Lame Shame: Paunchy Feminazi Reporter Mandy Appleyard (The Sun) Whines About BBC Panorama Flop Documentary And Lays Bare The Sleazy World of Scum Reporters Like Her Who Make Fake Underage Sex Claims
50 Year Old Mandy Moans And Lies About Consensual Sex (Calling it Pressured) And Defames Dating Coaches Addy Agame and Street Attraction. Ignorant Grandma Appleyard Hates Young People Having “Same Day Lays”
Manly Mandy Appleyard unwittingly lifts the lid on the disgusting seedy world of scum reporters like herself making horrific, fake, underage, forced sex claims in The Sun newspaper! Munter Mandy implies consensual sex was “pressurised” as well as using the word “teen” without verifying that everyone involved was over the age of legal consensual sex in the UK! Fake News and underhanded slime journalism is nothing new for Appleyard as she was editor at disgraced (and extinct) news rag “The News of The World;” responsible for numerous phone hacking scandals that had them sued countless times. Moany old Mandy has previously wrote articles admitting her negative decayed mindset, stating; “found looking on the bright side hell.” The spinster admits she can’t stop whining and actually enjoys being a hopelessly negative emotion leech stating, “normally have a list of moans before 10am, from weather to driving.” In her trash Sun article she also reveals she loves to moan about young men and young women having consensual sex – framing it as a dark sordid experience carved and twisted from her own wretched mind. The sluggish hater previously said she “doesn’t suit rose tinted glasses,” but her poisonous perspective is another filthy stain on objective journalism – spewed onto the seedy pages of “The Sun” newspaper.
Man-hater Mandy starts her murky article by stating; “a man with a cocky swagger brazingly hitting on women in the street, eventually luring one back to his flat for what he calls a same day lay.” Monster Mandy implies that sex is not consensual by using the word “luring,” no one was “lured” Mandy you old pervert, all women involved, willingly and consensually acted of their own free will. The insecure feminazi displays jealousy towards confident men she finds “cocky swaggers” and “brazingly hitting on women” offensive, guess what Mandy – most women find it attractive you out of touch old fogey! Guys do use terms like “same day lay” in the dating community; news flash Mandy – people of this generation meet and sleep with each other within hours of an introduction; would you prefer it if it was called “rumpy pumpy” or “knocking boots”, or “rogering” – get over yourself you idiot hack.
Lame journo Appleyard continued; “makes an audio recording of them having sex…shoots video of woman asleep with unused condom still in the packet beside her on bed.” The crime of the century, ooooh, the facts are no criminal charges were pressed or came to light because you simply sensationalised this crap. OK Mandy, so Addy had consensual sex with these women, some of which was adventurous where a couple films each other, again consensual, then it is used for a dating businesses YouTube channel – with all parties involved permitting it to be shown! Also there is no actual pornographic video and all female participants’ identities are protected because their actual faces are not shown. Adnan Ahmed even commented on the consented video content in a statement to the BBC Social in November 2018 which was ignored in order to make a video defaming him and not showing his actual views, here is a link to what Addy actually said to the press; http://redpillrights.com/bbc-social-reporter-myles-bonnar-set-up-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame/.
Hollow hound Appleyard also said, “a woman can be seen asleep next to a condom wrapper.” What’s wrong with using condoms Mandy, you may go around having endless casual sex with no protection spreading nasty diseases, but that doesn’t mean others should take part in the same filthy practices. Ahmed is an advocate of safe sex and making sure sex is consensual. Mandy wrote “sleeping woman next to a condom wrapper” to slander Ahmed. Mandy – always remember to wrap it up, safe sex is not a bad thing, it stops the spread of S.T.I’s.
Vile creep Appleyard continued; “Agame runs a YouTube Channel where he films himself chatting to girls attempting to take them home with him.” Yes Mandy you moron and they either consensually oblige or don’t, big whoop you cretin! Seedy weirdo Mandy continued; “later he uploads recordings onto his YouTube channel.” This is not illegal Mandy, you may feel it’s immortal but not more so than phone hacking and fake news spreading like the organisations you are involved with!
Paunchy chubber Appleyard continued; “just bust a nut or 2 in a random same day lay. It was a lot of last minute resistance I had to come through. Boasts the man who posted more than 250 videos, many of them bragging about his sexual conquests.” Mandy lies compulsively once again by misquoting Ahmed out of context. What the vile reporter failed to mention is that this was circumstances between a couple already in a sexual situation and where there was absolute consent. The context again was Keith Lemon style male locker room humour. Lighten up Mandy, you’re uptight and delusional, it’s not healthy living in a world of denial and hatred of others.
The video Mandy refers to shows Ahmed saying, “we do not condone rape culture or forcing anyone sexually or otherwise.” Ahmed actually refers to “last minute resistance” as “making women comfortable and creating the right mood for adult relations because too many guys either don’t know what to do or are too thirsty to get laid and forget to have fun.” We have a quote from Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame’s video about LMR on YouTube; Addy said “we do not condone rape, never force yourself on anyone, hold yourself in high regard and allow space for women to come onto you. If she leaves so be it, no means no, move onto someone who’s into you, don’t waste your time on time wasters.”
Addy Agame is not the founding father of “game” or the dating industry. It is a multi-million dollar industry which comes under the self-help umbrella, which started in the United States and spread all across the globe. Addy has thousands of followers, others have many more. By the sounds of it, all Mandy has ever helped herself to do is reach for junk food out of the fridge and order takeaways whilst talking trash on Twitter. Sounds like another low-class feminist monster! Those “sexual conquests” were women who consensually wanted the same thing Mandy, plus this is not illegal – what’s your point Mandy – do you prefer to keep the hundreds of strangers you have sex with private? Or are you jealous that no one wants to have sex with you? Strange opening Mandy! Appleyard gets her claim of “bragging” wrong, Adnan taught dating to men and gave tips and examples on how to meet and have consensual sex with women who want the same thing.
The rancid reptile then stated; “consent doesn’t seem to be a big concern for Addy Agame.” You don’t have any integrity or honour do you Mandy – you even imply non-consensual sex, you horrible troll-like creature, it’s disgusting to accuse anyone of non-consensual sex Mandy, you should be ashamed of yourself! Let’s get one thing clear straight away. Adnan Ahmed has never been accused of doing anything non-consensual, he has never had non-consensual sex, he has never been charged with non-consensual sex, nor has he ever promoted or been associated with “non-consensual sex.” This is a disgusting accusation by journalist donkey, Mandy Appleyard.
Ghastly toad Appleyard continued; “Ahmed who says: women want you to take the lead. Remember this is not rape. Listen to her actions, her body, not her words.” This is a prime example of seedy Appleyard using selective editing to imply out of context “back-up” for her bogus fairy tale claims. The key fact here is Addy said; “this is not rape…” What Mandy left out was Addy saying; “We do not condone rape in any shape of form. Rape is disgusting and wrong.”
Beastly O.A.P Mandy Appleyard continued her delusional lies, stating; “now behind bars after being convicted of harassing victims.” This is an absolute lie, Addy was not found guilty of “harassing” anyone, there were no charges of “harassing” ever lodged against him. This is another reason to sue Mandy and racist publication The Sun for defamation! This dirty geek’s writing is almost as bad as her crap dress sense. Look at her choice of words “victims,” there were no victims, there were no actual crimes recognised under UK Law, there has to be a crime to be a “victim.” Fake “victims” who are glory-hungry idiots, jump on a fake #MeToo bandwagon (saying they were simply chatted up) actually take away from real victims who actually have to face the reality of real crimes. The only “victims” in connection to The Sun are the people they victimise through their vile trash hate articles.
In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict will be appealed and overturned in the next few months as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintains his innocence, 13 charges were dropped before the biased jury got a chance to deliberate on them. Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct!
The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, this is not justice, it’s a farce!
It is the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” or after the trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation!
Over-the-hill fart Appleyard continued; “notorious Ahmed sells what he says are sure-fire secrets to picking up women.” Despite the scummy Sun reporter’s condescending tone Ahmed is notorious for actually helping people better their lives. Check out the link below (for proof of his “sure-fire” results);
Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Aame Helps Football Referee in Australia With His Dating Life – http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-football-referee-in-australia-with-his-dating-life/
Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Personal Trainer in London With His Dating Life – http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-personal-trainer-in-london-with-his-dating-life/
Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Joiner In Edinburgh- http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-joiner-in-edinburgh/
Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps IT Specialist in London – http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-it-specialist-in-london/
Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Video Editor in Spain – http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-video-editor-in-spain/
Glasgow Dating Coach Addy Agame Helps Marketing Expert in Glasgow – http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-marketing-expert-in-glasgow/
Perverted predatory Mandy Appleyard continued; “he is one of several predatory men featured in BBC Documentary..” Hungry desperado Appleyard stated Ahmed “has been labelled a predator,” By who Mandy – you, your hack buddies and some sad weirdo online trolls. Addy is not a predator. He is an exemplary human being, a good father, he worked in the Criminal Justice field helping others and did daily community work (with NA, CA and AA) for free. He has a fiance, a mother and all his ex-partners testify there has never ever been any “predatory” behaviour on his part, ever! The BBC flop-umentary she refers to is by creep Myles Bonnar, a ball-less low status creep trying to make a name for himself, by literally being a lying snitch. Cowardly racist Myles “Boner ” or Bonnar has disappeared into nothingness again after selling himself out for fame (he has no actual skills/ talent) by trying to destroy innocent men’s lives because he’s a spineless weasel who women find repulsive.
Sickening liar Mandy continued; “program goes undercover at seduction boot camp where picking up women has been turned into a game….lines of consent can be blurred. Only men know the rules: women don’t even know they’re taking park. Known as game to brash pick-up artists who harass women on streets.” Shut your fake feminazi mouth Mandy – you mean like the countless women’s magazines and channels that exist and have existed for decades that teach women how to date/ seduce/ keep men – when men are none the wiser. Neither ethos is wrong, it’s just how it is Mandy you fool. Men and women think about dating differently because biologically our brains work differently, that’s an evolutionary fact. Women are naturally better at dating/ romantic situations as they are more emotionally and intuitively in touch with themselves, whereas men are not as clued up due to their logical thinking and because of modern day radical feminism being used as a shaming, marketing and control tool.
If anything there was no “harassment” or “lack of consent” ever involved. Both Addy and Street Attraction are on record saying things like; “if the girl isn’t into it move on to someone else/ don’t get stuck on one girl/ we don’t condone rape/ you never have to force a women to do anything, she will want to do it” we could go on, the list is endless. These guys helped men be better, better than feminazi’ like bitter Mandy Appleyard! You trying to come across as knowledgeable by saying “what pick-up artists call game” is cringe-worthy Mandy! Creepy Mandy Appleyard labels Adnan Ahmed as a “so-called pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.”
Moany Mandy continued; “post footage which they or their friends have secretly filmed. Ahmed films himself approaching women in Glasgow and Eastern Europe.” Idiot Mandy’s reference to “friend” is actually a cameraman, also filming on public property is 100% legal, however scumbag hypocrite reporters like Appleyard secretly film people for career advancement on a daily basis! The dead-beat clowns at The Sun continued; “secretly filmed himself approaching in Glasgow and Eastern Europe.” Ahmed was not charged with this because it is not a crime! It may be immoral to some, but who the hell are The Sun to talk about morality to anyone, they’ve been caught with their pants down and arse exposed hundreds of thousands of times.
Mongrel Mandy continued; “Ahmed says: reason you’re doing it is to get laid. Only the brave get laid. You will get numbers that’s what number farming is.” What’s wrong with that Mandy? Addy taught guys who lacked confidence and courage to talk to women, he helped those men better their love lives. Just because Mandy likes to sleep with spineless cowards with no backbone, doesn’t mean other women do also!
Wretched rat Appleyard continued; “he is leading a group of sexual opportunists based in Glasgow who teach pick-up techniques with unique names such as the cold approach – stopping women in the street to get as many phone numbers as possible.” Mandy you rotten old bitty. All people are “sexual opportunists” towards other people they find attractive, get a grip grandma, leave that crap for church old-timer! You wouldn’t understand this Mandy – we can see why you are offended by this you pipsqueak. Men wanting to have sex with women and vice versa is natural Mandy, it’s how babies are born you numbskull. Mandy you may not find men sexually attractive, but here’s some obvious data for you – heterosexual men and women want to have sex with each other and the best way to start that process is to be “brave” enough to go talk to each other. Women don’t usually initiate this, so it’s up to a guy to do so, most women agree with this. Mandy it was a business you fool, that was obvious to all, except you. You work like a dog barely making ends meet Mandy, so it’s understandable you don’t get it. As far as the slang goes, every subculture has it, i.e. hip-hop, skate boarders, the upper classes, the working classes even social justice wankers have theirs; i.e. misogyny, woke, creep, victim-blaming, etc.
Firstly “cold approach” is a sales term you fool and initially Myles Bonnar was told to approach any girls because he was a petrified coward who was terrified to speak to females – this was to help him overcome his social anxiety. Afterwards, students are told to only approach women they are attracted to. Mandy you are not qualified to cover the seduction community; you’re coming from a place of lack of understanding, lack of communication skills and a dark feminazi clown mind-set.
Adnan Ahmed has always maintained he is not a pick-up artist, he has always said he is a dating/ life coach. It is a sad state of affairs when people are unable to talk to each other face to face, confining society further into dating apps and social media. In this era it is more normal to troll pictures and profiles online, messaging desperately and projecting a false persona to lure others in; whereas starting a random conversation with someone you find attractive face to face during the day is considered not only abnormal, but also criminal. There is more danger involved in meeting someone online than there is in meeting them in person. Plus face to face dating is a much more human and much less time consuming process, that is if Police Scotland don’t arrest you first.
Wrinkly loser Mandy continued; “preying on teenagers….” absolute bullshit Mandy you decrepit insect! Mandy Appleyard states; “Addy Agame targeting teenagers in Glasgow.” You are an idiot Mandy, “targeting teenagers in Glasgow,” this is not the truth. Addy wasn’t accused of “targeting” anyone, the “teenagers’ ‘ Mandy weirdly talks about were young adults over the age of sexual consent in the UK and the supposed incidents were not said to have taken place in Glasgow.
Predatory Appleyard continued; “what he’s teaching is part of global business of game: from America to Australia industry worth £80 million….coaches sell lucrative courses – on how to sleep with as many women as possible as quickly as possible…the epicentre is London, weekend courses cost up to £1500 and a week’s £4000.” This shows the demand for dating advice, especially in the West Mandy! Mixed up men need help. Dating coaches do cross promote each others businesses (just like other You Tubers) only if they agree/ teach similar things. There is plenty of rivalry and competition also, like with any other business. £80 million pound says it all, clients willingly pay for help because it works, it’s not a con – unlike Mandy who is a complete and utter fraud and charlatan bum reporter.
Dramatic tragedy Mandy continued; “young men on courses hit the streets with their coaches where innocent, unsuspecting often mere teenagers being approached by persuasive older men,” Firstly Mandy make your mind up “young men/ older men,” you write like a confused illiterate – it’s men of all ages moron! The legal age of consensual sex is 16 Mandy, do a documentary on that if it bothers you, it’s the law. 17, 18, 19 are “teenagers,” but they are still adults, your wording implies otherwise. It’s funny how social justice warriors like Mandy suspiciously employ almost biblical moral high-grounds when judging others, but act hypocritically in secret. Mandy’s ethics are in place to push her desperate agenda, not because of any actual value system. If 2 adults of any consensual sexual age decide to get together that’s up to them Mandy.
Calling women “innocent/ unsuspecting” is assuming they are stupid Mandy, they know they are being seduced and they have a choice, it’s not hidden, it’s out in the open and during day you fool! What dating coaches like Addy, Eddie and Richard, etc, taught clumsy social misfits like Myles is that they can learn to perceive things differently, to cut through illusions of the mind/ PC society that they believe or fear, to stop seeing imaginary problems and to learn to focus on the reality of male-female dynamics. Too often clients who think like Bonnar react emotionally, get despondent and lose perspective. Their negative perceptions invade their minds and throw off their emotional compass, resulting in social anxiety. Dating is taught as a science and an art. Human brains evolved for an environment very different from the one we currently inhabit, resulting in people carrying biological baggage (as social justice ideologies clash with basic human instincts). Humans are still primed to detect threats/ dangers that no longer exist, ie. stress of rejection or the fight-or-flight response Myles experienced when talking to a female. Addy and Street Attraction taught that men have a choice in how they respond to this situation; to not be led by primal feelings, to understand them and learn how to filer them in order to be attractive to the opposite sex (its not trickery, it’s science and art).
Bitter Mandy hates men who have honed the ability to control, channel and understand primal signals; Mandy you are a slave to your impulses, instincts, social justice conditioning and need for approval – you’ve never even questioned why you are the way you are! If the BBC Social video or Panorama/ Disclosure flop-umentary was even slightly accurate; it would have shown how Addy and Street Attraction turn seduction into an education, skill-set and success with women. Many men from all backgrounds testify online on how they learned to control emotions, to have a positive outlook, to overcome anxiety/ depression, to enjoy the present moment and to handle situations that disturb/ limit others. Women benefit from this also, they can have healthy relationships (whether short-term or long-term) with men you have their shit together! Instead Mandy- you showed what your dark sordid agenda and limited mind made-up and twisted!
Monstrosity Mandy continued; “time after time these men approach strangers and chat them up in often secretly recorded conversations which they later upload to YouTube for the world to see.” This is nonsense, client’s interactions are not uploaded and if any other interactions were all identities were concealed (blurred faces and no personal details at all). Plus you keep repeating yourself Mandy, must be that old lady memory loss again! Dating coaches like Street Attraction and Addy taught their clients a series of exposure therapy in varying levels of difficulty; from simple daunting approaches, until they did it so many times that it became as second nature as breathing. Making it natural and familiar, removing uncertainty, leading to confidence through experience. Fear is relieved by authority. Training is authority, it’s a release value. With enough exposure, ordinary and innate fears are ironed out. Unfamiliarity is eliminated, which in turn increases tolerance to stress/ anxiety/ uncertainty.
It is not illegal to “teach men” dating nor is it illegal to “chat-up and sleep with women.” Appleyard may find this strange because of her lack of sexual experience, for most men and women this is a normal thing. Imbecile Appleyard continued; “seems nowhere and no one is safe as they target clothes shops as an ideal hunting ground for honing pick-up skills.” You’re wrong there Mandy, you are definitely safe as no one approaches old ugly hags in their 50s (thsi maybe why you wrote this jealous attention seeking article – to cock block younger hotter women). If you observe clearly there is no “hunting” or “targeting” of women. They either stop to speak or they walk with, both of their own free will. This is another predictable gas lighting tactic by feminazi scum-bags, they use words like “targeting” instead of “approaching” and “hunting” instead of “meeting.”
What you’re saying is this group of respected professional men, who want to meet attractive females and had the courage to strike up conversations with them in extremely busy, well-populated public areas with CCTV cameras. We see how you twisted that Mandy. Now go have a nap old lady. Low intelligence Appleyard chuntered on; “experienced London coach Eddie Hitchens, 34, runs Street Attraction, YouTube channel…has more than 100,000 subscriber…in-field videos made via covert recordings…and sells residential courses in Eastern Europe with men travelling from all over the world to take part.” This is the resume of a legit and successful business Mandy you scumbag. Did your unsuccessful life bug you so much that you took it upon yourself to use propaganda to destroy other men’s livelihoods, who are self-made successes?!
Dirty Mandy continued; “Hi I’m Eddie, I’m a heterosexual sex addict…I’ve been doing game since 2005, been coaching since 2011.” Firstly, Eddie’s intro is a joke, it’s funny humour, locker room chat between the guys, which is clear to anyone who is not socially retarded like Mandy. Secondly, Eddie’s CV speaks for itself, Eddie’s credentials and knowledge of game is evident. It would therefore make sense to listen to Eddie about the subject rather than some feminazi like Mandy Appleyard – who found out about it less than a year ago.
Grandma Appleyard continued; “Six students, from recently single to experienced, each paid £600 to learn how to pick-up women.” Mandy sounds like a country bumpkin star struck by London, she fails to mention the BBC reporter also handed over £600 of the BBC’s money (swindled from the public via TV licences) just to get to be around the good folks at Street Attraction. The men who “enthusiastically participated” include a doctor, a navy seal, a chef, computer programmer and software engineer. These are respected professionals, a lot more respected than a slimy weasel failed BBC Scotland reporter bum.
Hypocritical witch Mandy continued; “approach to lay is Hitchen’s pay walled website…he teaches seduction techniques all the way to the bedroom. Visitors can pay £47 fee to watch secret recordings of Eddie picking up an 18 year old. From the street to a coffee shop to the bedroom, where apparently he secretly records the sounds of them having sex.” Firstly, this video is totally consensual. The female involved goes with Eddie willingly everywhere he goes, she chooses to do so. Secondly her identity is totally concealed and this is not illegal! Thirdly, Eddie was in his early 20s at the time the video was made and even if he was 34 – 2 consenting adults of any age can choose to have sexual relations, that’s their business and no one elses. The word “apparently” shows Mandy’s stupidity further, it was a black screen with some moans and groans. Eddie is not on camera doing anything pornographic or sexual, this is a bogus claim by a bum feminazi! Mandy words this as if Eddie was charging clients to view sex. In reality Eddie’s program was an example of how to meet a woman that leads to a dating scenario which can lead to consensual sex.
Manipulative Mandy continued; “first lesson stop women they don’t know in the street and convert that random approach into a sexual encounter.” Another lie, this is never the “first lesson,” instead it’s to learn to have conversations with new people. Mandy strangers meet, date and have sex – it’s probably how your parents met you socially unaware outcast! Liar Appleyard stated; “Eddie and other coaches suggest students approach teenagers….undercover reporter says she’s too young for me. Eddie replied “doesn’t matter even if she’s underage, it’s not illegal to stop someone. That was a good target.” Firstly, this is totally out of context, at no point in this quote did Eddie say to approach anyone underage as was implied by the reporter! The BBC reporter was chickening out of doing approaches, hence why Eddie took him aside and told him to be less “selective,” his excuses and social anxiety were the cause not Eddie! Hitchens didn’t tell him to approach kids ever – that’s in your head Mandy. Eddie has never been linked to anything to do with anyone “underage,” this is a disgusting allegation; made by a beady-eyed coward in the feminised form of Mandy Appleyard.
Mandy continued; “Hitchens denied telling students they should approach teenagers, he said; not true, the thing I teach is exactly this. Find out how old the girl is before you do anything sexual/ flirtatious…you are basically misrepresenting what we’re doing. It’s absolutely disgusting and we’ll see you in court.”Eddie only told clients to pursue women over the age of consent, never anyone underage, again he has no history of this ever! Even in the flop-umentary Eddie said to find out the age first. Eddie’s statement was again true. Street Attraction are responsible for helping hundreds of thousands of men. They taught self-development as well as dating. Appleyard chose to demonise them to advance her bummy no-go career.
Gas lighting feminazi Mandy continued; “in many cases these so-called seduction coaches seem to be using their obvious profession as cover for pressuring young and vulnerable girls.” Mandy you sexist, labelling women “vulnerable” because of their gender is chauvinistic, “vulnerable” how? “Vulnerable” to having a conversation in broad day-light with hundreds/ thousands of people and CCTV around. And “young” how, all women were adults above the legal age of consensual sex in the UK!
No females have ever accused Hitchens of ever `pressuring ” them into anything. Feminazi Mandy continued to quote Eddie; “he said: that’s completely wrong. You have twisted it completely out of context…it’s an art. It’s completely consensual. We actually help men…if anything we help prevent rape culture and help prevent them getting involved in anything illegal or non-consensual.” This is 100% true – Eddie has never been linked to anything “non-consensual” or “rape,” ever! There are thousands of clients and hundreds of women who can back up what he said.
Fascist Appleyard went onto say; “fellow coach Richard Hood advises…“when you get to the apartment tell her to take off her shoes as soon as you walk through your front door – you start taking your shoes off, it’s basically the first part of the escalation.” Firstly – the man has high standards in hygiene and takes pride in his home. If you go to someone’s home and don’t want to take your shoes off, you leave – that’s their first opportunity to leave! Secondly in a seductive setting where both parties have agreed to be there, comfort is required. No one wants to get intimate with heavy coats and shoes on, the females wouldn’t be comfortable so of course they would want to “leave” (hence if they want to stay they would get comfortable). Thirdly Richard says it’s “frustrating” when sex doesn’t happen, meaning he doesn’t force anyone, if the female leaves she is free to do so. What’s the issue here Mandy?! Again your article does not offer an alternative, because you don’t have one, you loser!
Appleyard continued; “he told men can be too preoccupied with consent.” It was edited so out of context it’s ridiculous! We’ve seen Richard’s videos on LMR and can tell you the full context. Richard saying “so much consent” refers to killing the mood, in the context that you have consent (both parties are willing) and you don’t have to ask at every stroke during sex, a simple “no” from the female is enough. One “No” and everything stops, Richard is on record saying this! Richard said, “feel out the right moment,” referring to the moment of full consent! Then, only then, does he say to “push forward and lead,” Mandy your accusations are disgusting.
Weirdo Mandy then writes as if she’s attracted to Hood, stating; “boasted about manipulated situations and overcome LMR to get what he wants. Hood seems to have an answer to everything…he certainly seems to know every trick in the book. In a video in Slovakia on YouTube, he secretly recorded himself having sex with a woman he just met.” Once again the sex was totally consensual and no pornographic/ sexual imagery was ever uploaded online – this is a total lie told by vile reported Appleyard! It is documented on video that Richard knows what women want and they react to him accordingly, at times even pursuing him! Richard exudes the kind of calm equanimity that comes from the absence of irrational or extreme emotions. This is not a loss of feelings, just the loss of the harmful, unhelpful kind. This is a skill Richard has cultivated – freedom from disturbance and perturbation – to focus energy exclusively on solving problems rather than reacting to them.
Prejudiced Appleyard continued to quote Hood, stating; “girls who haven’t had sex for a while are usually easier to seduce than girls who have sex on a regular basis.” This is a true statement that can be applied to men also, it’s factual Mandy – what is your point, except from twisting people’s statements to demonise them?!
Manly-woman Appleyard continued; “Dr Rachel O’Neill an academic at London school of Economics, has studied the seduction industry for 10 years.” This so-called “doctor” isn’t qualified to give an opinion because she’s looking from the outside in. Eddie Hitchens on the other hand has over 14 years actual experience, his opinion is that of fact, not outside observation. Within the seduction industry there are numerous armchair coaches who watch every video on the subject of seduction but never actually put any theory into practice by actually talking to women. These men are ridiculed as pretenders, this “Rachel O’Neill” is on par with them. Researchers are not experts, practitioners are. Your use of O’Neill’s opinion is asinine Mandy, she doesn’t fully comprehend the industry – book smarts don’t equate to social skills and theory certainly is no match for experience!
Cringe worthy Mandy continued; “Dr O’Neill said; there’s an idea that seduction essentially provides a blueprint that men can follow as a way of interacting with women. So you’ll be given a more or less scripted set of lines, routines that you can follow.” This is not accurate. Some men who hire dating coaches have extreme social problems, mental health issues and emotional blocks. To start with these particular clients will be given lines/ routines.” However after repeated exposure to human interactions they are told to drop the training wheels and become free-flowing spontaneous and naturally witty in their interactions, reacting on a spur of the moment basis. Again a “blueprint” is taught to start with due to the biologically logical nature of male brains in order for them to understand on a methodical level. After that a transition to an emotional/ intuitive level is taught in order to internalise seduction as part of who they are.
Desperate Appleyard continued to quote the unqualified quack, stating; “most training camps spend the majority of time out on streets, bars, cafes, museums, any public place, actually practising techniques putting them into practice. That means often unwillingly drawing women into these interactions.” This coming from someone who has never attended or taught a boot camp, it’s a shoddy evaluation from personal bias, not experience. O’Neill’s recognition of game being taught in “public places” inadvertently highlights the fact that it is done in the open in a safe way with witnesses around.
As far as “unwillingly drawing women in,” she’s way off the mark again. Addy met his girlfriend via daytime dating, Eddie met his girlfriend in this way also, as have hundreds of thousands of other clients and coaches. Many women have also testified online as welcoming this type of dating, no women are ever forced to do anything – some stay and talk, others walk away, it really is that simple!
Feminazi idiot Appleyard continued; “Dr Rachael O’Neill explained: idea with LMR that women put up certain amount of token resistance prior to sex, this is under seduction logic what women to do safeguard reputation…really worrying this creates a situation in which a no can never be heard as no.” This is absolute rubbish, again from an under-qualified quack with no real substance to her argument. Addy and Street Attraction have both said in videos “no means no, we don’t advocate rape.”
Needy approval seeker Mandy continued; “ Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon expressing her horror at gaming earlier this year in a speech to Scottish Parliament following a BBC investigation. That’s because of the falsified information portrayed in the BBC Social video. Sturgeon later helped Ahmed’s girlfriend with vital information regarding his case afterwards which we have documented on the RPR site. Although Nicola Sturgeon’s hypocrisy is not lost in this instance as her own mentor was facing multiple rape allegations while she worked with him.
Hypocrite Nicola Sturgeon vs Addy Agame (Not Guilty!): http://redpillrights.com/hypocrite-nicola-sturgeon-vs-addy-agame-not-guilty/
Demonising cretin Appleyard continued; “several women came forward to complain. Ahmed was arrested and charged with harassment 2 days after the BBC expose.” This is total garbage! The toilet dweller scum Mandy makes up fake charges of “harassment.” Typical tabloid trash. Addy faced no charges of “harassment” – he will sue the hounds at The Sun for harassing him with their lies and filth!
BBC The Social hounded the Glasgow dating coach for months, he reached out to them and responded with a detailed explanation of his business model and background to his client base as well as the scientific reasoning behind this method of face to face daytime speed dating, which was in large ignored. Instead they used choice sentences to turn up the controversy in order to create a story and demonise an innocent man. The police didn’t act because of online videos, they were aware of them for years, they crumbled because of media pressure because Police Scotland is a Mickey Mouse force of hick villagers.
Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.
Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong also said of these incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In our civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. This is the main route to the train station in Uddingston, not a secluded lane, it has fields of grass either side and the school happens to be right next to the train station. All sides have said it was during the day outside school hours. For talking sake, even if both these ladies had went on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!” Adnan Ahmed’s excellent lawyer Donna Armstrong described another witness to the court as “she is unreliable, on record she changed her story 3 times, you can’t trust the testimony she has given.”
Ahmed’s lawyer told the court of a third witness; “the messages are from one source, her! This is not a crime, my client is giving an honest testimony. Being confident is not a crime. You the jury must have felt somewhat uncomfortable and intimidated when selected to be jurors for this case, that doesn’t equate to a crime either. This is not the fault of my client, these are emotions felt by all people. This is not a court of morality, it’s a court of law, you may not like my client but that doesn’t mean he’s guilty. He did not intimidate anyone.” Lawyer Ms Armstrong also cross-examined this accuser stating, “there are messages missing from the feed, why did he respond “no joke” after initially sending “fun to meet you” without a response, it doesn’t make sense. You said in your statement, “is this a joke” now you’re saying it was in person and not over text?!” The witness twisted her face and scowled at the lawyer in response.
It was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.”
Two random #MeToo nobodies jumped on the hate-campaign against Addy, just to get some fleeting (15 minutes of) fame by faking being victims – this is obvious as the two individuals didn’t contact police, they “tracked” them down. Why didn’t they come forward before or during the prejudiced BBC Social Video defaming Addy in January 2019? The reason is because they know deep down they had nothing to complain about as both of them willingly gave Addy their numbers!
Feminazi Mandy continued; ”Beth was walking home through the main shopping street in Glasgow after her shift, it was a dark November night and Ahmed stepped into her path. She was 17, Ahmed was 37.” Myles is a terrible writer, his attempt to sensationalise this scenario is totally see-through. This “Beth” gave Addy her number, she admitted this. She was walking on the “main” street in Glasgow, with thousands of people around as witnesses. The “dark” November night is another frail attempt by Myles to twist facts, in Scotland it gets “dark” at 4pm in November. resorts to being ageist as well as racist in regards to Addy. Firstly a 37 year old dating a 17 year old is not illegal in the UK. Secondly the last 10 women Ahmed has dated were aged 18-26, while he was in his 30s.
Sleazy Mandy continued to quote the glory-hunting faker stating; “he was like, oh are you Russian? He was mentioning he was in Ukraine or something and he had hired prostitutes, he had just a horrible manner.” Such a disgusting manner that you gave him your phone number to contact you for a date Beth? Get a grip! We managed to get Addy to comment on this, he said; “this is absolute nonsense, this girl is lying. I don’t pay women for sex or use prostitutes, I’ve made videos telling viewers and clients not to use prostitutes or porn as it messes up their sex lives and mental health. This is a disgusting accusation and if anything this girl is worse than a prostitute. This girl tells lies for fame, thank god I didn’t go out with her. I have 5 witnesses, 3 males and 2 females who can vouch that I didn’t hire any prostitutes – David, Matt, Mike, Katrina and Veera. I was in Ukraine with them, they were with me the whole time.”
RPR managed to track down Matthew Bertram, Michael Smith, David Kasonga, Katrina Dubenskij and Veera Szmul – Addy’s 5 friends who accompanied Addy on his trip to the Ukarine, all 5 of them confirmed “he did not hire prostitutes,” they further stated; “he wouldn’t even go to a strip club, he doesn’t believe in paying for sex, at most he’s buy a girl a coffee or a drink on a date.” We also managed to get a copy of Ahmed’s YouTube video “don’t use porn and prostitutes,” from his DWLF archives which confirmed what he stated about his stance to his clients!
Reptilian Appleyard continued;” he kept on asking for her number, he kept trying to touch her. Beth said – I said no countless times, I gave excuses and he was like: oh it’s fine, like, just give me your number, whatever.” We asked Addy to comment on this, he said; “I don’t even talk like that, I don’t say – oh it’s fine, like, whatever. That sounds like some rehearsed crap she’s made up. It sounds like a gay guy. There’s hour long tutorials of me speaking, people have heard me speak, they know how I talk. I’m a trained public speaker, I don’t use stupid language like that, I have no problem saying what I feel. The fact of the matter is she says she gave me her number, look how she’s talking on the documentary, she acts coy, but she’s not stupid or nervous or shy. As far as touching goes – as this reporter Mandy Appleyard said; the only touching I ever do is hand-shakes upon introduction and after girl’s gave me their number (when leaving). I only ask for phone numbers once and she said she gave me it.”
Monster Mandy continued; “Beth was shaken and thought that he would leave her alone if she agreed to give him her number.” You sound like a band-wagon jumping glory-hunter. If Ahmed was dangerous why would he approach you during the day in a well populated area and ask for your phone number, which you consented to give him! Anyone with criminal intent would not make conversation with a phone number (in order to go on a date) as their end goal! If this “Beth” person felt “shaken” why did she consensually give her number to Addy? Why did she not ask or shout or scream for help? The real reason is she’s making this all up to play up to the media. You’re not a victim, you’re a lying drama queen that is actually hurting women who are the real victims of real crimes – as well as innocent men who are simply confident and masculine!
Tiny brain Appleyard continued to quote this woman Beth stating; “he knew I was going to the bus stop, he knew I’d be alone for around an hour waiting for my bus, so I stayed on the phone to my mum for 30 minutes talking her through the situation, trying to give me peace of mind.” OK Beth, how did he know this information, is it because he’s psychic or because you told him! And you must have called your mum after you gave him your number and he left right?! Your mum should be ashamed of you Beth, you’re a liar and not a very good one at that. You could have said “No” to giving him your number or gave him a fake number. Something smells fishy Beth! We asked Addy about this, he said; “she said I spoke to her for 5 minutes or less and then left, she started talking about silly stuff like having to wait for a bus for an hour, I think she wanted me to wait with her, I’m not going to waste my time waiting for some girl I just met, my attention is not free, especially to a stranger, she said I left, then she’s twisting what actually happened, it’s a horrible accusation.”
Mandy continued;” Beth knew this was not just a chat-up. It felt wrong. It was not harmless she said, I spend the night terrified.” For God sake Mandy, at least get someone who can lie better than this. There was no threat (physical, mental or verbal). Myles was sniffing around this girl in his flop-umentary like a frustrated teenager confused of what to do next, but just happy to be around a girl who was semi-attractive. Beth, were you just “terrified” after the wait for the bus and after the bus-ride and after the evening passed (not during) – just during the night?! Beth you were so terrified that you actually texted him back. We asked Addy about this; “this is ridiculous. If I was a threat in any way shape or form, why would I settle for a number and leave after 5 minutes. If someone is a threat they wouldn’t leave, they would stick around especially after what she said she told me, a number wouldn’t be their aim, she’s a complete liar, either that or she’s mentally unstable, either way I dodged a bullet not meeting her.” Ladies and gentlemen, looks like we have another air-head who thinks it’s cool to be a fake #MeToo activist.
Following are links to actual testimonials of women who actually know and have dated Addy, whom he met via “daygame”;
Gender neutral Mandy continued by recruiting another wolf-crying #MeToo fraud called Emily, she stated; “a friend of Ahmed filmed him as he approached 20-year-old Emily. Ahmed uploaded the video to his YouTube channel.” This “friend,” Mandy speaks of was Ahmed’s camera man (Matthew Bertram) and filming on public property is 100% legal. Mandy secretly films people for career advancement, as do her sleazy Scottish media counterparts. Also Ahmed took this video down on 10th January 2019.
Man-woman Mandy continued; “Emily found out their conversation was available online.” No Mandy, Myles Bonnar stalked her on Twitter, met her and showed her the 3 year old video he downloaded (that was not available online). Appleyard continued; “her experience is something I’ve heard from many women who have experienced street harassment.” Mandy is what you heard, that this Emily consensually gave Addy her number also, you saw the video, the evidence is there. We at RPR also have a copy and seen it ourselves. It’s not cool to make accusations of harassment when no such thing took place, you hypocritical fool.
Appleyard continued to quote this idiot; “the ridiculous thing is, that entire conversation I’m sitting there trying to figure out a way to let him down gently, we don’t want to be called b*tch or rude for closing an interaction down.” No Emily, the ridiculous thing is how you gave Addy your number 2 years ago, then are pretending to be a humble snowflake on camera after speaking to a seedy reporter and seeing his prejudicial video towards Addy you “rude b*tch.” And you weren’t “sitting” you were standing. Most people just politely decline or make up an excuse if they want to “let others down gently,” they don’t give their phone number to the guy willingly, you could have given a fake number Emily?! And don’t say “we” Emily, you don’t represent all women, a lot of women like confident men. You’ve been reading too much old school pick-up theory stuff (when people think “negging” is still relevant) haven’t you Emily, so you could go on that “c*nt” saying, wrinkly, puppet faced Victoria Derbyshires’ show with mini-man Myles to lie about what actually happened and try to back it up with some out of date research and buzzwords. Addy had a witness there who seen the whole interaction.
We asked witness Matthew Bertram, “Addy didn’t use or teach tactics, everything he done was spur of the moment and spontaneous, this girl happily gave him her number, they probably could have went for a coffee then and there, but Addy was too busy to pursue it that day, so he settled for a phone number to let her down gently. She was far too keen.”
Mandy continued; “in the video Ahmed boasted if he had met Emily on holiday, he would have definitely had sex with her or as he put it, it would have been a same day lay.” More selective quoting/editing from tiny Bonnar. We asked Addy about this, he said; “this Myles is such a passive aggressive phoney! I think the clown has got a crush on me, he’s spent too much time dedicating his wasted life on me. He said it out of context, anyone who watches the video can see I stated that if I met a girl in this scenario on vacation and if I had time to go on a date, the likelihood would be sexual. This Emily girl was open-minded, friendly and quite keen. The context I said “same day lay” applied to the scenario, not this specific girl! It’s all on video, I didn’t have time to ask her to come for a drink then and there because I was busy. Matt was there, ask him, he saw the full thing, he filmed it.”
Mandy continued to quote Emily; “Emily said- that infuriates me…for him to so painfully misread that is frustrating.” No Emily, it “infuriates you” because you’re on camera receptive of his approach, a witness confirms Addy’s account, whereas you are simply finding this “frustrating” because this reporter has twisted and coerced you into thinking you were conned (you weren’t) or did something wrong (you didn’t).
Appleyard continued to quote Emily; “men assuming women want to have sex with them is part of a considerably larger problem is society. He probably didn’t think much about it, just saying this person’s a same day lay.” Emily, you gave him you number and it was edited out of context by slimy Mandy – your signal was, “have my number for a date,” people have sex on dates Emily. And news flash, women do want to have sex with men and vice versa!
This fabricator”Emily” should be displeased by the outcome of her life, as at 20 she runs to a dirty dishonest BBC reporter to defame an innocent man.. Society in Scotland is going down the toilet you fame-chasing, phoney – radical feminism is not about equality, it discriminates aggressively towards males, quoting airheads like “Emily” talking absolute nonsense.
It seems this wolf-crier thought Ahmed’s behaviour was “OK” in 2017 as she con-sensually gave him her number to contact her. So according to her it’s “not OK” for men and women to speak in Scottish society, this makes no sense and is utter stupidity. Addy has never manipulated women.
Here are further testimonials of women who have had real experiences with Addy and know him well.
Compulsive liar Mandy gave 2 flimsy accounts from 2 shoddy sources, all of whom admit to giving Addy their number. Either these people are extremely stupid or they are lying; they seem very savvy to us at RPR, more than savvy – two faced truth-twisters who know exactly what to do and say to cover-up their faults and change facts about what actually happened, that led to them giving Addy their number! Could it be that a prejudicial video made by creep Myles Bonnar portraying Ahmed as sinister suddenly tricked you into thinking he was. Sounds pretty consistent with this whole media circus crap that happened to Addy since January 2019.
Ahmed’s legal team were targeting a full acquittal because there was no crime to answer to in any of the incidents under UK Law. The prosecutor decided “threatening and abusive behaviour” (another terminology for section 38 – breach of the peace) was the only chance, as the scope is so wide, ie. it covers raising one’s voice outdoors all the way to actually verbally threatening someone, plus a wide array of things in between. Also most of the complainers didn’t even go to the police, the police tracked them down via Twitter comments – this is one of the many points Ahmed’s legal team are using to appeal his wrongful conviction and sentence!
Police Scotland are quoted as saying Ahmed’s behaviour was “predatory and would cause fear and alarm”, after succumbing to media pressure from aggressive online feminists and blood thirsty journalists. Initially when BBC The Social’s video degrading Adnan Ahmed went viral, Police Scotland are quoted as saying “we cannot follow up on this as there is no actual crime to investigate, no crime has been committed.” They were quick to change their tune after BBC The Social’s video gained millions of views and began a witch-hunt amongst the public because of how it was edited and how it portrayed Adnan Ahmed as a demonic sexual caricature, rather than the responsible understanding life coach that he is.
It’s totally bizarre and shockingly worrying that a country’s police force can’t withstand pressure from online trolls and can be manipulated so easily by faceless crazies on the internet. Yes, Scotland is a very small country, but that does not excuse the stupid backward policing tactics used for this matter. There should never have been an arrest in the first place. The police were aware of Ahmed’s dating business 3 years prior to BBC The Social’s hate fuelled video falsely demonising him. They spoke to Mr Ahmed about it on a number of occasions in casual conversation. Both male and female officers approved of it. There are phone calls and written police reports to confirm this.
Adnan Ahmed worked in conjunction with the police, as his job as a Criminal Justice Practitioner made this inevitable. Ahmed’s behaviour was never “predatory”. He ran an online dating business on YouTube for all to see; his clients, video demonstrations and spontaneous conversations with any women were all during the day on well populated busy city centre streets. He wasn’t hiding anything, so how can his actions be described as predatory, shameful or dangerous?
Police Scotland are supposed to investigate matters neutrally and without prejudice. Instead they contributed to the media mayhem by making comments defaming a man who is not guilty of an actual crime, but was charged, indicted and remanded regardless. The police are now trying to fish for a conviction to cover their mistakes and to not face legal action themselves. At the time of writing this, Ahmed has been on remand for the past 6 months, he has been held in custody, untried and without the option of bail since January 2019.
The Sheriff Court indictment was designed in such a way to convict Adnan Ahmed on a technicality of Scottish Law (Moorov/ corroboration) rather than using substantial hard evidence, because there is none. Ahmed is not permitted to present vital evidence that proves his innocence because of Scottish court laws that protect prosecution witnesses, even if they are lying.
The Scottish Sun are scumbags, that make a living from spreading lies, fake news and defaming innocent people – they then pay lawyers to cover their sexist, racist and anti-semitic mistakes online. The hypocrites at The Scottish Sun advocate for “women’s rights” to sell copies of their toilet paper publication. Until recently, the newspaper’s page 3 features young teenage girls with their naked breasts on display on a daily basis. The Scottish Sun is a total sham.
Recently Johnny Depp has filed a defamation case against the Scottish Sun for naming him a “wife beater.” Depp was married to Amber Heard which ended in a divorce with Heard accusing Depp of domestic abuse, which is still to be proven in a court of law.
Johnny Depp and Amber Heard got married in February 2015 after a romantic connection formed while filming 2011’s The Rum Diary. Heard filed for divorce in May 2016 which she originally cited was due to irreconcilable differences as the reason for separation. Their divorce was finalised and Heard received $7 million as part of the settlement deal.
Amber Heard then accused Depp of domestic abuse and this sparked an ugly legal drama. Information has been brought to light which proves Depp’s innocence. Johnny Depp has been falsely accused. His legal team have discovered evidence in the form of video footage which proves that Heard had fabricated the abuse allegations.
Adam Waldman, Depp’s lawyer stated “dozens of video security tapes….eyewitness statements, newly discovered sworn affiidavits and deposition transcripts from 2016, and text messages between The Sun and their #metoo source” were found as well.
He also stated that “Johnny Depp is a victim of violent abuse.”
Additionally, Prince Harry has spoken out and launched at attack on the British press, including The Scottish Sun, accusing them of “bullying” and “relentless propaganda.” Prince Harry released a statement that stated his “deepest fear” was his “wife falling victim to the same powerful forces” that his mother; Princess Diana did.
He said; “Unfortunately, my wife has become one of the latest victims of a British tabloid press that wages campaigns against individuals with no thought to the consequences – a ruthless campaign that has escalated over the past year, throughout her pregnancy and while raising our new born son.”
Prince Harry continued; “There is a human cost to this relentless propaganda, specifically when it is knowingly false and malicious, and though we have continued to put on a brave face – as so many of you can relate to – I cannot begin to describe how painful it has been. Because in today’s digital age, press fabrications are repurposed as truth across the globe. One day’s coverage is no longer tomorrow’s chip paper.”
He added; “My deepest fear is history repeating itself. I’ve seen what happens when someone I love is commoditised to the point that they are no longer treated or seen as a real person. I lost my mother and I will not watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces.”
This has come after Meghan has decided to take legal action against the Mail on Sunday after publication of a letter to her estranged father Thomas Markle.