. We at Red Pill Rights have obtained copies of the videos from YouTube and can confirm there were no images of sex or nudity in the two videos. In fact a YouTube policy spokeswomen confirmed “YouTube would not have even allowed videos containing images of sex or nudity to be uploaded in the first place.” The Scottish Sun had no dirt on Ahmed so resorted to reporting Twitter feeds of trolls, one of whom said they “fled in terror” because he simply talked to them and that he got “so aggressive,” (not physically or verbally) without defining the word aggressive.
The vile Scottish Sun said “the unnamed Glaswegian revealed to her Twitter followers how Ahmed offered to walk with her but became so aggressive after she spurned his advances.” After searching out the indictment against Ahmed we found out the “unnamed” Glaswegian is called Kirsty Ryan (her Twitter account is @kdownonit). This female felt it was necessary to take this non-issue to social media on 10th January 2019 after The BBC Social video defaming Adnan Ahmed and his dating business went viral. On the indictment the incident supposedly took place on 22nd March 2018, nearly a year previously. Kirsty Ryan didn’t go to the police on 22nd March 2018 or on 10th January 2019, instead she went on Twitter to lap up the #MeToo attention, claiming Ahmed attempted to have a short conversation with her which caused her annoyance.
This incident has crazily been listed on Ahmed’s charge sheet as a “section 38 breach of the peace” after the police hunted down Kirsty Ryan for comment, because she failed to make any police report (because nothing happened that equates to a crime), despite hecklers on social media urging her to do so because they felt she was lying.
The Scottish Sun sensationalised her tweets which prompted the police to investigate her false accusations and extreme exaggerations. The newspaper wrote; “the frightened female told on Twitter how she’d been approached by Ahmed in Glasgow city centre.” Kirsty Ryan is not a “frightened female” at all, she went on social media boldly and swore at anyone who exposed her as a liar; she bullied and argued with hecklers if they dared call her bluff. Kirsty Ryan is lying, nothing happened, she is being a drama queen as it gives her much wanted attention on Twitter, that she craves.
The Scottish Sun lied further saying; “women claims she was shaken with fear and had to flee into a nearby hotel to ask them, to phone her a taxi to get her home because she was terrified he was on drugs.” This is complete bullshit! If she was “terrified” why did she not ask the hotel for help or call the police straight away?! If she was “shaken with fear” she would have asked for help, she didn’t because Kirsty Ran is a liar and made it up. She did not “flee” or “run” to a nearby hotel to phone a taxi, she has a smartphone she uses very regularly for Twitter. She said in her statement to the police (contradicting her Twitter rant) that she walked away and was not followed, so why did she have to run/flee?! She didn’t! She only went to the hotel to call a taxi because her phone battery was dead and decided to make up the incident to get famous from a bogus #MeToo campaign.
Furthermore, Ahmed doesn’t take drugs. This is a well documented fact. His job as a criminal justice practitioner has a mandatory drug test requirement, he would not be able to work if he had any drugs in his system. This is a disgusting accusation made by The Scottish Sun and by Kirsty Ryan.
The Scottish Sun quoted Kirsty Ryan’s Twitter comments; stating; “captioning BBC The Social’s video, she posted online: A can confirm that this guy asked if he could walk me home when a just finished work at 9pm next to the Clyde then got so aggressive with me when a declined that a had to run inty a hotel and ask them to phone me a taxi. How the fuck is he not in jail.”
Firstly she uses “A” instead of “I” and “inty” instead of “into.” Low-intelligence writing! She also captioned The BBC Social viral video that defamed Ahmed’s dating business, which further show’s her fame chasing and attention seeking intentions. Once again Kirsty Ryan is not clear about what she means as “aggressive.” Kirsty Ryan did say that Addy shouted at her when she made her false claims of Twitter! However after the police hunted her down she changed her story saying “he spoke to me for maybe a couple of minutes, I walked away, it sounded like he was swearing and shouting when I was quite a distance away, but I can’t be sure it was at me.
This is a totally different story to Twitter – maybe not or maybe he swore, he did not follow, she did not flee or run – because it is a made up story. Where is the “aggressive” she spoke of on Twitter, there’s nothing “aggressive!”
Look at the language Kirsty Ryan uses online, “how the fucks he not in jail?” In jail for what?! Nothing happened and even if it did, in jail for a guy asking to walk a girl home and the girl declining?! This is delusional gas-lighting and horrible behaviour. Kirsty Ryan’s transparent false claims didn’t stop with just Addy, she shot down all hecklers who called out her falseness and inconsistencies.
The Scottish Sun continued quoting her Twitter feed; “feel like a need to explain maself cos of some idiots in the comments, a never phoned the police because a had just come out of work late I was shaking with fear and my main concern was getting home safely, I thought he was on drugs or something by the way he was staring at me.” How convenient. OK let’s for arguments sake say Kirsty did want to “get home safely,” why did she not call the police when she got home on 22nd March 2018. Furthermore why did she not call the police on 10th January 2019 when The BBC Social video came out; why did the police have to find her?!
We’ll tell you why because nothing happened, it’s all lies. She comments on Addy “being on drugs and staring at her.” In her police statement she accuses Addy of “being drunk” but doesn’t say he was “staring” more striking contradictions! Addy does not drink or use drugs as detailed earlier.
Kirsty Ryan bullied, abused and made excuses when online hecklers called out her lies. ly@wee frumpy said – you can still report it now. Kirsty made up the following excuse commenting back; “I’m in Asia atm and won’t be back in the country for another 12 months so unsure if there’s anything I can do at the moment.” This was a complete lie as the police tracked her down in Scotland within a week and took her statement. The real reason Kirsty didn’t go to the police was because firstly there was no crime, secondly she just wanted to hype up the #MeToo uproar online, thirdly she was lying and exaggerating and lastly if she went to the police she may get caught in her lie. Kirsty then went onto label Ahmed’s staff as a “gang” and calls them “absolute horrible bastards.”
An account called DittyBopper also reopened to Kirsty Ryan’s gas-lighting comment “how the fucks he not in jail,” by saying – “because you phoned a taxi and not the police.” Paddy @paddyB1988 also said the same thing. Kirsty Ryan responded venomously saying; “aw fuck up n stop victim bullying, you don’t even know what you’re talking about you idiot.” OK so “fuck up” means “shut the fuck up.” Kirsty also shames the guy saying he’s “victim blaming,” a victim of what? Even if Kirsty’s false claims were true, it would mean a “victim” of a conversation that is absolutely insane! Paddy shaken up by the online abuse and bullying replied “I’m not victim blaming just suggesting it may have been an idea to report to the police.” Kirsty Ryan then responded with another blatant lie saying; “They’re aware of the situation and have been for over a year.” This is totally false as she didn’t report anything to the police, Kirsty then continued her false claims and disgusting language on Twitter saying, “absolute freak, he was intimidating, I actually burst into tears while watching the video on thought of all the other poor girls.”
Again the drama queen, Kirsty though of no one but herself getting 5 seconds of fame. She didn’t “burst into tears” she had no reason to and how was she “intimidated” she wasn’t, the only thing that is intimidating is Kirsty Ryan’s online lies, bullying and abuse. Labelling innocent people “freaks” and “bastards” online in an attempt to glory hunt are the actions of a real freaky bastard!
The Scottish Sun continued their over-inflated sensationalised garbage quoting Kirsty Ryan’s lies on Twitter further; “he was stumbling over his words, a couldn’t understand what he was saying when he started shouting at me as I walked away.” Kirsty told the police she walked away first and thought Ahmed was shouting from a distance, but she couldn’t be sure it was at her! Also the fact she said she “walked away” contradicts the claim she made about “running” to a hotel. Also Addy is a trained public speaker, even on YouTube he never “stumbles over his words.” This is a fairy story. Kirsty Ryan is quoted as adding to her contradictions saying “then once I got in the taxi the driver started laughing n went – want me to batter him for you. I thought I was overreacting and didn’t expect him to be repeatedly harassing other girls.”
The taxi driver laughed because of the context Kirsty Ryan told her story, in a funny way. That is if he exists at all! A taxi driver offering to “batter” Addy is an attempt by the cabbie to impress Kirsty. Report the driver to the police for getting “aggressive” Kirsty. A out of share Glasgow cab driver is only able to “batter” deep fried chocolate bards, he’s get his arse beat down in the streets. Addy AGame has never “repeatedly harassed” anyone. He spoke to girls he found attractive for the purpose of dating them or teaching clients. He has the right to do so. Kirsty Ryan admitted, “I thought I was over reacting” that’s because she is. She didn’t think it was an issue until The BBC Social video came out nearly a year later and even then she didn’t report a crime, because there is no crime to report, it is total fabrication.
We approached Adnan Ahmed for a comment on this incident, he said; “I don’t recall this at all, it either didn’t happen or was such a insignificant incident I have no memory of it. What she is saying happened is a lie, that’s quite apparent from the amount of inconsistencies and contradictions in her stories. Plus its obvious she is lying. I don’t shout and swear at girls when I chat to them, I’ve documented on YouTube telling clients to never take a failed interaction personally and move on to the next girl straight away, without showing any negative emotion, I’ve made full videos about this topic, the press and the public have seen them. Kirsty Ryan is lying. Also, I don’t drink alcohol or use drugs, once again I taught my clients about not getting intoxicated in order to have better mental and emotional health in numerous videos.
These claims are crazy and childish anyone with half a brain can see it’s absolute nonsense and totally stupid behaviour on her part. I don’t follow people, I talk to them standing stationary, I give myself a time constraint to put them at ease and allow myself to leave quickly if they are weird. I only ever walk with someone if I happen to be going in the same direction” This seems to be another case of no actual offence being committed and the accuser having no inclination in her mind that there was a crime until the BBC Social video defaming Ahmed’s dating business went viral.
Christine Lavelle has said “Sandy Brindley from Rape Crises Scotland, said she had approached police Scotland with concerns about Ahmed.” The glorified bum, Sandy Brindley has never met Glasgow dating coach Adnan Ahmed, however took it upon herself to approach the police regarding a man who has never raped anyone, nor ever been accused or linked with a horrible word like rape.
Overweight and delusional Sandy Brindley is the ultimate stereotype of an irresponsible hate fuelled separatist feminazi, hell bent on destroying men because of her saggy emotional baggage in regards to being rejected by men. If Brindley would improve her pudgy appearance and horrid ignorant personality, maybe she wouldn’t face as much rejection.
Sandy belongs to a group of insecure women who are mad at men because inwardly they are mad at themselves for letting themselves down. Her self-loathing and victim mentality is disguised as empowered justice and women’s rights; which is used to hurt any and every man who doesn’t follow the ideal that all women should be worshipped regardless of them being aggressive, mean, criminal or even fat. No Sandy, all human beings have the choice of who they want to be with and who they find attractive.
Trying to brainwash men into accepting mean women or big women as a sexual preference, even if they don’t want to is insane. Some men have that fetish, fair enough, but instead of ranting about “fat-shaming,” isn’t it medically obvious that excess body weight equals heart disease, depression, diabetes, etc, etc. It is simply not healthy and an absolute cop out. Doctors urge that men and women should choose to lose weight and eat right to live long and content lives, everyone is capable of doing so unless they have a medical condition that prevents this. Blaming psychological or genetic reasons is a lame excuse and out of touch with reality.
Sandy Brindley is quoted by The Sun and many other newspapers as saying “when someone is displaying what seems to be predatory behaviour.” After watching Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed’s online “game” videos it is clear that he is simply having short flirty conversations with females who are willing participants, which ends at most, with an exchange of content details. How is that predatory Sandy? The real stalker behaviour is displayed by Brindley who contacted the police regarding this, to justify having her useless job, which serves no purpose in this instance, how about you actually help real rape victims Sandy or is that too difficult, as you may have to do some actual work rather than cheat the Scottish government to fund your bummy reptilian “Rape Crises” organisations.
The “intimate images” referred to by Brindley are not illegal and are permitted to be online. She goes onto say “…to establish whether or not consent has been given and the impact it is having on the women is approaching.“ Any woman Glasgow dating coach Adnan Ahmed has ever dated or slept with has not complained against him, they have had the opportunity to do so and did not. In fact, Ahmed has received support from a number of them. Addy AGame Ahmed is not the inventor of online YouTube dating videos, this is a concept that is global, especially in Western Nations. Uploads from massive multi-million pound dating companies happen on an almost daily basis. Ahmed’s videos are tame compared to his counterparts in London and the States. No one has faced backlash like this.
There is a clear link between this over reaction and the venomous women’s groups with small hick-town mentality in a place like Glasgow, compared to open-minded independent thinking women in London and the U.S.A who see this as a non-issue. Brindley continued “misogyny is not a crime but I think a number of behaviours shown in the videos I have seen – arguably are caught by criminal law, “this is utter non-sense. Sandy Brindley fumes at Ahmed meeting slim, pretty women and calls him a misogynist because he teaches other men to do the same. She fails to detail what behaviours are “arguably caught by criminal law.” The facts are that no one do.
Ahmed faces no charges in regards to his dating videos, because they contain nothing illegal, even the filming of the videos is legal. Brindley is surprisingly right about one thing – misogyny is not a crime, but labelling an innocent man misogynist (when he clearly is not) is slander and reporting it to the police is absolute lunacy.
Christine Lavelle wrote, “he argued that the view of rape crises were absurd. Mr Ahmed told the BBC; the allegations are false. Mr Ahmed insisted: no one is at risk of rape or assault. I have women in my family that I love dearly and this is a terrible accusation for me and them.” This is true, except Ahmed did not argue anything, he simply stated the facts.
Journo pervert Christine Lavelle then quoted Annie Wells, a Tory spokeswoman, made the following comment about Adnan Ahmed even though the low-level Scottish Conservative Party member had no business getting involved with matters that did not concern her, Wells stated; “this man is clearly a despicable individual who displays a vile approach to women and insulting view of men.” Annie Wells did not research anything about Adnan Ahmed, if she did she would clearly see Ahmed helps men become better human beings and that in turn has a positive effect on women.
Annie Wells is a vile human being. This is not the first time she has trash talked innocent people online, she has done so in such a frequent irresponsible manner that she fears for her safety as people wouldn’t stand for it and made online threats towards her. This is not professional conduct from a politician figure, even a low status one like Wells. Annie Wells used the feminist card and reported this to the police, which they ignored. She was abused on Twitter, you would think Annie would relate to Adnan’s situation because he faced similar circumstances, instead she chose to slander him.
Annie Wells was excluded from Scottish Parliament and face suspension after breaching the code of conduct because she undertook unprofessional actions in the attempt to gain political advantage. She did the exact same thing when she jumped her dirty dishonest self onto the Addy AGame media scandal set-up. Crooked clout-chasing vulture Wells was suspended from all parliamentary and committee meetings after uploading a complaint she falsely made, leaking an advance comment to the press on an unpublished equalities and human rights committee report on prisoner voting, again just to gain political advantage.
Annie Wells is a bum in the small world of Scottish politics, she is virtually an unknown to her peers and is only known for being a crooked corner – cutting, media attention hungry nobody. This is who the Scottish press chose to quote regarding Addy AGame. Wells is a shambles of a woman that deserves no respect. She can’t be taken seriously as her motives are to lie, cheat and make a fool of herself on social media. She is a mousy looking woman in her 50’s with a short boy haircut, glasses and big teeth – yet she acts like a child. Annie Wells should be fired and if she keeps up her misconduct it won’t be long before she is.
Scumbag Lavelle poorly attempted to miserably report politically further by quoting what Labour equalities spokeswoman Pauline McNeil commented on Adnan Ahmed. McNeil said; “the fact someone things such behaviour is appropriate in the 21st century – particularly given the recent revelations of the MeToo scandal – is an outrage.” Pauline McNeil is a fool. She simple read the mainstream press and made a ridiculous assumption about Adnan Ahmed and his teaching methods, furthermore she ran her mouth like an absolute liar.
What really is an “outrage” is a 56 year old low-rank politician acting like a delusional nosy neighbour without knowing the full facts. Punk Pauline McNeil is a known liar and a racist, particularly towards brown people from Arabic influenced backgrounds, this explains her hate speech towards life coach Addy AGame, who is innocent of any illegal activity.
Prejudiced Pauline doesn’t miss an opportunity to bash brown people and makes no apologies for it. How can this headache be given a post that represents “equalities”?! Recently, bigot McNeil shared a Guardian article which falsely claimed an Israeli officer was cleared of all charges in connection with the death of a 13 year old Muslim teen, Iman-Al-Hams in Gaza, killed by gunfire in a hate attack. The article claimed he was acquitted, he was not!
Pauline McNeil shared this article to show her racial hatred and views that people of Muslim backgrounds deserve to die and it’s not a crime to do so. McNeil is a disgusting racist, why is she in a political position, why is The Scottish Sun quoting her??? The reason is racists stick together to strengthen their hate! Prejudiced separatist Pauline McNeil hates Ahmed because of his skin colour and ethnic background, simple as that. She uses radical feminism as an excuse to push that agenda, it’s disgusting.
Pauline McNeil refuses to apologise for her racist views and for falsely claiming an IDF officer was acquitted for the murder of a Palestinian teenager. She also refuses to apologise for her racism towards Adnan Ahmed. This is not every Scottish politician, however there are many similar to her, and they are who the media want to promote.
Insecure radical feminist and Glasgow councillor, Rhianon Spear saw a moment to gain accolade by involving herself in the media scandal, making ludacris claims that rape and coercion were being made into a game. Her outright stupidity was evident through her mention of rape culture, which holds no foundation of truth.
Adnan Ahmed, though falsely accused of ridiculous charges of breach of the peace is NOT accused of rape, he is NOT accused of coercion. How irresponsible of an SNP councillor to even bring those two disgusting words into this situation and destroy an innocent man’s reputation and character.
Despite the false allegations against Mr Ahmed, no one – let me repeat, no one has accused him of rape, no one has accused him of coercion. Rhianon Spear should be fired from her job. She has lived up to the stereotype of being an politician making insane outlandish remarks to gain popularity. Look at how she slandered an innocent man, look at her discriminatory stance against justice, look at her hatred of men for just existing – this is not a person that should be in a political position in any way shape or form.
Rhianon Spear is an absolute joke of a politician, who should never have been hired in the first place and should never be taken seriously again. Her views are dangerous, fascist, separatist and derogatory. She did no background research into Adnan Ahmed’s dating business, yet mouthed off without any prior investigation.
Rhianon Spear does not know Ahmed’s views on women, on consent and about sex. We do; http://www.addyagame.com. Click on the link to hear Adnan “Addy A-Game” Ahmed talk about his love for women, freedom of sexual expression and to always make sure there is consent as well as his condemnation of rape culture. This debunks Rhianon Spear’s disgusting claims, unfortunately for Mr Ahmed and his family the struggle continues and the stigma from his horrible ordeal may be a life long battle for him and his family, which consist mostly of women. Well done Rhianon, Girl Power! Spear is yet another example of a phoney misusing feminism as a weapon to push her own personal agenda, hiding behind the veil of equality, whilst actually hurting more women than she helps. Luckily, not many people believe what politicians say anyway.
Nicola Sturgeon on the other hand helped Mr Ahmed and the concerned women in his family by offering valuable legal advice through her team as well as kind words of support. Evidence of which can be found online.
The MSP wrote to St. Enoch Centre begging, “are you aware this group of men are using you shopping centre to make unsolicited approaches to women whilst filming them…could you make management aware?” Reptile Rhianon Spear trolled every member of DWLF’s social media and collected their pictures and sent them out. When was the last time this cowardly jealous MSP actually did something for the community? The answer is never. She is as useless as her job title and has a clear bias towards a radical feminism agenda, rather than looking at facts objectively.
This shows emotional instability on her part as well as a lack of professionalism. Childish bratty tantrums are unsettling behaviour. Has any man ever approached her – maybe, maybe not; her unstable behaviour and twisted perspective means more towards not than maybe. Red Pill Rights did our own investigating; and St. Enoch centre spokesperson told us “we had no reports of disturbances about the group, security never dealt with them, there were never any complaints of approaches or filming, we just reacted to the MSP making a request.”
The Sun continued “councillor Spear added they are also sharing this information with the club manager and networks throughout Glasgow, they hold firm this behaviour will not be tolerated.” This is absolutely ridiculous, what behaviour?! Let’s look at the facts; none of Rihanon Spears blustering chuntering and brat dancing was looked at as an offence and the police did not bring up any charges in regards to the MSPs nincompoopery or pointless rat infested efforts.
Lavelle continued “Buchanan Galleries said – we have passed this to our security team and will make all other members of staff aware.” Buchanan Galleries took no action, there was no ban and nothing more came of this because nothing illegal even happened.
Police Scotland are quoted as saying Ahmed’s behaviour was “predatory and would cause fear and alarm”, after succumbing to media pressure from aggressive online feminists and blood thirsty journalists. Initially when BBC The Social’s video degrading Adnan Ahmed went viral, Police Scotland are quoted as saying “we cannot follow up on this as there is no actual crime to investigate, no crime has been committed.” They were quick to change their tune after BBC The Social’s video gained millions of views and began a witch-hunt amongst the public because of how it was edited and how it portrayed Adnan Ahmed as a demonic sexual caricature, rather than the responsible understanding life coach that he is.
It’s totally bizarre and shockingly worrying that a country’s police force can’t withstand pressure from online trolls and can be manipulated so easily by faceless crazies on the internet. Yes, Scotland is a very small country, but that does not excuse the stupid backward policing tactics used for this matter. There should never have been an arrest in the first place. The police were aware of Ahmed’s dating business 3 years prior to BBC The Social’s hate fuelled video falsely demonising him. They spoke to Mr Ahmed about it on a number of occasions in casual conversation. Both male and female officers approved of it. There are phone calls and written police reports to confirm this.
Adnan Ahmed worked in conjunction with the police, as his job as a Criminal Justice Practitioner made this inevitable. Ahmed’s behaviour was never “predatory”. He ran an online dating business on YouTube for all to see; his clients, video demonstrations and spontaneous conversations with any women were all during the day on well populated busy city centre streets. He wasn’t hiding anything, so how can his actions be described as predatory, shameful or dangerous?
Police Scotland are supposed to investigate matters neutrally and without prejudice. Instead they contributed to the media mayhem by making comments defaming a man who is not guilty of an actual crime, but was charged, indicted and remanded regardless. The police are now tying to fish for a conviction to cover their mistakes and to not face legal action themselves. At the time of writing this, Ahmed has been on remand for the past 6 months, he has been held in custody, untried and without the option of bail since January 2019.
The Sheriff Court indictment has been designed in such a way to convict Adnan Ahmed on a technicality of Scottish Law (Moorov/ corroboration) rather than using substantial hard evidence, because there is none. Ahmed is not permitted to present vital evidence that proves his innocence because of Scottish court laws that protect prosecution witnesses, even if they are lying.