Seedy Scumbag Scam Site “UK-database.net” Published Bogus Article By Disgusting Scottish Media Hack About Proven Innocent Dating Coach Being Wrongfully Imprisoned For False Allegations Of Threatening Behaviour (The Article Remains Live, Despite The Man Being Cleared Of All Charges)
The Cretins At UK-database.net Gloated That Adnan Ahmed Had Been Jailed; Then Addy Agame Won His Appeal Against Conviction And Sentence, Exposing UK-database.net As Lying Scumbags Who Practice Corruption By Falsely Including Innocent Men On Their Seedy Sex Site Authored By Spineless Scottish Media Perverts
Addy Agame Proven Innocent, Beats False Allegations Due To Miscarriage Of Justice / No Actual Crime! –https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43CGp8ptitk
Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To –https://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/
The Deception Game: By Myles Bonnar, The Man-Child Who Made A BBC Flop-umentary Defaming Dating Coaches In Order To Kick-Start His Failed Career As A Reporter; http://redpillrights.com/the-deception-game-by-bitch-boy-myles-bonnar-the-man-child-who-made-a-bbc-flop-unmentary-defaming-dating-coaches-in-order-to-kick-start-his-failed-career-as-a-reporter/
BBC Scotland “Exposed” For Using Prejudicial Social Media Campaign To Frame An Online Dating Coach; http://redpillrights.com/bbc-scotland-exposed-for-using-prejudicial-social-media-campaign-to-frame-an-online-dating-coach/
EPISODE 1- ”Mainstream Media Demonisation Of Addy Agame” –https://youtu.be/EUbs7CozXyI
EPISODE 2 – ”The BBC’s Manipulation / Defamation Of Street Attraction” –https://youtu.be/fTxL7T_Kh1w
EPISODE 3 – ”Infield Videos & False Allegations” –https://youtu.be/ztKtdE33vFU
EPISODE 4 – ”History, Society, Politics & Feminazis” –https://youtu.be/BLJK1TKK5TQ
UK-database.net are morons who lie to sensationalise nonsense in order to push their deceitful, pathetic narrative, as well as influence unsuspecting members of the public. These idiots don’t fact check at all, as is evident via their stupid hit-piece article by a cowardly “court reporter” (not gutsy enough to reveal their name) on October 19th, 2019 regarding Addy Agame.
Turns out Addy was right all along as all false allegations were dropped, all charges were reversed, and all wrongful convictions were overturned. Looks like scummy UK-database.net got it totally wrong as usual! The fake news slime-balls even called Addy a “pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help – not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.” Addy’s innocence was so clear cut that despite the underhanded tactics the sleazy Scottish press employed, he was found not guilty and defeated them!
Passive-aggressive runts at UK-database.net continued; “a Scots pick-up artist approached young and vulnerable girls,” UK-database.net are sexist; labelling women “vulnerable” because of their gender is chauvinistic, “vulnerable” how? “Vulnerable” to having a conversation in broad day-light with hundreds / thousands of people and CCTV around. And “young” how, all women were adults above the legal age of consensual sex in the UK! They reported a total lie, there were no charges of ”secretly filmed himself approaching women.” There are legal documents (indictment and appeal outcome) that prove this. UK-database.net are bare faced lying pigs, it’s no wonder they’re getting sued all across the UK!
The stinking losers at UK-database.net tried to further defame an innocent man. Ahmed’s wrongful conviction being quashed basically proves UK-database.net wrong and Addy right – the cry babies don’t seem to be handling it too well. UK-database.net pathetically tried to demonise Ahmed by saying “secretly filmed himself approaching women,” which he didn’t, he didn’t “film himself,” plus it’s not illegal to do so, it’s a common press tactic.
The dead-beat clowns at UK-database.net continued; “secretly filmed himself approaching in Glasgow and South Lanarkshire.” Again he didn’t film himself, he was being filmed you idiots! Ahmed was not charged with this because it is not a crime! It may be immoral to some, but who the hell are UK-database.net to talk about morality to anyone, they’ve been caught with their pants down and exposed hundreds of thousands of times. Stop whining you alarmist idiots. This is no different from how media hypocrites like you and sleazy Myles Bonnar film people without their consent and post / broadcast it. What’s “horrific” is UK-database.net and Bonnar don’t conceal the identities of the people they demonise for personal gain – these coaches at least did protect the identities of the females they interacted with. And how are others supposed to learn if there are no video examples?! Ultimately – this is not illegal under UK law. You seem to have more of a problem with the law, rather than an actual valid issue.
In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, complete madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict was appealed and overturned in September 2020 as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintained his innocence, all 18 of the fake charges were dropped due to all allegations being false! Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct – that is the official legal outcome of this bizarre UK-database.net witch-hunt! Addy won; the media, the trolls and his false accusers were defeated by him!
The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, the initial Sheriff court case was not justice, it was a farce! It was the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation in order to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the kangaroo-court show-trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation, which he is in the process of doing!
The toilet paper news outlet made up fake charges of “filming and targeting.” Typical tabloid press style trash. Ahmed faced no charges of “filming or targeting” anyone, he was wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace. He won his appeal to overturn all false allegations and will sue the hounds at UK-database.net for targeting him with their lies and filth!
These creeps have the cheek to accuse Addy Agame (an innocent man, proven not guilty and totally vindicated in the highest court in the country) of “filming and targeting” – really! This is an absolute lie, Addy was not found guilty of “filming or targeting” anyone, there were no charges of “filming or targeting” even lodged against him.
How does it feel to the scumbags at UK-database.net to know they were disgustingly wrong and that Ahmed fought them all they way and embarrassed them by winning; maybe that’s why they’re so desperate to still demonise him, well cry a river you reptiles because you were well and truly defeated!
The morons at UK-database.net continued; “Police Scotland launched investigation after his actions were revealed by BBC’s The Social in 2019.” Nothing was “revealed” BBC The Social lied and made a trash defamation hit-piece video – hence why Addy Agame was found “not guilty.”
BBC The Social hounded the Glasgow dating coach for months, he reached out to them and responded with a detailed explanation of his business model and background to his client base as well as the scientific reasoning behind this method of face-to-face daytime speed dating, which was in large ignored. Instead, they used choice sentences to turn up the controversy in order to create a story and demonise an innocent man. The police didn’t act because of online videos, they were aware of them for years, they crumbled because of media pressure because Police Scotland is a Mickey Mouse force of hick villagers.
Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden, a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.
Following are links to Addy’s actual statement to the press in January 2019 and the actual details of his appeal victory.
BBC Social Reporter Myles Bonnar Set Up Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/bbc-social-reporter-myles-bonnar-set-up-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame/
Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To –http://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/
The clowns at UK-database.net stated; “YouTube removed hundreds of videos and deactivated 2 channels run by Addy Agame and Street Attraction.” YouTube removed videos because of pressure from UK-database.net, in order to avoid bad publicity, not because these videos violated any YouTube rules on nudity or sexual conduct. Thousands of these channels still exist and the dating businesses are still functioning. Ahmed’s DWLF channel had been down since January 2019 through his own direction, not because it was deleted. None of Addy Agame’s videos violated any YouTube policies!
The fake news alarmists continued with more lies, stating; “offered tips on last-minute resistance to sex. One clip included audio of a woman apparently recorded during sex.” We have a quote from Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame’s video about LMR on YouTube, Addy said; “we do not condone rape, never force yourself on anyone, hold yourself in high regard and allow space for women to come to you. If she leaves so be it, no means no, move onto someone who’s into you, don’t waste your time on time-wasters.”
The video the slime balls refer to shows Ahmed saying; “we do not condone rape culture or forcing anyone sexually or otherwise, everything sexual is consented.” Ahmed actually refers to “last minute resistance” as “making women comfortable and creating the right mood for adult relations because too many guys either don’t know what to do or are too thirsty to get laid and forget to have fun.”
The cowards at UK-database.net continued; “Mr Ahmed also included audio apparently recorded during sex.” Apparently, being the word, top reporting their you idiots! OK, so Addy had consensual sex with these women, some of which was adventurous where a couple filmed each other, again consensual, then it is used for a dating businesses YouTube channel – with all parties involved permitting it to be shown! Also, there is no actual pornographic video and the female participants’ identity is protected because actual faces are not shown. Adnan Ahmed even commented on the consented video content in a statement to the BBC Social in November 2018 which was ignored in order to make a video defaming him and not showing his actual views, here is a link to what Addy actually said to the press. http://redpillrights.com/bbc-social-reporter-myles-bonnar-set-up-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame/.
Bitter bums at UK-database.net continued; “5 women gave evidence at trial about Ahmed.” Well turns out they were lying because Ahmed was acquitted of all charges due to no crime to answer to, he should have them imprisoned for perjury!
UK-database.net are just butt-hurt because Ahmed proved them wrong, exposed them as liars and is now suing them! UK-database.net are scumbags, that make a living from spreading lies, fake news and defaming innocent people.
- Chloe From Lenzie Discuses Her Rendezvous With Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/chloe-from-lenzie-discuses-her-rendezvous-with-addy-agame/
- Tia From Glasgow Talks About Dating Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/tia-from-glasgow-talks-about-dating-addy-agame/
- Aisha From Saudi Arabia Describes Her Holiday Romance With Adnan Ahmed (aka Addy Agame) –http://redpillrights.com/aisha-from-saudi-arabia-describes-her-holiday-romance-with-adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame/
- Jill From Sheffield Gives Honest Feedback On Her Positive Experience With Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/jill-from-sheffield-gives-honest-feedback-on-her-positive-experience-with-addy-agame/
- Christine From China Discusses Meeting And Dating Addy Agame Truthfully-http://redpillrights.com/christine-from-china-discusses-meeting-and-dating-addy-agame-truthfully/
- Canadian Karen Describes Her “Lovely” Chance Meeting With Addy Agame In Uddingston –http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Football Referee In Australia With His Dating Life –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-football-referee-in-australia-with-his-dating-life/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Personal Trainer In London With His Dating Life –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-personal-trainer-in-london-with-his-dating-life/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Joiner In Edinburgh –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-joiner-in-edinburgh/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps IT Specialist In London –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-it-specialist-in-london/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Video Editor In Spain –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-video-editor-in-spain/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Addy Agame Helps Marketing Expert In Glasgow –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-marketing-expert-in-glasgow/
The creeps at UK-database.net grasped at straws by quoting the disgraced and rebuked judge, they stated, “Sheriff Lindsay Wood sent Ahmed to prison for 2 years and put him on the sex offenders register for 10 years.” Well merely months later Ahmed appealed this corrupt judge’s wrong decision and reversed the wrongful verdict, proving his innocence fully, Ahmed was removed from the register because he committed no sexual offences or crimes at all!
Reasons For Appeal;
- The trial judge caused a miscarriage of justice via his bias and discriminatory misconduct, especially when he elected to cross examine the accused at the end of the defence’s case
- The judge erred in repelling the ‘no case (crime) to answer submissions‘ made under Scottish law for all the charges the accused was wrongfully convicted of, causing a miscarriage of justice
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial based on the manner the police sought out complainers
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial because the Scottish press influenced the jury / public negatively both before and during the trial, causing a miscarriage of justice
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial because the social worker initially allocated, and the trial judge were influenced by press propaganda during the trial causing a miscarriage of justice
- The social workers report was prejudicial and relied on opinion from the press rather than impartiality from a professional standpoint
- There was NO sexual element / aggravation / motivation – the accused was running a dating business for a monetary purpose not for sexual gratification
- There was NO actual sexual offense committed and NO actual sexual convictions, hence notification requirements were the wrong outcome, causing a miscarriage of justice
Scotland is in an extremely regressive, backwards, violent and ugly era of criminal justice. Legal precedents and crazy laws are being made up on the spot without political clearance. How can a sheriff / judge justify wrongfully convicting a man of something that is not a crime by simply labelling it ‘breach of the peace’ or ‘threatening / abusive behaviour?’ Even so, none of the convictions were sexual offences, putting a person on the sex offenders register for 10 years despite that person not even being convicted of a sexual offence is a disgrace! Simply stating there may have been that motivation is a farcical miscarriage of justice and total lunacy – Sheriff Lindsay Wood was playing up to the press in order to be quoted so he could gain accolade and praise. He himself should face legal action for using a court of law in such a manner. Wood is a man who enabled the media’s prejudicial imperative by default in his legislative actions, judgement and ruling, reflexively and emotionally driven, without genuine judicial insight. Simply put the man is an incompetent imbecile.
If someone hasn’t committed any sexual offences at all, no register should be required. Ahmed’s wrongful conviction was “section 38 breach of the peace.” There was no sexual element, it was chatting! A Sheriff should not be influenced by other cases or the media, they have a duty to be impartial and to do the right thing by the law! The law should always overrule the media; however, it seems to be the opposite way around in Scotland. This insanity occurring meant any man chatting up any woman in Scotland (whether it be during the day or in a nightclub) will be at risk of being put on the sex offenders register, even if no sexual offence has occurred! Luckily Ahmed’s victory ensured that chatting up women in Scotland is now 100% legal!
3 of the highest judges in Scotland agreed with Ahmed and stated the evidence did not indicate Ahmed did anything wrong! Ahmed was totally correct, he also never called himself a “victim.” despite the sleazy media trying oh so hard to stop him; he beat the fake charges and the fake news media in one swift motion – wow, what a man!
Scumbag reporters stated; “Ahmed’s behaviour, according to a social worker, was entrenched.” Red Pill Rights can exclusively reveal that the social worker who wrote the report for the court stating this stupid claim was immediately removed from Ahmed’s case for unprofessional conduct (i.e. making up statements from opinion that were heavily media influenced and not based on fact!). The social worker was sacked from Ahmed’s case immediately because her inaccurate media bias “entrenched” views were not based on reality, plus her language and conduct during Ahmed’s social work reports breached professional protocol. Ahmed made an official complaint to the relevant social work complaints department and is planning civil legal action against this social worker.
The fake news clowns continued; “defence counsel Donna Armstrong, said: the accused accepts he was convicted and will change the way he speaks to women.” This is not entirely true, we asked Mr Ahmed about this and he stated, “I did not say this or do not hold that view, I never accepted the wrongful conviction or said I would change the way I speak to women – I committed no crime and the way I speak to women is 100% right. Ms. Armstrong is a brilliant lawyer; she employed this statement as a mitigation strategy to soften corrupt judge Sheriff Wood because he was so influenced by the media and was acting as their representative – again I didn’t say or accept any of that statement!”
UK-database.net went onto quote their disgraced media-influenced rebuked judge, stating: “Sheriff Wood said Ahmed had a lack of remorse.” Well, that’s because Ahmed did nothing wrong and proved it in a high court in front of 3 real judges, not a donkey Sheriff who was trying to be a hero for the slimy Scottish press in a kangaroo-court show-trial! UK-database.net continued; “he told him: you gave evidence and said the victims were lying or mistaken; but the jury thought otherwise. It was obvious when they gave evidence how they were affected.” Eh, no! Firstly – there were no “victims” as no crime was committed (that’s official now in the Scottish law books and legal records). Secondly, Ahmed “gave evidence” the accusers were “lying or mistaken” and was proven to be telling the truth in the high court (another L for you Sheriff Wood). Thirdly, the jury could think what they want – Ahmed got a “not guilty” verdict for all charges in the high court (plus the jury were not impartial as they were brain-washed by the scumbags in the Scottish media). Lastly, it wasn’t “obvious how they were affected” as this was a witch-hunt created by the media, there was no crime in the first place – what’s next the media will hype eating vegetables as misogynistic and a trial will be held hosting a bunch of idiots saying a man eating a carrot made them feel uncomfortable?! Get a grip on reality!
The idiots at UK-database.net continued to quote the shamed Sheriff trying to gain clout by co-signing social justice nonsense, they stated (quoting the shamed Sheriff); “you have acquired notoriety and an unenviable reputation, the public will be wise to such inappropriate behaviour by you and others like you.” Turns out you were wrong again Sheriff. Ahmed’s reputation is that he was acquitted, vindicated, found not guilty, proved his innocence and was right all along – while Sheriff Wood is now a laughing stock in Scottish Legal circles, here is what his superiors had to say about his “unenviable reputation” –
The shamed sheriff was criticised by 3 high court judges for conducting a “cross-examination” of a defendant and telling his representative to “sit down”.
Counsel for the appellant, Claire Mitchell QC, said that Sheriff Lindsay Wood’s questions “would have led the independent observer to reach the view that the sheriff had formed an adverse view of his credibility”.
The judges said the evidence did not indicate that Mr Ahmed was guilty of threatening behaviour.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “It does not seem to us that a polite conversational request or compliment can be construed as threatening merely because it is uninvited or unwelcome.”
Sheriff Wood was also criticised by the judges for his “cross-examination”.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “The trial sheriff engaged in an exercise which could only be described as cross-examination.
“The informed and impartial observer would readily have concluded that the sheriff had formed an adverse view on the credibility of the appellant’s evidence.
“The result was a miscarriage of justice and the appeal against conviction on each charge must be upheld on this ground.”
The judges also found that Sheriff Wood’s behaviour in telling advocate Donna Armstrong to sit down was “unacceptable”.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “In the present case counsel was correct to object to the sheriff’s questioning when she did.
“It is unacceptable for a judicial office holder to address a responsible practitioner by telling her to sit down.
“Such behaviour carries the risk of demeaning the standing of the judiciary in the eyes of both the legal profession and of the public.”
And yes Addy has gained positive notoriety in men’s rights political circles in which he is working and helping other men in similar circumstances who have been wronged by biased criminal and family courts. Ahmed is speaking at many public men’s rights events as well as suing the state and media for compensation. Turns out his behaviour wasn’t “inappropriate” and that is now official under Scottish law!
Scummy toerags at UK-database.net continued; “the court heard Ahmed approached 2 schoolgirls in a secluded lane in Uddingston in 2016. They were aged 16 and 17 at the time.” The “schoolgirls” are above the legal age of consent in the UK, 17 and 16. The alleged conversations are said by the two witnesses to have took place around 10am approximately, school had already started. The witnesses stated, “they were in there last year (6th year) of high school in 2016,” to the court. This is several months before a college or university course would begin should students at the late stage of high school wish to continue further education. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
UK-database.net continued; “one witness, who was 17 at the time, said the man told her she looked pretty.” Again 17 is above legal age of consent in the UK and this allegation has not been proven. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
What the reporters conveniently left out was that the witness also said, “it was around 10am, not the usual time people go to school and the lane is attached to two main roads on either side, along with two small open grass fields at either side.” The witness also said that, “this is the common route to the train station that most people coming from that direction would take.” UK-database.net left out the fact that before this quote the witness told the jury, “he introduced himself then I told him I was at school, he made general conversation, we spoke for under three minutes and parted ways.” This is vital information!
In regard to the second witness UK-database.net left out that the incident is said by the witness to have taken place again around 10am after school had already began an hour previously, in the same lane attached to two main roads that is the main route to the train station which commuters take. Both these witnesses admit to being linked and both stated that they are good friends. What UK-database.net again conveniently left out was that the witness told the court; “the school is right next to the train station and that the pair parted ways in under 3 minutes in different directions towards their separate destinations!” Mr Ahmed’s defence team lodged an eyewitness in his defence who can confirm there was no “intimidation” involved. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
UK-database.net also conveniently left out the testimony Adnan Ahmed gave to the court himself, Addy gave a real honest account of events stating; “it was around 10am, we were both walking on the main route to the train station, it is not a secluded lane, it’s a open main route to the train, I was walking in front of her, waved and signalled for her to take her headphones out, then said – hey you look pretty enough to go for coffee with, that is if your boyfriend is cool with it. She smiled and said, I don’t have a boyfriend. I then said I’m catching a train to the city centre. I thought she was doing the same as she wasn’t wearing a school uniform and it was outside school hours, I assumed she was 19 or 20. She then said – I’m going to school; which shocked me, I immediately asked how old are you? She said 17, I then said – hope you’re enjoying school and shook her hand to say bye, her ring struck my hand when we shook hands, I said – you hit me with your wedding ring as a parting joke, I did not ask her about her being married! The conversation lasted under a minute, I did not ask her for her number or to go for a coffee. I saw her many times around that area for 3 years and we never spoke again, she also confirmed this to the police.”
Click the following link to read about a testimonial by a female who dated Addy, who met him in the same area around the same time further proving his innocence – http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/
Regarding the second incident, Addy told the court; “it was around the same time and place, again 10 am, on my way to the city, no school uniform, soon as she said she was 16 I left, this girl confirmed to the court I didn’t ask for a number, she confirmed I didn’t ask her out, it was less than a minute of chat. She also said in court she saw me many times after that in the area and we never spoke again. These incidents are said to have happened in 2016 and no one came forward then. only in 2019 after how I was portrayed in the social media hate campaign (referring to BBC Social hate video against him) there was a sudden change in perspective by these girls to say passing comments were a crime that caused them discomfort. I could have asked someone for the time, after the January 2019 media uproar, they would have reported it. They both know each other well and colluded on social media. They are not being truthful! There was nothing sinister or rehearsed or pre-planned as is being suggested, it was spontaneous and quick.”
What UK-database.net left out is Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong also said of these incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In our civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual, and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. This is the main route to the train station in Uddingston, not a secluded lane, it has fields of grass either side and the school happens to be right next to the train station. All sides have said it was during the day outside school hours. For talking sake, even if both these ladies had gone on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!”
Corny liars at UK-database.net selectively falsified more stating; “a 21-year-old female broke down in court when she said Ahmed followed her through Glasgow city centre in 2016.” The woman was also asked why it took her 3 years to report it (in 2019) she told the court she didn’t feel there was a crime. The woman also told the court she had anxiety and mental health issues. She also said, “I looked a lot better 3 years ago, I was thinner, I didn’t have tattoos on my face,” the court heard. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
UK-database.net blatantly lied by saying she was “followed through Glasgow city centre,” no one said this but the slime bag hack journo rodent! This is inaccurate as the woman told the court it was over an hour later, she actually said after the initial approach in Buchanan Galleries she went shopping in various stores, called her grandmother for 45 minutes and headed to Argos in Stockwell street in Glasgow a further 35 minutes later approximately. The reporters then biasedly stated; “he tried to pull me close to him so he could kiss me, so I pushed him away.” UK-database.net left out that it was pointed out to jurors that this recollection of events contradicted her police statement, in which she did not say she was “pulled close to him.” The witness responded by saying the police lied. The witness told the court “I did not make physical contact with the man when I pushed him,” however in her police report she said she did, this was also pointed out to the jury by Ahmed’s lawyer. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
The court heard, in her police statement she said the man “touched her face and tried to kiss her,” when the woman was cross examined about this contradiction in court, she said she didn’t say so at first as she didn’t want to interrupt the questioning (despite being asked numerous times) then suddenly claimed both “the pull and face touch” took place. When the contradictory police statement and court statement was pointed out to the woman in front of the jurors, she sat down from a standing position in the witness box! UK-database.net left out that the woman also said she was messaged by the man on social media, she told jurors this happened despite her giving a fake name to the man which was not linked to any of her social media accounts as she said she did not tell him any details of mutual friends. She also told the court the man wrote his details on a receipt during the initial meeting but was still able to contact her despite not having any of her contact details and not even knowing her name! UK-database.net continued; “she walked away from him and stood with strangers to be somewhere safe.” The reporters failed to report that these alleged witnesses were not presented in court and that when the woman was asked if anyone saw this, she said no despite people being around her. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Adnan Ahmed’s excellent lawyer Donna Armstrong described this witness to the court as “she is unreliable, on record she changed her story 3 times, you can’t trust the testimony she has given.” Ahmed also took the stand to testify regarding this “unreliable” witness, Ahmed stated, “she’s lying, we met briefly on Buchanan Street, then 2 hours later on Stockwell street. I was with my friend David, he’s an eyewitness. I did not try to kiss her; she gave me her number and Snapchat. She changed her story over and over. In court she said I touched her back and not face, in her police statement she said I touched her face with no mention of touching her back. In court she said she didn’t push me physically, in her police statement she said she did.” The “unreliable” woman also said she came forward in 2019 because of the BBC Social video.”
The scum at UK-database.net just made-up events stating, “grabbed her head and tried to kiss her.” This did not happen, wasn’t said in court, wasn’t a charge and wasn’t even an accusation that was made – the false accuser said, “touch face” not “grabbed head.” Ahmed was cleared of this lie regardless, but it just goes to show how low the media will stoop – they just make things up – but the facts are Ahmed was proven innocent!
The sour-pussed suckers at UK-database.net lied more; “BBC investigation into his activities revealed he was part of global network of PUAs who practice game.” Shut up, you idiots, at least learn to lie convincingly if that’s how you’re going to report! The BBC flop-umentary they refer to is by creep Myles Bonnar, a low status creep trying to make a name for himself, by literally being a lying snitch. Cowardly racist Myles Bonnar has disappeared into nothingness again after selling himself out for fame (he has no actual skills / talent) by trying to destroy innocent men’s lives because he’s a spineless weasel who women find repulsive.
Hungry desperados at UK-database.net stated Ahmed “BBC investigation revealed wider pattern of predatory behaviour,” no it didn’t because 3 judges said Addy is innocent, no one wrongfully labelled him a predator except you, your hack buddies, irresponsible police officers and some sad weirdo online trolls. Addy is not a predator. He is an exemplary human being, a good father, he worked in the Criminal Justice field helping others and did daily community work for free. He has a fiancé, a mother and all his ex-partners testify there has never ever been any “predatory” behaviour on his part, ever!
Here are some more legal facts that brilliant senior judge Lord Turnbull stated; “there was nothing in the appellant’s behaviour as spoken by complainers which was overly threatening or which could be construed as threatening. There was nothing in the appellant’s conduct spoken by complainers which constituted threatening behaviour, witness described a compliment. Accordingly, the Sheriff erred in failing to give affect to no case to answer submissions presented on the appellants behalf in respect to these charges also. The exercise the Sheriff was engaged in had already lacked any element of clarification, the Sheriff appeared to be in the process of arguing with the appellant. Since the appeal against conviction is upheld on both grounds in all charges, the appeal against sentence flies off.”
Now that’s true justice by a revered, learned, top tier, law-chief; well said Lord Turnbull! UK-database.net stated; “Ahmed has now been officially acquitted,” music to our ears, masculine men who fight for justice always win!
The most important fact is justice was done and Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful convictions and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020!
Check out our next blog post here; http://redpillrights.com/vile-creep-hack-connor-gordon-glorified-wrongful-imprisonment-of-glasgow-dating-coach-addy-agame-for-fake-news-dirtbags-glasgow-live-ahmed-was-acquitted-proven-innocent-in-the-high-court/