Self-Proclaimed ‘Mentally-Ill’ Feminist Blogger Christie Page Fake Rape Case Thrown Out Of Court After Evidence Revealed She Conspired With Gang Of #MeToo Witches Online To Falsely Accuse An Innocent Military Airman & Father Of 2 Daughters (Because He Dumped Them)
Self-proclaimed ‘mentally-ill’ feminist blogger Christie Page falsely reported a rape backed by a MeToo gang of lying witches. Fortunately, against all odds the prospect of her accused mate’s guilt was rightly dismissed in military court.
The falsely accused male in question was a Technical Sergeant assigned to the 45th Civil Engineer Squad in Patrick Air Force Base. Having lost his wife to connective tissue disease in 2015, the single dad of two young daughters was rendered vulnerable to female opportunists and predators alike. His good looks, wide smile and big heart attracted women from within and outside his base, including evil older woman Christie Page, a mother of two, who started a relationship of sorts with the much younger airman. She visited his house numerous times and had consensual sex with him over and over again just like the women before her. But the airman was not so keen in the relationship with Christie so she came up with a bizarre exit plan. After using him for her own sexual and emotional gratification, she decided to move on, but not before vindictively conniving with two other women he previously dated, to “take him down” MeToo style.
With all plotted and set, Christie Page went to the airman’s house once again. She had sex with him one last time and then stirred up drama by alleging that during the act, she had ordered him to stop but he didn’t. Using her cellphone, Christie Page recorded the aftermath conversation in which she persistently provoked the male to admit that he raped her. Convinced that his recorded responses were incriminating enough, she took her phone with other samples and left his house. With the evidence of sex, she called 911 and reported a “rape” despite the old woman having made a conscious decision to go have sex with him in his house.
The police took her statement and the so-called “evidence.” Christie Page co-operated with the cops, went through medical examination along with all the tax-funded phases of becoming a legit “survivor.” Then she went to meet with the other two women to deliver the good news and celebrate their first steps in destroying the innocent man. At that time, Christie Page apparently thought what she gave law enforcement was all it would take to obliterate an airman who dedicated 20 years of his life in the service of his country. But no, she learned a few lessons in the process. Firstly, Florida is a two-party consent state, which means you don’t go recording people without their approval. That said, Christie’s so-called video evidence would actually incriminate her. Secondly, she would have to deal with Air Force superiors of the man she accused, the same superiors who more than likely already knew her relationship with the man she was trying to destroy.
After several meetings in Airforce Base by which she stopped at nothing to demonstrate how dangerous the man she falsely accused was, liar Christie Page expressed her disappointments including that someone in the ranks reminded her that the man she accused was also in fear, as his name was published online. In response to that idea, Christie wrote on her blog: “As if I should care that a potential murder suspect and serial rapist was feeling “unsafe”.” In other words, everyone should care about Christie alone but no one should care what harm her false report can do to others, including the 2 young daughters of the innocent man!!!
Feminist moron Christie Page also accused the U.S. Air Force of not despising her accused airman as much as she does. “I’m righteous. Are you?” wrote Christie Page on her mentally-ill victim blog against the Air Force. She did not appreciate that everyone was not supportive of her and her false allegations, despite the Air Force taking unwarranted disciplinary action against the falsely accused sergeant in addition to squashing his retirement plans and forcing him to remain on active duty pending the outcome of the case.
With the MeToo Movement in full swing, the fake rape case became United States vs. (The Accused Sergeant) and made its way to Military court with the gang of 3 metoo false accusers being led by Christie Page. The court documents referred to the false accusers only as CP, CN and DF. CP is Christie Page. In order for the court to conduct a fair trial, all of the evidence was required, not just the cherry-picked lies provided by the false accusers. The court subpoenaed the accusers for their social media accounts and digital devices. The responsibility of ensuring compliance with the subpoenas fell on Major General Stephen N. Whiting of Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, as the GCMCA representing the government in the case.
The false accusers partially complied by offering filtered/limited/one-sided evidence unsuitable for a fair trial. The court persistently asked for the subpoenas to be enforced but one excuse came in after another. More attempts by the court to get the false accusers to comply was blocked by Gen. Whiting in what appeared to be him taking sides with the false accusers for fear of a MeToo backlash. As the court could not obtain sufficient information for the trial without the consent of the false accusers, the case was stalled. Meanwhile, one of the accuser’s testimony back in December 2018, along with preliminary investigation revealed quite a lot but not in favour of the accusers:
In 2017, she used up to 80 different social media profiles to contact every woman suspected to be the falsely accused airman’s ex, interested lover, or family member. Even women who simply liked his photos on social media were also targeted. If they responded, she would detail sexual acts, send them nude photos and text screenshots saying the airman was cheating on them and that he had just been diagnosed with an STD, and other slanders. The defence attorney’s investigators uncovered at least 38 women who were targeted with such communication against the accused airman.
After the accused airman ended the relationship and had blocked her on social media, this bitter false accuser responded with a text: “I’m on my way there, you can ignore me all you want, you will have to face me to do it … you cant quit me.”
Long before the fake rape allegations, the 3 women connived on Instagram and discussed that the airman had cheated on all three of them and needed to be “taken down” both “civilly and criminally.” They even suggested that he lose his children too. All three false accusers destroyed, hid and withheld evidence relevant to properly investigating their false allegations.
Preliminary investigations uncovered much more dirt on the false accusers, including them having openly discussed a desire to bring down the accused man and celebrate his conviction, having taken steps that could result in financial and professional gains. One of the 3 MeTooers even realised their lies were closing in on them, and she decided not to push on with her false allegation. However, with all these problems facing the case, the trial was expected to proceed by the say-so of male-feminist white knight cuck Maj. Gen. Stephen Whiting who simped hard for the MeToo trio of rats, rather than represent fairness and justice. Ladies and Gentlemen these are the types of people calling the shots in our justice system (both civilian and military).
The accusers refuse to fully comply with the subpoenas because the evidence suggested their interactions with the falsely accused airman would reveal a pattern of them having been romantically obsessed with him, here-by diminishing their credibility as “sexual assault victims.” Besides, their interactions with each other would reveal their plot to destroy the innocent airman. Additionally, their interactions with other men would have been discovered and scrutinised in the process if they were relevant to the case.
According to the accused airman’s defence attorney to the Washington Times, the prosecution “blindly entertained the accusations of these three colluding and fundamentally dishonest accusers from Day One without any meaningful or critical analysis of their claims or past deception,” … “People are falsely accused of sexual assault in the military, especially now in the environment that incentivises accusation. Decent people do not want to believe that vindictive and self-motivated people like this exist in our society or the military, but they do,” he added. Fortunately, the judge was not willing to be as blind as the prosecutors.
Due to the 16-month “outstanding discovery” or the prolonged failure of mangina Maj. Gen. Stephen N. Whiting to enforce subpoenas onfalse accuser Christie Page and her lying accomplices to present complete evidence in court, the Military Judge moved on to dismiss the case in a refreshing 13-page court decision against the current woke culture where political correctness has overridden common sense and fairness.
“The accused is not at fault..,” stated the judge about the delay.
“Unlike the government, the court, in this case, will not shrink from its obligations to enforce the law and protect the rights of all persons who come before it. The actions and positions taken by the government in this case have convinced this court that anything other than a dismissal with prejudice will continue to prejudice the accused’s rights and reward the government for its conscious decision to withhold its authority and meet its obligations under the law. WHEREFORE, the Defense Motion to Dismiss all charges and specifications with prejudice is GRANTED.”
Dismissing the case ‘with prejudice’ means that the same case cannot be brought back in court. You would have thought that was the end of it, but no, not for perjurer Christie Page. She would she respect the court’s decision. She continued to slander the innocent airman online.
Christie Page took to her cringe blog to confess: “I was always prepared for the possibility that I could lose. I never prepared for it to end like this.” Of course, any sensible liar should expect to not only lose in court but be charged with perjury, false reporting, tampering with evidence, etc. Especially in this case there was enough evidence against her to have her imprisoned!
Christie Page continued to attack the (proven innocent) airman’s character online, calling him a “serial rapist” and “sexual predator”. She even released the video she initially secretly recorded after sex as an attempt to frame him with the fake rape. Bear in mind, Christie Page had already been notified that Florida is a two-party consent state so her releasing the secretly recorded conversation with the man without his consent is a crime. Also bear in mind the man in question was not a one night stand with Christie. She had a sexual relationship with him and had sex with him on multiple occasions. She even calls herself a “survivor” which is the word mainstream diminished to merely describe a woman who didn’t die in the process of dating a man. Maniac Christie Page continued to call herself the ‘victim’ whilst defaming the innocent airman online, even going as far as suggesting he killed his wife. He didn’t!
The reputation of the falsely accused Air Force serviceman may, unfortunately, never be fully redeemed due to mainstream media’s anti-male bias reporting on the case. It is up to society to right that wrong. Since mainstream media schemers popularised the feminist-coined terms “slut-shaming” and “victim-blaming” to protect liars like Christie from being rebuked, we assume the responsibility to expose false accusers and feminist scumbags to help men not to fall victim of them.
Check out our next post; https://redpillrights.com/star-actor-noel-clarke-is-innocent-thats-why-he-correctly-denies-the-false-allegations-made-against-him-by-lying-clout-chasing-feminist-journalists-woke-metoo-bimbo-clowns-the-majority-of-whom/