Jul 09, 2020

|

by: dexter

|

Tags: Addyagame, adnanahmed, eveningstandard, katewills, misandrist

|

Categories: Uncategorized

Inside The Seedy World Of Misandrist Hack ”Kate Wills,” Twisting Facts For The “Evening Standard” To Demonise The Seduction Industry And Heterosexual Men

Kate Wills is a typical modern-day misandrist reporter, jumping on demonising narratives to increase page views for amateur unprofessional news site “Evening Standard.” Wills is an airhead, just go on her Twitter (if you can bear it) and you’ll see her moaning about “being pregnant, having no boobs” and begging for “relationship advice.”

Kate Wills is your usual “woke” socialised idiot that splutters from the usual social justice script, despite scientific evidence proving otherwise! SJW Kate doesn’t care about facts, it’s all about virtue-signalling the latest activism trend for discriminatory morons like her. Simpleton Kate even describes herself as “specialising in women’s rights,” if this is so, how can you write an objective article about a male safe space?! Kate is like a WW2 Nazi writing about Jewish people.

Toxic Kate goes on the war path from the jump, stating; “same day lay” as if consensual sex is a bad thing, how odd of you Kate! Weirdo Wills even disgustingly implies underage sex by stating; “approaching teenagers on Oxford Street.” The legal age of consensual sex in the UK is 16 Kate, do a documentary on that if it bothers you, it’s the law. 17, 18, 19 are “teenagers,” but they are still adults, your wording implies otherwise. It’s funny how social justice warriors like Kate Wills suspiciously employ almost biblical moral high-grounds when judging others, but act hypocritically in secret.  If 2 adults of any consensual sexual age decide to get together that’s up to them Kate.

Glory-hunting slob Kate continued; “covertly filming women and putting footage online.” Stop whining Kate you alarmist fool. This is no different from how media hypocrites like you and sleazy Myles Bonnar film people without their consent and post / broadcast it. What’s “horrific” is Wills and Bonnar don’t conceal the identities of the people they demonise for personal gain – these coaches at least did protect the identities of the females they interacted with. And Kate how are other’s supposed to learn if there are no video examples?! Ultimately – this is not illegal under UK law. You seem to have more of a problem with the law, rather than an actual valid issue.

Click bait Kate desperately demonises through lazy outdated reporting, stating; “escalation techniques, negging, rapid escalation…..,some of these tactics.” This is like talking about 1980’s rap group NWA to describe UK rapper Stormzy – it’s terrible journalism! Sad-sack Wills astonishingly manages some current slang, but her lack of research handicaps her intelligence once again, as she proceeds to rant totally out of context, stating; “one day lay, last-minute resistance, daygame.”

What dating coaches teach clumsy social misfits is that they can learn to perceive things differently, to cut through illusions of the mind/ PC society that they believe in or fear, to stop seeing imaginary problems and to learn to focus on the reality of male-female dynamics. Too often clients who think like Myles Bonnar react emotionally, get despondent and lose perspective. Their negative perceptions invade their minds and throw off their emotional compass, resulting in social anxiety. Dating is taught as a science and an art. Human brains evolved for an environment very different from the one we currently inhabit, resulting in people carrying biological baggage (as social justice ideologies clash with basic human instincts). Humans are still primed to detect threats/ dangers that no longer exist, i.e. stress of rejection or the fight-or-flight response experienced when talking to a female. Dating coaches taught men they have a choice in how they respond to this situation; to not be led by primal feelings, to understand them and learn how to filer them in order to be attractive to the opposite sex (it’s not trickery, it’s science and art). Kate truly doesn’t get it and this, along with her bitterness led to her hate-campaign and jealous lies about men who she perceives as superior to her.

Bitter Kate hates men who have honed the ability to control, channel and understand primal signals because she can’t access that part of herself; Kate you are a slave to your impulses, instincts, social justice conditioning and need for approval- you’ve never even questioned why you are the way you are! If the BBC Social video or Panorama/Disclosure flop-umentary were even slightly accurate; they would have shown how dating coaches turn seduction into an education, skill-set and success with women. Many men from all backgrounds testify online on how they learned to control emotions, to have a positive outlook, to overcome anxiety/ depression, to enjoy the present moment and to handle situations that disturb/ limit others. Women benefit from this also, they can have healthy relationships (whether short-term or long-term) with men who have their shit together! Instead Kate – you showed what your dark sordid agenda and limited mind made-up and twisted!

Misandrist man-hater Wills continued her defamation spewing; “£80 million industry, thriving in London, promising to teach heterosexual men mastery with women, videos gaining millions of views.” This shows the demand for dating advice, especially in the West Kate! Mixed up men need the help. Dating coaches do cross promote each other’s businesses (just like other You Tubers) only if they agree/ teach similar things – there is plenty of rivalry and competition also, like with any other business. £80 million pound says it all, clients willingly pay for help because it works, it’s not a con – unlike Wills who is a complete and utter fraud and charlatan reporter. It is not illegal to “teach men” dating nor is it illegal to “chat-up and sleep with women.” Kate may find this strange because of her lack of social experiences, for most men and women this is a normal thing.

Clown Kate nearly gets something right, but again her agenda fails her objectivity, she stated; “PUA portrayed as a lovable rouge – think Ryan Gosling…reality a lot more troubling.” Kate is basically jumping on a media bandwagon to demonise heterosexual dating coaches just because the scum at the BBC did it; you know what journalists are like – desperate copycat vultures!

Pitiful Wills continued in this vain, stating; “Panorama documentary exposed PUA scene.” The BBC flop-umentary she refers to is by creep Myles Bonnar, a ball-less low status creep trying to make a name for himself, by literally being a lying snitch. Cowardly racist Myles Bonnar has disappeared into nothingness again after selling himself out for fame (he has no actual skills / talent) by trying to destroy innocent men’s lives because he’s a spineless weasel who women find repulsive.

Kate then goes onto take a pop at Richard Hood from Street Attraction. It is documented on video that Richard knows what women want and they react to him accordingly, at times even pursuing him! Richard exudes the kind of calm equanimity that comes from the absence of irrational or extreme emotions. This is not the loss of feelings, just the loss of the harmful, unhelpful kind, this is a skill Richard has cultivated – freedom from disturbance and perturbation – to focus energy exclusively on solving problems rather than reacting to them. Bonnar is the complete opposite of this, he doesn’t get it, so labels Richard “high-pressure salesman.” This is evident at the end of sexual/social reject Myles flop-umentary, when Richard charms the cretin with open arms and warm smiles and Myles shuffles away like an awkward, sexually frustrated incel.

Kate went onto misquote Hood out of context; “when you get to the apartment tell her to take off her shoes as soon as you walk through your front door – you start taking your shoes off, it’s basically the first part of the escalation. Some girls can be annoying. If they are in their shoes and jacket, they’ll be like that’s enough for tonight…leave the rest for next time…that’s frustrating.” OK Kate, firstly – the man has high standards in hygiene and takes pride in his home. If you go to someone’s home and don’t want to take your shoes off, you leave – that’s their first opportunity to leave! Secondly in a seductive setting where both parties have agreed to be there, comfort is required. No one wants to get intimate with heavy coats and shoes on, the females wouldn’t be comfortable so of course they would want to “leave” (hence if they want to stay, they would get comfortable). Thirdly Richard says it’s “frustrating” when sex doesn’t happen, meaning he doesn’t force anyone, if the female leaves, she is free to do so.

Reptilian Bonnar left out how Richard totally owned him and sent him reeling during the ambush. Richard had bright eyes, a warm smile and open arms whilst talking to the pouting drama-queen Myles. Richard said to Bonnar; “I haven’t given you consent to film this,” to which Myles stuttered and mumbled saying, “It’s not the uh, same thing.” Yes, it is you fool, it’s actually worse. Street Attraction protected the identities of anyone they may have filmed, you on the other hand Myles lie and demonised them in order to advance your failed career. Hood then said to Bonnar; “I love the BBC, I love you Myles, give me a hug,” to which Myles walked away bitched out and beaten like a child having a tantrum, sensing he was being taunted, ridiculed and mocked. Myles took the piss out of himself via his sexually frustrated incel demeanour, Richard just played it cool and laughed at the little snitch!

Crappy Kate then has a pop at another seduction coaching, esteemed author Nick Krauser, by quoting him out of context and using selective quotes such as; “younger, hotter, tighter.” Are you jealous he doesn’t want older, uglier and looser like you Kate?! Wills then falsely implies forced non-consensual sex! So basically, you’re saying PUAs are rapists Kate – that’s really psychologically manipulative and coercive. Again, your man-hating tantrums make you sound like a child, how would you like it if someone called you a rapist Kate?!

Manly woman Kate continued; “Dr Rachel O’Neill an academic at London school of Economics, has studied the seduction industry for 10 years.” This so-called “doctor” isn’t qualified to give an opinion because she’s looking from the outside in. Eddie Hitchens from Street Attraction on the other hand has over 14 years actual experience, his opinion is that of fact, not outside observation. Within the seduction industry there are numerous armchair coaches who watch every video on the subject of seduction but never actually put any theory into practice by actually talking to women. These men are ridiculed as pretenders, this “Rachel O’Neill” is on par with them. Researchers are not experts, practitioners are. Your use of O’Neill’s opinion is asinine Kate, she doesn’t fully comprehend the industry – book smarts don’t equate to social skills and theory certainly is no match for experience!

Cringe worthy Kate continued; “Dr O’Neill said; there’s an idea that seduction essentially provides a blueprint that men can follow as a way of interacting with women. So, you’ll be given a more or less scripted set of lines, routines that you can follow.” This is not accurate. Some men who hire dating coaches have extreme social problems, mental health issues and emotional blocks. To start with these particular clients will be given lines/ routines.” However, after repeated exposure to human interactions they are told to drop the training wheels and become free-flowing spontaneous and naturally witty in their interactions, reacting on a spur of the moment basis. Again a “blueprint” is taught to start with due to the biologically logical nature of male brains in order for them to understand on a methodical level. After that a transition to an emotional/ intuitive level is taught in order to internalise seduction as part of who they are.

Desperate Kate continued to quote the unqualified quack. This coming from someone who has never attended or taught a boot camp, it’s a shoddy evaluation from personal bias, not experience. O’Neill’s recognition of game being taught in “public places” inadvertently highlights the fact that it is done in the open in a safe way with witnesses around. Many women have also testified online as welcoming this type of dating, no women are ever forced to do anything – some stay and talk, others walk away, it really is that simple! A feminist hack quoting a feminist quack about male dating perspectives is just prejudicial and discriminatory. Both these foolish pigs are going to push the female sexual imperative whilst shaming men for being masculine (and to cash in at the same time).

Kate has an instant crush on Cassell, describing him as; “silk handkerchief, chin-length hair, manicured goatee, diamond cuff links…greet me, kiss me…” There you have it, proof that game even works on leftist SJW feminist journalists. Johnny Cassell actually makes some decent points about what the dating industry entails, but Wills sarcastically twists his synopsis. However, Cassell clearly casts a spell over Wills as she stated; “at least not manipulation and coercion like other coaches.” Wrong Kate, it’s much the same, you just saw Johnny first-hand and read about the others from a hit-piece article.

Kate then goes onto quote 2 losers who were not coached properly, we’re not going address those simping beta’s: following are testimonials from men who were coached properly –

Glasgow Dating Coach Addy Agame Helps Marketing Expert in Glasgow: http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-marketing-expert-in-glasgow/

Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Video Editor in Spain: http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-video-editor-in-spain/

Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps IT Specialist in London: http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-it-specialist-in-london/

Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Joiner In Edinburgh: http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-joiner-in-edinburgh/

Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Personal Trainer in London With His Dating Life: http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-personal-trainer-in-london-with-his-dating-life/

Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Football Referee in Australia With His Dating Life: http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-football-referee-in-australia-with-his-dating-life/

Dirt bag Kate continued with her nasty biased agenda, stating; “toxic masculinity into formulaic process says Emily May of Hollaback! Aims to end street harassment.” Whoever this loser is, her angle is to gain funding and create problems that don’t exist to justify the funding, instead Kate should be asking real women who have experienced game.” Following are testimonials;

Tia From Glasgow Talks About Dating Addy Agame – http://redpillrights.com/tia-from-glasgow-talks-about-dating-addy-agame/

Chloe From Lenzie Discusses Her Rendezvous With Addy Agame – http://redpillrights.com/chloe-from-lenzie-discuses-her-rendezvous-with-addy-agame/

Canadian Karen Describes Her Lovely Chance Meeting With Addy Agame – http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/

Jill From Sheffield Gives Honest Feedback On Her Positive Experience With Addy Agame – http://redpillrights.com/jill-from-sheffield-gives-honest-feedback-on-her-positive-experience-with-addy-agame

Christine From China Discusses Meeting And Dating Addy Agame – http://redpillrights.com/christine-from-china-discusses-meeting-and-dating-addy-agame-truthfully/

Aisha From Saudi Arabia Describes Her Holiday Romance With Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/aisha-from-saudi-arabia-describes-her-holiday-romance-with-adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame/

The toilet paper news rag ‘Evening Standard’ and Kate Wills made up fake charges of “hounding girls.” Typical tabloid trash. Ahmed faced no charges of “hounding” anyone, he was wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace. He will appeal and sue the hounds for hounding him with their lies and filth! Prejudiced Wills continued to quote moron Emily, stating; “societies definition of real man….consequences for women.” Come one Kate, modern feminist societies definition of a real man is a quivering friend-zone bitch boy. Stop the lies!

Misandrist sexist Kate then goes for the usual false generalisation used by most radical feminazis as a shame tactic – she stated; “online misogyny….manosphere, men’s rights activists, anti-feminist community, men going their own way…share same ideology as PUAs…”

Wow, you really hate men huh Kate! OK, Kate is full of bs and her demeanour should make us all (men and women) hate the separatist demonic hate-regime of modern-day 3rd wave feminism. Men’s rights activists, PUAs, incels and MGTOW’s all dislike each other – that’s a fact. Many enlightened females are men’s rights activists also. We recommend you read Dr. Peterson’s book to see how he backs his points on this with scientific fact, whereas feminist haters just jealously make up narratives that suit their bratty insanity! Plus, feminists hate Jordan because he always beats them intellectually, PUAs avoid them, M.R.A’s expose them – and incels are hated by everyone because they are sad f**ks. Also Kate, check out the many female men’s rights activists (ie. Erin Pizzey, Cassey Jaye, Karen Straughen, Lisa Britton, Christy O’Misty, Camile Paglia, etc ,etc)

Wills again quotes a feminazi sexist; “forcing women into sex says Laura Bates, men hate women…coaches grooming recruits online….misogynistic…trick or scam women into bed…” The men who “enthusiastically participated” include a doctor, a navy seal, a chef, computer programmer and software engineer. These are respected professionals, a lot more respected than a weasel feminist or a dodgy reporter.

Instead of listening to that nut-job, watch a 4-part documentary explaining the truth;

EPISODE 1-  ”Mainstream Media Demonisation Of Addy Agame” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/PQrKJMRFnwDG/

EPISODE 2 – ”The BBC’s Manipulation / Defamation Of Street Attraction” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/gEkoZIz0Qu9R/

EPISODE 3 –  ”Infield Videos & False Allegations” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZBv0ZtYd55Yc/

EPISODE 4 – ”History, Society, Politics & Feminazis” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/za6X02BuTtR7/

Reptilian Kate Wills then goes on to quote puppet face weirdo Laura Bates. Why does this meddling nobody Laura Bates have to get involved?! There were no accusations of any incidents involving rape, why doesn’t this stupid publicity starved muppet go and help actual rape victims?! What does Laura Bates actually do?! She isn’t qualified to speak about this, it is out with her pointless role – she would do anything to back her feminist man hating agenda.

Swine Kate continued her blatant manufactured (agenda serving) lies stating; “pick-up artist Addy Agame jailed for 2 years. Creepy Kate Wills labels Adnan Ahmed as a “so-called pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.”

In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a bias jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by the Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, peoples perspective was skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate his, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict will be appealed and overturned in the next few months as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintains his innocence; 13 charges were dropped before the bias jury got a chance to deliberate on them. Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct!

The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased/testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, this is not justice, it’s a farce!

It is the aim of the clowns in the mainstream press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation!

Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden, a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.

We have a quote from Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame’s video about LMR on YouTube, Addy said, “we do not condone rape, never force yourself on anyone, hold yourself in high regard and allow space for women to come onto you. If she leaves so be it, no means no, move onto someone who’s into you, don’t waste your time on time wasters.” The video KATE refers to shows Ahmed saying, “we do not condone rape culture or forcing anyone sexually or otherwise.” Ahmed actually refers to “last minute resistance” as “making women comfortable and creating the right mood for adult relations because too many guys either don’t know what to do or are too thirsty to get laid and forget to have fun.”

Seedy Wills continued; “many prominent PUAs deleted their content from YouTube.” They are all back now Kate. No one else in the dating industry has faced legal backlash because they are not based in Scotland. Also, Kate, it’s not just “men teaching men,” there are plenty of women dating coaches teaching the exact same thing as Addy Agame taught to other men, you cretin.

Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong said of these incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In our civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. For talking sake, even if these ladies had gone on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!”

Adnan Ahmed’s excellent lawyer Donna Armstrong described another witness to the court as “she is unreliable, on record she changed her story 3 times, you can’t trust the testimony she has given.”

Ahmed’s lawyer told the court of a third witness; “This is not a crime; my client is giving an honest testimony. Being confident is not a crime. You the jury must have felt somewhat uncomfortable and intimidated when selected to be jurors for this case, that doesn’t equate to a crime either. This is not the fault of my client; these are emotions felt by all people. This is not a court of morality, it’s a court of law, you may not like my client but that doesn’t mean he’s guilty. He did not intimidate anyone.”

It was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.”

Check out our next blog post; http://redpillrights.com/scottish-law-prosecute-comedian-for-teaching-his-dog-nazi-salute-joke/