Sleazy Reporter Loser “Blair Meikle” Calls Red Pill Rights “Addy Agame Website” / Addy Was Not Convicted Of “Hounding” Anyone!

Bogus Journo Scum “Blair Meikle” Burns With Jealous Rage Over Red Pill Rights Reporting The Truth About “Addy Agame” Being Found “Not Guilty” of 13 Charges

Blasphemous liar, Blair “Witch” Meikle wrote a second trash article about Addy Agame (Not Guilty!) claiming Red Pill Rights is a “Addy Agme” website. We are a human rights organisation Blair you idiot, unlike the underhanded scum at “The Scottish Sun,” who are a fake news pushing bunch of heathens (who keep getting sued for lying).

http://redpillrights.com/johnny-depp-falsely-accused-of-domestic-abuse/

http://redpillrights.com/creepy-coward-blair-meikle-the-sun-writes-hate-article-about-adnan-ahmeds-previous-convictions-despite-ahmed-being-fully-rehabilitated/

Blood-sucker Blair Meikle claimed RPR; “boasted he was found not guilty of 13 charges.” Nah, Blair you bum, we don’t need to “boast” or lie, it’s the truth, burn with jealous rage, the truth hurts doesn’t it Blair!

Moron Blair continued; “he was found guilty of hounding five young girls in the street.” This is absolute rubbish, Ahmed faced no charges of hounding; The toilet paper news rag teamed up with guilty creep Blair Meikle to make up fake charges of “hounding girls.” Typical tabloid trash. Ahmed faced no charges of “hounding” anyone, he was wrongfully convicted of ‘section 38 breach of the peace.’ He will appeal and sue the hounds at The Scottish Sun for hounding him with their lies and filth!

The so-called plagiarising thief reporter creep Blair Meikle continued; “Glasgow pick-up artist is behind bars convicted of harassing victims in Glasgow.” Again utter nonsense! Ahmed faced no charges or convictions for “harassing,” and there were no “victims.” Ahmed was wrongfully convicted for actions that are not even a recognised crime under UK law and his appeal is in process!

Adnan Ahmed has always maintained he is not a pick-up artist, he has always said he is a dating/ life coach. It is a sad state of affairs when people are unable to talk to each other face to face, confining society further into dating apps and social media. In this era it is more normal to troll pictures and profiles online, messaging desperately and projecting a false persona to lure others in; whereas starting a random conversation with someone you find attractive face to face during the day is considered not only abnormal, but also criminal. There is more danger involved in meeting someone online than there is in meeting them in person. Plus face to face dating is a much more human and much less time consuming process, that is if Police Scotland don’t arrest you first.

Look at Blair Meikle’s choice of words, “victims,” there were no victims, there were no actual crimes recognised under UK Law, there has to be a crime to be a “victim.” Fake “victims” who are glory-hungry idiots, jump on a fake #metoo bandwagon (saying they were simply chatted up) actually takes away from real victims who actually have to face the reality of real crimes. The only “victims” in connection to The Scottish Sun are the people they victimise through their vile trash hate articles.

Blair Meikle continues his lie filled Scottish Sun article with the headline “Addy Agame Behind Bars After Targeting Young Girls In Glasgow.” You are an idiot Blair. Addy Agame has been remanded for the past 9 months awaiting court, he’s already behind bars, he’s been wrongfully remanded since January 2019 you half-wit. And what a disgusting perv you are Blair, “targeting young girls in Glasgow,” this maybe a warped fantasy in your mind Blair, but it’s not the truth. Addy wasn’t accused of “targeting” anyone, the “young girls” Blair weirdly talks about were young adults over the age of sexual consent in the UK and the supposed incidents were not said to have took place in Glasgow. Mucky Meikle deliberately writes “young girls” with no explanation of age, to imply they were children, they were not, it’s disgusting to imply that adults are children just to ruin a man’s reputation!

Fake snitch Blair Meikle starts his stolen click bait article by  stealing a previous article from over 10 years ago and twisting it, the failed hack stated; “creepy pick-up artist Addy Agame previously jailed caught with stun guns and £7,000 cocaine and cannabis stash – has previously served jail time for drugs and firearms charge.” Firstly the only thing “creepy” in this whole article is thief Blair Meikle. Adnan Ahmed practised radical honesty in all his interactions, including with women!

Adnan is drug-free and does not drink alcohol. He has no mental health issues. He did a lot of community work over the last 4 years with Narcotics Anonymous and Cocaine Anonymous, mentoring and sponsoring vulnerable individuals, as well as having went through the 12-step program of recovery with his own mentors and sponsors as part of his own rehabilitation after his last sentence in 2013.

Adnan’s previous record is bad. However, he plead guilty to those offences straight away because he was guilty of those crimes. He is not guilty of the allegations the Procurator Fiscal has made, hence why he took this farce all the way to a trial., maintaining his innocence Adnan has not committed any offences since 2013, has never been on trail before, has worked with the police and has never been placed on a fully committed remand or been indicted in the past.

Although his previous is bad, it does not include any sexual offences or assaults. The drug offences he had in his past he has fully rehabilitated from and is willing to be drug tested at random to prove this. The firearm offences were a Taser that was not functional and a fake replica pistol (which could not harm anyone). For all his drug offences and firearm offences together in 2009, he received a total of 35 months custodial sentence.

Adnan was a criminal justice practitioner for Turning Point until the time of his remand. He was also moving away from the dating field and taking DWLF in a new direction focusing on human rights/ men’s rights. His job was supporting ex-cons and drug addicts to reform and integrate them into society. He planned to expand DWLF into representing men who had been wrongfully accused of crimes they didn’t commit. He had no idea that he would be in a very similar situation.

Adnan was planning to study criminology in his 4th year at University. In his 1st year he gained an HNC in Social Services (at the City of Glasgow College). In his 2nd year he gained an HND in Additional Support Needs (at Glasgow Clyde College). At the time of his arrest he was half-way through his 3rd year doing a BA in Learning Difficulties/Disabilities (between Fife College and Abertay University). His 4th year would have been a BA (Hons) in Criminology (at Abertay University in Dundee). His place on the course was terminated as was his employment because of the media scandal. Adnan also has a previous BA in Business Studies (From Glasgow Caledonian University).

Baby-brain Blair babbled a shred of truth by stealing (typical thief) a RPR quote; “Red Pill Rights said on Instagram: Breaking News: Adnan Ahmed acquitted of 13 charges; all 3 sexual assaults and 10 threatening and abusive behaviour. He was found not guilty.” It’s the truth Blair, read it and weep you little toad; burn baby-brain Blair witch burn! Lying fool Blair Meikle continued “Ahmed, approached 5 girls between 2016 and 2018 in Glasgow and Uddingston.” This may seem like news to Blair as it is 5 more girls than Blair has ever talked to in his whole geeky sad journo life. Well, maybe Blair likes boys, if so, that’s his choice.

In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a bias jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by the likes of Blair Meikle and his sleazy Scottish media scum pals). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, peoples perspective was skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, this is total madness as it was the only way to convict him of something which didn’t actually amount to a crime! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict will be appealed and overturned in the next few months as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintains his innocence and 13 charges were dropped before the bias jury got a chance to deliberate on them. Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct!

The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to confirm if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, this is not justice, it’s a farce!

It is the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation – in order to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation!

Creepy click bait thief and failed sports journo Blair Meikle recycled more stolen info, stating; “the convicted drug dealer faced 18 charges but 13 of them were dropped.” That’s because he didn’t do it you reptile! In all reality, all of them should have been dropped as they are not actually recognised crimes under UK law, Adnan Ahmed is not guilty and will win his appeal!

http://redpillrights.com/criminal-justice-professional-adnan-ahmed-helps-people-change-their-lives-for-the-better/

Bleak thieving charlatan Blair “Witch” Meikle exaggerated and falsified reality more so by stating; “blocked their path and made unsolicited comments about their appearance.” At Red Pill Rights we stick to the facts Blair (not stolen plagiarised lies like you), in fact, what this particular witness said in court was; “it was a chat under 1 minute, he gave me a compliment, was smiling and said I had a really good fashion sense, I left within a minute as I was busy when I decided to.” Ahmed also truthfully stated to the court; “I didn’t block anyone’s path ever, it was a casual chat under 1 minute, she left, that was it.”

Public-hate figure manky Blair Meikle, blatantly lied again (no surprise) by stating; “he also reportedly demanded their phone number,” no Blair you muppet, a number of girls gave Addy their contact details. Bumbling buffoon Blair blabbed more bile; “tried to contact one on social media, he even tried to kiss one and touched her cheek.” Well since shameless thief Blair and the scummy Scottish Sun keep compulsively lying, it’s up to us at Red Pill Rights to tell the truth, here’s the facts;

Scummy toe rag Blair Meikle continued; “the court heard Ahmed approached 2 schoolgirls in a secluded lane in Uddingston in 2016. They were aged 16 and 17 at the time.” The “schoolgirls” are above the legal age of consent in the UK, 17 and 16. The alleged conversations are said by the two witnesses to have took place around 10am approximately, school had already started. The witnesses stated, “they were in there last year (6th year) of high school in 2016,” to the court. This is several months before a college or university course would begin should students at the late stage of high school wish to continue further education.

Blair Meikle continued; “one witness, who was 17 at the time, said the man told her she looked pretty and asked her if she was married.” Again 17 is above legal age of consent in the UK and this allegation has not been proven. Additionally, to call someone pretty or ask their marital status, is not a criminal offence!

What Blair Meikle conveniently left out was that the witness also said, “it was around 10am, not the usual time people go to school and the lane is attached to two main roads on either side, along with two small open grass fields at either side.” The witness also said that, “this is the common route to the train station that most people coming from that direction would take.”

Blair quoted the witness as saying; “he asked me if I was at school and what I was doing at school.” Meikle left out the fact that before this quote the witness told the jury, “he introduced himself then I told him I was at school, he made general conversation, we spoke for under three minutes and parted ways.” This is vital information! Blair Meikle quoted the witness alleging, “he was asking if I had a boyfriend and I said no.” This is not a crime.

Blair Meikle continued; “she said – he asked me if I was married, as I was wearing a ring, I said no and walked away.” However no “friends” or “teachers” came to court to confirm this. In the woman’s police statement, she said she saw Mr Ahmed several times after the 2016 incident in the same area, but they never spoke again! The 2016 incident was reported to police in January 2019 after the BBC made a video defaming Ahmed’s dating business.

In regards to the second witness Blair left out that the incident is said by the witness to have taken place again around 10am after school had already began an hour previously, in the same lane attached to two main roads that is the main route to the train station which commuters take. Both these witnesses admit to being linked and both stated that they are good friends. What Blair Meikle again conveniently left out was that the witness told the court; “the school is right next to the train station and that the pair parted ways in under 3 minutes in different directions towards their separate destinations!” Mr Ahmed’s defence team have lodged an eye witness in his defence who can confirm there was no “intimidation” involved.

Creepy Blair also conveniently left out the testimony Adnan Ahmed gave to the court himself, Addy gave a real honest account of events stating; “it was around 10am, we were both walking on the main route to the train station, it is not a secluded lane, it’s a open main route to the train, I was walking in front of her, waved and signalled for her to take her headphones out, then said – hey you look pretty enough to go for coffee with, that is if your boyfriend is cool with it. She smiled and said, I don’t have a boyfriend. I then said I’m catching a train to the city centre. I thought she was doing the same as she wasn’t wearing a school uniform and it was outside school hours, I assumed she was 19 or 20. She then said – I’m going to school; which shocked me, I immediately asked how old are you? She said 17, I then said – hope you’re enjoying school and shook her hand to say bye, her ring struck my hand when we shook hands, I said – you hit me with your wedding ring as a parting joke, I did not ask her about her being married! The conversation lasted under a minute, I did not ask her for her number or to go for a coffee. I saw her many times around that area for 3 years and we never spoke again, she also confirmed this to the police.”

Click the following link to read about a testimonial by a female who dated Addy, who met him in the same area around the same time – http://redpillrights.com/?p=1086&preview=true

Regarding the second incident, Addy told the court; “it was around the same time and place, again 10 am, on my way to the city, no school uniform, soon as she said she was 16 I left, this girl confirmed to the court I didn’t ask for a number, she confirmed I didn’t ask her out, it was less than a minute of chat. She also said in court she saw me many times after that in the area and we never spoke again. These incidents are said to have happened in 2016 and no one came forward then. only in 2019 after how I was portrayed in the social media hate campaign (referring to BBC Social hate video against him) there was a sudden change in perspective by these girls to say passing comments were a crime that caused them discomfort. I could have asked someone for the time, after the January 2019 media uproar, they would have reported it. They both know each other well and colluded on social media. They are not being truthful! There was nothing sinister or rehearsed or pre-planned as is being suggested, it was spontaneous and quick.”

Hate-mongering liar Blair Meikle spewed more bile by stating; “lawyer, Donna Armstrong defending said; he didn’t want to cause fear or alarm.” What camp Blair left out is Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong also said of these incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In our civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. This is the main route to the train station in Uddingston, not a secluded lane, it has fields of grass either side and the school happens to be right next to the train station. All sides have said it was during the day outside school hours. For talking sake, even if both these ladies had went on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!”

Seedy weirdo Blair Meikle stated; “he is known for posting seedy videos on his DWLF Game page.” Those videos were teaching aids, the public should check out talentless bum Blair Meikle’s internet porn history for a real insight into seedy videos, sources have said they are down right disgusting!

Ignorant Meikle again continued on the defamation route via video titles, by stating; ” the You Tuber speaks about how to pick up a girl who already has a partner, how to get girls to have threesomes with you and how to find yes girls that are down to f***.” OK Blair, we’re not going to explain the meaning of click bait to you again, but we will address other aspects of your stupidity. Agame did make a video about sleeping with “a girl who already had a partner,” but the buffoon reporter Blair Meikle showed his weasel tendencies yet again by failing to explain the context. We also watched this video and it is clear to see Addy is referring to girls in bad relationships that are coming to an end, or who have casual partners they are not committed to. This is totally fine between 2 consenting adults.

And Blair you frigid judgemental jealous little girly man, what’s wrong with having “threesomes” or meeting “yes” girls who are just “down to f***.” Blair Meikle is a two-faced spineless reporter that on the one hand uses religious reformer type of biblical judgement shame tactics and on the other hand lies, fabricates and makes false accusations to sell his garbage articles. It’s 2019, if people want to have “threesomes” or “no strings attached causal sex” they have the choice to do so Blair. Your attempt to control other men’s sexual choices reeks of envy and is a classic beta male shame tactic Blair.

Let us explain the concept of click bait video titles to you Blair; Agame’s videos did have click bait titles, this was to attract more clientele as daytime dating videos are filmed and uploaded on an almost daily basis all across the UK and this industry is very competitive, having shock value titles is a marketing strategy to trigger more interest from customers. You’d think hypocritical plagiariser Blair Meikle would already know the concept of click bait as he uses it to spread unbelievable stupid fake news crap!

Come on Blair, you sleazy hack nitwit, can’t you see the ladie’s faces are blurred out, protecting their identity. Furthermore you failed to mention it is a dating business, not a day out with friends. Additionally, the foolish journo failed to report that the majority of videos on Ahmed’s dating site are from cities around the world.”

Vile weirdo Blair Meikle’s bizarre article continued; “chatting to girls and attempting to take them home with him.” OK Blair, what is actually wrong with that, people do so every weekend at bars and clubs. Would you prefer if men chatted to just men or just to animals and only attempted to take them home?! If you would like to do so Blair that’s up to you, but don’t impose your wretched warped views on others!

Robbing slime Meikle continued; “Nicola Sturgeon told Scottish Parliament she was utterly sickened by what she saw,” in regards to Addy Agame – funny how Nicola Sturgeon’s office then helped Adnan Ahmed’s girlfriend with advice on his case after his arrest, a bit hypocritical Nicola. Though Sturgeon is no stranger to hypocrisy, she was a sub-ordinate of her former boss Alex Salmond who was accused of multiple rapes and serious assaults while Nicola Sturgeon worked for him, she hasn’t said this is “utterly sickening,” guess she condones real sickening behaviour. Ahmed on the other hand faced no such charges and only had “section 38 breach of the peace” to (unfairly and wrongfully) answer to.

Maybe Nicola is miffed as to why Alex didn’t go for her or maybe she’s like any other dishonest politician – she conveniently chimes in when it gets her public support! Sturgeon recently announced she wants Scotland to be a feminist state with female only MPs, that is sexist Nicola. If all the men left Scotland it would crumble into jelly. Sturgeon was also recently asked to apologise for a disgraceful comment she made dismissing the pay concerns of a serving police officer. Nicola also joined the hate-campaign against serving Prime Minister Boris Johnson over Brexit. Come on Nicola, don’t be jealous because he’s a male MP and because he is what you’ll never be – Prime Minister of the UK! Though Sturgeon does have one thing in common with Boris, they both have the same hairstyle, except Boris’ suits him. Nicola Sturgeon should be helping Adnan Ahmed and his family, they are Scottish citizens and suffering a massive injustice at the hands of the media, instead of irresponsibly condemning an innocent man who was wrongfully convicted for something that isn’t even a crime under Scottish Law!

Bottom-feeder Blair Meikle then makes a critical amateur journalist mistake by listing an incident Adnan Ahmed was acquitted of, found not guilty of and did not do! Dummy Blair actually printed this after Ahmed’s trial, after he was cleared of the incident, this guarantee’s Ahmed being able to sue for defamation. Moron Meikle even stated; “we told you earlier how a woman told the court she was left shaking with fear,” this did not happen Blair, no one told the court this, she didn’t even come to court, she told The Sun you absolute imbosile!

The vile Scottish Sun said, “the unnamed Glaswegian revealed to her Twitter followers how Ahmed offered to walk with her but became so aggressive after she spurned his advances.” Actually this Glaswegian is not  “unnamed” she publicly declared herself (via Twitter account @kdownonit). This female felt it was necessary to take this non-issue to social media on 10th January 2019 after The BBC Social video defaming Adnan Ahmed and his dating business went viral. On the indictment the incident supposedly took place on 22nd March 2018, nearly a year previously. She didn’t go to the police on 22nd March 2018 or on 10th January 2019, instead she went on Twitter to lap up the #MeToo attention, claiming Ahmed attempted to have a short conversation with her which caused her annoyance.

This incident was crazily listed on Ahmed’s charge sheet as a “section 38 breach of the peace” after the police hunted her down for comment, because she failed to make any police report (because nothing happened that equates to a crime), despite hecklers on social media urging her to do so because they felt she was lying.

Blair Meikle sensationalised her tweets which prompted the police to investigate her false accusations and extreme exaggerations; “the frightened female told on Twitter how she’d been approached by Ahmed in Glasgow city centre.” She is not a “frightened female” at all, she went on social media boldly and swore at anyone who exposed her as a liar; she bullied and argued with hecklers if they dared call her bluff. This girl is lying, nothing happened, she is being a drama queen as it gives her the much wanted attention on Twitter, that she craves.

Blair Meikle lied further saying; “woman claims she was shaken with fear and had to flee into a nearby hotel to ask them, to phone her a taxi to get her home because she was terrified, he was on drugs.” This is complete BS! If she was “terrified” why did she not ask the hotel for help or call the police straight away?! If she was “shaken with fear” she would have asked for help, she didn’t because she is a liar and made it up. She did not “flee” or “run” to a nearby hotel to phone a taxi, she has a smartphone she uses very regularly for Twitter. She said in her statement to the police (contradicting her Twitter rant) that she walked away and was not followed, so why did she have to run/flee?! She didn’t! She only went to the hotel to call a taxi because her phone battery was dead and decided to make up the incident to get famous from a bogus #MeToo campaign. NOTE – Ahmed was acquitted of this horrible false accusation – the charge was dropped and thrown out of court.

Furthermore, Ahmed doesn’t take drugs. This is a well-documented fact. His job as a criminal justice practitioner has a mandatory drug test requirement, he would not be able to work if he had any drugs in his system. This is a disgusting accusation made by The Scottish Sun and by this rancid female.

Blair Meikle quoted the girl’s Twitter comments; stating; “captioning BBC The Social’s video, she posted online: A can confirm that this guy asked if he could walk me home when a just finished work at 9pm next to the Clyde then got so aggressive with me when a declined that a had to run inty a hotel and ask them to phone me a taxi. How the fuck is he not in jail.”

Firstly, she uses “A” instead of “I” and “inty” instead of “into.” (Low-intelligence writing!) She also captioned The BBC Social viral video that defamed Ahmed’s dating business, which further show’s her fame chasing and attention seeking intentions. Once again she is not clear about what she means as “aggressive.” She said that Addy shouted at her when she made her false claims on Twitter! However, after the police hunted her down she changed her story saying “he spoke to me for maybe a couple of minutes, I walked away, it sounded like he was swearing and shouting when I was quite a distance away, but I can’t be sure it was at me.

This is a totally different story to Twitter – unsure if he swore, he did not follow, she did not flee or run – because it is a made-up story. Where is the “aggressive” she spoke of on Twitter, there’s nothing “aggressive!”

Look at the language this girl uses online, “how the fucks he not in jail?” In jail for what?! Nothing happened and even if it did, in jail for a guy asking to walk a girl home and the girl declining?! This is delusional gas-lighting and horrible behaviour.Her transparent false claims didn’t stop with just Addy, she shot down all hecklers who called out her falseness and inconsistencies.

Blair Meikle continued quoting her Twitter feed; “feel like a need to explain maself cos of some idiots in the comments, a never phoned the police because a had just come out of work late I was shaking with fear and my main concern was getting home safely, I thought he was on drugs or something by the way he was staring at me.” How convenient. OK let’s for arguments sake say she did want to “get home safely,” why did she not call the police when she got home on 22nd March 2018. Furthermore, why did she not call the police on 10th January 2019 when The BBC Social video came out; why did the police have to find her?!

We’ll tell you why because nothing happened, it’s all lies. She comments on Addy “being on drugs and staring at her.” In her police statement she accuses Addy of “being drunk” but doesn’t say he was “staring” more striking contradictions! Addy does not drink or use drugs as detailed earlier. Once again Addy was found ‘not guilty’ of this charge.

This female bullied, abused and made excuses when online hecklers called out her lies. ly@wee frumpy said – you can still report it now. She made up the following excuse commenting back; “I’m in Asia atm and won’t be back in the country for another 12 months so unsure if there’s anything I can do at the moment.” This was a complete lie as the police tracked her down in Scotland within a week and took her statement. The real reason she didn’t go to the police was because firstly there was no crime, secondly, she just wanted to hype up the #MeToo uproar online, thirdly she was lying and exaggerating and lastly if she went to the police she may get caught in her lie. This girl then went onto label Ahmed’s staff as a “gang” and calls them “absolute horrible bastards.”

An account called DittyBopper also responded to the accusatory female’s gas-lighting comment “how the fucks he not in jail,” by saying – “because you phoned a taxi and not the police.” Paddy @paddyB1988 also said the same thing. The female responded venomously saying; “aw fuck up n stop victim bullying, you don’t even know what you’re talking about you idiot.” OK so in Scottish slang “fuck up” means “shut the fuck up.” She also shamed the guy saying he’s “victim blaming,” a victim of what? Even if her false claims were true, it would mean a “victim” of a conversation, that is absolutely insane! Paddy shaken up by the online abuse and bullying replied, “I’m not victim blaming just suggesting it may have been an idea to report to the police.” She then responded with another blatant lie saying; “They’re aware of the situation and have been for over a year.” This is totally false as she didn’t report anything to the police, She then continued her false claims and disgusting language on Twitter saying, “absolute freak, he was intimidating, I actually burst into tears while watching the video and thought of all the other poor girls.”

Again, the drama queen, this girl thought of no one but herself getting 5 seconds of fame. She didn’t “burst into tears” she had no reason to and how was she “intimidated,” she wasn’t, the only thing that is intimidating is her online lies, bullying and abuse. Labelling innocent people “freaks” and “bastards” online in an attempt to glory hunt are the actions of a real freaky bastard!

Blair continued his over-inflated sensationalised garbage quoting the accusatory female’s lies on Twitter further; “he was stumbling over his words, a couldn’t understand what he was saying when he started shouting at me as I walked away.” She told the police she walked away first and thought Ahmed was shouting from a distance, but she couldn’t be sure it was at her! Also, the fact she said she “walked away” contradicts the claim she made about “running” to a hotel. Also, Addy is a trained public speaker, even on YouTube he never “stumbles over his words.” This is a fairy story. The female is quoted as adding to her contradictions saying “then once I got in the taxi the driver started laughing n went – want me to batter him for you. I thought I was overreacting and didn’t expect him to be repeatedly harassing other girls.”

The taxi driver laughed because of the context she told her story, in a funny way. That is if he exists at all! A taxi driver offering to “batter” Addy is an attempt by the cabbie to impress this rancid girl. Did she also report the driver to the police for getting “aggressive”! An out of shape Glasgow cab driver is only able to “batter” deep fried chocolate bars, he’d get his arse beat down in the streets. Addy Agame has never “repeatedly harassed” anyone. He spoke to girls he found attractive for the purpose of dating them or teaching clients. He has the right to do so. This female admitted, “I thought I was over reacting” that’s because she was. She didn’t think it was an issue until The BBC Social video came out nearly a year later and even then, she didn’t report a crime, because there is no crime to report, it is total fabrication.

We approached Adnan Ahmed for a comment on this incident, he said; “I don’t recall this at all, it either didn’t happen or was such a insignificant incident I have no memory of it. What she is saying happened is a lie, that’s quite apparent from the amount of inconsistencies and contradictions in her stories. Plus, it’s obvious she is lying. I don’t shout and swear at girls when I chat to them, I’ve documented on YouTube telling clients to never take a failed interaction personally and move on to the next girl straight away, without showing any negative emotion, I’ve made full videos about this topic, the press and the public have seen them. She is lying. Also, I don’t drink alcohol or use drugs, once again I taught my clients about not getting intoxicated in order to have better mental and emotional health in numerous videos.

These claims are crazy and childish, anyone with half a brain can see its absolute nonsense and totally stupid behaviour on her part. I don’t follow people, I talk to them standing stationary, I give myself a time constraint to put them at ease and allow myself to leave quickly if they are weird. I only ever walk with someone if I happen to be going in the same direction” This seems to be another case of no actual offence being committed and the accuser having no inclination in her mind that there was a crime until the BBC Social video defaming Ahmed’s dating business went viral.

Blair Meikle continued his lie filled The Scottish Sun article (25/09/2019) with the headline “Addy Agame Faces Jail After Targeting Teenagers.” You are an idiot Blair. Addy Agame has been remanded for the past 9 months awaiting court, he’s already in jail, he doesn’t “face jail” he’s been wrongfully remanded since January 2019 you half-wit. And what a disgusting perv you are Blair, stating “targeting teenagers,”  without stating their age was over that of legal consent. This horrible implication and intentional tactical smear maybe a warped sexual fantasy in your mind Blair, but it’s not the truth about Addy. Addy wasn’t accused of “targeting” anyone, the “teenagers” Blair weirdly talks about were young adults over the age of sexual consent in the UK. Compulsive liar Blair Meikle (as RFC fans labelled him) deliberately writes “teenagers” with no explanation, to imply they were underage, they most certainly were not – keep the subliminal underage fantasies to yourself Blair you rat! It’s disgusting to imply this, it’s not the truth!

The weak mousy Scottish Sun reporter then spat; “Ahmed said what he did was educational. However, women he had approached told his trial they had been upset and intimidated.” Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaigns in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.

Creepy coward sleaze “Blair Meikle” is a failed sports journalist and a warped weirdo liar. This is why the toilet-paper newspaper “The Scottish Sun” employed him, more about those scumbags later. Sleazy reporter Blair Meikle will be sued for defamation as he even published charges Ahmed was found not guilty of after his trial had finished! You stupid little man Blair, do your homework you failed hack!

Vile perv Blair Meikle is hated by the general public. The ginger country-bumpkin from the Scottish Borders, has pages upon pages of online hate towards him because of Blair’s disgusting lies and twisted views. Football fans called manky Blair Meikle a “moron” because he targeted Rangers fans only in sectarian fashion, hounding them with his filthy prejudice. Monster Blair Meikle then blocked his creepy Twitter account like a cowardly weasel because of the backlash of hate he received!

People said of Blair’s bastardised fake news; “shocking what passes for journalism, embarrassing standard of sports journalist, he should be named and shamed.” We agree 100% and will name and shame the coward Blair Meikle. Dishonest swine Meikle was said (by the public) to “steal click bait stories from Twitter and report them as his own,” this is true, he did the same thing in regards to spreading lies about Addy Agame. People also said that snake-rat Blair Meikle “should have a background check done on him before he was allowed to report anything.” We agree once more, the background check would show Blair Meikle to be a desperate journalist predator and a sneaky liar!

Discriminatory pig Blair Meikle is also said to have spread hate towards people with disabilities. This is in regards to the despicable reptilian creature Meikle making offensive comments about disabled people online. The public did not react well to this either; two of the public’s top comments come to mind about sickening Blair; “Blair looks like the kind of arsehole you wouldn’t tire of slapping” and “ban him and his paper.” Here is a link to the rest, enjoy! https://www.followfollow.com/forum/threads/blair-meikle-scottish-sun.25407/page-2

Speaking of his disgusting newspaper, scummy “The Scottish Sun,” the stinking tabloid muck is being sued yet again! This is great news for Adnan Ahmed who will also sue the slimy rag in the near future. Prince Harry is suing The Sun because they hacked his phone and stole his voice messages! This is utterly sickening behaviour by the rancid dogs at The Sun. Harry filed against The Sun in the high court of justice, the same way actor Johnny Depp did after The Sun lied about him also. Until recently, the newspaper’s page 3 featured young girls with their naked breasts on display on a daily basis. It’s pretty rich that these idiots would call anyone sexist when they objectified females to increase their sales. The Scottish Sun is a total sham.

Check out our next blog post: http://redpillrights.com/sleazy-connor-gordon-the-scottish-sun-attempts-to-influence-court-proceedings-against-addy-agame-ahmed-not-guilty-claiming-court-decide-if-sexually-motivated-despite-no-sexual-offences-comm/