Fake News Scam Site “news.knowledia.com” Spam Bitter Copy-Cat Sour Grapes BBC News Article Hating On Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed For Officially Proving His Innocence Via Appeal Victory Quashing All Wrongful Convictions
Addy Agame Proven Innocent, Beats False Allegations Due To Miscarriage Of Justice / No Actual Crime! –https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43CGp8ptitk
Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To –https://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/
news.knowledia.com doesn’t report truth or have any originality at all – even the journalists are nameless, faceless cowards! One particular bummy ”court reporter” coward wrote articles about Adnan Ahmed’s wrongful conviction / show-trial by the media and the complete miscarriage of justice he experienced (Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful conviction and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020). This reporter is most likely a low-life bitter media hack, too spineless to reveal his actual identity, in pathetic fear that Red Pill groups will expose him-her for the seedy scumbag liar that he-she is. Men’s rights are human rights; hence why we represent the truth without succumbing to what mainstream media propaganda wants to brain-wash the masses to think.
The obvious problem with leftist SJW reporters and press is that they are trained to be deceitful and to sensationalise the truth by reporting inaccurate falsehoods that allow them to just about get away with telling lies because of how the misinformation is presented to simply imply something false as true. For a sneaky reporter it is a tactic used to be a creepy stalker and to attack others, whilst keeping their filthy laundry private!
news.knowledia.com is a news site set-up for coward reporters to spam their fake news (whilst pretending it’s by another journalist). Scummy journalists basically just spam the same lies and inaccuracies in as many pages as possible in order to make it look like different people are talking about the same thing. This (they think) gives their stories weight as it tricks the public into believing a story because it looks like it is coming from various sources! Read Ryan Holiday’s book “Trust me, I’m lying” for a full understanding of how the media manipulate the public and destroy reputations without facing any repercussions.
Following is the fake news sensationalised (BBC News Scotland) article stolen by the dirty thieves at the news.knowledia.com. Just replace the wretched BBC News with the predators at news.knowledia.com (so they can get some kudos for trying to con folk with a fake news article that they didn’t even write!) Enjoy;
EPISODE 1- ”Mainstream Media Demonisation Of Addy Agame” –https://youtu.be/EUbs7CozXyI
EPISODE 2 – ”The BBC’s Manipulation / Defamation Of Street Attraction” –https://youtu.be/fTxL7T_Kh1w
EPISODE 3 – ”Infield Videos & False Allegations” –https://youtu.be/ztKtdE33vFU
EPISODE 4 – ”History, Society, Politics & Feminazis” –https://youtu.be/BLJK1TKK5TQ
BBC News are morons who lie to sensationalise nonsense in order to push their pathetic narrative, as well as influence unsuspecting members of the public. These idiots don’t even fact check at all, as is evident via their stupid hit-piece article by a cowardly “court reporter” (not gutsy enough to reveal their name) on September 18th, 2020 regarding Addy Agame winning his appeal against the wrongful convictions he said he was innocent of. Turns out Addy was right all along as all false allegations were dropped, all charges were reversed, and all wrongful convictions were overturned. Looks like the scummy BBC News got it totally wrong as usual! The fake news slime-balls even called Addy a “pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help – not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.”
This toxic article was designed to cast doubt over the positive outcome of Ahmed’s appeal, but Addy’s innocence was so clear cut that despite the underhanded tactics the sleazy Scottish press employed, he was found not guilty and defeated them! BBC News article (from September 2020) then stated; “jailed for targeting young women has had conviction quashed on appeal.” Firstly, Addy was released in January 2020, which these idiots should have known, but again the Scottish media are not known for their intelligence or truthfulness – so no, he wasn’t jailed when you clowns published this garbage! (And clear his name, he did – burn baby burn!).
Secondly, they reported a total lie, there were no charges of ”secretly filmed himself approaching women.” There are legal documents (indictment and appeal outcome) that prove this. BBC News are bare faced lying pigs, it’s no wonder they’re getting sued all across the UK!
The stinking losers at BBC News tried to further defame an innocent man because Ahmed’s wrongful conviction was initially their doing via rat reporter Myles Bonnar. Ahmed’s wrongful conviction being quashed basically proves the BBC wrong and Addy right – the cry babies don’t seem to be handling it too well.
BBC News pathetically tried to demonise Ahmed by saying “secretly filmed himself approaching women,” which he didn’t, he didn’t “film himself” plus it’s not illegal to do so, it’s a common press tactic.
The dead-beat clowns at BBC News continued; “secretly filmed himself approaching in Glasgow and South Lanarkshire.” Again he didn’t film himself, he was being filmed you idiots! Ahmed was not charged with this because it is not a crime! It may be immoral to some, but who the hell are BBC News to talk about morality to anyone, they’ve been caught with their pants down and exposed hundreds of thousands of times. Stop whining you alarmist idiots. This is no different from how media hypocrites like you and sleazy Myles Bonnar film people without their consent and post / broadcast it. What’s “horrific” is BBC News and Bonnar don’t conceal the identities of the people they demonise for personal gain – these coaches at least did protect the identities of the females they interacted with. And how are others supposed to learn if there are no video examples?! Ultimately – this is not illegal under UK law. You seem to have more of a problem with the law, rather than an actual valid issue.
In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, complete madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict was appealed and overturned in September 2020 as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintained his innocence, all 18 of the fake charges were dropped due to all allegations being false! Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct – that is the official legal outcome of this bizarre BBC Scotland witch-hunt! Addy won; the media, the trolls and his false accusers were defeated by him!
The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, the initial Sheriff court case was not justice, it was a farce! It was the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation in order to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the kangaroo-court show-trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation, which he is in the process of doing!
The toilet news outlet made up fake charges of “filming or targeting.” Typical tabloid press style trash. Ahmed faced no charges of “filming or targeting” anyone, he was wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace. He won his appeal to overturn all false allegations and will sue the hounds at BBC News for targeting him with their lies and filth!
These creeps have the cheek to accuse Addy Agame (an innocent man, proven not guilty and totally vindicated in the highest court in the country) of “filming or targeting” – really! This is an absolute lie, Addy was not found guilty of “filming or targeting” anyone, there were no charges of “filming or targeting” even lodged against him.
BBC News cried more; “3 judges at the court of criminal appeal ruled verdict a miscarriage of justice.” How does it feel to the scumbags at BBC News to know they were disgustingly wrong and that Ahmed fought them all they way and embarrassed them by winning; maybe that’s why they’re so desperate to still demonise him, well cry a river you reptiles because you were well and truly defeated!
The morons at BBC News continued; “Police Scotland launched investigation after his actions were revealed by BBC’s The Social in 2019.” Nothing was “revealed” BBC The Social lied and made a trash defamation hit-piece video – hence why Addy Agame was found “not guilty.”
BBC The Social hounded the Glasgow dating coach for months, he reached out to them and responded with a detailed explanation of his business model and background to his client base as well as the scientific reasoning behind this method of face-to-face daytime speed dating, which was in large ignored. Instead, they used choice sentences to turn up the controversy in order to create a story and demonise an innocent man. The police didn’t act because of online videos, they were aware of them for years, they crumbled because of media pressure because Police Scotland is a Mickey Mouse force of hick villagers.
Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden, a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.
Following are links to Addy’s actual statement to the press in January 2019 and the actual details of his appeal victory.
BBC Social Reporter Myles Bonnar Set Up Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/bbc-social-reporter-myles-bonnar-set-up-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame/
Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To –http://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/
The clowns at BBC News stated; “YouTube removed hundreds of videos and deactivated 2 channels run by Addy Agame and Street Attraction.” YouTube removed videos because of pressure from the BBC, in order to avoid bad publicity, not because these videos violated any YouTube rules on nudity or sexual conduct. Thousands of these channels still exist and the dating businesses are still functioning. Ahmed’s DWLF channel had been down since January 2019 through his own direction, not because it was deleted. None of Addy Agame’s videos violated any YouTube policies!
The fake news alarmists continued with more lies, stating; “offered tips on last-minute resistance to sex. One clip included audio of a woman apparently recorded during sex.” We have a quote from Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame’s video about LMR on YouTube, Addy said; “we do not condone rape, never force yourself on anyone, hold yourself in high regard and allow space for women to come to you. If she leaves so be it, no means no, move onto someone who’s into you, don’t waste your time on time-wasters.”
The video the slime balls refer to shows Ahmed saying; “we do not condone rape culture or forcing anyone sexually or otherwise, everything sexual is consented.” Ahmed actually refers to “last minute resistance” as “making women comfortable and creating the right mood for adult relations because too many guys either don’t know what to do or are too thirsty to get laid and forget to have fun.”
The cowards at BBC News continued; “Mr Ahmed also included audio apparently recorded during sex.” Apparently, being the word, top reporting there you idiots! OK, so Addy had consensual sex with these women, some of which was adventurous where a couple filmed each other, again consensual, then it is used for a dating businesses YouTube channel – with all parties involved permitting it to be shown! Also, there is no actual pornographic video and the female participants’ identity is protected because actual faces are not shown. Adnan Ahmed even commented on the consented video content in a statement to the BBC Social in November 2018 which was ignored in order to make a video defaming him and not showing his actual views, here is a link to what Addy actually said to the press. http://redpillrights.com/bbc-social-reporter-myles-bonnar-set-up-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame/.
Bitter bums at BBC News continued; “5 women gave evidence at trial about Ahmed.” Well turns out they were lying because Ahmed was acquitted of all charges due to no crime to answer to, he should have them imprisoned for perjury!
BBC News are just butt-hurt because Ahmed proved them wrong, exposed them as liars and is now suing them! BBC News are scumbags, that make a living from spreading lies, fake news and defaming innocent people.
- Chloe From Lenzie Discuses Her Rendezvous With Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/chloe-from-lenzie-discuses-her-rendezvous-with-addy-agame/
- Tia From Glasgow Talks About Dating Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/tia-from-glasgow-talks-about-dating-addy-agame/
- Aisha From Saudi Arabia Describes Her Holiday Romance With Adnan Ahmed (aka Addy Agame) –http://redpillrights.com/aisha-from-saudi-arabia-describes-her-holiday-romance-with-adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame/
- Jill From Sheffield Gives Honest Feedback On Her Positive Experience With Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/jill-from-sheffield-gives-honest-feedback-on-her-positive-experience-with-addy-agame/
- Christine From China Discusses Meeting And Dating Addy Agame Truthfully-http://redpillrights.com/christine-from-china-discusses-meeting-and-dating-addy-agame-truthfully/
- Canadian Karen Describes Her “Lovely” Chance Meeting With Addy Agame In Uddingston –http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Football Referee In Australia With His Dating Life –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-football-referee-in-australia-with-his-dating-life/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Personal Trainer In London With His Dating Life –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-personal-trainer-in-london-with-his-dating-life/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Joiner In Edinburgh –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-joiner-in-edinburgh/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps IT Specialist In London –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-it-specialist-in-london/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Video Editor In Spain –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-video-editor-in-spain/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Addy Agame Helps Marketing Expert In Glasgow –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-marketing-expert-in-glasgow/
The creeps at BBC News grasped at straws by quoting the disgraced and rebuked judge, they stated, “Sheriff Lindsay Wood sent Ahmed to prison for 2 years and put him on the sex offenders register for 10 years.” Well merely months later Ahmed appealed this corrupt judge’s wrong decision and reversed the wrongful verdict, proving his innocence fully, Ahmed was removed from the register because he committed no sexual offences or crimes at all!
Reasons For Appeal;
- The trial judge caused a miscarriage of justice via his bias and discriminatory misconduct, especially when he elected to cross examine the accused at the end of the defence’s case
- The judge erred in repelling the ‘no case (crime) to answer submissions‘ made under Scottish law for all the charges the accused was wrongfully convicted of, causing a miscarriage of justice
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial based on the manner the police sought out complainers
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial because the Scottish press influenced the jury / public negatively both before and during the trial, causing a miscarriage of justice
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial because the social worker initially allocated, and the trial judge were influenced by press propaganda during the trial causing a miscarriage of justice
- The social workers report was prejudicial and relied on opinion from the press rather than impartiality from a professional standpoint
- There was NO sexual element / aggravation / motivation – the accused was running a dating business for a monetary purpose not for sexual gratification
- There was NO actual sexual offense committed and NO actual sexual convictions, hence notification requirements were the wrong outcome, causing a miscarriage of justice
Scotland is in an extremely regressive, backwards, violent and ugly era of criminal justice. Legal precedents and crazy laws are being made up on the spot without political clearance. How can a sheriff / judge justify wrongfully convicting a man of something that is not a crime by simply labelling it ‘breach of the peace’ or ‘threatening / abusive behaviour?’ Even so, none of the convictions were sexual offences, putting a person on the sex offenders register for 10 years despite that person not even being convicted of a sexual offence is a disgrace! Simply stating there may have been that motivation is a farcical miscarriage of justice and total lunacy – Sheriff Lindsay Wood was playing up to the press in order to be quoted so he could gain accolade and praise. He himself should face legal action for using a court of law in such a manner. Wood is a man who enabled the media’s prejudicial imperative by default in his legislative actions, judgement and ruling, reflexively and emotionally driven, without genuine judicial insight. Simply put the man is an incompetent imbecile.
If someone hasn’t committed any sexual offences at all, no register should be required. Ahmed’s wrongful conviction was “section 38 breach of the peace.” There was no sexual element, it was chatting! A Sheriff should not be influenced by other cases or the media, they have a duty to be impartial and to do the right thing by the law! The law should always overrule the media; however, it seems to be the opposite way around in Scotland. This insanity occurring meant any man chatting up any woman in Scotland (whether it be during the day or in a nightclub) will be at risk of being put on the sex offenders register, even if no sexual offence has occurred! Luckily Ahmed’s victory ensured that chatting up women in Scotland is now 100% legal!
3 of the highest judges in Scotland agreed with Ahmed and stated the evidence did not indicate Ahmed did anything wrong! BBC News continued crying; “Ahmed believes he has fallen victim to a miscarriage of justice.” Ahmed was totally correct, he also never called himself a “victim.” The lying hacks continued; “his legal team address a panel of judges and ask to quash conviction.” And Addy did just that, despite the sleazy media trying oh so hard to stop him; he beat the fake charges and the fake news media in one swift motion – wow, what a man!
BBC News went onto quote their disgraced media-influenced rebuked judge, stating: “in his report to the appeal court Sheriff Wood said he believed their was enough evidence to be considered by jurors.” Ahmed did nothing wrong and proved it in a high court in front of 3 real judges, not a donkey Sheriff who was trying to be a hero for the slimy Scottish press in a kangaroo-court show-trial!
Firstly – there were no “victims” as no crime was committed (that’s official now in the Scottish law books and legal records). Secondly, Ahmed “gave evidence” the accusers were “lying or mistaken” and was proven to be telling the truth in the high court (another L for you Sheriff Wood). Thirdly, the jury could think what they want – Ahmed got a “not guilty” verdict for all charges in the high court (plus the jury were not impartial as they were brain-washed by the scumbags in the Scottish media). Lastly, it wasn’t “obvious how they were affected” as this was a witch-hunt created by the media, there was no crime in the first place – what’s next the media will hype eating vegetables as misogynistic and a trial will be held hosting a bunch of idiots saying a man eating a carrot made them feel uncomfortable?! Get a grip on reality!
The idiots at BBC News continued to quote the shamed Sheriff trying to gain clout by co-signing social justice nonsense, they stated (quoting the shamed Sheriff); “you have acquired notoriety and an unenviable reputation, the public will be wise to such inappropriate behaviour by you and others like you.” Turns out you were wrong again Sheriff. Ahmed’s reputation is that he was acquitted, vindicated, found not guilty, proved his innocence and was right all along – while Sheriff Wood is now a laughing stock in Scottish Legal circles, here is what his superiors had to say about his “unenviable reputation” –
The shamed sheriff was criticised by 3 high court judges for conducting a “cross-examination” of a defendant and telling his representative to “sit down”.
Counsel for the appellant, Claire Mitchell QC, said that Sheriff Lindsay Wood’s questions “would have led the independent observer to reach the view that the sheriff had formed an adverse view of his credibility”.
The judges said the evidence did not indicate that Mr Ahmed was guilty of threatening behaviour.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “It does not seem to us that a polite conversational request or compliment can be construed as threatening merely because it is uninvited or unwelcome.”
Sheriff Wood was also criticised by the judges for his “cross-examination”.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “The trial sheriff engaged in an exercise which could only be described as cross-examination.
“The informed and impartial observer would readily have concluded that the sheriff had formed an adverse view on the credibility of the appellant’s evidence.
“The result was a miscarriage of justice and the appeal against conviction on each charge must be upheld on this ground.”
The judges also found that Sheriff Wood’s behaviour in telling advocate Donna Armstrong to sit down was “unacceptable”.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “In the present case counsel was correct to object to the sheriff’s questioning when she did.
“It is unacceptable for a judicial office holder to address a responsible practitioner by telling her to sit down.
“Such behaviour carries the risk of demeaning the standing of the judiciary in the eyes of both the legal profession and of the public.”
And yes Addy has gained positive notoriety in men’s rights political circles in which he is working and helping other men in similar circumstances who have been wronged by biased criminal and family courts. Ahmed is speaking at many public men’s rights events as well as suing the state and media for compensation. Turns out his behaviour wasn’t “inappropriate” and that is now official under Scottish law!
In all reality it was media rats like BBC News that lost the public and taxpayers £100,000 plus in costs because they caused the fake hype around Addy Agame’s “no crime to answer” case. A corrupt judge fell for it, as well as some less than intelligent police officers. However when Adnan Ahmed took his case to the highest court in Scotland – 3 of the top judges in the country saw it for the “trial by media” rubbish it was and quashed all the false convictions!
The defeated losers at BBC News even tried to spin Ahmed’s empathic legal victory as some sort of legal technicality (it wasn’t, Ahmed won on “no crime to answer to for all charges”); the clowns at BBC News spun it as; “Lord Turnbull wrote; the result was a miscarriage of justice and appeal against conviction on each charge must be upheld on this ground…” Lord Turnbull is a fantastic senior judge that applies the law 100%, he is a shining example of justice and is not afraid of the media. BBC News even attempted to selectively quote Ahmed’s excellent QC Claire Mitchell, the tricksters at BBC News stated; lawyers acting told the court that Sheriff Wood conducted inappropriate cross-examination of their client….Defence Claire Mitchell said questions asked by Sheriff Wood to Mr Ahmed and his conduct resulted in her client being denied a fair and impartial trial.” The brilliant Claire Mitchell was 100% right and secured yet another great legal victory during her fantastic legal career!
BBC News tried to save their blushes by reporting Ahmed’s victory and proven innocence from a technicality angle (which is a trick they use to defame), in fact all charges were dropped due to “no case to answer to.” BBC News desperately stated; “Ahmed’s legal team also told the court that Sheriff Wood failed to properly explain the rules of corroboration to jurors in the case. Ms Mitchell also told the court that the Sheriff was wrong to reject a defence motion to have charges thrown out on the basis there wasn’t enough evidence to allow jurors to return guilty verdicts.” See how they spun and reworded “no crime to answer to” the corrupt Sheriff could have told the brainwashed jury the rules in mandarin, it still wouldn’t have been enough to reverse the media corruption brainwashing hype designed to influence trial proceedings!
BBC News are employing an age old media trick known as omission of facts! Basically the media leave out facts to frame a situation in a certain context. The truth is Ahmed did suffer a miscarriage of justice due to a corrupt Sheriff being overly influenced by media hype, however if this was the only reason he won the appeal; there would have been a mandatory re-trial! Addy was also found “not guilty of all charges due to no crime to answer to” in the first place, deeming a re-trial impossible and resulting in all charges being dropped and all 5 wrongful convictions being quashed! This is a legal fact, it’s now in the Scottish law books and on Ahmed’s appeal outcome document online!
The con men at the BBC are at it again. Making false allegations and publishing fake news. The BBC always find themselves in controversy one way or another; if it’s not conning pensioners out of TV licence money, it’s misconduct via their editing of videos of people to trick viewers to see something that is not fact.
BBC News has always been the main fear mongering propaganda machine for the UK Government. More recently the BBC have been in the midst of a treacherous scandal themselves because of their attempts to con old-age pensioners out of their life savings by scrapping free TV licences for people over 75. This is a disgusting, desperate move on the BBC’s part; as younger people hardly watch TV and their main audience is the elderly, whom the BBC decided to target and exploit to make a profit. An improvement in content is a better strategy to gain popularity. The reason why the BBC’s popularity is failing is because of shows like BBC News reporting lies.
The BBC have announced that free TV licences for around 3.7m pensioners are being scrapped. The government in 2015 had originally said the BBC would take over the cost of providing free licences to pensioners by 2020. But surprise surprise in 2019 they have backed out of this agreement and are robbing vulnerable pensioners of their hard earned cash. They made this decision as they didn’t have enough of their budget in 2021/22 to cover the original ask. The new scheme will cost them around £250 million by 2021/22 saving the BBC around £500 million.
They originally said that “fairness” was at the heart of the ruling, however today they have stated that funding free licences would have resulted in “unprecedented closures.” Their Chairman Sir David Clementi said it had been a “very difficult decision” but this was “the fairest and best outcome.” Although former Prime Minster Theresa May voiced her disappointment with the BBC’s decision. The government stated that; “we’ve been clear that we want and expect the BBC to continue this concession.” Labour deputy leader also voiced his disappointment stating that; “millions of elderly and isolated people will lose out because of this announcement.”
Read the full article here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48583487
Recently the BBC were called racist when one of their presenters labelled a Muslim prayer a terror salute. The BBC’s prerogative is to call all Muslims terrorists, no surprise there. More recently the BBC had to offer an on-screen apology for pocketing money raised by the public for charity. The BBC kept £106,000 of premium rate phone in money that should have gone to the Comic Relief charity. The scumbags at the BBC only offered a half-hearted apology and instead blamed their staff, who they said they would retrain.
Sir Alex Ferguson, a legendary Manchester United manager, boycotted the BBC in 2004 after it made false abuse allegations against his son, Jason in a TV documentary. In 2010 it was reported that Sir Alex Ferguson could face sanctions for boycotting the BBC.
The BBC continually make false allegations and are involved in the wrongful defamation others, even spooling their family members into the abuse. Who is exactly running the BBC that they ruin so many lives? Left-wing radical feminazis by the looks of it. The BBC is meant to be a government trust, paid for by British tax payer’s money, however certain social and political activists seek employment there just to incite trouble and push their own sick agenda!
In 2019 Ferguson agreed to lift his ban on talking to the BBC. A statement said; “Sir Alex and the BBC have put behind them the difficulties which led to Sir Alex feeling unable to appear on BBC programmes.” Tread carefully Alex, the BBC can’t be trusted!
Read the full article here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/14664803
Prince Harry has spoken out and launched at attack on the British press; including the BBC – accusing the media of “bullying” and “relentless propaganda.” Prince Harry released a statement and stated that his “deepest fear” was his “wife falling victim to the same powerful forces” that his mother, Princess Diana did.
He said; “unfortunately, my wife has become one of the latest victims of a British tabloid press that wages campaigns against individuals with no thought to the consequences – a ruthless campaign that has escalated over the past year, throughout her pregnancy and while raising our new born son.”
Prince Harry continued; “There is a human cost to this relentless propaganda, specifically when it is knowingly false and malicious, and though we have continued to put on a brave face – as so many of you can relate to – I cannot begin to describe how painful it has been. Because in today’s digital age, press fabrications are repurposed as truth across the globe. One day’s coverage is no longer tomorrow’s chip paper.”
He added; “my deepest fear is history repeating itself. I’ve seen what happens when someone I love is commoditised to the point that they are no longer treated or seen as a real person. I lost my mother and will not watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces.”
This has come after Meghan has decided to take legal action against the Mail on Sunday after publication of a letter to her estranged father Thomas Markle.
BBC Panorama accused The Labour Party of interfering with antisemitism complaints. This urged Labour to declare war on the BBC.
The Party had said they would be pursuing complaints “at all levels” of the corporation after the BBC Panorama programme was aired. The programme included how Jewish party members stated they had been subjected to anti-semitic abuse at Labour meetings.
Following this Labour accused Panorama of being bias and of deliberately misrepresenting evidence in an attempt to smear the party. This is a usual tactic used by BBC Panorama. Their programmes are biased and never give an account of the full events or look to get both sides of a story.
A spokesperson said; “The Panorama programme was not a fair or balanced investigation. It was a seriously inaccurate, politically one-sided polemic, which breached basic journalistic standards, invented quotes and edited emails to change their meaning. It was an overtly biased intervention by the BBC, in party political controversy. An honest investigation into anti-semitism in Labour and wider society is in the public interest. The Panorama team instead pre-determined an answer to the question posed by the programme’s title.”
They added: “We complained in advance to the BBC over the way the programme was put together and its choice of a presenter who has expressed overt personal and political hostility to Jeremy Corbyn’s politics. We will be pursuing complaints at every level. The Labour party will fully investigate any complaints concerning the anti-semitic incidents reported by party members in interviews in the programme.”
They continued; ”Labour stands in solidarity with Jewish people and is fully committed to the support, defence and celebration of the Jewish community and its organisations. Despite claims made in the programme, Labour is taking decisive action against anti-semitism. Since Jennie Formby became general secretary, the rate at which anti-semitism cases have been dealt with has increased more than four-fold. We will build on the improvements to our procedures made under Jennie Formby, and continue to act against this repugnant form of racism.”
This is a usual tactic used by BBC Panorama. Their programmes are biased and never give an account of the full events or look to get both sides of a story. They just push their own disgusting left-wing narrative in order to trick the public!
The most important fact is justice was done and Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful convictions and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020!
Check out our next blog post here; http://redpillrights.com/the-daily-mail-accused-of-seedy-slave-labour-mask-manufacturing-scheme/