Scumbag Reporters Lie About Addy Agame On ‘pressform.info’ Site – He Did Not Target Anyone, All The Girls He Briefly Talked To Were Of Adult Age! (Addy Agame Proven Innocent, Beats False Allegations Due To Miscarriage Of Justice / No Actual Crime!)
Addy Agame Proven Innocent, Beats False Allegations Due To Miscarriage Of Justice / No Actual Crime! – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43CGp8ptitk
Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To – https://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/
Being an anonymous author is a synonym for a coward leftist journalist, pressform.info is a WordPress site set-up for coward reporters to spam their fake news (whilst pretending it’s by another journalist). Scummy journalists basically just spam the same lies and inaccuracies in as many pages as possible in order to make it look like different people are talking about the same thing. This (they think) gives their stories weight as it tricks the public into believing a story because it looks like it is coming from various sources!
Read Ryan Holiday’s book “Trust me, I’m lying” for a full understanding of how the media manipulate the public and destroy reputations without facing any repercussions. This particular article is a copy of Daily Record reporter, Connor Gordon’s trash fake news article about Addy Agame. Just change Connor’s name to anonymous reporter and The Daily Record to Pressform.info to keep in line with their disgusting tactics.
Connor Gordon starts his lie filled Daily Record article with the headline, “Addy Agame Faces Jail After Targeting Schoolgirls In Glasgow.” You are an idiot Connor. Addy Agame had been remanded for the past 9 months awaiting court when you wrote that, he was already in jail, he didn’t “face jail” he’d been wrongfully remanded since January 2019 you half-wit. And what a disgusting perv you are Connor, “targeting schoolgirls in Glasgow,” this maybe a warped fantasy in your mind Connor, but it’s not the truth. Addy wasn’t accused of “targeting” anyone, the “schoolgirls” Connor weirdly talks about were young adults over the age of sexual consent in the UK and the supposed incidents were not said to have took place in Glasgow. Scumbag Connor Gordon deliberately writes “schoolgirls” with no explanation, to imply they were children, they were not, keep your sordid fantasies to yourself Connor you rat! (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Connor “the creep” Gordon wrote his perverted, stupefied, childish, warped opinion (fuelled by lies to advance his back-breaking lacklustre career) by stating; “Adnan Ahmed posted warped videos on YouTube approaching females but now he faces jail for his creepy antics.” The only thing creepy and warped in this scenario is your existence Connor! Ahmed didn’t “face jail,” he was already on remand and he was not charged with anything to do with YouTube videos about approaching females. Connor Gordon is a reptilian rodent liar. Ahmed’s antics were normal YouTube protocol, hundreds of individuals around the world run online dating businesses. A lonely sex-less weirdo like Connor Gordon finds this “warped” as he spends all his time addicted to strange internet porn and writing trash falsified articles!
Passive-aggressive runt Connor Gordon continued; “a Scots pick-up artist approached young and vulnerable girls,” Connor you sexist, labelling women “vulnerable” because of their gender is chauvinistic, “vulnerable” how con-man? “Vulnerable” to having a conversation in broad day-light with hundreds/ thousands of people and CCTV around. And “young” how, all women were adults above the legal age of consensual sex in the UK! Creepy Connor Gordon labels Adnan Ahmed as a “so-called pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.”
Lying fool Connor Gordon continued; “Ahmed, approached 5 girls between 2016 and 2018 in Glasgow and Uddingston.” This may seem like news to Connor as it is 5 more girls than Connor has ever talked to in his whole geeky sad journo life. Well, maybe Connor likes boys, if so, that’s his choice. Cowardly Connor Gordon chuntered on; “using the name Addy Agame, Ahmed posted the videos on YouTube of him approaching females to teach others about how to pick-up women.” Notice the use of language dumb-ass Connor Gordon uses to imply “the videos” were of the “5 girls,” this is blatant lies, none of the 5 girls were ever filmed or appeared on You Tube, another reason to sue for defamation Connor you dirty little turd!
Man-child Connor Gordon blabbered on; “Ahmed was found guilty at court for acting in a threatening and abusive manner that could cause a reasonable person fear or alarm.” (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, complete madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict was appealed and overturned in September 2020 as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintained his innocence, all 18 of the fake charges were dropped due to all allegations being false! Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct – that is the official legal outcome of this bizarre BBC Scotland witch-hunt! Addy won; the media, the trolls and his false accusers were defeated by him!
The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, the initial Sheriff court case was not justice, it was a farce! It was the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation in order to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the kangaroo-court show-trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation, which he is in the process of doing!
Scummy toerag Connor Gordon continued; “the court heard Ahmed approached 2 schoolgirls in a secluded lane in Uddingston in 2016. They were aged 16 and 17 at the time.” The “schoolgirls” are above the legal age of consent in the UK, 17 and 16. The alleged conversations are said by the two witnesses to have took place around 10am approximately, school had already started. The witnesses stated, “they were in there last year (6th year) of high school in 2016,” to the court. This is several months before a college or university course would begin should students at the late stage of high school wish to continue further education. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Connor Gordon continued; “one witness, who was 17 at the time, said the man told her she looked pretty and asked her if she was married.” Again 17 is above legal age of consent in the UK and this allegation has not been proven. Additionally, to call someone pretty or ask their marital status, is not a criminal offence! (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
What Connor Gordon conveniently left out was that the witness also said, “it was around 10am, not the usual time people go to school and the lane is attached to two main roads on either side, along with two small open grass fields at either side.” The witness also said that, “this is the common route to the train station that most people coming from that direction would take.”
Connor quoted the witness as saying; “he asked me if I was at school and what I was doing at school.” Gordon left out the fact that before this quote the witness told the jury, “he introduced himself then I told him I was at school, he made general conversation, we spoke for under three minutes and parted ways.” This is vital information! Connor Gordon quoted the witness alleging, “he was asking if I had a boyfriend and I said no.” This is not a crime!
Connor Gordon continued; “she said – he asked me if I was married, as I was wearing a ring, I said no and walked away.” However no “friends” or “teachers” came to court to confirm this. In the woman’s police statement, she said she saw Mr Ahmed several times after the 2016 incident in the same area, but they never spoke again! The 2016 incident was reported to police in January 2019 after the BBC made a video defaming Ahmed’s dating business. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
In regards to the second witness Connor left out that the incident is said by the witness to have taken place again around 10am after school had already began an hour previously, in the same lane attached to two main roads that is the main route to the train station which commuters take. Both these witnesses admit to being linked and both stated that they are good friends. What Connor Gordon again conveniently left out was that the witness told the court; “the school is right next to the train station and that the pair parted ways in under 3 minutes in different directions towards their separate destinations!” Mr Ahmed’s defence team lodged an eye witness in his defence who can confirm there was no “intimidation” involved. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Creepy Connor also conveniently left out the testimony Adnan Ahmed gave to the court himself, Addy gave a real honest account of events stating; “it was around 10am, we were both walking on the main route to the train station, it is not a secluded lane, it’s a open main route to the train, I was walking in front of her, waved and signalled for her to take her headphones out, then said – hey you look pretty enough to go for coffee with, that is if your boyfriend is cool with it. She smiled and said, I don’t have a boyfriend. I then said I’m catching a train to the city centre. I thought she was doing the same as she wasn’t wearing a school uniform and it was outside school hours, I assumed she was 19 or 20. She then said – I’m going to school; which shocked me, I immediately asked how old are you? She said 17, I then said – hope you’re enjoying school and shook her hand to say bye, her ring struck my hand when we shook hands, I said – you hit me with your wedding ring as a parting joke, I did not ask her about her being married! The conversation lasted under a minute, I did not ask her for her number or to go for a coffee. I saw her many times around that area for 3 years and we never spoke again, she also confirmed this to the police.”
Click the following link to read about a testimonial by a female who dated Addy, who met him in the same area around the same time further proving his innocence – http://redpillrights.com/?p=1086&preview=true
Regarding the second incident, Addy told the court; “it was around the same time and place, again 10 am, on my way to the city, no school uniform, soon as she said she was 16 I left, this girl confirmed to the court I didn’t ask for a number, she confirmed I didn’t ask her out, it was less than a minute of chat. She also said in court she saw me many times after that in the area and we never spoke again. These incidents are said to have happened in 2016 and no one came forward then. only in 2019 after how I was portrayed in the social media hate campaign (referring to BBC Social hate video against him) there was a sudden change in perspective by these girls to say passing comments were a crime that caused them discomfort. I could have asked someone for the time, after the January 2019 media uproar, they would have reported it. They both know each other well and colluded on social media. They are not being truthful! There was nothing sinister or rehearsed or pre-planned as is being suggested, it was spontaneous and quick.”
Hate-mongering liar Connor Gordon spewed more bile by stating; “lawyer Donna Armstrong defending said; he didn’t want to cause fear or alarm.” What camp Connor left out is Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong also said of these incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In our civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. This is the main route to the train station in Uddingston, not a secluded lane, it has fields of grass either side and the school happens to be right next to the train station. All sides have said it was during the day outside school hours. For talking sake, even if both these ladies had went on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!”
Corny lair Connor Gordon selectively falsified more stating; “a 21-year old female broke down in court when she said Ahmed followed her through Glasgow city centre in 2016. She was 18 at the time.” Connor Gordon labelled what appeared to be seconds of tears as “sobbing,” the woman then talked as normal in front of the jury. The woman was also asked why it took her 3 years to report it (in 2019) she told the court she didn’t feel there was a crime. The woman also told the court she had anxiety and mental health issues. She also said “I looked a lot better 3 years ago, I was thinner, I didn’t have tattoos on my face,” the court heard. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Connor Gordon blatantly lied by saying she was “followed through Glasgow city centre,” no one said this but the slime bag hack journo rodent! This is inaccurate as the woman told the court it was over an hour later, she actually said after the initial approach in Buchanan Galleries she went shopping in various stores, called her grandmother for 45 minutes and headed to Argos in Stockwell street in Glasgow a further 35 minutes later approximately. Connor Gordon then biasedly stated; “he tried to pull me close to him so he could kiss me, so I pushed him away.” Connor left out that it was pointed out to jurors that this recollection of events contradicted her police statement, in which she did not say she was “pulled close to him.” The witness responded by saying the police lied. The witness told the court “I did not make physical contact with the man when I pushed him,” however in her police report she said she did, this was also pointed out to the jury by Ahmed’s lawyer. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
The court heard, in her police statement she said the man “touched her face and tried to kiss her,” when the woman was cross examined about this contradiction in court she said she didn’t say so at first as she didn’t want to interrupt the questioning (despite being asked numerous times) then suddenly claimed both “the pull and face touch” took place. When the contradictory police statement and court statement was pointed out to the woman in front of the jurors, she sat down from a standing position in the witness box! Connor left out that the woman also said she was messaged by the man on social media, she told jurors this happened despite her giving a fake name to the man which was not linked to any of her social media accounts as she said she did not tell him any details of mutual friends. She also told the court the man wrote his details on a receipt during the initial meeting, but was still able to contact her despite not having any of her contact details and not even knowing her name! Connor Gordon continued; “she walked away from him and stood with strangers to be somewhere safe.” Connor failed to report that these alleged witnesses were not presented in court and that when the woman was asked if anyone saw this she said no despite people being around her. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Adnan Ahmed’s excellent lawyer Donna Armstrong described this witness to the court as “she is unreliable, on record she changed her story 3 times, you can’t trust the testimony she has given.” Ahmed also took the stand to testify regarding this “unreliable” witness, Ahmed stated; “she’s lying, we met briefly on Buchanan Street, then 2 hours later on Stockwell street. I was with my friend David, he’s an eye witness. I did not try to kiss her, she gave me her number and Snapchat. She changed her story over and over. In court she said I touched her back and not face, in her police statement she said I touched her face with no mention of touching her back. In court she said she didn’t push me physically, in her police statement she said she did.” The “unreliable” woman also said she came forward in 2019 because of the BBC Social video.”
This “unreliable” woman also gave a 3rd story that did not mention any “touching of face” or “touching of back” or “pulling” or “pushing” to the press in January 2019, (after the BBC Social hate video dropped) which was not included in the court proceedings (only a bias unfair jury would find a man guilty of breach of the peace for such an obvious lie).
Predatory freak reporter Connor Gordon lied more stating; “a 20 year old female thought Ahmed was playing a practical joke on her on Buchanan Street in November last year. She said: he gave me a compliment, said I looked like Kim Kardashian.” What Connor Gordon failed to state is that the 20 year old woman told jurors she messaged the man on Instagram, he also failed to establish how the man and woman added each other on Instagram! Connor continued to report that the woman told the jury that the man messaged her on Instagram and she messaged him also, Connor also stated; “the man went onto claim the woman was racist before she blocked him.” (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Jurors also heard that this account of messages were from only one source, the witness, they were not found on the accused’s phone or laptop. The jurors also heard this supposedly happened in 2018 and was not reported until 2019. The BBC made a video defaming Ahmed in January 2019, triggering a cyber bullying campaign against him, leading to his remand. She told jurors, I thought it was a prank, he managed to get my name from my phone case, she felt uncomfortable and intimidated by the man, she was asked to go for a glass of wine, she pretended to have a boyfriend.” (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
The media quoted this without pointing out the woman said only one part of her name was on her phone case and she claimed Ahmed found her on Instagram by chance despite her full name being her Instagram title. Ahmed testified in court regarding this also, he said; “we talked for under 5 minutes on St.Vincent Street, she gave me her insta details. She said to the court only one part of her name was on her phone case, her Instagram name is her whole name, and has an underscore in it, there was no way anyone could guess that – check the evidence, plus it’s not a common name. Also there are 2 messages from her missing in the feed she provided to the court, check my message feed; I initially sent – “Kim Kardashian fun to meet you” she sent me the message “haha is this a joke” (this was missing). I responded with “no joke, let’s get drinks,” she responded, “I don’t know you,” I responded, “get to know me, do you drink red or white wine,” she then sent a “black face” emoji (this was missing from her feed) – which I didn’t notice until a few days after, I thought she was joking, so I sent back “good morning ya racist” as a joke in response. There was no further response, so I didn’t contact her again. We are both of non-white ethnicity, it was a joke, we’re both brown! She didn’t block me, I didn’t contact her again, she confirmed this. When we initially met, she didn’t say she had a boyfriend, that’s a lie, I have an eye witness who can confirm all of this!”
Ahmed’s lawyer told the court; “the messages are from one source, her! This is not a crime, my client is giving an honest testimony. Being confident is not a crime. You the jury must have felt somewhat uncomfortable and intimidated when selected to be jurors for this case, that doesn’t equate to a crime either. This is not the fault of my client, these are emotions felt by all people. This is not a court of morality, it’s a court of law, you may not like my client but that doesn’t mean he’s guilty. He did not intimidate anyone.” Lawyer Ms Armstrong also cross-examined this accuser stating, “there are messages missing from the feed, why did he respond “no joke” after initially sending “fun to meet you” without a response, it doesn’t make sense. You said in your statement, “is this a joke” now you’re saying it was in person and not over text?!” The witness twisted her face and scowled at the lawyer in response. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Perv Connor Gordon weakly attempted to defame Ahmed further by stating; “Ahmed has previous convictions for drink driving and the firearms act, Sheriff Woods deferred sentence for reports until next month.” What con-man Connor left out is it was stated in court that these previous offences were from 10 years ago. The Sheriff stated; “consider a non-custodial sentence appropriate but I have to continue the remand period because of your previous record.” Ahmed’s solicitor did point out, “5 breach of the peace charges do not warrant anymore time in custody than my client has already done on remand, this is legal protocol!”
Gremlin Connor Gordon continued to misquote the trial judge. Adnan is drug-free and does not drink alcohol. He has no mental health issues. He did a lot of community work over the last 4 years with Narcotics Anonymous and Cocaine Anonymous, mentoring and sponsoring vulnerable individuals, as well as having went through the 12-step program of recovery with his own mentors and sponsors as part of his own rehabilitation after his last sentence in 2013.
Adnan’s previous record is bad. However, he plead guilty to those offences straight away because he was guilty of those crimes. He is not guilty of the allegations the Procurator Fiscal has made, hence why he took it to a trial. Adnan has not committed any offences since 2013, has never been on trail before, has worked with the police and has never been placed on a fully committed remand or been indicted in the past.
Although his previous is bad, it does not include any sexual offences or assaults. The drug offences he had in his past he has fully rehabilitated from and is willing to be drug tested at random to prove this. The firearm offences were a Taser that was not functional and a fake replica pistol (which could not harm anyone). For all his drug offences and firearm offences together in 2009, he received a total of 35 months custodial sentence.
Adnan was a criminal justice practitioner for Turning Point until the time of his remand. He was also moving away from the dating field and taking DWLF in a new direction focusing on human rights/ men’s rights. His job was supporting ex-cons and drug addicts to reform and integrate them into society. He planned to expand DWLF into representing men who had been wrongfully accused of crimes they didn’t commit. He had no idea that he would be in a very similar situation.
Adnan was planning to study criminology in his 4th year at university. In his 1styear he gained an HNC in Social Services (at the City of Glasgow College). In his 2ndyear he gained an HND in Additional Support Needs (at Glasgow Clyde College). At the time of his arrest he was half-way through his 3rdyear doing a BA in Learning Difficulties/Disabilities (between Fife College and Abertay University). His 4thyear would have been a BA (Hons) in Criminology (at Abertay University in Dundee). His place on the course was terminated as was his employment because of the media scandal. Adnan also has a previous BA in Business Studies (From Glasgow Caledonian University).
Creepy Connor Gordon continued his crappy article by quoting a random policeman – Mark McLennan who said; “the women approached were subjected to harassment and were frightened by his unwanted attention.” This is false! Ahmed wasn’t charged or tried for “harassment” and no woman claimed to be “frightened” and why does Mark McLennan feel it appropriate to talk in the media, he’s supposed to be an impartial/ neutral officer of the law, not a media commentator. The lewd reporter continued to quote Mark McLennan; “I pay tribute to the courage of these women coming forward giving evidence in order to bring Ahmed to justice, particularly as he appears to have expected them to tolerate his behaviour.” Well Mr McLennan; firstly if they didn’t come forward the police would have issued a warrant for their arrest, that’s a fact. One witness who didn’t want to come forward said the police harassed her and there were many like her who got caught in the social media hype in January 2019, but didn’t want to go to court in September 2019 but felt forced by the police.
Secondly Mr McLennan, Ahmed didn’t commit a crime actually recognised under Scottish Law, this is the first time in human history a non-sense case like this has been tried in a Scottish Court. It’s a shameful day when the police are run by Twitter trolls dictating their actions. What is a crime is Adnan Ahmed reporting Rita Bruce in early 2019 for sexually assaulting him numerous times – Police Scotland did nothing about this! What is a crime is Ahmed’s mother’s house being robbed in February 2019 (weeks after his initial remand) by a criminal gang stealing over £100,000 in cash and jewellery- Police Scotland did nothing about this! What is a crime is Ahmed’s family being the victim of identity car insurance fraud in late 2019 – Police Scotland did nothing about this! The police need to get out of the news to get flimsy praise for convicting an innocent man for actions that are not a crime and actually go out there and fight / solve real crimes! Again Twitter should never have more power over justice than the actual police, apparently in Scotland they do!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQwbf_vB0qU
And Mr McLennan, you said, “Ahmed appears to have expected them to tolerate his unwarranted and unwelcomed behaviour,” when the majority of the women involved in the case admittedly gave Ahmed their mobile numbers and social media details!
What is ironic is that days after Ahmed was wrongfully convicted, Police Scotland male officers were accused by Scottish women (and female officers) of “threatening and abusive behaviour.” A group of Police Scotland officers called “the boys club” are accused of sexual harassment/acts. One officer actually had sex with a “vulnerable” woman after she’d just reported a crime, then proceeded to stalk her. She accused him of calling her “pretty” and “intimidating” her! Hopefully Mark McLennan is not involved in any of this controversy. Check it out;https://stv.tv/news/highlands-islands/1441340-police-boys-club-accused-of-targeting-crime-victims-for-sex/
Corny crappy Connor also included a caption in his fake news article stating; “had a pal secretly filming his attempts to pick-up unsuspecting women.” Come on Connor, you sleazy hack nitwit, can’t you see the ladies faces are blurred out, protecting their identity. This is no different from how media hypocrites like you and sleazy Myles Bonnar film people without their consent and post/ broadcast it. What’s “horrific” is Gordon and Bonnar don’t conceal the identities of the people they demonise for personal gain – dating coaches at least did protect the identities of the females they interacted with. And con-man how are other’s supposed to learn if there are no video examples?! Ultimately – this is not illegal under UK law. You seem to have more of a problem with the law, rather than an actual valid issue. Furthermore you failed to mention it is a dating business, not a day out with friends. And what are they “unsuspecting” of? A fun conversation, ooohhh the controversy. Additionally, the foolish journo failed to report that the majority of videos on Ahmed’s dating site were from cities around the world, not Glasgow!
The sleazy dirt bag journalist continued, “in one video, titled how to f*** girls in alleyways and public toilets, the website host approaches on Buchanan Street and Sauchiehall Street while an accomplice secretly films the interaction.” Look at the criminal words the journalist uses to describe a cameraman, “accomplice,” his vocabulary betrays his own secret perversions, it’s a disgusting use of language. Did the reporter see the video, was there any sex in “alleyways” or “public toilets”? No there wasn’t! And what was the result of the 3 “interactions” on Buchanan Street and Sauchiehall Street? Well they all resulted in all 3 women giving Addy Agame their number! The Scottish media fail to mention this fact because they are either lying or stupid or trying to sell a story, it’s actually all 3.
The most important fact is justice was done and Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful convictions and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020!
Check out our next blog; http://redpillrights.com/shoddy-website-global-news-glbnews-com-regurgitates-click-bait-hate-propaganda-from-simp-myles-bonnar-and-bbc-flop-documentary-seduction-game-expose-of-seduction-bootcamp-addy-agame-proven/