Fake News Slimeballs At “East Kilbride Connect” Spam Lies Told By Scum At “Evening Times” About False Crimes Adnan Ahmed Didn’t Commit (Addy Agame Proven Innocent, Beats False Allegations Due To Miscarriage Of Justice / No Actual Crime!)
Addy Agame Proven Innocent, Beats False Allegations Due To Miscarriage Of Justice / No Actual Crime! – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43CGp8ptitk
Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To – https://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/
“East Kilbride Connect” is a small-time amateur publication based in a remote Scottish village in the sticks. The hicks that run the trashy outfit disgustingly plagiarise fake news stories word for word from slimy mainstream media left-wing deception merchants – such as the scum at The Evening Times! East Kilbride Connect doesn’t report truth or have any originality at all – even the journalists are nameless, faceless cowards! One particular bummy coward wrote articles about Adnan Ahmed’s wrongful conviction, show-trial by the media and the complete miscarriage of justice he experienced (Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful conviction and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020). The weird wacky reporter is most likely a low-life bitter Scottish media hack, too spineless to reveal their actual identity, in pathetic fear that Red Pill groups will expose them for the seedy scumbag liars that they are. Not to worry, we will take the responsibility to expose this reporter for the reptile that the he-she is. Men’s rights are human rights; hence why we represent the truth without succumbing to what mainstream media propaganda wants to brain-wash the masses to think.
The obvious problem with Scottish reporters and press is that they are trained to be deceitful and to sensationalise the truth by reporting inaccurate falsehoods that allow them to just about get away with telling lies because of how the misinformation is presented to simply imply something false as true. Que East Kilbride Connects weirdo reporter, no name, a ghost online – no Twitter, no social media, no pictures. One may think (for an everyday person) this lack of online presence is admirable, but for a sneaky Scottish reporter it is a tactic used to be a creepy stalker and to attack others, whilst keeping their filthy laundry private!
Following is the fake news sensationalised (The Evening Times) article stolen by the dirty thieves at the East Kilbride Connect. Just change wretched ‘The Evening Times’ with the snakes ‘East Kilbride Connect’ (so they can get some kudos for trying to con folk with a fake news article that they didn’t even write!) Enjoy;
Adnan Ahmed: Glasgow ‘Agame Dating Coach’ Wrongfully Appears In Glasgow Court Falsely Accused Of Sexual Assault By Evening Times Online
(NOTE – AHMED WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ OF ALL CHARGES, HIS INNOCENCE WAS PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW!)
Yet another article full of falsehoods published by the heathens and nameless cowards that make up the scummy staff at Evening Times Online. The whole establishment should be shut down, banned and sued for defamation for the countless articles of lies they report on a daily basis.
This is not news, this is journalism degraded to spreading rumours that are not true. This article is dated 14th January 2019 and begins with a picture of Glasgow Sheriff Court and the rotten newspaper writing, “Agame pick-up artist appears in court charged with sexual assault,” this is false. Adnan Ahmed is a dating / life coach, he has never referred to himself as a pick-up artist, instead he has went on record stating “I am not a pick-up artist,” years before any media attention came his way. Ahmed has been on remand since Jan 2019 despite evidence that proves his innocence. He is being held because of a media defamation campaign by BBC The Social, not any actual crimes. (NOTE ALL 3 SEXUAL ASSAULT CHARGES WERE DROPPED DUE TO EVIDENCE THAT AHMED WAS INNOCENT AND THEY DID NOT TAKE PLACE)
Foolish Evening Times Online reporters start their article with, “a man appeared in court on a string of charges including sexual assault and voyeurism,” this is a lie. Ahmed faced no charges of voyeurism, at that time in January 2019, there was no “string” of charges, it was 3 charges, all fake allegations! Wretched Evening Times Online reporters use “string of charges” to sensationalise the story and make it seem worse than it is. Totally irresponsible journalism, but again what is to be expected from self-confessed social justice weirdos.
Dumb reporters list “sexual assault” without explaining it. There was NO sexual assault, an alibi with video evidence was presented to court showing Adnan Ahmed was elsewhere at the exact time and date of the false allegation, yet he was still remanded in custody due to the media hype surrounding his legitimate dating business.(Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER)
Evening Times Online journalists continued their terrible article listing a number of random charges plucked from thin air, “4 charges of breach of the peace, 2 charges of behaving in a threatening and abusive manner, sexual assault, assault, voyeurism, a charge under the sexual offences act.” Evening Times Online are down right dirty dogs and filthy lying pigs. Following is the actual indictment against Adnan Ahmed who is innocent and has not committed any crimes. (NOTE – AHMED WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ OF ALL CHARGES, HIS INNOCENCE WAS PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW!)
Adnan Ahmed was charged with 14 counts of “section 38, breach of the peace,” for simply talking to people during the day, most of whom gave him their number. Two of these charges weren’t even people, one was a video of Ahmed chatting to women who are “unknown” to the prosecutor and who did not even report or complain about an incident to the authorities. The other one was also “unknown” to the prosecutor, which is a shadow silhouette of an anonymous woman that spoke to him. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THESE CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)
How could these charges even be considered, or worst still put on an indictment? Furthermore how could the accused defend them? There was no complaint! In reality, they were put on the indictment against Ahmed to run a trial, in order to convict him on legal technicalities by convincing a jury he is of bad character, using his bad-boy image in the media to do so. (NOTE – AHMED WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ OF ALL CHARGES, HIS INNOCENCE WAS PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW!)
The fake sexual assault charges consisted of one female saying Ahmed squeezed her leg and another saying Ahmed touched her face. Both of these allegations are said to have happened in broad daylight, on busy city centre streets, fully clothed and the allegations were from over 5 years ago. These individuals didn’t make these accusations until there was a media scandal regarding Adnan Ahmed’s dating business in 2019, before that no accusations were ever made or reported. The accusers even appeared in the news and on social media when the media scandal regarding Ahmed’s dating business initially happened. They did not make these claims in the press or online. In fact their initial online /press statements actually contradict their later police statements. The police had to find these individuals to file a report, they made no police report of there own accord, they only talked online and in the media. The police did so to build a case against Ahmed. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF BOTH SEXUAL ASSAULT CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)
Furthermore, Ahmed was not charged with any of this when he was arrested then remanded in January 2019. The police /procurator fiscal added this to his indictment in April 2019, in order to have a document of charges to justify a trial and prosecution. There is a 3rd charge of sexual assault which is a false accusation by a female Ahmed has never even met before. It is alleged to have took place on 5th November 2018. Ahmed was not there, there is video evidence of this. Ahmed appears in a time stamped video filmed by his girlfriend at the exact date and time of the false accusation. The accuser blatantly lied to the police and contradicted her police statement on Instagram. Ahmed’s girlfriend took screenshots of this and sent the evidence to the police along with the alibi video proving Ahmed wasn’t there. Despite this, police and prosecutors chose to ignore the evidence. Ahmed’s girlfriend was made a defence witness and had to go to court to testify, rather than the charge being dropped. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE ALSO, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER)
The authorities would have had to release Adnan Ahmed on bail if they had dropped the charge, which they could have done in January 2019. Instead they added it to the indictment despite Ahmed’s girlfriend’s police statement and alibi evidence. If they didn’t include these charges they would have not been able to indict Ahmed – as the other charges were too small to do so. Additionally they wanted to convict Ahmed of this on a technicality through the jury process because of a Scottish Law called Moorov / Corroboration – even though Ahmed has never ever met the accuser before. Corroboration is when 2 or more independent parties make a similar complaint.
However, in Ahmed’s case no one who had made an accusation was an independent source, as everyone spoke to each other on social media through the Twitter feed of the BBC The Social video defaming Ahmed’s dating business. Hence corroboration/ Moorov Law does not apply as there was clearly collusion between all the accusing parties. All accusers also start all their police statements with “I saw the BBC Social video on Twitter….”
Furthermore, the three alleged sexual assault charges we have just explained are written as “or alternatively, section 38 breach of the peace” on Ahmed’s indictment document. Meaning, the mild nature of the false allegations are not even considered concrete “sexual assaults,” they are “breach of the peace” charges trumped up to the bigger charge as an alternative option in order to justify the uncertain element of the bigger charge. This is not justice, it is ridiculous. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF ALL 3 SEXUAL ASSAULT CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)
Adnan Ahmed denies all charges. The media know they acted hastily, yet they still splashed “sexual assault” all over the tabloids (again with no details or explanation of what was involved) in order to pressure prosecutors into convicting him. Adnan Ahmed is innocent, he is a victim of ambush journalism and a corrupt set-up. Never before had a court of law in Scotland dealt with a case like this.
Journalists picked and chose certain parts of the indictment against Ahmed in order to make their fake news stories juicy. They wrote; “it is claimed he pressured one women into giving him her phone number and then sent a message referring to sex.” If a person is pressuring another, why would they ask for a phone number or even “pressure” someone for a phone number just to send text messages. It doesn’t make sense, there is no motive.
These women are independent people who welcomed the interactions, willingly gave their numbers and only came foreword because of the media scandal defaming Ahmed’s dating business. Before that they did not even see it as an issue or a crime. The media claims are false. Every female who gave Ahmed her number did so of their own free will. He did not “pressure” or “force” any of them. There was no text message with the word “sex” in it, that is a fact.
Journalists continued with their despicable lies writing, “another is said to be approached in a secluded lane,” the “lane” being referred to here is in the Uddingston area. It is joined onto a housing estate, between 2 main roads, leading to a main train station. This supposed incident is said to have happened at 10am, at this time the “lane” is massively populated with people making their was into the city centre for work and adult education. In no way is it a “secluded lane.” Ahmed also has an eye witness in his favour for this alleged incident. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE ALSO, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER)
The media continued; ”one woman alleged she went to a hotel to get away.” We researched these claims and found that the accuser said she very briefly spoke to Ahmed for less than a minute and she left, then went to a hotel to call a taxi. This woman was questioned about her claim by the public who asked, “why didn’t you call the police?” and “why did you wait until the BBC Social video came out to talk about it?” and “in what way was it scary, you walked away.” This seems to be another case of no actual offence being committed and the accuser having no inclination in her mind that there was a crime until the BBC Social video defaming Ahmed’s dating business went viral, that is if they even actually talked in the first place, it could be another fabrication. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE ALSO, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER)
In all the incidents on the indictment; either no one thought a crime was being committed until the media scandal (because of how the BBC Social video was designed to portray Ahmed), or people made false accusations to gain some small-time fame, or worst of all no crime was even reported by an actual person – but a charge was added to the indictment anyway (i.e. the “unknowns” to the prosecutor).
Journalists fluffed on; “Ahmed is further accused of filming himself approaching a female,” this is a total lie. Ahmed faces no charges of “filming” anyone. “Filming” is not included on the indictment. The media’s lies are constant and transparent. Journalists did write one true statement about Adnan Ahmed, that is “he denies a total of 18 charges at Glasgow Sheriff Court,” that is because he is an innocent man.
The most important fact is justice was done and Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful convictions and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020!
Check out our next blog post here; http://redpillrights.com/dirt-bag-geoff-weiss-reports-lies-about-youtube-crackdown-on-dating-advice-vloggers-globally-for-sleazy-site-tubefilter-addy-agame-found-not-guilty-of-all-false-allegations-after-winning/