Game on: Creepy Carla Jenkins And Jerk Jack Aitchison Make Up “Fake Victims” To Justify Wrongful Conviction Of Dating Coach Addy Agame Ahmed (Glasgow Evening Times)

Witch Carla Jenkins And Beta Male Creep Jack Aitchison Are Fake News Spreading Deviant Scum Reporters And Horrible Evil Mutants That Write For Disgraced Rag “The Evening Times”

Looks like hack Jack Aitchison groomed another chick to write sexualised fake news smut with him. This time it’s paunchy weirdo Carla Jenkins. Carla is a munter with embarrassing dress-sense, haggered looks and a horrible personality. Both these horrible evil deviant mutants specialise in fraud journalism. Fat-boy beardo Jack Aitchison is a self-deluded wimp and a terrible liar that thinks the public believe his BS! Clown bum Carla Jenkins is a professional seedy stalker, whose job entails hounding people and desperately begging for stories for minimum wage. Both vultures Jack Aitchison and Carla Jenkins invent entire scenarios, casts of characters and reams of dialogue in their Evening Times article about wrongfully convicted dating coach Addy Agame  Ahmed (who’s appeal is in progress).

Shady Jack Aitchison and tragic Carla Jenkins make a measly living out of corrupting an already self-indulgent / predominately white Scottish media field that fakes diversity and equality. In reality they are just a couple of idiot low-IQ slime-bags that write for garbage tabloids like the Evening Times!

Disgusting donkeys Carla and Jack call Ahmed; “predatory” and “pick-up artist,” creepy Carla and Jack label Adnan Ahmed as a “so-called pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.”

Hungry desperadoes Carla and Jack stated Ahmed “has been labelled a predator,” By who – you, your hack buddies and some sad weirdo online trolls. Addy is not a predator. He is an exemplary human being, a good father, he worked in the Criminal Justice field helping others and did daily community work (with NA, CA and AA) for free. He has a fiancé, a mother and all his ex-partners testify there has never ever been any “predatory” behaviour on his part, ever!

The dirty reporters writing styles are almost as bad as their crap dress sense. Look at their choice of words “victims,” there were no victims, there were no actual crimes recognised under UK Law, there has to be a crime to be a “victim.” Fake “victims” who are glory-hungry idiots, jump on a fake #metoo bandwagon (saying they were simply chatted up) actually take away from real victims who actually have to face the reality of real crimes. The only “victims” are the people these reporters victimise through their vile trash hate articles.

Yucky Carla and Jack wrote; “3 women approached by Ahmed opened up on their experiences after his conviction.” You pair of piglets mean 3 ambulance chasers you made-up (no real names, pictures or actual details given) trying to get 15 seconds of #MeToo fame by clout chasing and drama queen excitement because their sad lives suck. Crap Carla and jakey Jack can’t get anyone any clout, as journos their names are mud and their reputations are ridiculed.

Passive-aggressive runts Carla Jenkins and Jack Aitchison continued; “a Scots pick-up artist approached young and vulnerable girls,” labelling women “vulnerable” because of their gender is chauvinistic, “vulnerable” how? “Vulnerable” to having a conversation in broad day-light with hundreds/ thousands of people and CCTV around. And “young” how, all women were adults above the legal age of consensual sex in the UK!

Lying fools Carla and Jack continued “Ahmed, approached 5 girls between 2016 and 2018.” This may seem like news to Jack as it is 5 more girls than Jack has ever talked to in his whole geeky sad journo life. Well, maybe Jack likes boys, if so, that’s his choice. Cowardly Carla and Jack chuntered on; “using the name Addy Agame, Ahmed posted the videos on YouTube of him approaching females to teach others about how to pick-up women.” Notice the use of language they use to imply “the videos” were of the “5 girls,” this is blatant lies, none of the 5 girls were ever filmed or appeared on You Tube, another reason to sue for defamation – Carla and Jack you dirty little turds!

Man-children Carla and Jack blabbered on; “Ahmed was found guilty at court for acting in a threatening and abusive manner that could cause a  reasonable person fear or alarm.” In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by The Evening Times and the Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were  skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict will be appealed and overturned in the next few months as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintains his innocence, 13 charges were dropped before the biased jury got a chance to deliberate on them. Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct!

The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, this is not justice, it’s a farce!

It is the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation!

The pair of predatory reporters stated; “Nas Moya, 24 said she was approached in 2016. She told Evening Times – I’m really pleased about the outcome of the trial, it shows we’re taking a step in the right direction as a society recognising this type of behaviour is not okay.” This compulsive liar “Nas Moya” should be displeased by the outcome of her life, as at 24 she runs to a dirty dishonest tabloid newspaper to defame an innocent man, she willingly gave her number to. Society in Scotland is going down the toilet you fame-chasing phoney; radical feminism is not about equality, it discriminates aggressively towards males, quoting airheads like “Nas Moya” talking absolute nonsense.

It seems this wolf-crier thought Ahmed’s behaviour was “absolutely OK” in 2016 as she consensually gave him her number to contact her. So according to her it’s “not OK” for men and women to speak in Scottish society, this makes no sense and is utter stupidity.

The horrible hacks continued to quote this person, stating; “the way he interacted with me made me feel vulnerable and unsafe. I didn’t think I would be taken seriously if I came forward, now I feel differently.” You’re still not being taken seriously, you sound like a band-wagon jumping glory-hunter. If Ahmed was dangerous why would he approach you during the day in a well populated area and ask for your phone number, which you consented to give him! Anyone with criminal intent would not make conversation with a phone number (in order to go on a date) as their end goal! If this “Nas Moya” person felt “vulnerable” or “unsafe” why did she consensually give her number to Addy? Why did she not ask or shout or scream for help? The real reason is she’s making this all up to play up to the media. You’re not a victim, you’re a lying drama queen that is actually hurting women who are real victims of real crimes – as well as innocent men who are simply confident and masculine!

The nasty reporters continued quoting this faker, stating; “I was on my own and I saw him and his friend walking towards me, he asked me about my ethnicity background, grabbed my hand, pulled me towards him holding my hand to his chest, almost pleading for me to go for a drink with him. I couldn’t say no when he asked for my number, he called it there and then to make sure it was the right number.” Wait a minute “Nas Moya,” so you were able to say “no” to drinks, but not “no” to giving your phone number.

We tracked down Addy and the “friend” (Dean Chinula) that was with him that day to find out if “Nas Moya” was telling the truth, it turns out she is a liar! We put her fake account to Addy, he said; “I actually don’t remember her. Firstly I would never plead anyone to go out with me, I’m not desperate, seems like this girl’s on an ego trip, quite evident in the way she’s going to the media and lying. She said ‘almost pleading,’ don’t flatter yourself, my girlfriend is a stunner, she’s worth a million of whatever this crazy chick is. I’m brown, the guy with me at the time is black and if this girl had a darker skin tone, it’s what people of non-white ethnicities do, we ask about background, that is not illegal. I’ve never grabbed anyone’s hand or pulled them towards me or held it to my chest – this girl is a liar. I have an eye witness that can confirm this. She gave me her number – so she says – I have no need to call anyone on the spot, I’m not desperate. If a girl doesn’t want to engage, I just move on as there are plenty of girls who do. Honestly what is this person saying, it sounds ridiculous.”

We at RPR agree, why would a man who intended to force a women into anything, force a phone number? Would such a person not force something much worse? So “Nas Moya” is implying a number was forced, so that she could be contacted in future to meet in person in order to be forced in person? Why would someone with criminal intent go 2 steps backwards to do something they could have done then and there? The answer is; there was no force, no criminal intent and no sinister intentions on Addy’s part ever! This person is a liar and a fame-chasing creep.

We asked Dean Chinula, the eye witness, that both parties said was there, he said: “I was there, the interaction was a few minutes, she was smiling, she gave Addy her number, they shook hands and we left. There was no grabbing hands, holing hand to chest or pulling towards him. Addy doesn’t plead anyone to come on dates or call girls on the spot, he’s smooth and has a lot of options of girls to date, he never takes it personal either. This girl is playing up to the media as these days a lot of stupid chicks think it’s cool to be a #MeToo activist victim to get attention, nothing happened to her, I know so, I saw the whole thing.”

Mutants Carla and Jack continued to quote this bizarre female, stating; “later he texted me I admitted I was seeing someone and didn’t want to go for a drink. Immediately he started going on about how his mum warned him about mixed race girls and I blocked him on WhatsApp. He didn’t try to contact me again until I got a random text that just said “s**g?”

OK – so if you blocked him, how was he able to text you again? We again asked Addy about this, he said; “this is nonsense and out of context. If someone doesn’t want to meet up, I would move on, she’s making it up. Sounds like a random that’s seen the crap some weirdo journalist has wrote in the papers and regurgitated it. This girl is trying to come across as a special innocent snowflake, if she had a boyfriend, why did she give her number to a guy she just talked to for a few minutes.” Sounds like a dysfunctional relationship and a bunch of contradictory lies to us! Here are links to testimonials of women who know Addy and have actually dated him;

Slimy Carla and Sleazy Jack continued their line-up of characters by quoting an “anonymous” female (how convenient), stating; “a 25 year old female from Largs, who wishes to remain anonymous said she was approached on Sauchiehall Street in 2016. It was busy with Xmas shoppers, but was dark and I was by myself. He asked if I was mixed race because I didn’t look Scottish. He asked if I was a dancer because I had the figure.” OK – none of this is illegal you invisible cowardly anonymous air-head! That’s if this person even exists at all and is not just a figment/ lie from Jack and Carla’s perverted (and limited) imaginations. Sauchiehall Street at Christmas is packed with Christmas shoppers, there are thousands of witnesses and no-one batted an eyelid because nothing happened! This supposed source even said it was “busy,” and it gets “dark” in Glasgow around 3pm in December, stop with the drama queen sensationalised bullshit!

The scummy reporters continued with their “anonymous” quotable, stating; “he asked for my number so I just gave it to him to get rid of him and he texted me while I was there to make sure it wasn’t fake. He went to shake my hand and then took my hand and kissed it- which was creepy. Preying on young girls when they’re on their own is plain wrong.”

Actually what is “creepy” is being an “anonymous” liar from Largs that gave a guy her number in 2016 then went to the papers in 2019 to tell a bunch of lies about what actually happened, just because she saw a video demonising him on BBC The Social. “Preying” on any girls is “plain wrong” you idiot and Addy has never “preyed” on anyone. What is also “plain wrong” and “creepy” is making false accusations against a guy you consensually gave your number to! Why didn’t you tell him no? Why didn’t you just not give him your number? Why didn’t you give him a fake number? You say he texted you on the spot, did you physically predict he would do so or did you just say so to the press to save face and look like a fake-ass victim at the same time? And again there were thousands of people around why not alert someone? Why did no one notice, it was in the middle of the street? Why are there no witnesses? Because you are talking absolute rubbish!

We asked Addy about this, he said; “I don’t remember any of this. Sounds like some chick trying to put the boot in. I wouldn’t kiss any random bird’s grubby hand, I don’t know where it’s been, she claims she gave me her number, also that I texted her on the spot, I’ve never done that unless someone requests my number also! I mean you can’t date a phone number, I don’t see what these reporters are getting at, it’s totally absurd, anyone with half a brain can see they are full of shit.”

Jake-ball Jack and chunky Carla continued to quote their made up source, stating; “after he was gone I remember being paranoid that he followed me. In the weeks after I received texts from him, one of them just said s**g?” Wait a minute “he was gone,” means not there, so the “being paranoid he followed” makes no sense. Also this fake info from creepy couple (Jack and Carla) is again regurgitated mirror image crap designed to demonise Addy. If readers look at these reptilian journalists past work (if you can stomach how bad it is) a similar theme / tactics can be seen to be used to push hate-agendas to harm people in order to sell their below par stories. The rat-infested pair also wrote; “the court heard Ahmed approached 2 schoolgirls in a secluded lane in Uddingston in 2016, who were aged 16 and 17.” This is not illegal and there was no “secluded lane.”

The following links are the full account of what was said about this bogus claim by the low-life reporters and of accounts of women who dated Ahmed and met him under similar circumstances;

The Evening Times Selective Bias To Report About Man, Mr Ahmed, Adamantly Pleading “Not Guilty” to “School Girls Feeling Intimidated After Approach In Lane” –

Predators Jenkins and Aitchison twisted reality further with a 3rd scenario, stating; “24 year old named only as Ella was on Argyle Street with a friend in May 2017 when he approached them.” Wait, are you 2 clown reporters not pushing the “lone female” thing? So he had the confidence to approach 2 girls, this is the sign of a grounded high-self esteem person with nothing to hide.

The rancid reporters continued; “bombarding them with questions – again about their ethnicity.” This is not factual. This is 2 white reporters working for the white Scottish media, trying to shame a brown man for being interested in non-white women. Typical racist motives from Jack and Carla – privileged white people dictating who other ethnicities are allowed to date, what they can discuss or ask about. No one was “bombarding with questions,” no source actually said this, jakey Jenkins and appalling Aitchison bombarded this article with their lies and warped hype!

The putrid pair continued to quote “named only as Ella”; she said; “he asked me where we were going, about our jobs, relationship status, my friend was conversing with him a bit and gave him her number.” Oh the horror, you poor victim “Ella” – jobs, locations, relationship status. Oh no! And it wasn’t even attention-seeker “Ella” who he was interested in, it was her “friend,” who didn’t come forward or complain; but did willingly, eagerly and consensually “gave him her number.”

So that’s 3 flimsy accounts from 3 shoddy sources, all of whom admit to giving Addy their number. Either these people are extremely stupid or they are lying; they seem very savvy to us at RPR, more than savvy. two faced truth-twisters who know exactly what to do and say to cover up their faults and change facts about what actually happened, that led to them giving Addy their number!

Moronic Carla and Jack continued to quote moronic “named only as Ella”; “at the time he seemed to just be more of a chancer than anything sinister.” Ella, could that actually be all it was and nothing more! Could it be that a prejudicial video made by creep Myles Bonnar portraying Ahmed as sinister suddenly tricked you into thinking he was. Sounds pretty consistent with this whole media circus crap that happened to Addy since January 2019.

Joke Jack and crap Carla continued to quote “Ella,” stating; “a while later he did WhatsApp my friend some messages like – hey baby what times our date tonight? Pick you up at 7? – This indicated to my friend he was creepy and she blocked his number.” A grown woman called “Ella” talking about her imaginary “friend” in the tabloids is super creepy Ella – you goon! This “friend” did not complain or come forward or make the claims. Looks like sad desperado creep Ella is ultra needy for some lime light; get a life you absolute nugget of a creature. We also asked Addy about this, he said; “that’s a load of rubbish, I don’t know this pair of creeps. I would never text anything like that. All these sad low-class birds are trying to make a name for themselves by trying to associate themselves with me. They are not on my level, they are in the gutter where they belong and will always be. Block me? I wouldn’t even give them the time of day!”

Following are yet more real-life accounts of women who testify to dating Addy and their experiences with him;

Check out our next blog post: