Human Rights Group Probe Journalist Andrew Learmont, After His Sexually Charged Article in The National, Aimed At Wrongfully ccused Adnan Ahmed, Causes Outrage

Disgusting White Supremacist Newspaper “The National” And “Cretan” Andrew Learmont Support Reportedly “Racist” BBC Social Video

Red Pill Rights are probing another maggot journalist Andrew Learmont. The rodent reporter is yet another fake news predator, using perverted sexually charged language and reporting total falsehoods. Learmont represents white supremacist, nationalist and racist newspaper “The National.” Together they seize opportunities to slander ethnic minorities using misinformation to spread their hate fuelled views in their quest for Scottish white supremacy.

Deviant Andrew Learmont starts his fabricated article off with a picture of wrongfully and falsely accused dating coach Adnan Ahmed. In this caption Ahmed is seen shaking hands with a smiling woman, during the day with on lookers watching. And you point is Andrew?Leering stalker Learmont must have got the picture from Ahmed’s social media which was publicly available to all as Ahmed wasn’t hiding anything. The dull reporter states (under the caption), “secretly filmed videos show Adnan Ahmed and friends approaching unsuspecting women around Glasgow.”

Come on Andrew, you sleazy hack nitwit, can’t you see the ladies faces are blurred out, protecting their identity. Furthermore you failed to mention it is a dating business, not a day out with friends. And what are they “unsuspecting” of? A fun conversation, ooohhh, the controversy. Additionally, the foolish journo failed to report that the majority of videos on Ahmed’s dating site are from cities around the world, not Glasgow!

Andrew Learmont makes a feeble attempt to get in on the action and media sensationalisation surrounding Adnan Ahmed aka Addy AGame. Learmont continues his lies in The National by stating, “a notorious Glasgow internet pick-up artist who has been accused of Turning consent and coercion into a game.” Really Andrew, so why are consent and coercion not charges faced by Addy AGame? We’ll tell you why, because he didn’t do it! And who made these accusations? The police – No! The public – No! It was the dirty rotten dog of an MSP by the name of Rhianon Spear. More about her later. First we must deal with Learmont. Also Ahmed always maintained that he is a dating coach not a PUA.

The dim-witted reporter continued, “he offers training for men on how to have sex with beautiful women.” What’s wrong with that Andrew? Some men have terrible social skills and need the help, do you have sex with ugly women? Your choice Andrew. Leech Learmont continued, “AGame has been identified in local press as Adnan Ahmed,” this is a lies Andrew. AGame’s real name was revealed on social media by old hound Rita Bruce who sexually harassed Ahmed in 2018, and by the sex crime convict/ internet troll Brodan White. You’re quoting sex-pests Andrew; you know what they say birds of a feather flock together.

The journalist continued his smear of innocent man Adnan Ahmed, “the 30 something….supposedly teaches men tactics for convincing women to sleep with them.” This proves that Andrew Learmont is a shameless liar who would sell his own mother out to sell a story. The facts are that Adnan Ahmed gave the press a full statement which was largely ignored because it didn’t fit the lying media’s angle of defamation. In this statement Ahmed talks about not using “tactics” and not having to “convince” anyone to do anything.

We at Red Pill Rights did our homework and obtained Addy AGame’s media statement, we quote, “we don’t promote using techniques, tactics or trickery instead it’s lifestyle and mind-set improvement…game is a male sub-culture and guys watch it because they like women and wish to attract them.” said by Adnan Ahmed in November 2018. So Andrew which part of that is using “tactics” or “convincing women,” none of it. Reporters like Learmont don’t do their research and just print falsehoods with blatant disregard for an innocent person’s reputation, it’s disgusting behaviour, and sadly this is the majority of the mainstream media in the UK today.

Liar Learmont continued, “Ahmed teaches how to bypass last minute resistance, when a woman does not consent to sex.” This is an absolute lie. The video Learmont refers to shows Ahmed saying, “we do not condone rape culture or forcing anyone sexually or otherwise.” Ahmed actually refers to “last minute resistance” as “making women comfortable and creating the right mood for adult relations because too many guys either don’t know what to do or are too thirsty to get laid and forget to have fun.”

Filthy clown Andrew Learmont goes onto say, “one video on his channel features another man trying to convince a 17-year old to have sex with him. After leaving the conversation because her male friend arrives, a DWLF member off camera says, you should have pulled your pants down.” Whoa Andrew you little stirring lying scumbag! Firstly, Addy AGame didn’t even feature in this video “another man” did, what’s the relevance? Secondly, it is filmed in Croatia not Glasgow what’s the relevance? We watched this video, at no point did this “man” Learmont refers to “try to convince” anyone “to have sex,” the man featured in the video tried to go on a date with a girl of the legal consent age of it. Legal both in the UK and Croatia. And the “man” referred to is in his early 20’s. Also the girl is a college student not a school girl, they call college “school” in Zagreb, Learmont you Scottish nationalist, expand your vocabulary beyond your perverted sexualised drivel. There you go with that word “convince” again Andrew Learmont may think convincing women to have sex is OK but it’s not, women choose to do it because of attraction, not because they are convinced to do so. Sexist Andrew Learmont is insulting women’s intelligence by continuously suggesting they can be “convinced to have sex.”

Back to the video Learmont obsessively watched (for much needed tips probably) then fabricated or simply didn’t understand. The “other man” didn’t “leave the conversation because her male friend arrived.” It was the girl’s boyfriend that arrived, the “other man” left respectfully, and what did he leave Andrew, you said it – “the conversation.” The conversation; when did it become so controversial for a man and woman to have a conversation, it didn’t but maybe it’s controversial to Learmont and The National Newspaper because it was a young black male talking to a young white female.

Andrew Learmont in The National  then resorts to classic talent less hack tactics by misquoting “a DWLF member” out of context saying “off camera he says you should have pulled your pants down.” If anyone with half a brain watches the video Andrew Learmont refers to they can clearly see, the original “man who left the conversation” come back disappointed and his “off camera” friend uses joking banter to tease him with his locker-room comment, two Croatian dating students are also present. The actual concept of the video was “handling rejection,” deliberately showing an interaction that didn’t end in a romantic conclusion, to highlight it is not a huge humiliation or a big deal. Andrew Learmont lacks a sense of humour as well as intelligence, hopefully this article cheers him up and explains things.

Scummy scoundrel Andrew Learmont then quotes MSP Rhianon Spears and makes utterly non-sense claims stating “the women who said they had been harassed by Ahmed contacted Spear to share their story – I literally told him I was 16 at the time and he still continued talking to us.” Andrew no women contacted the MSP, that is another total lie. Ahmed wasn’t charged with this because it didn’t happen; and even if it did it is not illegal, 16 is the legal age of consent set by you white supremacist country Andrew, talk to your people man! And what “story,” the two sentences worth of “story” that told the tale of “he continued talking to us.” This supposed person didn’t complain of anything sexual or even romantic, just “talking,” oh the horror, a brown male talked to a white female, what is Scotland coming to, someone call The National newspaper and get Andrew Learmont on the case, he’s the only one stupid enough to support this racist rhetoric – and he did!

Learmont ends his terrible article with a quote from Adnan Ahmed by choosing a few choice words as usual you know to sell the angle of the false story. Learmont said “Ahmed defended his behaviour to BBC Social” he didn’t. Guess what, we have full quote from Ahmed’s January 2018 press statement, don’t say we’re not good to you, here goes, Ahmed actually said; “When you try to tell guys they need to better themselves through self-development, healthy lifestyle, mental health and addressing their issues – they don’t want to listen. Most guys just want sex, so you give them proof it works to hook them in, then start the internal work so they can realise that sex or women won’t bring them sustained happiness. The client base wants evidence of results as there are a lot of con men in the community, this is an ethical debate and I can understand where opinions will clash on this. The seduction community can be a controversial place. I see it like gangster rap in its early days, however I don’t feel game will ever go mainstream, it’s not for the politically correct.

Insecure radical feminist and Glasgow councillor, Rhianon Spear saw a moment to gain accolade by involving herself in the media scandal, making ludacris claims that rape and coercion were being made into a game. Her outright stupidity was evident through her mention of rape culture, which holds no foundation of truth.

Adnan Ahmed, though falsely accused of ridiculous charges of breach of the peace is NOT accused of rape, he is NOT accused of coercion. How irresponsible of an SNP councillor to even bring those two disgusting words into this situation and destroy an innocent man’s reputation and character.

Despite the false allegations against Mr Ahmed, no one – let me repeat, no one has accused him of rape, no one has accused him of coercion. Rhianon Spear should be fired from her job. She has lived up to the stereotype of being an politician making insane outlandish remarks to gain popularity. Look at how she slandered an innocent man, look at her discriminatory stance against justice, look at her hatred of men for just existing – this is not a person that should be in a political position in any way shape or form.

Rhianon Spear is an absolute joke of a politician, who should never have been hired in the first place and should never be taken  seriously again. Her views are dangerous, fascist, separatist and derogatory. She did no background research into Adnan Ahmed’s dating business, yet mouthed off without any prior investigation.

Rhianon Spear does not know Ahmed’s views on women, on consent and about sex. We do; Click on the link to hear Adnan “Addy A-Game” Ahmed talk about his love for women, freedom of sexual expression and to always make sure there is consent as well as his condemnation of rape culture. This debunks Rhianon Spear’s disgusting claims, unfortunately for Mr Ahmed and his family the struggle continues and the stigma from his horrible ordeal may be a life long battle for him and his family, which consist mostly of women. Well done Rhianon, Girl Power! Spear is yet another example of a phony misusing feminism as a weapon to push her own personal agenda, hiding behind the veil of equality, whilst actually hurting more women than she helps. Luckily, not many people believe what politicians say anyway.

Nicola Sturgeon on the other hand helped Mr Ahmed and the concerned women in his family by offering valuable legal advice through her team as well as kind words of support. Evidence of which can be found online.

The MSP wrote to St. Enoch Centre begging, “are you aware this group of men are using you shopping centre to make unsolicited approaches to women whilst filming them…could you make management aware?” Reptile Rhianon Spear trolled every member of DWLF’s social media and collected their pictures and sent them out. When was the last time this cowardly jealous MSP actually did something for the community? The answer is never. She is as useless as her job title and has a clear bias towards a radical feminism agenda, rather than looking at facts objectively.

This shows emotional instability on her part as well as a lack of professionalism. Childish bratty tantrums are unsettling behaviour. Has any man ever approached her – maybe, maybe not; her unstable behaviour and twisted perspective means more towards not than maybe.

The media lied further saying “a spokeswoman said – we will ensure security and the wider centre team are briefed on this matter. Kokomo nightclub have also reportedly been in touch to say the men are banned indefinitely from both their venues.” Red Pill Rights did our own investigating; and St. Enoch centre spokesperson told us “we had no reports of disturbances about the group, security never dealt with them, there were never any complaints of approaches or filming, we just reacted to the MSP making a request.” We also spoke to Kokomo nightclub who said, “we did not recognise the group, they are not regulars, we have never had any complaints about them regarding anything apart from the MSP.” Rhianon, it’s a nightclub, we know you’re an older lady, but men and women go there to meet each other. There is no need for the Hitler like hatred.

The media continued “councillor Spear added they are also sharing this information with the club manager and networks throughout Glasgow, they hold firm this behaviour will not be tolerated.” This is absolutely ridiculous, what behaviour?! Let’s look at the facts; none of Rihanon Spears blustering chuntering and brat dancing was looked at as an offence and the police did not bring up any charges in regards to the MSPs nincompoopery or pointless rat infested efforts.

Newspapers continued “Buchanan Galleries said – we have passed this to our security team and will make all other members of staff aware.” Buchanan Galleries took no action, there was no ban and nothing more came of this because nothing illegal even happened.

Police Scotland are quoted as saying Ahmed’s behaviour was “predatory and would cause fear and alarm”, after succumbing to media pressure from aggressive online feminists and blood thirsty journalists. Initially when BBC The Social’s video degrading Adnan Ahmed went viral, Police Scotland are quoted as saying “we cannot follow up on this as there is no actual crime to investigate, no crime has been committed.” They were quick to change their tune after BBC The Social’s video gained millions of views and began a witch-hunt amongst the public because of how it was edited and how it portrayed Adnan Ahmed as a demonic sexual caricature, rather than the responsible understanding life coach that he is.

It’s totally bizarre and shockingly worrying that a country’s police force can’t withstand pressure from online trolls and can be manipulated so easily by faceless crazies on the internet. Yes, Scotland is a very small country, but that does not excuse the stupid backward policing tactics used for this matter. There should never have been an arrest in the first place. The police were aware of Ahmed’s dating business 3 years prior to BBC The Social’s hate fuelled video falsely demonising him. They spoke to Mr Ahmed about it on a number of occasions in casual conversation. Both male and female officers approved of it. There are phone calls and written police reports to confirm this.

Adnan Ahmed worked in conjunction with the police, as his job as a Criminal Justice Practitioner made this inevitable. Ahmed’s behaviour was never “predatory”. He ran an online dating business on YouTube for all to see; his clients, video demonstrations and spontaneous conversations with any women were all during the day on well populated busy city centre streets. He wasn’t hiding anything, so how can his actions be described as predatory, shameful or dangerous?

Police Scotland are supposed to investigate matters neutrally and without prejudice. Instead they contributed to the media mayhem by making comments defaming a man who is not guilty of an actual crime, but was charged, indicted and remanded regardless. The police are now tying to fish for a conviction to cover their mistakes and to not face legal action themselves. At the time of writing this, Ahmed has been on remand for the past 6 months, he has been held in custody, untried and without the option of bail since January 2019.

The Sheriff Court indictment has been designed in such a way to convict Adnan Ahmed on a technicality of Scottish Law (Moorov/ corroboration) rather than using substantial hard evidence, because there is none. Ahmed is not permitted to present vital evidence that proves his innocence because of Scottish court laws that protect prosecution witnesses, even if they are lying.

Check out next blog post here: