Maya Oppenheim is the epitome of a toxic, delusional social justice man-hater; whose insecure blind-spots, lack of intelligence and total disregard for the facts show her up as a childish stereotype. She is wearing a mask to gain approval and supremacy over men. Feminism is a mask, a strange one, for it mostly deceives the one who wears it. Some see through its hateful façade, however there are many other vulnerable, impressionable people that don’t. Oppenheim is a calculated manipulator, the worst kind. Some misguided feminists have the human capacity for evil in the name of good and possess the psychological capability of self-deception. Maya is the type that has the human capacity for evil for the sake of evil, she takes joy in destroying others.

Feminazi Maya Oppenheim unfortunately has a bad case of man-face (mainly via her awful haircut and double chin). She looks like an aggressive butch lesbian with penis envy issues. This could be the root of her hatred, but it runs deeper, right to the core of her low self-esteem. Oppenheim’s naivety and toxicity is evident through the articles she writes as well as her tweets. She is an attention-seeker starved of attention. She looks to be in her 40’s and she’s angry about men.

Maya writes for sleazy newspaper “The Independent.” speaking of originality; The Independent recently had to apologise for plagiarism in their crappy newspaper. It just goes to show that the news they print isn’t even factual or from independent (pun intended) research.

Horrible Maya starts her crappy article by stating; “pick-up community criticised for objectifying women as targets instead of equals.” No Maya, its popularity has increased through misandrists like you spreading hate for men, men no longer want to be slaves to your dumb woke SJW narrative!

The best thing for men to do, who don’t like the way things are in regards to women’s attitudes and appearance in the UK, is to leave them to it and go to Russia or the Ukraine. All the women there look like models, an overweight or rude woman is very rare to see. This is not due to female oppression; it’s because culturally, men and women there respect masculinity and femininity in a classic sense and don’t allow sexist “#MeToo” propaganda to poison their society or mutual respect! A trip there would be a eye-opener for British men. The Europeans ridicule British women’s attitudes saying; “they are the least physically attractive and the most aggressively feminist,” the link is obvious! The extreme turn towards political correctness via the #MeToo movement has exacerbated this problem. The voices shouting against oppression have become louder, in precise proportion to how supposedly “equal” (increasingly skewed against men) society has become. There are whole university disciplines forthrightly hostile towards men. There areas of study claim Western culture is an oppressive structure created by white men to dominate and exclude women, when in actuality it’s the other way around.

Modern men are suffering genuine declines in mental health by being philosophically berated by feminazis for their existence as members of the human species. They are labelled as privileged beneficiaries of the patriarchy with their accomplishments considered unearned, as well as being accused of being adherents of rape culture. Male privilege is a myth, are black or Arab males more privileged than white women, are Chinese or Latino males more privileged than white women – NO! It’s the opposite! White privilege always prevails, it has layers, privilege in the West is based more on race than gender. White males are not to blame presently, it’s white women in the West who are pushing the feminist agenda the hardest! These very women acting out such a visible stance against prejudice feel justified and obligated to denounce men in a quest for supremacy disguised as equality.

Lady-boy lookalike Oppenheim stated; “Panorama journalist undercover at Seduction bootcamp..” The BBC flop-umentary she refers to is by creep Myles Bonnar, a low status creep trying to make a name for himself, by literally being a lying snitch. Cowardly racist Myles Bonnar has disappeared into nothingness again after selling himself out for fame (he has no actual skills / talent) by trying to destroy innocent men’s lives because he’s a spineless weasel who women find repulsive.

“Targeting” is another saucy word in Oppenheim’s limited vocabulary that we must define. “Targeting” for what Maya? Conversations on the street in the middle of the day with thousands of people around. If someone was “targeting” people, we imagine they would do so with no witnesses around in a hidden manner.

Hopeless Maya mumbled on; “community centred around manipulative techniques to seduce women. ”  What dating coaches like Addy, Eddie and Richard, etc, taught clumsy social misfits like Myles Bonnar is that they can learn to perceive things differently, to cut through illusions of the mind/ PC society that they believe or fear, to stop seeing imaginary problems and to learn to focus on the reality of male-female dynamics. Too often clients react emotionally, get despondent and lose perspective. Their negative perceptions invade their minds and throw off their emotional compass, resulting in social anxiety. Dating is taught as a science and an art. Human brains evolved for an environment very different from the one we currently inhabit, resulting in people carrying biological baggage (as social justice ideologies clash with basic human instincts). Humans are still primed to detect threats/ dangers that no longer exist, i.e.. stress of rejection or the fight-or-flight response experienced when talking to a female. Addy and Street Attraction taught that men have a choice in how they respond to this situation; to not be led by primal feelings, to understand them and learn how to filer them in order to be attractive to the opposite sex (it’s not trickery, it’s science and art). Maya truly doesn’t get it and this, she just ignorantly displays bitterness towards men whom she perceives as superior to her.

Moronic misandrist man-hating hack Oppenheim describes herself as a “women’s correspondent” which is basically a P.C. dressing up of her real title of “jealous sexist radical feminist brat who fakes oppression to blame all her failings on men because she’s an irresponsible idiot that can’t take responsibility for her tragic, selfish, egoic life decisions which have led her to deluded mediocrity.

Simpleton Maya even describes herself as “specialising in women’s rights,” so how can you write an objective article about a male safe space?! Oppenheim is like a WW2 Nazi writing about Jewish people. The clown reporter then goes into say; “PUA community encouraging sexual violence.” You don’t have any integrity or honour do you Oppenheim – you even imply non-consensual sex, you horrible troll-like creature, it’s disgusting to accuse anyone of non-consensual sex Maya, you should be ashamed of yourself! All of a sudden, the low-life man-hater Oppenheim’s ego inflates and her shaming tactics take on the role of psychological analysis. The more Maya Oppenheim writes the more foolish she reveals herself to be. She is hyper-judgemental, censorious and thinks she always knows what’s wrong about others and what to do about it. This is ignorant, arrogant, shallow and delusional.

This is crazy venomous propaganda, no wonder they label people like Maya feminazi. This is a bitter allegation, accusing someone of being a ‘potential rapist’ is as bad as accusing them of being a murderer. These terms should never be thrown around as a shaming tactic, again you should be ashamed of yourself Maya! Does this type of dirty tactic give her a sense of importance or validity for her fake mission, or is it just nastiness deep in her core; it’s probably all 3.

Maya calling men who want to improve their dating life “potential rapists” is hate filled, exaggerated arm chair philosophising and victim identifying. Men who want to improve their relations with women, even just for casual sex, want women because they find them attractive, they like the feminine. Radical feminists hate men, they proudly label all men the enemy, they justify their existence via this blame and hate. Pity and contempt dispensing social reformer types like Maya Oppenheim, don’t stand for women (especially if they are not feminists), as they claim, instead they just hate masculine men. They disguise their resentment and jealousy with false piety, fake sanctimony and self-righteousness. This is how things work in the social justice dispensing leftist front. What do Maya Oppenheim and her feminist counterparts stand for via their complaining, criticising, shaming and trying to change other’s behaviour?!

What justice means to them is that the world be filled with storms of their revenge. They wreck vengeance and abuse on all whose equals they are not, or so they perceive. They call for equality via virtue; however, they secretly hide from their demons, refusing to face them and become better people because the pain is too sore, instead they choose to be tyrants and shroud themselves in false words of virtue. People who are truly motivated to make things better start with themselves first, then lead by example, they don’t attack others, they aren’t concerned with changing people, they take responsibility.

Toxic feminazis like you see masculinity as a threat to your bratty quest for supremacy and some enlightened men don’t want to be your lap-dogs anymore! So basically, you’re saying PUAs are rapists Maya – that’s really psychologically manipulative and coercive. Again, your man-hating tantrums make you sound like a child, how would you like it if someone called you a rapist Maya?! Maya Oppenheim is basically jumping on a media bandwagon to demonise heterosexual dating coaches just because the scum at the BBC did it; you know what journalists are like – desperate vultures!

Glory-hunting slob Maya continued; “covertly filming women and putting footage online.” Stop whining Maya you alarmist fool. This is no different from how media hypocrites like you and sleazy Myles Bonnar film people without their consent and post / broadcast it. What’s “horrific” is Oppenheim and Bonnar don’t conceal the identities of the people they demonise for personal gain – these coaches at least did protect the identities of the females they interacted with. And Maya how are other’s supposed to learn if there are no video examples?! Ultimately – this is not illegal under UK law. You seem to have more of a problem with the law, rather than an actual valid issue.

Monster Maya spewed; “shared videos of young women he preyed upon online.” If you observed Addy’s videos, clearly there was no “preying” of women. They either stopped to speak to Addy or they walked with him, both of their own free will. This is another predictable gas lighting tactic by the feminist scum-bag, she uses words like “targeting” instead of “approaching” and “preying” instead of “meeting.”

She is referring to YouTube but calls it “online” to be a sneaky rat that stirs up controversy. Ahmed was not charged with this because it is not a crime! Sicko perv Oppenheim does what most creepy leftist hacks do, write “preying” and leave it open for negative, out-of-context, misinterpretation! “Preying” for a conversation and potential date – well, that would mean every one who practices any type of dating (online or otherwise) are “preying” one another – what an absolute classless pathetic reptile you are Maya!

Rancid Maya continued in this fashion stating; “been jailed after leaving young women mentally scarred.” OK Maya you’re doing that thing again where you make idiotic claims that are lies and leave it open to negative misinterpretation. Again “mentally scarred” after having a light chat consisting of passing polite remarks, because that’s all it was, but you conveniently left that out you journalist dirt-bag! Also 3 top judges agreed that Ahmed was innocent and that “he left no one mentally scarred,” as well as proving the 5 moron women making false allegations (of feeling uncomfortable despite giving positive feedback, before BBC Social made a hit-piece) as lying perjurers! Plus Oppenheim took the quote “mentally scarred” from the disgraced judge from Ahmed’s show-trial, the judge was disciplined and ridiculed by superior law chiefs for this corruption in dealing with Ahmed’s case! This is a common press tactic, putting quotes from idiots into inverted commas to name-call the people they write about, isn’t that right Maya you “predator.”

• 2 Year Sentence Is Reversed And His Lawyers Seek Compensation For His Wrongful Imprisonment

• Taken Off The Offenders Register Due To; No Crime Taking Place, Incompetent Brainwashed Judge And Jury, And Press Corruption!

• Whistle-Blower Exposed For Creating Witch-Hunt Because She Sexually Assaulted And Racially Abused Him!

• Judge Who “Hit Out” (At Addy Agame) Is Disciplined, Punished And Rebuked By His Superiors As Addy Wins Appeal To Have Wrongful Conviction Overturned Due To Miscarriage Of Justice Resulting From Media-Puppet Judge’s Conduct

• Fake News Hack Feminist Creep Maya Oppenheim Humiliated And Exposed As Dishonest Liar And Incapable Journalist Moron

• False Accusers Proven To Be Liars And To Be Faking “Mental Scarring” As Nothing Happened But Passing Polite Remarks

Maya Oppenheim is a typical modern-day feminist reporter, jumping on demonising narratives to increase page views for disgraced news outlet The Independent. Oppenheim is an airhead, just go on her Twitter (if you can bear it) and you’ll see her moaning about the usual social justice virtue signalling garbage leftist idiots cry about to score social points. Maya Oppenheim is your usual “woke” socialised idiot that splutters from the usual social justice script, despite scientific evidence proving otherwise! SJW Maya doesn’t care about facts, it’s all about virtue-signalling the latest activism trend for discriminatory morons like her.

The Independent doesn’t report truth or have any originality at all – even the journalists are nameless, faceless cowards! One particular coward Maya Oppenheim wrote articles about Adnan Ahmed’s wrongful conviction / show-trial by the media and the complete miscarriage of justice he experienced (Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful conviction and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020). Maya is most likely a low-life bitter media hack, too spineless to reveal her actual identity, in pathetic fear that Red Pill groups will expose her for the seedy scumbag liar that she is. Men’s rights are human rights; hence why we represent the truth without succumbing to what mainstream media propaganda wants to brain-wash the masses to think.

The obvious problem with leftist SJW reporters and press is that they are trained to be deceitful and to sensationalise the truth by reporting inaccurate falsehoods that allow them to just about get away with telling lies because of how the misinformation is presented to simply imply something false as true. For a sneaky reporter it is a tactic used to be a creepy stalker and to attack others, whilst keeping their filthy laundry private!

The Independent is a newspaper set-up for coward reporters to spam their fake news (whilst pretending it’s by another journalist). Scummy journalists basically just spam the same lies and inaccuracies in as many pages as possible in order to make it look like different people are talking about the same thing. This (they think) gives their stories weight as it tricks the public into believing a story because it looks like it is coming from various sources! Read Ryan Holiday’s book “Trust me, I’m lying” for a full understanding of how the media manipulate the public and destroy reputations without facing any repercussions.

Yep, we have another woke, radical feminist and self-proclaimed man-hater. There seems to be a direct correlation between feminist journalists that write garbage and that are borderline sociopaths. Que bad haircut, even worse dress-sense and below average looks and we have our latest feminist hate-pusher.

Rancid Maya Oppenheim doesn’t have a personality or an original thought in her head. She is the epitome of a constructed fake person attempting to tick certain socially acceptable boxes because she is an approval chasing loser with low self-esteem. She comes across as a child desperately wanting people to like her, which in turn makes people dislike her!

Horrendous Oppenheim writes for scummy virtue signalling fake news rag The Independent. Amongst creepy Maya’s articles about man-hating and petty gossip for The Independent is a sea of radical feminist / man-hating / woke brainwashing drivel! Don’t read The Independent, it’s written by bitter idiots for bitter idiots. It will only serve to ruin balanced feminine women and grounded masculine men. The Independent is propaganda for idiots too stupid and conditioned to see through the disgusting feminist narrative!

EPISODE 1-  ”Mainstream Media Demonisation Of Addy Agame” – https://youtu.be/EUbs7CozXyI

EPISODE 2 – ”The BBC’s Manipulation / Defamation Of Street Attraction” – https://youtu.be/fTxL7T_Kh1w

EPISODE 3 –  ”Infield Videos & False Allegations” – https://youtu.be/ztKtdE33vFU

EPISODE 4 – ”History, Society, Politics & Feminazis” – https://youtu.be/BLJK1TKK5TQ

Adnan Ahmed Acquitted And Cleared Of All False Allegation Of Acting In Threatening Or Abusive Manner (Which Is Basically Just Section 38 Breach Of The Peace) 

The Independent are morons who lie to sensationalise nonsense in order to sell copies of their pathetic newspaper, as well as influence unsuspecting members of the public. These idiots don’t fact check at all, as is evident via their stupid hit-piece article by cowardly “court reporter” Maya Oppenheim on October 23rd, 2019 regarding Addy Agame.

Turns out Addy was right all along as all false allegations were dropped, all charges were reversed, and all wrongful convictions were overturned. Looks like the scummy Independent got it totally wrong as usual! The fake news slime-balls even called Addy a “pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help – not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.” Addy’s innocence was so clear cut that despite the underhanded tactics the sleazy Scottish press employed, he was found not guilty and defeated them!

Spineless creep journo Maya Oppenheim has a slimy bitter bratty writing manner that reflects her poncey geek appearance. Sleazy reporter Maya Oppenheim lacked the back-bone to make her wasted education count for anything and ended up writing for fake news rag, The Independent. Creepy sleaze Maya Oppenheim is a charmless bore, this is evident via her lame tweets about monotonous drivel. Feminist perv losers like Oppenheim will forever be mad at alpha males who go out and win in life!

Maya is unattractive, overweight, has below average looks and a horrible personality. This horrible evil deviant mutant specialises in fraud journalism. Clown bum Maya Oppenheim is a professional seedy stalker, whose job entails hounding people and desperately begging for stories for minimum wage. Vulture Maya Oppenheim invents entire scenarios, casts of characters and reams of dialogue in his Independent article about wrongfully convicted dating coach Addy Agame.

Shady Maya Oppenheim makes a measly living out of corrupting an already self-indulgent / predominately white leftist media field that fakes diversity and equality. In reality she is just an idiot low-IQ slime-bag that writes for garbage tabloids like the Independent!

Dog-hack Maya Oppenheim is at again. The overweight, try-hard, bitter joke of a reporter wrote a crappy article in October 2019 celebrating Ahmed’s wrongful conviction / imprisonment – which has now been completely reversed and quashed! Maya Oppenheim’s track record of corny and disgusting articles that she spews out as some sort of alarmist warped trash is evident from her past work. Sickening clown Maya doesn’t care about helping people, the chubby journo only cares about pushing fake news down the throats of anyone unfortunate enough to come across her crazed ramblings. Oppenheim gives off the air of a deranged person with “woke” perspectives gathered from confused social media posts and from the sinister shallow masks of her gaping insecurities / inferiority complex.

Fraudster Maya mentions Addy Agame in order to dirty his name further by associating him with issues that have nothing to do with him and that are not even issues in the first place. This is a disgusting abuse of journalistic responsibility, ridiculously predatory reporting and sham news – well we expect nothing less from Maya to make up a pointless story just to try to hurt someone’s reputation, at least Ahmed punished slimy Oppenheim by winning his appeal to prove his innocence and exposed Maya’s pathetic poisonous tactics!

Ahmed’s wrongful conviction being quashed basically proves Maya wrong and Addy right – the cry baby doesn’t seem to be handling it too well. The Independent pathetically tried to demonise Ahmed by saying “filmed himself trying to chat-up women….posted on YouTube,” he didn’t “film himself,” plus it’s not illegal to do so, it’s a common press tactic.

Sleazy scumbag Maya Oppenheim stated; “Ahmed found guilty of acting in threatening and abusive manner by jury after 8-day trial.” In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, complete madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict was appealed and overturned in September 2020 as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintained his innocence, all 18 of the fake charges were dropped due to all allegations being false! Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct – that is the official legal outcome of this bizarre Daily Star witch-hunt! Addy won; the media, the trolls and his false accusers were defeated by him!

The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, the initial Sheriff court case was not justice, it was a farce! It was the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation in order to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the kangaroo-court show-trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation, which he is in the process of doing!

The toilet paper news outlet made up fake charges of “preying and targeting.” Typical tabloid press style trash. Ahmed faced no charges of “preying or targeting” anyone, he was wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace. He won his appeal to overturn all false allegations and will sue the hounds at The Independent for targeting him with their lies and filth!

These creeps have the cheek to accuse Addy Agame (an innocent man, proven not guilty and totally vindicated in the highest court in the country) of “preying and targeting” – really! This is an absolute lie, Addy was not found guilty of “preying or targeting” anyone, there were no charges of “preying or targeting” even lodged against him.

How does it feel to the scumbags at The Independent to know they were disgustingly wrong and that Ahmed fought them all they way and embarrassed them by winning; maybe that’s why they’re so desperate to still demonise him, well cry a river you reptiles because you were well and truly defeated!

Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden, a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.

Following are links to Addy’s actual statement to the press in January 2019 and the actual details of his appeal victory.

BBC Social Reporter Myles Bonnar Set Up Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/bbc-social-reporter-myles-bonnar-set-up-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame/

Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To –http://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/

Bitter bum Maya continued; “he approached 5 girls between 2016 and 2018.” Well turns out they were lying because Ahmed was acquitted of all charges due to no crime to answer to, he should have them imprisoned for perjury!

The Independent are just butt-hurt because Ahmed proved them wrong, exposed them as liars and is now suing them! The Independent are scumbags, that make a living from spreading lies, fake news and defaming innocent people.

1. Chloe From Lenzie Discuses Her Rendezvous With Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/chloe-from-lenzie-discuses-her-rendezvous-with-addy-agame/
2. Tia From Glasgow Talks About Dating Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/tia-from-glasgow-talks-about-dating-addy-agame/
3. Aisha From Saudi Arabia Describes Her Holiday Romance With Adnan Ahmed (aka Addy Agame) –http://redpillrights.com/aisha-from-saudi-arabia-describes-her-holiday-romance-with-adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame/
4. Jill From Sheffield Gives Honest Feedback On Her Positive Experience With Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/jill-from-sheffield-gives-honest-feedback-on-her-positive-experience-with-addy-agame/
5. Christine From China Discusses Meeting And Dating Addy Agame Truthfully-http://redpillrights.com/christine-from-china-discusses-meeting-and-dating-addy-agame-truthfully/
6. Canadian Karen Describes Her “Lovely” Chance Meeting With Addy Agame In Uddingston –http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/
7. Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Football Referee In Australia With His Dating Life –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-football-referee-in-australia-with-his-dating-life/
8. Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Personal Trainer In London With His Dating Life –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-personal-trainer-in-london-with-his-dating-life/
9. Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Joiner In Edinburgh –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-joiner-in-edinburgh/
10. Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps IT Specialist In London –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-it-specialist-in-london/
11. Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Video Editor In Spain –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-video-editor-in-spain/
12. Glasgow Dating Coach Addy Agame Helps Marketing Expert In Glasgow –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-marketing-expert-in-glasgow/

Scummy toerag Maya Oppenheim continued; “the court heard Ahmed approached 2 schoolgirls. They were aged 16 and 17 at the time.” The “schoolgirls” are above the legal age of consent in the UK, 17 and 16. The alleged conversations are said by the two witnesses to have took place around 10am approximately, school had already started. The witnesses stated, “they were in there last year (6th year) of high school in 2016,” to the court. This is several months before a college or university course would begin should students at the late stage of high school wish to continue further education. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)

Maya continued; “he asked the older one if she wanted to meet her for coffee.” Dirtybag Maya outright lied stating; “asked if she was at school, if she was married.” Again 17 is above legal age of consent in the UK and this allegation has not been proven. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)

What the reporter conveniently left out was that the witness also said, “it was around 10am, not the usual time people go to school and the lane is attached to two main roads on either side, along with two small open grass fields at either side.” The witness also said that, “this is the common route to the train station that most people coming from that direction would take.” The Independent left out the fact that before this quote the witness told the jury, “he introduced himself then I told him I was at school, he made general conversation, we spoke for under three minutes and parted ways.” This is vital information!

In regard to the second witness The Independent left out that the incident is said by the witness to have taken place again around 10am after school had already began an hour previously, in the same lane attached to two main roads that is the main route to the train station which commuters take. Both these witnesses admit to being linked and both stated that they are good friends. What Maya again conveniently left out was that the witness told the court; “the school is right next to the train station and that the pair parted ways in under 3 minutes in different directions towards their separate destinations!” Mr Ahmed’s defence team lodged an eyewitness in his defence who can confirm there was no “intimidation” involved. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)

Oppenheim also conveniently left out the testimony Adnan Ahmed gave to the court himself, Addy gave a real honest account of events stating; “it was around 10am, we were both walking on the main route to the train station, it is not a secluded lane, it’s a open main route to the train, I was walking in front of her, waved and signalled for her to take her headphones out, then said – hey you look pretty enough to go for coffee with, that is if your boyfriend is cool with it. She smiled and said, I don’t have a boyfriend. I then said I’m catching a train to the city centre. I thought she was doing the same as she wasn’t wearing a school uniform and it was outside school hours, I assumed she was 19 or 20. She then said – I’m going to school; which shocked me, I immediately asked how old are you? She said 17, I then said – hope you’re enjoying school and shook her hand to say bye, her ring struck my hand when we shook hands, I said – you hit me with your wedding ring as a parting joke, I did not ask her about her being married! The conversation lasted under a minute, I did not ask her for her number or to go for a coffee. I saw her many times around that area for 3 years and we never spoke again, she also confirmed this to the police.” (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)

Click the following link to read about a testimonial by a female who dated Addy, who met him in the same area around the same time further proving his innocence –http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/

Regarding the second incident, Addy told the court; “it was around the same time and place, again 10 am, on my way to the city, no school uniform, soon as she said she was 16 I left, this girl confirmed to the court I didn’t ask for a number, she confirmed I didn’t ask her out, it was less than a minute of chat. She also said in court she saw me many times after that in the area and we never spoke again. These incidents are said to have happened in 2016 and no one came forward then. only in 2019 after how I was portrayed in the social media hate campaign (referring to BBC Social hate video against him) there was a sudden change in perspective by these girls to say passing comments were a crime that caused them discomfort. I could have asked someone for the time, after the January 2019 media uproar, they would have reported it. They both know each other well and colluded on social media. They are not being truthful! There was nothing sinister or rehearsed or pre-planned as is being suggested, it was spontaneous and quick.” (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurers)

What Maya left out is Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong also said of these incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In our civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual, and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. This is the main route to the train station in Uddingston, not a secluded lane, it has fields of grass either side and the school happens to be right next to the train station. All sides have said it was during the day outside school hours. For talking sake, even if both these ladies had gone on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!” (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)

The creeps at The Independent grasped at straws by quoting the disgraced and rebuked judge, they stated, “Sheriff Lindsay Wood sent Ahmed to prison for 2 years and put him on the sex offenders register for 10 years… found there was a significant sexual aspect to the offences” Well merely months later Ahmed appealed this corrupt judge’s wrong decision and reversed the wrongful verdict, proving his innocence fully, Ahmed was removed from the register because he committed no sexual offences or crimes at all!

The moron Sheriff was wrong and is now viewed as a complete embarrassment to his profession as there was “no sexual aspect whatsoever,” look it up in the Scottish Law books, Lindsay Wood gets a grilling and is completely put in his place as being a dunce of a judge by his legal superiors!

So there were no offences as no convictions exist, no crime took place – are The Independent dumb or are they gas-lighting and defaming an innocent man?! One thing’s for sure, they are fake news dirt-bags making false accusations because Ahmed was proven innocent in a court of law and ”all 5 women” were proven to be lying perjurers, so no ”offences” took place apart from by the women who lied under oath!

Reasons For Appeal;

• The trial judge caused a miscarriage of justice via his bias and discriminatory misconduct, especially when he elected to cross examine the accused at the end of the defence’s case
• The judge erred in repelling the ‘no case (crime) to answer submissions‘ made under Scottish law for all the charges the accused was wrongfully convicted of, causing a miscarriage of justice
• It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial based on the manner the police sought out complainers
• It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial because the Scottish press influenced the jury / public negatively both before and during the trial, causing a miscarriage of justice
• It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial because the social worker initially allocated, and the trial judge were influenced by press propaganda during the trial causing a miscarriage of justice
• The social workers report was prejudicial and relied on opinion from the press rather than impartiality from a professional standpoint
• There was NO sexual element / aggravation / motivation – the accused was running a dating business for a monetary purpose not for sexual gratification
• There was NO actual sexual offense committed and NO actual sexual convictions, hence notification requirements were the wrong outcome, causing a miscarriage of justice

Scotland is in an extremely regressive, backwards, violent and ugly era of criminal justice. Legal precedents and crazy laws are being made up on the spot without political clearance. How can a sheriff / judge justify wrongfully convicting a man of something that is not a crime by simply labelling it ‘breach of the peace’ or ‘threatening / abusive behaviour?’ Even so, none of the convictions were sexual offences, putting a person on the sex offenders register for 10 years despite that person not even being convicted of a sexual offence is a disgrace! Simply stating there may have been that motivation is a farcical miscarriage of justice and total lunacy – Sheriff Lindsay Wood was playing up to the press in order to be quoted so he could gain accolade and praise. He himself should face legal action for using a court of law in such a manner. Wood is a man who enabled the media’s prejudicial imperative by default in his legislative actions, judgement and ruling, reflexively and emotionally driven, without genuine judicial insight. Simply put the man is an incompetent imbecile.

If someone hasn’t committed any sexual offences at all, no register should be required. Ahmed’s wrongful conviction was “section 38 breach of the peace.” There was no sexual element, it was chatting! A Sheriff should not be influenced by other cases or the media, they have a duty to be impartial and to do the right thing by the law! The law should always overrule the media; however, it seems to be the opposite way around in Scotland. This insanity occurring meant any man chatting up any woman in Scotland (whether it be during the day or in a nightclub) will be at risk of being put on the sex offenders register, even if no sexual offence has occurred! Luckily Ahmed’s victory ensured that chatting up women in Scotland is now 100% legal!

3 of the highest judges in Scotland agreed with Ahmed and stated the evidence did not indicate Ahmed did anything wrong! Ahmed was totally correct, he also never called himself a “victim.” despite the sleazy media trying oh so hard to stop him; he beat the fake charges and the fake news media in one swift motion – wow, what a man!

The rancid hack continued to quote the now disgraced clown Sheriff, stating; “schoolgirls were shamefully targeted by you in a quiet lane and 3 other women were considerably younger than you, the Sheriff told Ahmed.” All of which is a lie! The reality is this Sheriff has a history of kissing up to the scummy Scottish media’s butt-cheeks and saw this as an opportunity to do so again, but he was caught out by 3 higher ranked judges and punished for it – every thing he stated was reversed. There was no one that was “shamefully targeted,” there was no “quiet lane” and even if 3 other women were “considerably younger” than Ahmed, that is not a crime. Just because Sheriff Wood is attracted to over-the-hill grandmas doesn’t mean every other man should be. You don’t see George Clooney or Leonardo DiCaprio or Drake standing trial for being attracted to young, hot models – the fact is this Sheriff was a male-feminist idiot trying to enforce dumb social justice nonsense as actual law! He was rightly caught out and exposed for it by his superiors and now his actual job is in question because no one in the Scottish legal system respects his decisions or authority! 3 of the highest judges in Scotland agreed that Addy Agame is innocent.

Creepy Maya Oppenheim continued to quote the amateur judge; “he added: why on earth would you consider it appropriate to touch a complete stranger on the cheek and try to kiss them. The public will be wise to such behaviour towards women by you and others like you.” Yeah, wrong again idiot. This didn’t happen – the prosecutor, the defence, the jury and even you laughed at this lying false accuser in court when she gave evidence because of how outlandishly far-fetched it was! There are 4 contradictory accounts on record that prove this false accuser lied, Ahmed had an eye witness that said she lied, Addy himself said she lied – it didn’t happen!

And the public are not wise to anything but the facts, which are “Adnan Ahmed was totally acquitted, found innocent and given a not guilty verdict by 3 intelligent highly ranked judges because there was no crime to answer to and this idiot Sheriff who ran the trial caused a complete miscarriage of justice due to his SJW views and insane conduct.”

Here are some more legal facts that brilliant senior judge Lord Turnbull stated; “there was nothing in the appellant’s behaviour as spoken by complainers which was overly threatening or which could be construed as threatening. There was nothing in the appellant’s conduct spoken by complainers which constituted threatening behaviour, witness described a compliment. Accordingly, the Sheriff erred in failing to give affect to no case to answer submissions presented on the appellants behalf in respect to these charges also. The exercise the Sheriff was engaged in had already lacked any element of clarification, the Sheriff appeared to be in the process of arguing with the appellant. Since the appeal against conviction is upheld on both grounds in all charges, the appeal against sentence flies off.”

Seedy feminist Maya Oppenheim continued to quote her simp daddy Sheriff; “he praised victims for giving evidence, adding; the mental scarring won’t leave in a hurry….they will be fortified that by giving evidence you will be held to account.” Firstly there were no victims because there was no crime, they were proven to be liars and Ahmed was found not guilty. Secondly, the lack of mental intellect of the Sheriff’s statement will not leave – ever, because no one was “mentally scarred” by a passing conversation / remarks, as all false accusers were proven to be lying perjurers because Ahmed was acquitted and found innocent in the high court! Thirdly, the false accusing witches were “fortified” as full-blown lying, racist, #MeToo, Karen, white women that made false allegations whilst giving evidence against a brown man because of his skin colour and to get pathetic attention via a media induced scandal!

Lastly, if you mean Adnan Ahmed would emerge victorious and defeat everyone involved in his attempted demise by “held to account” then ok, but the ironic fact is Sheriff Wood was the one “held to account” by higher legal authorities for being a useless judge that is unable to do his job or serve justice via the actual law! Addy won, you lost, hope your idiotic press rant was worth your career being ended pal!

Maya Oppenheim went onto quote the disgraced media-influenced rebuked judge, stating: “Sheriff Wood said Ahmed had a lack of remorse.” Well, that’s because Ahmed did nothing wrong and proved it in a high court in front of 3 real judges, not a donkey Sheriff who was trying to be a hero for the slimy Scottish press in a kangaroo-court show-trial! Maya continued; “he told him: you gave evidence and said the victims were lying or mistaken; but the jury thought otherwise. It was obvious when they gave evidence how they were affected.” Eh, no! Firstly – there were no “victims” as no crime was committed (that’s official now in the Scottish law books and legal records). Secondly, Ahmed “gave evidence” the accusers were “lying or mistaken” and was proven to be telling the truth in the high court (another L for you Sheriff Wood). Thirdly, the jury could think what they want – Ahmed got a “not guilty” verdict for all charges in the high court (plus the jury were not impartial as they were brain-washed by the scumbags in the Scottish media). Lastly, it wasn’t “obvious how they were affected” as this was a witch-hunt created by the media, there was no crime in the first place – what’s next the media will hype eating vegetables as misogynistic and a trial will be held hosting a bunch of idiots saying a man eating a carrot made them feel uncomfortable?! Get a grip on reality!

The idiots at The Independent continued to quote the shamed Sheriff trying to gain clout by co-signing social justice nonsense, they stated (quoting the shamed Sheriff); “you have acquired notoriety and an unenviable reputation, the public will be wise to such inappropriate behaviour by you and others like you.” Turns out you were wrong again Sheriff. Ahmed’s reputation is that he was acquitted, vindicated, found not guilty, proved his innocence and was right all along – while Sheriff Wood is now a laughing stock in Scottish Legal circles, here is what his superiors had to say about his “unenviable reputation” –

The shamed sheriff was criticised by 3 high court judges for conducting a “cross-examination” of a defendant and telling his representative to “sit down”.

Counsel for the appellant, Claire Mitchell QC, said that Sheriff Lindsay Wood’s questions “would have led the independent observer to reach the view that the sheriff had formed an adverse view of his credibility”.

The judges said the evidence did not indicate that Mr Ahmed was guilty of threatening behaviour.

Lord Turnbull wrote: “It does not seem to us that a polite conversational request or compliment can be construed as threatening merely because it is uninvited or unwelcome.”

Sheriff Wood was also criticised by the judges for his “cross-examination”.

Lord Turnbull wrote: “The trial sheriff engaged in an exercise which could only be described as cross-examination.

“The informed and impartial observer would readily have concluded that the sheriff had formed an adverse view on the credibility of the appellant’s evidence.

“The result was a miscarriage of justice and the appeal against conviction on each charge must be upheld on this ground.”

The judges also found that Sheriff Wood’s behaviour in telling advocate Donna Armstrong to sit down was “unacceptable”.

Lord Turnbull wrote: “In the present case counsel was correct to object to the sheriff’s questioning when she did.

“It is unacceptable for a judicial office holder to address a responsible practitioner by telling her to sit down.

“Such behaviour carries the risk of demeaning the standing of the judiciary in the eyes of both the legal profession and of the public.”

And yes Addy has gained positive notoriety in men’s rights political circles in which he is working and helping other men in similar circumstances who have been wronged by biased criminal and family courts. Ahmed is speaking at many public men’s rights events as well as suing the state and media for compensation. Turns out his behaviour wasn’t “inappropriate” and that is now official under Scottish law!

Sleazy Maya sensationalised more stating; “convicted of approaching several women,” no Oppenheim it was 5 liars who were proven to be perjurers, Ahmed was proven innocent – get that through your hollow head you idiot hack moron!

Corny liars at The Independent selectively falsified more stating; “court heard woman aged 21, Ahmed approached in street made comments about appearance, touched her cheek and tried to kiss her, leading to her pushing him away.” The woman was also asked why it took her 3 years to report it (in 2019) she told the court she didn’t feel there was a crime. The woman also told the court she had anxiety and mental health issues. She also said, “I looked a lot better 3 years ago, I was thinner, I didn’t have tattoos on my face,” the court heard. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)

This is inaccurate as the woman told the court it was over an hour later, she actually said after the initial approach in Buchanan Galleries she went shopping in various stores, called her grandmother for 45 minutes and headed to Argos in Stockwell street in Glasgow a further 35 minutes later approximately. The reporter then biasedly stated; “he tried to pull me close to him so he could kiss me, so I pushed him away.” The Independent  left out that it was pointed out to jurors that this recollection of events contradicted her police statement, in which she did not say she was “pulled close to him.”  The witness responded by saying the police lied. The witness told the court “I did not make physical contact with the man when I pushed him,” however in her police report she said she did, this was also pointed out to the jury by Ahmed’s lawyer. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)

The court heard, in her police statement she said the man “touched her face and tried to kiss her,” when the woman was cross examined about this contradiction in court, she said she didn’t say so at first as she didn’t want to interrupt the questioning (despite being asked numerous times) then suddenly claimed both “the pull and face touch” took place. When the contradictory police statement and court statement was pointed out to the woman in front of the jurors, she sat down from a standing position in the witness box! The Independent left out that the woman also said she was messaged by the man on social media, she told jurors this happened despite her giving a fake name to the man which was not linked to any of her social media accounts as she said she did not tell him any details of mutual friends. She also told the court the man wrote his details on a receipt during the initial meeting but was still able to contact her despite not having any of her contact details and not even knowing her name! The Independent  continued; “she walked away from him and stood with strangers to be somewhere safe.” The reporter failed to report that these alleged witnesses were not presented in court and that when the woman was asked if anyone saw this, she said no despite people being around her. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)

Adnan Ahmed’s excellent lawyer Donna Armstrong described this witness to the court as “she is unreliable, on record she changed her story 3 times, you can’t trust the testimony she has given.” Ahmed also took the stand to testify regarding this “unreliable” witness, Ahmed stated, “she’s lying, we met briefly on Buchanan Street, then 2 hours later on Stockwell street. I was with my friend David, he’s an eyewitness. I did not try to kiss her; she gave me her number and Snapchat. She changed her story over and over. In court she said I touched her back and not face, in her police statement she said I touched her face with no mention of touching her back. In court she said she didn’t push me physically, in her police statement she said she did.” The “unreliable” woman also said she came forward in 2019 because of the BBC Social video.”

The scum at The Independent continued – “approached 2 other women, all offences between 2016 and 2019.” There were no offences as no convictions exist, no crime took place – are The Independent dumb or are they gas-lighting and defaming an innocent man?! One thing’s for sure, they are fake news dirt-bags making false accusations because Ahmed was proven innocent in a court of law and the ”2 other women” were proven to be lying perjurers, so no ”offences” took place apart from by the women who lied under oath!

Pathetic geek desperado Maya continued; ”Ahmed disputed his actions were unlawful…accused victims of misconstruing him. His lawyer told the court he had not intended to cause fear or alarm.” Ahmed and his lawyer were 100% correct, 3 of the highest judges in Scotland agreed and acquitted Ahmed accordingly, clearing him of all false accusations from the phony ambulance / attention/ fame chasing fake victims!

Sordid perv Oppenheim continued with the sham sensationalism by further quoting the ridiculed and corrected Sheriff, stating; “the courts will always try to keep abreast of developing criminal trends which cause public concern and outrage and will take steps to tackle these.'” No Sheriff, your roundabout way to disguise your clout-chasing to appease a corrupt Scottish press who manufactured a scandal out of nothing about a dating coach (because he debunked feminist dating tactics as a farce) was exposed – there was no “criminal trend” except your irresponsible behaviour as a law official, hope it was worth destroying your reputation and career over.  And shut up you idiot journo, there was no “outrage” and there were no “crimes” – Ahmed was found “not guilty” by 3 judges on the basis that his unfortunate circumstances were a “miscarriage of justice” and the incidents were legally labelled “no crime to answer to.”

Check out the following links to the failed protest (under 10 people) constructed by feminist morons who work for BBC The Social (who caused this miscarriage of lies), as well as Addy’s response to proving his innocent;

Mentally Ill Feminist Mandy Jones Staged Failed Rally Against Red Pill Dating Coach Addy Agame – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjxiLbXQ8SA

EPISODE 5 – ”Addy Agame Proven Innocent And Acquitted Of All Charges” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpdrQYa8u7A

The wretched lying reporter stated; “Ahmed had been previously jailed 7 times.” This is a total lie, check the prison records, Ahmed had only previously been imprisoned twice. Is this how amateur these clowns are that they make stupid idiotic mistakes due to a lack of fact-checking or are they just fake news liars that make-up falsehoods – it’s actually both!

The dumb numb skull continued; “the court heard Ahmed had previous convictions for drink-driving and a firearms charge.” Adnan’s previous record is bad. However, he plead guilty to those offences straight away because he was guilty of those crimes. But he was not guilty of the false allegations related to his legitimate dating business, hence why he took this farce all the way to a trial maintaining his innocence, then to the appeal court and proved his innocence! Adnan has not committed any offences since 2013, had never been on trial before, had worked with the police and had never been placed on a fully committed remand or been indicted in the past.

Although his previous is bad, it does not include anything sexual ever!  The alcohol offences he had in his past he has fully rehabilitated from and is willing to be tested at random to prove this. The firearm offences were a taser that was not functional and a fake replica pistol (which could not harm anyone). For all his offences together he received a total of 35 months custodial sentence.

Adnan worked as a criminal justice practitioner for Turning Point until the time of his remand. He was also moving away from the dating field and taking DWLF in a new direction focusing on human rights / men’s rights. His job was supporting ex-cons and drug addicts to reform and integrate them into society. He planned to expand his company into representing men who had been wrongfully accused of crimes they hadn’t committed. He had no idea that he would be in a very similar situation.

Adnan was planning to study criminology in his 4^thyear at University. In his 1^styear he gained an HNC in Social Services (at the City of Glasgow College). In his 2^ndyear he gained an HND in Additional Support Needs (at Glasgow Clyde College). At the time of his arrest he was half-way through his 3^rdyear doing a BA in Learning Difficulties /Disabilities (between Fife College and Abertay University). His 4^thyear would have been a BA (Hons) in Criminology (at Abertay University in Dundee). His place on the course was terminated as was his employment because of the media scandal. Adnan also has a previous BA in Business Studies (From Glasgow Caledonian University).

Horrid Maya Oppenheim continued; “police began an investigation after his behaviour was revealed by BBC The Social.” Nothing was revealed except that the BBC are corrupt liars getting sued for defamation by Ahmed after he proved his innocence and proved them to be lying scumbags!

You idiots should at least learn to lie convincingly if that’s how you’re going to report! The BBC flop-umentary they refer to is by creep Myles Bonnar, a low status creep trying to make a name for himself, by literally being a lying snitch. Cowardly racist Myles Bonnar has disappeared into nothingness again after selling himself out for fame (he has no actual skills / talent) by trying to destroy innocent men’s lives because he’s a spineless weasel who women find repulsive.

BBC The Social hounded the Glasgow dating coach for months, he reached out to them and responded with a detailed explanation of his business model and background to his client base as well as the scientific reasoning behind this method of face-to-face daytime speed dating, which was in large ignored. Instead, they used choice sentences to turn up the controversy in order to create a story and demonise an innocent man. The police didn’t act because of online videos, they were aware of them for years, they crumbled because of media pressure because Police Scotland is a Mickey Mouse force of hick villagers.

In all reality it was media rats like The Idependent that lost the public and taxpayers £100,000 plus in costs because they caused the fake hype around Addy Agame’s “no crime to answer” case. A corrupt judge fell for it, as well as some less than intelligent police officers. However when Adnan Ahmed took his case to the highest court in Scotland – 3 of the top judges in the country saw it for the “trial by media” rubbish it was and quashed all the false convictions!

It’s totally bizarre and shockingly worrying that a country’s police force can’t withstand pressure from online trolls and can be manipulated so easily by faceless crazies on the internet. Yes, Scotland is a very small country, but that does not excuse the stupid backward policing tactics used for this matter. There should never have been an arrest in the first place. The police were aware of Ahmed’s dating business 3 years prior to BBC The Social’s hate fuelled video falsely demonising him. They spoke to Mr Ahmed about it on a number of occasions in casual conversation. Both male and female officers approved of it. There are phone calls and written police reports to confirm this.

Police Scotland are supposed to investigate matters neutrally and without prejudice. Instead they contributed to the media mayhem by making comments defaming a man who is ”not guilty” of an actual crime, but was charged, indicted and remanded regardless. The police tried to fish for a conviction to cover their mistakes and to not face legal action themselves.

Dirty creepy predator Maya Oppenheim is a scummy liar that attempts to make a pathetic living off demonising masculine men because Maya is a spineless feminist misandrist! Seedy sleaze-ball Oppenheim calls Addy “predatory” in her trash article on 23rd Oct 2019 for embarrassing joke newspaper The Independent ! Ahmed is not predatory – that is a proven fact under Scottish law as Addy was acquitted, cleared and proven innocent of all false allegations in the high court! What is predatory is writing shameless virtue-signalling crap in a male-feminist fashion to trick women into thinking you are an ally, when in reality you are trying to friend-zone your way into sleeping with them – sound familiar Maya?! Also making up fake sexually suggestive accusations of “targeting women” should be a sexual offence and any journo hack doing so should be labelled a life-long sex offender – do you agree Maya Oppenheim?!

The clowns at The Independent stated; “YouTube deactivates channels after investigation.” YouTube removed videos because of pressure from the BBC, in order to avoid bad publicity, not because these videos violated any YouTube rules on nudity or sexual conduct. Thousands of these channels still exist and the dating businesses are still functioning. Ahmed’s DWLF channel had been down since January 2019 through his own direction, not because it was deleted. None of Addy Agame’s videos violated any YouTube policies!

Hungry for acceptance Maya continued; “Ahmed provided advice on last-minute resistance.” We have a quote from Addy regarding his video about LMR on YouTube, He said “we do not condone rape, never force yourself on anyone, hold yourself in high regard and allow space for women to come to you. If she leaves so be it, no means no, move onto someone who’s into you, don’t waste your time on time wasters.” The video shows Addy saying, “we do not condone rape culture or forcing anyone sexually or otherwise.” Addy actually refers to “last minute resistance” as “making women comfortable and creating the right mood for adult relations because too many guys either don’t know what to do or are too thirsty to get laid and forget to have fun.”

The reason Maya Oppenheim uses such ridiculous comparisons (dating coaches and encouraging sexual violence) is to contrast something normal unfavourably with something truly vulgar, using that unbridgeable gap as false evidence for the injustice she’s attempting to show, in order to undermine her target. This is not an isolated incident, all feminazis adopt this method; thus we must rediscover the values of our culture-veiled by feminist ignorance, hidden by a feminist supremacy motive of demonising the past – rescue those values and integrate them into our own lives as Addy Ahmed taught. Maya Oppenheim needs to consult her resentment, pathological deceit and arrogance. Her resentment means two things, she’s immature (she should shut up, quit whining and get on with it) and that there’s feminist tyranny afoot. Men and non-feminist women have a moral obligation to speak , the consequence of remaining silent is worse. Silence is a lie and tyranny feeds on lies! Feminism is poisonous, it aims for revenge with the wish to destroy.

The philosophical saying that what one criticises others for one sees in themselves, is distinctly true in Maya Oppenheim’s case. She takes pleasure in being a victim and in well-practised martyrdom, living by the gratifying myth that she deserves better, even if the truth of the situation be damned. Maybe she doesn’t like her partner, maybe she never really liked men as a whole, maybe she’s taking revenge on her father, or mother, or society?! She should consider the faults of her own spirit before she dares to accuse others, and before she attempts to repair society. Maybe it’s not men that are at fault Maya, maybe it’s you – maybe you’ve fallen short of the mark. Oppenheim is full of BS and her demeanour should make us all (men and women) hate the separatist demonic hate-regime of modern-day feminism.

Maya Oppenheim follows blind impulse and short-term gain. She’s narrow and selfish. She lies to get her way. She takes nothing valid into account. She is limited because of all the skeletons in her closet. She avoids responsibility. She’s cowardly, shallow and wrong. She has the character of a demon, she merely transfers the curse on her head to others (men). This is the same for every feminazi in a nutshell! There is no faith, courage or sacrifice in modern feminism. There is no careful observations that presuppositions matter, they either don’t or don’t want to understand that having meaning in your life is better than having what you want by any means necessary. They don’t even know what they want, nor what they truly need!

Feminism today is antisocial, anti-human, jealous, desirous of failure, resentful and destructive. No one on the side of humanity or aiming at moving upwards should ally him or herself with such a thing. Oppenheim knows nothing real about herself. She knows nothing about individuals. She knows nothing real about the world. She is a movie played out of focus. And she desperately waits for stories about her left-wing social justice feminist ideology to make it all make sense. She hides behind ideas that are not her own, she hides behind clichés and falsehood.

Men don’t know how to behave around women in Western countries Maya, elsewhere in the world, they know! This isn’t because of the “#MeToo movement,” it’s because of radical feminist conditioning in the West over the past couple of decades. Feminism has invisible rules that are designed to confuse men in order to cultivate power, this makes men act “inappropriately” because beta males in the West are given mixed messages in the media on how to act with women which go against natural male instincts and against male traits, healthy females actually find attractive.

The #MeToo movement has also given crazy females a route to revenge by fake accusations. This is further fuelled by feminist members of the police force and law societies, especially in Scotland. There isn’t even a need for concrete evidence, if a accusation like this is made a man will be remanded in prison for up to 2 years, then stand trial. His fate depends in whether his lawyer or the prosecutor do a good enough job of convincing a jury that is already brain-washed by feminazi conditioning, which is considered normal narrative these days. The falsely accused man faces an uphill battle, he doesn’t stand a chance! There are many men who are guilty of historic crimes and there are many men who are not. However her word against his, along with a lack of evidence, gives liars a lane to do what they want and abuse the Scottish legal system at will. Plus £20,000 in compensation is enough incentive for any corrupt soul to tell lies of being a victim (which is cool thanks to #MeToo) which brings an abundance of much wanted attention also!

Before that comes the arrogance and sense of superiority (via feminism) that inevitably accompanies the production of lies. This is one of the greatest dangers; apparently everyone is fooled, so everyone is considered stupid by the accuser. When they feel everyone is stupid and fooled by them, they realise they can get away with whatever they want. Feminist culture promotes that men are collateral damage and deserve no respect or empathy. Thus the legal system being susceptible to manipulation through false accusations is seen as a easy task. Also there is no deterrent in Scotland, even if the man is found innocent the accuser faces no criminal repercussions, they can be sued in civil court, that is if the man can afford the legal fees. This is a growing problem for innocent men in Scotland and there doesn’t seem to be any sign of an end in sight.

The most important fact is justice was done and Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful convictions and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020!

Check out our next blog post here; http://redpillrights.com/brilliant-mens-rights-agency-founder-sue-price-exposed-women-that-falsely-accuse-men-of-domestic-violence-in-order-to-cheat-the-family-court-system/