Sexually-Jealous Manipulative Liar Myles Bonnar, Writes Prejudicial “Fame-Starved” Article For Fake News-Rag “The Telegraph,” About How He Paid To Learn How To Pick-Up Women (And Is Still A Bitter Beta Male)

Here’s what women think about how sickening Myles Bonnar is;

Bum-hole Myles Bonnar starts his (begging for approval) article by stating; “In a dark corner of YouTube, men share videos bragging about the number of women they seduced – and audio of themselves apparently having sex…known as pick-up coaches, make a living selling advice about how to seduce women.” Straight off the bat, Bonnar’s lies pile up. The only “dark corners” involved here is the one bummy Bonnar crawled out of (from nothingness) – at 31 years old, this sensationalised crap is his only claim to fame – loser! Dating coaches don’t hide on YouTube! Freedom of speech is a right all people have, it can be used to “brag about seduction” or to “teach dating,” but social justice terrorists like Bonnar want to silence and control others and sell a story that isn’t truthful or valid. He uses the word “apparently” because he has no proof of any “audio of sex.” And it’s not just “pick-up artists” who teach dating to men – female coaches do also i.e. Kezia Noble, Harley Quinn, etc; as well as other dating coaches, who adamantly state they are not PUAs eg. Mr Locario, Afi King, Steve The Dean, Addy A-game, AMS, etc.

Misinformed liar Bonnar continued; “so-called game industry – popularised in Neil Strauss’s controversial 2005 book.” Bonnar clearly lacks in facts and research skills. The founder of the community/ industry is a man named “Mystery,” Neil Strauss was his side-kick and RSD took it to a new level. Most people in the industry ridicule Strauss’ book as it is amateur. Insect Bonnar continued; “worth £80 million globally, footprint in UK, US, Australia, Canada. Artists from each country keep in touch about latest seduction techniques through video calls and posts on social media…train clients on how to get women to the bedroom.” This shows the demand for dating advice, especially in the West Myles! Mixed up men like you need the help. Dating coaches do cross promote each other’s businesses (just like other You Tubers) only if they agree/ teach similar things – there is plenty of rivalry and competition also, like with any other business. £80 million pound says it all, clients willingly pay for help because it works, it’s not a con – unlike Bonnar who is a complete and utter fraud and charlatan bum reporter.

Social justice worm Bonnar then goes onto write about the man who made creepy stalker Myles; yes, Myles Bonnar is so much of a coward, he couldn’t make himself, Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame made the bum journo semi-famous (in Scotland!) Snake Bonnar couldn’t lace Ahmed’s boots, Bonnar is in the gutter, Ahmed is on a higher level of understanding, which midget Myles can never reach. Creepy Bonnar labels Adnan Ahmed as a “so-called pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.”

Beta Bonnar wrote; “Agame, this man is in prison for threatening and abusive behaviour.” In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a bias jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Myles Bonnar and the Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were  skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict will be appealed and overturned in the next few months as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintains his innocence, 13 charges were dropped before the biased jury got a chance to deliberate on them. Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct!

The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, this is not justice, it’s a farce!

It was the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” after the trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation!

Scumbag Bonnar wrote; “my first report for BBC Scotland at the beginning of this year, looked into Adnan “Agame” Ahmed’s harassment of women.” This is an absolute lie, Addy was not found guilty of “harassing” anyone, there were no charges of “harassing” even lodged against him. This is another reason to sue Bonnar and the racist Scottish media for defamation! Myles Bonnar hounded the Glasgow dating coach for months, Addy eventually reached out to him and responded with a detailed explanation of his business model and background to his client base as well as the scientific reasoning behind this method of face to face daytime speed dating, which was in large ignored. Instead Bonnar used choice sentences to turn up the controversy in order to create a story and demonise an innocent man. The scum at BBC Scotland allowed beta male Myles to make up fake charges of “harassing girls.” Typical tabloid trash. No-one faced any charges of “harassing” anyone, Addy should sue the hounds at The Telegraph for targeting them with their lies and filth!

Following is the full conversation between liar Bonnar and Addy;

Adnan Ahmed’s original BBC Social statement – That was manipulated and ignored by reporter Myles Bonner

“Thanks for getting in touch. The allegations are false.

It’s not nice to be accused of absurd allegations. It’s just a bunch of guys talking to a bunch of girls. If the female declines to speaking, the male has to respect that and leave.

No-one is at risk of rape or assault. I have women in my family that I love dearly and these are terrible accusations for me and them.

No-one even goes out in Glasgow. Other cities are better suited because of population and culture. This is no different than a lad’s holiday or a night out at the weekend. The BBC social video wasn’t reported accurately, it was portrayed in a certain way to look controversial in order to sell a story. Game is a male sub-culture on YouTube and guys watch it because they like women and wish to attract them.

I have sent you the questions I answered for them. They are as follows;

When you try to tell guys they need to better themselves through self-development, healthy lifestyle, mental health and addressing their issues – they don’t want to listen. Most guys just want the sex, so you give them proof it works to hook them in, then start the internal work so they can realise that sex or women will not bring them sustained happiness.

Infield footage is an old ‘game’ cultural thing that I did not create, but I have complied with it at times. The client base wants evidence of results as there are a lot of con men in the community, this is an ethical debate and I can understand where opinions will clash on this. The seduction community can be a controversial place. I see it like gangster rap in its early days, however I don’t feel game will ever go mainstream, it’s not for the politically correct.

A quality woman depends on the guy’s individual taste. For me it’s a match between physical beauty and attractive personality traits such as kindness, femininity, manners and a positive perspective. Every man’s perception of a quality woman will be different, it’s up to them to learn and define this. This also applies to physical beauty; different guys prefer different things in looks and personality. Someone may like a particular kind of girl and finds what attracts me to a woman less attractive. I can’t force an opinion on anyone, it’s their preference.

Myles – Motivation behind techniques; / Use of techniques;

  • Ans – We don’t promote using techniques, tactics or trickery; its lifestyle and mind-set improvement. I am simply talking about my rights as a man and my preference in certain types of women (good looks combined with a good personality and similar perspective on life). Game is self-development, it’s not about getting girls, it’s about improving yourself as a man outside of negative societal stereotypes, conditioning and expectations – and by default you will attract better people into your life including women. I’m living the best lifestyle for me personally, it’s not for everyone and I respect that.
  • This is about human behaviour and biology not just words and language.  90% of human communication is non-verbal that’s what we’re tapping into and teaching. It’s like seeing through the matrix of marketing and social conditioning. The rate of mental health issues, relationship breakdowns and substance abuse is evidence of an imbalance – however there are also many amazing rights, ethics and freedoms in the society we live in.
  • Male human beings are not responsible for all of society’s ills neither are female human beings; it’s unfair to blame one gender. We just view things practically and pragmatically rather than through a mainstream media lens. Gender should not be used as an excuse or tool to shame or hate anyone, this applies to both males and females, no-one is superior to anyone else. We refuse to take part in negative agendas taken to the extreme – this applies to both chauvinism and feminism. People have the right to choose whether they want monogamous or polygamous relationships, there is no need to lie or use techniques.

Myles – Use of YouTube; / nature of being publicly promoted pua

  • Ans – I don’t consider myself a pick-up artist. I’m a dating and life coach, though many of my clients are from that community. YouTube is a great platform to promote on these days and we follow their guidelines which meet legal and community standards. I have both males and females in my family; if I’m the best version of myself and a positive example of masculinity it has a positive knock on effect for all the people I’m involved with. As long as I’m improving myself and no-one is getting hurt in the process, that is all I’m concerned with, that’s what I teach.

Myles – Some people won’t understand, challenge views, strong defences from other dating coaches;

  • Ans – I don’t feel the need to defend myself to anyone, other people have the right to their opinions, I’m not concerned with that, there’s no need to present a defence. I’m not trying to change minds or the world or society. If people are not into this or fail to understand it, then that’s up to them. Everyone has the right to believe and do what they want. I’m not battling or fighting an invisible war with feminism or anyone else for that matter.
  • Society promotes excessive alcohol consumption, drug intake, unhealthy foods and shaming masculinity – we promote the opposite. Again if someone wants to do that then cool, but we don’t and it’s considered ‘out of the box.’ The same goes for relations with the opposite sex. Manners, kindness and femininity are attractive values in females, if a man wants to be with women like this he should improve himself to that standard, he should also have the right to avoid women that don’t meet that criteria. We teach respect for people, men and women. No-one should have an agenda pushed upon them or have to live up to an agenda imposed by others with a bias. We all have to respect each other’s rights to the lives we want, as long as it’s legal and no one is being hurt. If someone is offensive or tries to control the way you think, you should have boundaries and standards to not deal with those people.

Myles – Scene in Scotland;

  • Ans – There is virtually no ‘scene’ in Scotland. The closest you get to a scene in Scotland is people getting drunk and going out at night but that goes on anyway. Even I don’t game in Scotland anymore. No-one really does this in Scotland. I’ve had clients here and there but mostly I deal with clients in England, Eastern Europe and other places. Glasgow and Edinburgh don’t have enough of the type of women I’m attracted to, hence why I’m in Eastern Europe and Arab countries every couple of months. Plus any city with a population of less than a million people is not good for game. We have tried in Glasgow and Edinburgh but they’re too small and even though I have met some amazing girls in Scotland that are my type and I’ve had awesome experiences with, I can meet a higher volume of my type in other countries. Scotland is a beautiful country with some lovely people but I wouldn’t recommend it for game, unless someone really likes a particular type of female.”

Dishonest tramp Bonnar continued; “a number of them went to the police.” Could it be that a prejudicial video made by Myles Bonnar portraying Ahmed as sinister suddenly tricked you into thinking he was. Sounds pretty consistent with this whole media circus crap that happened to Addy since January 2019. Weak mousy Myles Bonnar then spat; “Ahmed a dating and lifestyle coach, said what he did was educational. However, women he had approached told the court they had been upset and intimidated.” Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.

Police Scotland are quoted as saying Ahmed’s behaviour was “predatory and would cause fear and alarm”, after succumbing to media pressure from aggressive online feminists and blood thirsty journalists. Initially when BBC The Social’s video degrading Adnan Ahmed went viral, Police Scotland are quoted as saying “we cannot follow up on this as there is no actual crime to investigate, no crime has been committed.” They were quick to change their tune after BBC The Social’s video gained millions of views and began a witch-hunt amongst the public because of how it was edited and how it portrayed Adnan Ahmed as a demonic sexual caricature, rather than the responsible understanding life coach that he is.

It’s totally bizarre and shockingly worrying that a country’s police force can’t withstand pressure from online trolls and can be manipulated so easily by faceless crazies on the internet. Yes, Scotland is a very small country, but that does not excuse the stupid backward policing tactics used for this matter. There should never have been an arrest in the first place. The police were aware of Ahmed’s dating business 3 years prior to BBC The Social’s hate fuelled video falsely demonising him. They spoke to Mr Ahmed about it on a number of occasions in casual conversation. Both male and female officers approved of it. There are phone calls and written police reports to confirm this.

Adnan Ahmed worked in conjunction with the police, as his job as a Criminal Justice Practitioner made this inevitable. Ahmed’s behaviour was never “predatory”. He ran an online dating business on YouTube for all to see; his clients, video demonstrations and spontaneous conversations with any women were all during the day on well populated busy city centre streets. He wasn’t hiding anything, so how can his actions be described as predatory, shameful or dangerous?

Police Scotland are supposed to investigate matters neutrally and without prejudice. Instead they contributed to the media mayhem by making comments defaming a man who is not guilty of an actual crime, but was charged, indicted and remanded regardless. The police are now trying to fish for a conviction to cover their mistakes and to not face legal action themselves. At the time of writing this, Ahmed has been on remand for the past 6 months, he has been held in custody, untried and without the option of bail since January 2019.

The Sheriff Court indictment was designed in such a way to convict Adnan Ahmed on a technicality of Scottish Law (Moorov/ corroboration) rather than using substantial hard evidence, because there is none. Ahmed is not permitted to present vital evidence that proves his innocence because of Scottish court laws that protect prosecution witnesses, even if they are lying.

Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong said of the Uddingston incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In out civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. This is the main route to the train station in Uddingston, not a secluded lane, it has fields of grass either side and the school happens to be right next to the train station. All sides have said it was during the day outside school hours. For talking sake, even if both these ladies had went on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!” Adnan Ahmed’s excellent lawyer Donna Armstrong described another witness to the court as “she is unreliable, on record she changed her story 3 times, you can’t trust the testimony she has given.”

Ahmed’s lawyer told the court of a third witness; “the messages are from one source, her! This is not a crime, my client is giving an honest testimony. Being confident is not a crime. You the jury must have felt somewhat uncomfortable and intimidated when selected to be jurors for this case, that doesn’t equate to a crime either. This is not the fault of my client, these are emotions felt by all people. This is not a court of morality, it’s a court of law, you may not like my client but that doesn’t mean he’s guilty. He did not intimidate anyone.” Lawyer Ms Armstrong also cross-examined this accuser stating, “there are messages missing from the feed, why did he respond “no joke” after initially sending “fun to meet you” without a response, it doesn’t make sense. You said in your statement, “is this a joke” now you’re saying it was in person and not over text?!” The witness twisted her face and scowled at the lawyer in response.

It was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, peoples perspective was skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.”

Red Pill Rights tracked down Mrs Ahmed, Adnan Ahmed’s mother and got the following statement from her, “I love my son, he’s an innocent man, he has been remanded because of a media witch-hunt created by a journalist called Myles Bonnar from BBC The Social. This Myles fellow is an angry racist white man, he didn’t like the colour of my son’s skin in my opinion, especially in regards to my son speaking to white women. It’s 2019, there is no place for this type of racism and white supremacy. Myles Bonnar comes across as a shameless racist. He attacked my son’s character because he is jealous, Myles strikes me as the unlucky with women type. I feel he didn’t like the fact my son Adnan is an ethnic minority running a dating business with predominantly black staff, teaching white clients how to meet women.”

Ahmed’s mother also said, “Adnan loves women. We have a great relationship, he’s a responsible outgoing upstanding man. He is untried and innocent, he should not be held in custody on remand, he should have been bailed and allowed to help people in the community like he was doing. The Scottish Justice System is shameful and unjust. I know my son is in there because of the media, the charges against him are false, he has witnesses, proof and an alibi. Even though the false allegations are not of a serious nature he is still remanded, people who have committed robberies, assaults and even rape and murder are given bail. Adnan’s charges are nowhere near this level, yet he has been remanded for nearly 7 months so far. Adnan has a loving relationship with his 25 year old fiancé and his 11 year old daughter – our family consists mostly of women, we all love him and support. His fiancé and I visit him on a daily basis.”

Sicko Bonnar continued his begging sales pitch’ “seeing the scale of the problem. I went undercover for a Panorama episode airing tonight..exposes network of coaches who run boot camps – they teach men how to pick-up women in the street…goal to chat up as many women as possible and sleep with them.” There was no problem Myles, you made one up, despite this multi-million dollar companies like RSD continue to grow and flourish! The only thing that was “exposed” because of this is that Myles Bonnar is a seedy manipulative liar that selectively edits and misquotes innocent people out of context in order to advance his failed career.

It is not illegal to “teach men” dating nor is it illegal to “chat-up and sleep with women.” Bonnar may find this strange because of his lack of sexual experience, for most men and women this is a normal thing. Spineless coward Bonnar continued; “coaches claim they successfully teach how to turn cold approaches into sex and brag about same-night lays.” Firstly “cold approach” is a sales terms you fool. Students are told to only approach women they are attracted to. Myles you are not qualified to cover the seduction community; you’re coming from a place of lack of understanding, lack of communication skills and a dark beta-male mind-set. Myles your mumblings resemble that of a 31-year-old virgin. “Same night lay” is what people that go to nightclubs do on a nightly basis around the world. Go to a club Myles and try it out. We get it Myles you already did and no girls would sleep with you because you’re far too creepy, so you went back to being a social outcast that stalks men who are successful at dating women.

Dramatising creep Bonnar continued; “seduction coaches say they enhance client’s lives and boost confidence – but it’s darker than that.” This is a blatant falsehood in terms of “darker than that.” The only thing “dark” is the seedy mind of Myles Bonnar and the twisted lies he tells in a relentless manner about a legitimate business.

Is it darker than lying about your identity, secretly filming men while they work without their consent, then making fake news videos about them Myles? Is it weirder than stalking men via email and being a virtue-signalling male feminist pig that thinks women will like him and sleep with him because he fronts being a white knight lady-saver Myles? Is it weirder than trying to destroy another man’s life, income and family (including women and children) to get your rotten failed journalist career out of the gutter Myles? There’s nothing weird about it; what’s weird is you -Myles Bonnar; your fake perspective, your weasel demeanour, your insecurity/ inferiority complex to heterosexual men, your little man syndrome, you fake-ass wanna-be watchdog flop-umentary, your weedy little frame, your beady eyes, your seedy beard, your sweaty palms, your lack of masculinity, your lack of balls and backbone, your hypocrisy and your actual existence as a whole is weird Myles!

What dating coaches like Addy, Eddie and Richard, etc, taught clumsy social misfits like Myles is that they can learn to perceive things differently, to cut through illusions of the mind/ PC society that they believe or fear, to stop seeing imaginary problems and to learn to focus on the reality of male-female dynamics. Too often clients who think like Bonnar react emotionally, get despondent and lose perspective. Their negative perceptions invade their minds and throw off their emotional compass, resulting in social anxiety. Dating is taught as a science and an art. Human brains evolved for an environment very different from the one we currently inhabit, resulting in people carrying biological baggage (as social justice ideologies clash with basic human instincts). Humans are still primed to detect threats/ dangers that no longer exist ie. stress of  rejection or the fight-or-flight response Myles experienced when talking to a female. Addy and Street Attraction taught that men have a choice in how they respond to this situation; to not be led by primal feelings, to understand them and learn how to filer them in order to be attractive to the opposite sex (its not trickery, it’s science and art). Bonnar truly doesn’t get it and this, along with his bitterness led to his hate-campaign and sexually jealous lies about men who he perceives as superior to him.

Bitter Bonnar hates men who have honed the ability to control, channel and understand primal signals because he can’t access that part of himself; Myles you are a slave to your impulses, instincts, social justice conditioning and need for approval- you’ve never even questioned why you are the way you are! If your BBC Social video or Panorama/Disclosure flop-umentary were even slightly accurate; they would have shown how Addy and Street Attraction turn seduction into an education, skill-set and success with women. Many men from all backgrounds testify online on how they learned to control emotions, to have a positive outlook, to overcome anxiety/ depression, to enjoy the present moment and to handle situations that disturb/ limit others. Women benefit from this also, they can have healthy relationships (whether short-term or long-term) with men you have their sh*t together! Instead Myles – you showed what your dark sordid agenda and limited mind made-up and twisted!

Creepy liar Bonnar continued; “they teach ways to manipulate women into sex and never consider how a young woman might feel during pressure tactics; consent rarely figures in the conversation.” You mean the way you (Myles) manipulated Addy Agame and Street Attraction with countless emails, made inaccurate videos about their legitimate dating business (to advance your career) and ran up on them like a fake-ass magnum P.I. with a camera and a microphone after lying about your identity (you wannabe ronan farrow weirdo) – without their consent?! Nah Myles, it’s nothing like that you twisted, two faced, hypocritical little she-male! If anything there was no “harassment” or “lack of consent” ever involved. Both Addy and Street Attraction are on record saying things like; “if the girl isn’t into it move on to someone else/ don’t get stuck on one girl/ we don’t condone rape/ you never have to force a women to do anything, she will want to do it” we could go on, the list is endless. These guys helped men be better, better than beta-male like bitter Myles Bonnar!

Lying manipulator Myles Bonnar continued; “one British company selling courses is called Street Attraction…coaches Richard Hood and Eddie Hitchens – apparently secretly record their sexual exploits and upload to a YouTube channel which had over 110,000 subscribers and advertised boot camps and courses.” There’s that word “apparently” again – the truth is, liar Bonnar has no actual proof to back-up to his idiotic claims. This is the resume of a legit and successful business Myles you scumbag. Did your unsuccessful life bug you so much that you took it upon yourself to use BBC propaganda to destroy other men’s livelihoods, who are self-made successes?!

Slimy rat-bag Bonnar continues; “I wanted to find out what really goes on during these weekends, so I shaved my beard, ditched my real name and became known as Michael.” Shut your mouth Myles, the reason you went there was to advance you failed career – you made a vile video defaming Addy Agame that got you some fame as a slimy snitch in Scotland so you decided to repeat the formula to get UK-wide recognition. But you failed, the documentary flopped and you’ve faded back to nothingness; you lonely little dwarf! This is the epitome of Myles, it’s seedy – Eddie was helping those men better their lives and you were there secretly filming men for your gratification.

Desperately tragic Bonnar continued; “we meet outside Savoy hotel. Six students, from recently single to experienced, each paid £600 to learn how to pick-up women.” Myles sounds like a country bumpkin Scotsman starstruck by London, he fails to mention he also hands over £600 of the BBC’s money (swindled from the public via TV licences) just to get to be around the good folks at Street Attraction.

Disgusting beta-male Bonnar continued; “after students and coaches introduce themselves, we set off to approach some women.” Dating coaches like Street Attraction and Addy taught their clients a series of exposure therapy exercises in varying levels of difficulty; from simple daunting approaches, until they did it so many times that it became as second nature as breathing. Making it natural and familiar, removing uncertainty, leading to confidence through experience. Fear is relieved by authority. Training is authority, it’s a release valve. With enough exposure, ordinary and innate fears are ironed out. Unfamiliarity is eliminated, which in turn increases tolerance to stress/anxiety/ uncertainty

Vile weirdo Bonnar continued; “within 30 minutes of this first lesson, I could feel my anxiety rising. The young women who were targeted looked like teenagers to me. Eddie pointed out a young woman for me to stop. I refused.” Another lie, Bonnar admits in other articles he did approach women, he selectively disguises his saying no out of “anxiety rising” as some sort of moral high ground!

The legal age of consensual sex is 16 Myles, do a documentary on that if it bothers you, it’s the law. 17, 18, 19 are “teenagers,” but they are still adults, your wording implies otherwise. It’s funny how social justice warriors like Myles suspiciously employ almost biblical moral high-grounds when judging others, but act hypocritically in secret. Myles hidden-penis ethics are to push his desperate agenda not because of any actual value system (instead to kick-start his career). If 2 adults of any consensual sexual age decide to get together that’s up to them Myles. 31 year olds are not limited to date those of a similar age, funny thing is though Myles, you can’t even attract women your own age.

Involuntary-celibate Myles continued; “Eddie said; doesn’t matter even if she’s underage, it’s not illegal to stop someone. That was a good target.” Firstly, this is totally out of context, at no point in this quote did Eddie say to approach anyone underage as was implied by Bonnar! Myles was chickening out of doing approaches, hence why Eddie took him aside and told him to be less “selective,” your excuses and social anxiety were the cause Myles, not Eddie! Hitchens didn’t tell you to approach kids ever – that’s in your head Myles, you seem to protest a little too much here. Eddie has never been linked to anything to do with anyone “underage,” this is a disgusting allegation; made by a beady-eyed coward in the feminised form of Myles Bonnar.

Camp crusader Myles continued; “approaching young women was constant during boot camp. Men enthusiastically participated while I tried my hardest not to look judgemental.” Well Myles, they paid £600 (like  you did) to learn, so enthusiasm means they wanted to excel. Myles you weren’t “judgemental” you were jealous because you couldn’t do so. Men like Bonnar need alcohol or chemical courage to talk to the opposite sex (that’s assuming Myles is heterosexual, it’s not clear what he is, except gender neutral). Also it’s not illegal for a man to speak to a woman he’s attracted to (and vice versa), even though Myles is campaigning for it to be because as hard as he may try, females are not attracted to his repulsive toxic demeanour. The men who “enthusiastically participated” include a doctor, a navy seal, a chef, computer programmer and software engineer. These are respected professionals, a lot more respected than a slimy weasel failed BBC Scotland reporter bum.

Failure Bonnar continued; “Eddie said: even if you think she’s 17, don’t ever say you look 17 because if you say, she might start thinking why are are you approaching me.” This is reptilian Bonnar in a nutshell, twisting things out of context and misquoting people to push his sordid creepy agenda. The context Eddie said this in is – whatever you feel they feel; meaning if someone communicates as if what they are doing is wrong, feels anxious, paranoid, acts weird – the other person will feel the same and think, “well why are you approaching me then.” Hip-hop superstar Drake is in his mid-thirties, his girlfriend is 18 – neither of them feel it’s wrong, they want to be with each other and don’t care what social justice loser beta-males like Myles or over-the-hill overweight angry radical feminazis think! Under UK law, this is 100% legal! Also walking up to someone and asking their age as an introduction is socially awkward, a ‘hello’ will suffice. Despite this, Eddie is on record saying to Myles, “always ask age before doing anything flirtatious /sexual,” in order to make sure no one is underage. Again Street Attraction have never been linked with this type of disgusting controversy , it all comes from the perverted mind of midget dwarf Myles Bonnar.

Hetero-phobic Bonnar continued; “the group of men worked their way through clothes shops and busy tourist spots-stopping women as we moved.” What your saying is this group of respected professional men, who want to meet attractive females had the courage to strike up conversations with them in extremely busy, well-populated public  areas with CCTV cameras. We see how you twisted that Myles. Now untangle your knickers like a good little boy/girl.

Wimpy Myles uses “target” to make Eddie look seedy, when Myles himself used words like “it worked” and “pack.” Eddie used “target” to appeal to the logical male brain that can learn most things like building blocks and equations, there is nothing seedy about it. And no one was “blocked,” all of Street Attraction’s infield videos showed them temporarily stopping girls in a positive/ friendly manner, leaving enough space for them to stay or leave at their leisure. Mostly the women involved welcome and enjoy the interactions and again, there are thousands of people around! Myles – how do you suggest men meet women?! You don’t have a clue you creep – but you seem to think you know better than guys who actually know from experience. You’re full of sh*t Myles.

Non-masculine woman-child Bonnar continued; “As well as practical training, coaches offered in-depth theories…fitted students with transmitters so they could listen in, women had no idea of being recorded.” Your stupidity is astounding Myles, in any coaching/ student scenario – the perceiving eye is weak and the observing eye is strong. Eddie’s observing eye seen events from experience (clear of distraction, exaggerations and mis-perceptions); in contrast to Myles’ inexperienced perceiving eye that seen obstacles and issues. Hence the need for mics and ear pieces. Eddie taught how to focus the animal brain within milliseconds by questioning impulses and overriding them and to examine perceived threats that are not real. This is mental and physical training and requires practice by taking consistent action.

White Knight friend zone coward Bonnar virtue-signalled through his mangina, stating; “not that the women knew that,” just like Eddie didn’t know you were abusing his trust by secretly filming him and lying to him – while he was trying to help you. Myles, women benefit from this also, it’s win-win you childish idiot. Dating is difficult for females also to an extent, they want to meet a man, they want the right man to approach them – ask some women without your BBC rubbish hat on. Day-time dating is a solution for both men and women. Why be someone grovelling online, why not have something special to offer – daygame allowed men to be the answers to women’s prayers, not the other way around!

Mentally challenged Myles continued to project his insecurities; “the approaches made me feel uncomfortable. I kept on thinking about my sisters and cousins and what they would think if they were on the receiving end of the students advances.” You weird man Myles, who would think of sisters/ cousins during a dating scenario! Myles is fake virtue-signalling yet again. Myles your sisters and cousins would most likely welcome it, they’ve probably each had more sexual partners than you’ll ever have in your whole sad lifetime Myles! This is true sexism (from beta males like Myles) framing women as special snowflakes who don’t like sex, then shaming them for being sexual like all humans are. Your sisters and cousins shouldn’t be shamed for having sex with confident men who have the courage to approach and connect with them Myles, but they should be ashamed of you, you toxic man. Bonnar’s social anxiety and sexual inexperience is why he describes himself as feeling “uncomfortable” around women he approached.

Social misfit Myles stated; “Day two of boot camp. We listened to coach George Massey’s lesson on LMR, stands for last minute resistance to sex. Regarded as a women’s token attempt to reject sex – an obstacle to be overcome.” In reality no coach ever used terms “reject sex” or “obstacle to overcome,” these just further highlight Bonnar’s incompetency in actually understanding the context, as well as expose him flat out lying to sell his flop-umentary and Bonnar’s own seemingly subliminal stupid tendencies. The context “LMR” is explained in is when a women is playfully playing cat and mouse for the thrill after giving full consent, it’s a role play situation, nothing is ever forced!

Bonnar continued; “Massey explained: you have to be the one to take the lead. The whole vibe is you take responsibility for it. Yeah, I know, I am just an animal I couldn’t resist.” Myles doesn’t get it and leaves out the role play aspect of it (both parties are in on it – not just the guy). Massey is a published author in the field of seduction, we’ve read his book – it’s probably the most “politically correct” seduction book from the community, that benefits both men and women. Nowhere in George’s book is there any forced sex or connotations of rape, in fact it is a deep reflective account that includes women just as much as men, it is a good read for both genders. Massey explains “LMR” in a context of not making females feel cheap, guilty, slutty or undermined in any way!

Bonnar continued; “Dr Rachael O’Neill explained: idea with LMR that women put up certain amount of token resistance prior to sex, this is under seduction logic what women to do safeguard reputation…really worrying that this creates a situation in which a no can never be heard as no.” This is absolute rubbish, again from an under-qualified quack with no real substance to her argument. Addy and Street Attraction have both said in videos “no means no, we don’t advocate rape.”

We have a quote from Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame’s video about LMR on YouTube, Addy said “we do not condone rape, never force yourself on anyone, hold yourself in high regard and allow space for women to come to you. If she leaves so be it, no means no, move onto someone who’s into you, don’t waste your time on time wasters.” The video shows Ahmed saying, “we do not condone rape culture or forcing anyone sexually or otherwise.” Ahmed actually refers to “last minute resistance” as “making women comfortable and creating the right mood for adult relations because too many guys either don’t know what to do or are too thirsty to get laid and forget to have fun.”

Massey introduced Richard as the “king of LMR,” to highlight his skills at role play and high level of charisma. It is documented on video that Richard knows what women want and they react to him accordingly, at times even pursuing him! Richard exudes the kind of calm equanimity that comes from the absence of irrational or extreme emotions. This is not the loss of feelings, just the loss of the harmful, unhelpful kind, This is a skill Richard has cultivated – freedom from disturbance and perturbation – to focus energy exclusively on solving problems rather than reacting to them. Bonnar is the complete opposite of this, he doesn’t get it, so labels Richard “high-pressure salesman.” This is evident at the end of sexual/social reject Myles flop-umentary, when Richard charms the cretin with open arms and warm smiles and Myles shuffles away like an awkward, sexually frustrated incel.

Reject Myles went onto misquote Hood out of context; “when you get to the apartment tell her to take off her shoes as soon as you walk through your front door – you start taking your shoes off, it’s basically the first part of the escalation. Some girls can be annoying. If they are in their shoes and jacket they’ll be like that’s enough for tonight…leave the rest for next time…that’s frustrating.” OK Myles, firstly – the man has high standards in hygiene and takes pride in his home. If you go to someone’s home and don’t want to take your shoes off, you leave – that’s their first opportunity to leave! Secondly in a seductive setting where both parties have agreed to be there, comfort is required. No one wants to get intimate with heavy coats and shoes on, the females wouldn’t be comfortable so of course they would want to “leave” (hence if they want to stay they would get comfortable). Thirdly Richard says it’s “frustrating” when sex doesn’t happen, meaning he doesn’t force anyone, if the female leaves she is free to do so. What’s the issue here Myles?! Again your article/ documentary does not offer an alternative, because you don’t have one, you friend-zone sexless loser!

Myles “Boner” Bonnar continued; “a 14-point guide to overcoming resistance on their YouTube channel includes advice to respond to concerns about moving too quickly by stating – I know – before continuing.”  Bonnar twists everything out of context. We’ve seen the video Myles is referring to and it states in a “consensual situation,” also that “you should let the girl explore your home and always give her the option to leave, she should come to you willingly.”

Manipulative demonising Bonnar continued; “it’s manipulating and could be dangerous if someone watching decided they wouldn’t take no for an answer.” The only thing manipulative is how you’ve twisted the truth to fit your social justice witch-hunt narrative Myles! This is nonsense. Street Attraction promoted fully consensual sex and actually taught men to be “sensitive, alert and responding” to all red flags, both verbally and non-verbally! They stressed “no means no” and additionally taught “nuance non-verbal sub-communication” ie. facial expressions, body language, voice tonality, eye contact, etc. Additionally there has never been a “PUA” related sexual assault or rape conviction, ever! Also Myles did approach women off camera, he admits it in his flop-umentary. Technically he himself should be charged with “breach of the peace” in Scotland, the sneaky little midget.

Fame (and sex) starved Bonnar continued; “I was walking for 8 hours a day, during one of my final approaches, I introduced myself as Myles, much to the confusion of my coach. I made the excuse it was my nickname and thankfully he bought it. I knew I had to get out of there as soon as possible; I made my excuses and left.” How desperate are you for a break in journalism Myles – you actually spent a full weekend course / 8 hours a day doing approaches and lying about your identity to men trying to help you as well as you deceiving the women you harassed! That’s so low and needy Myles. You must have approached more women than the few you have mentioned in your few crap articles and star-struck fan-boy TV / radio appearances. To all the women Myles Bonnar harassed / hounded please call 101 and tell the police if a desperately weird little man who went by the name of “Michael Gibson” or “Myles” threatened or abused you via his demeanour, or if you felt uncomfortable/ annoyed/ intimidated by his conversation, or if he sexually assaulted you by touching you in anyway (even a consensual handshake) – do you see the ridiculousness of your shady mission yet Myles, deep down you know you’re a dirty little lying sensationalising turd Bonnar!

When people like Myles panic, they make social mistakes, become shaken and stop thinking clearly. They react to primal survival hormones coursing through their veins – this is the source of your women problems Myles. Bonnar blames his emotional freak-outs on external sources, ie. dating coaches/ PUA’s, because it’s easier than dealing with his glaring flaws. This panic has to be trained out and doesn’t go easily – especially for beta male losers like Myles living in denial. Addy and Street Attraction helped men who were honest enough with themselves to get help, to solve this.

Compulsive falsifier Bonnar continued his social justice act (disguising his motives of career advancement) by stating; “5 months after boot camp I was back in London – as a BBC journalist to challenge the coaches I had met.” You creepy little coward Myles – you stalked, secretly filmed, lied, misquoted (out of context) – then went to “challenge” Street Attraction. A challenge is one man against another; how about you pull your skirt up, put some gloves on and get in the ring with Eddie, Addy or Richard – if you really want a “confrontation or challenge.”

Manipulator Bonnar continued; “after weeks of refusing to engage with me, I found Eddie Hitchens coaching another group of men. I asked why he pressured women into having sex. He was outraged.” Wow Myles – you stalked a man who didn’t want to speak to a lying fool like you, then snuck up on him with a camera crew while he was working (helping other men). Eddie did look angry, but kept a dignified manner intact. Myles was only brave because it was being filmed, the little Scottish hick doesn’t have the backbone to step up by himself man to man. Eddie was right to be angry at Bonnar as he was making up accusations out of thin air. No females have ever accused Hitchens of ever “pressuring” them into anything.

Beta-male Bonnar continued to quote Eddie; “he said: that’s completely wrong. You have twisted it completely out of context…it’s an art. It’s completely consensual. We actually help men…if anything we help prevent rape culture and help prevent them getting involved in anything illegal or non-consensual.” This is 100% true – Eddie has never been linked to anything “non-consensual” or “rape” ever! There are thousands of clients and hundreds of women who can back up what he said.

Two faced swine Bonnar continued; “Hitchens denied telling students they should approach teenagers, he said; not true, the thing I teach is exactly this. Find out how old the girl is before you do anything sexual/ flirtatious…you are basically misrepresenting what we’re doing. It’s absolutely disgusting and we’ll see you in court.” Myles goes back to his seemingly sordid fantasies by using the word “teenagers” in an underage context. Eddie only told clients to pursue women over the age of consent, never anyone underage, again he has no history of this ever! Even in Myles’ flop-umentary Eddie said to find out age first. Eddie’s statement was again true. Street Attraction are responsible for helping hundreds of thousands of men. They taught self-development as well as dating, Bonnar chose to demonise them to advance his bummy no-go career. Bonnar and the BBC’s lawsuits are piling up as Ahmed’s appeal is in progress and he will also sue the dishonest organisation.

Fame-starved sex-weirdo Bonnar left out that Eddie also said; “I don’t pressure women into having sex, you’re trying to portray normal consensual sex as something else.” Bonnar filmed Street Attraction over a prolonged period of time and selectively edited certain quotes to fit his demonising narrative, just like he did to Addy in January 2019 in his vile BBC Social justice/ racial hate video! You should show all the footage Myles, so people can see the truth, not the lies you choose to show. Any conversation can be edited selectively with a narrative added to make any said person look bad, it’s basic school-boy crap – people see through it Myles!

Feminised Bonnar continued; “Richard Hood denied teaching men to pressurise women into sex and said all the women were recorded with their consent.” Richard is correct in what he said he taught, ask his clients Myles, they are the people taking the piss out of you online. Also prove otherwise Myles, Richard is to be taken at his word. And even if someone was filmed on public property without consent, it is not illegal – the media do so on a daily basis!

Wimp Myles continued to quote Hood; “he told me: we never film girls, ‘we’ve had actresses.’ So you’ve done nothing wrong? ‘Correct.’ And you don’t think you’re breaking the law? ‘Of course not.’ Reptilian Bonnar left out how Richard totally owned him and sent him reeling during the ambush. Richard had bright eyes, a warm smile and open arms whilst talking to the pouting drama-queen Myles. Richard said to Bonnar; “I haven’t given you consent to film this,” to which Myles stuttered and mumbled saying, “It’s not the uh, same thing.” Yes it is you fool, it’s actually worse. Street Attraction protected the identities of anyone they may have filmed, you on the other hand Myles lie and demonised them in order to advance your failed career. Hood then said to Bonnar; “I love the BBC, I love you Myles, give me a hug,” to which Myles walked away bitched out and beaten like a child having a tantrum, sensing he was being taunted, ridiculed and mocked. Myles took the piss out of himself via his sexually frustrated incel demeanour, Richard just played it cool and laughed at the little snitch!

Slimy male-feminazi Bonnar continued; “for now, men around the world continue to profit from filming and selling secrets of seduction; a game where women don’t even know they’re being played.” How overly dramatic, camp and transparent – Myles probably thinks this is a witty slogan, it just shows how much of a drama- queen sensationalising simpleton he is!

Shut your fake sell-out mouth Myles – you mean like the countless women’s magazines and channels that exist and have existed for decades that teach women how to date/ seduce/ keep men – when men are none the wiser. Neither ethos is wrong, it’s just how it is Myles you fool. Men and women think about dating differently because biologically our brains work differently, that’s an evolutionary fact. Women are naturally better at dating/ romantic situations as they are more emotionally and intuitively in touch with themselves, whereas men are not as clued up due to their logical thinking and because of modern day radical feminism being used as a shaming, marketing and control tool.

Picture the scene.  A 31 year old nobody sniffing around the outskirts of the BBC (not the UK-wide BBC, not even the amateurs at BBC Scotland, but eh, BBC The Social); living a sad cowardly existence with a lack of funds, no attractive female companions, a warped set of social justice/ slimy journalism values and a failed career that never started. This is the life of Myles Bonnar – an angry irresponsible little man angry simply because he’s a total loser in life! Hence why he is a passive-aggressive lizard. Myles has the physical frame of a camp teenager; no muscular definition, with a belly pouch (skinny fat guy) and no masculine swagger whatsoever.

His loser demeanour, toxic personality and ugly looks equates to no woman finding him attractive, though this toxic little simp thinks he deserves more from life like most man-children do. Myles resents beautiful women because they don’t want him and more so Myles resents men who are able to bed them more, as it exposes Bonnar’s lack of masculinity to a heightened level. Minion Myles mixes his confused spoiled brat feelings with his white privilege Scottish upbringing and is even more enraged with men of different ethnicities who are successful at dating the women he so desperately wants and cannot get, especially if those women happen to be white.

Beta-male racist Myles has a boner for hurting other men who are superior to him. He’s too much of a coward to confront them physically, so slimy  Myles resorts to dysfunctional effeminate weasel tactics of shaming, whining, lying, spreading bitter rumours and online defamation. Myles Bonnar is a disgusting, insecure, low self-esteem, transparent seedy worm. We could resort to the same loser tactics as Myles and say things like; “Myles Bonnar sucks the tiny penises of random farm animals,” or “Myles Bonnar looks like a police ID computer has crashed and given him the features of every major paedophile of our generation,” but we’re not going to do that. Mucus Myles Bonnar does enough damage to himself by just existing. How much of a creep are you Myles that another man’s wrongful downfall is your only claim to fame.

Myles, your only unreliable source for pursuing this stupidity was an old fart junky (Rita Bruce), everyone else in the media ignored the fatties bullsh*t, as did the police. But mud-slinging coward Myles had the motivation of fame (again angry beta-male with failed career) to find a target to burn in the public sphere to make a name for himself. Myles you reek of desperation and creepiness; you yucky, sickening little man.

Monotonous Myles even got the chance to be on TV (pathetic BBC shows like “The Nine” and “Victoria Derbyshire”) and radio, like an upcoming desperado trying to sell something (his flop-umentary – The Seduction Game, which flopped down south and didn’t catch fire, despite Myles’ sad back-breaking wasted efforts). Brain-dead Bonnar came across as a glory-hunting, fake-ass virtue-signalling brown-nosing weirdo. Face it Myles, your career is still a fail, you are still a failure and no matter what social justice hate bullsh*t you regurgitate from your mainstream marketing robotic value system – – you’re never going to get anywhere. Friend-zone lap-dog Bonnar even got to hang around with some semi-attractive girls, during his hate-campaign against men that make him feel insecure. The fact that is most laughable about Myles is that this was the highlight of the clown fan-boy reporter’s insignificant life. Myles you tragic little simp!

Bum Bonnar is a combination of low self-esteem and an over-inflated ego (defence mechanism to hide his insecurities). Wimp Myles is a neurotic individual, who is a member of a mainstream neurotic culture – against the matters of fact (real people don’t think like him). Myles puts culture on like an overcoat along with his fellow members, they use culture as a collectivised consensus to dictate what sort of neurotic behaviour is acceptable, (ie. Myles thinks filming women secretly to run a dating business is wrong, but thinks secretly harassing and filming men to advance his jaded career is right).

We live in a climate where big companies like the BBC have a criminal outlook and often employ criminal methods. People are randomly told (controlled) that more and more of their actions are illegal, as more natural human experience is assessed and judged. Who appointed the BBC or idiot fascists like Myles Bonnar as judges. This clown can barely run his own life or get his crappy career off the ground.

Boycott The BBC News: – This is Why The Predatory Scumbags Cannot Be Trusted!:

It’s easy to imagine walking-contradiction Myles Bonnar as a creature that’s not quite human that has adopted human form, but that would be letting him off the hook too easily. Boring Bonnar displays (what is called in Psychology) cognitive dissonance. He feels stress/pain holding two contradictory ideas at the same time (ie. pretending to stand for social justice/ radical feminism, whilst attempting to passively destroy men he thinks he can’t measure up to for career advancement). Either that or he’s a sneaky little simp faking the image of heroic crusader, building a fictional story of himself, barely holding himself together – foolishly thinking real people actually believe his toxic narrative/ bullsh*t!

Myles (The Boner) made a video defaming dating coach Addy Agame, coming from this same warped outlook. By fluke the video went viral in January 2019, Bonnar has no previous work that did so. Social media group madness took over because of the way the content was edited and displayed out of actual context in this garbage prejudicial video, as well as  a totally inaccurate narrative Bonnar chose to put across (despite Addy giving the weasel reporter a full explanation via email in November 2018.

Stamp BBC on the video, share it through BBC The Social via Twitter and it’s almost a stamp of approval because the majority of the public think BBC Scotland and the Scottish media actually report the truth/ news objectively – they don’t, they report selective propaganda to sell left-wing ideals and to sell units/ increase ratings to make money. People naively forget the media is a business, it is influence, it is a method of mind-control and marketing.  Social justice terrorists like Bonnar and the Scottish Media are only about women’s rights when it is convenient for them, not to actually help women or anyone for that matter.

They are carriers of a virus/ a contagious madness, they are a propaganda machine, a crowd; and humans are taken in by this, fall victim to this group-think mentality, lose control of their behaviour/ free will and restraint in a crowd; people in a group display actions they would not commit individually – that’s how propaganda, social media shaming and group-think tactics work.

After certain ideals are tattooed into our minds via the media’s constant reinforcement and repetition (most people don’t individually research this false information, they make an on-the-spot decision to believe it thinking the source is credible) social media is turned into a giant echo chamber where what we are told to believe is constantly reinforced by people who think they believe the same thing. Then opinions are expressed that a person is a monster and people are instantly congratulated for this. The media present this as a new kind of “democracy,” it isn’t, it’s the opposite, it locks people off in an online world and prevents them from finding out anything different. The BBC is a multi-million pound business with the power to do this easily.

People get unknowingly trapped in the “system” of feedback reinforcement. Twitter passes a lot of info around, mostly it’s the kind of info that people think others in their particular group will like, this acts as a kind of automatic mutual grooming. One person sends info they feel others will respond to in accepted ways, then in return those others will like the person who shared it (mostly this is socially conditioned information by mainstream media and marketers). Thus, information becomes currency to buy friends/ popularity/ career advancement or just to be accepted into the “system.”

When someone expresses information (from actual truth/ research/ experience) that disturbs the socially conditioned agreed protocols of the “system,” the other parts (internet trolls) react furiously, exert cyber mob-tactics and attack this person/ information to regain a false sense of stability. So the idea there is another world of other non-conditioned people who have real-life ideas is virtually non-existence or considered alien or wrong. Social justice terrorists are not “woke,” they are “controlled,” they define boundaries of “normality” by tearing apart people who dare to be unique outside of the smoke and mirrors!

If anyone should change their behaviour, it ought to be those doing the shaming for popularity (or other gain) ie. racist feminazi’s Myles Bonnar and Rita Bruce. Twitter/ media shaming allows fake people who complacently pretend to be “nice” or stand for “justice” to darkly take part in twisted yet somewhat hidden bullying, in the name of a “cause,” but in reality it’s just to indulge their shallow egos and to gain popularity of some sort (money, power, acceptance). Look at the facts and their track records – who have miserable creep Myles Bonnar and cowardly benefit-cheat Rita Bruce actually every helped? However it’s evident who they have hurt – a man who did nothing to either of them, ever; not to mention the women, children and men that are attached to him and depend on him! Some people grow-up and aspire to be what their hero’s are, what will our next generation be raised to aspire to be in a society fooled by and run by cheats and liars! Now let’s get to manky Myles Bonnar’s “Seduction Game” documentary garbage!

Myles is a lying spineless pig, that is clear for all to see. The producer of the flop-umentary is a fellow named Marc Ellison, a failed photo journalist who suspiciously works mostly on children’s cases. Ellison’s seedy website features videos of child soldiers , child brides and child witches. That’s extremely weird and his motives must be questioned, maybe that’s why he makes hate videos about men who are attracted to adult women (with his pal Myles).

Marc Ellison has been caught with his pants down previously. Ellison told of his “shame and public humiliation” after he was caught plagiarising information from a colleague. Thief Ellison was forced into making a public apology for his attempt to steal and lie about his work, he cried like a baby, stating; “I felt like burying my head in the sand, about giving up a career.” You should have, you’re an embarrassment. Not much has changed though Marc, you’re still a lying, cheating filthy BBC thief!

Creature Bonnar had another leech scumbag edit his BBC Panorama/ Disclosure flop-umentary. A manly-looking woman in her 50’s named Shelley Joffrey. She is an editor at BBC Scotland and a feminazi sexist, she founded a woman only journalism group excluding men (Myles must have got in because of his mangina). Joffrey was also outed as a liar on Twitter as she falsely claimed to break the Jimmy Saville child abuse story via a tweet. Shelley then got her flabby behind kicked on Twitter, including by the reporter who actually broke the Jimmy Saville story (note Saville worked for the BBC for years and the BBC endorsed and protected the child molester for years, by the way). Joffrey then lied further to cover up her original lie, stating; “I made no such claims, it was just in the headline and tweet, it makes me look really stupid.” Even so Shelley, it’s still false information, just like the flop-umentary on Addy and Street Attraction – which also makes you look really stupid. This is the company you keep Myles – lying, cheating thieves? Well, birds of a feather, stick together!

It’s fitting that man-whore Myles would write an article for a scumbag publication such as The Telegraph – as both are filthy liars that specifically target Easter European and Middle Eastern people to falsely accuse of allegations they make up out of thin air! Let’s look at The Telegraph’s recent track record; they apologised and paid substantial damages to Melania Turmp over a fake magazine cover story defaming her. The U.S first lady has Eastern European roots, The Telegraph claimed her modelling career only advanced due to her husband – this is utter nonsense, they just decided to fabricate this (much like spineless Bonnar’s story). The horrid newspaper was forced to admit the story contained a number of false statements that should not have been published, in a correction issued a week after the original article. The Telegraph also said it had been asked to make clear that Mrs Trump’s father was not a fearsome presence.

How disgusting of The Telegraph to not only defame the first lady, but to attack her father and family also. Other fake news The Telegraph published (made-up) about her included and then corrected was; she did not cry on election night, she met her husband in 1998 (not 1996) and that her mother/ father/ sister did not relocate to New York in 2005 to live in buildings owned by Donald Trump.

The Telegraph were also forced to apologise and pay damages to London business man, Mujib Islam, over a series of fake news articles spreading misinformation about him. This isn’t the only brown person the lying newspaper defamed recently! They also had to apologise and pay substantial libel damages over false extremism allegations to Ifhat Smith – a mother brought to public attention because of her son’s ill treatment at school. The Telegraph went as far as to say the innocent woman was a key figure in the Muslim brotherhood and her complaint about protecting her son was a lie – the only lies being told were by The Telegraph. It’s very suspicious that these demo-graphs of people were targeted and even more suspicious that The Telegraph would team up with so-called racist reporter Myles Bonnar to target more people of the same demographics yet again!




Check out our next blog post: