Vile Creep Hack Richard Spillet (Daily Mail Online) Published Debunked Bogus Article About Fake Female Victims Who Committed Perjury By Pretending To Be “Mentally Scarred” (By A Chat) And Made False Allegations Against YouTube Dating Coach Who Was Wrongfully Imprisoned, But Cleared His Name By Proving His Innocence In The High Court
Filthy liar reporter Richard Spillet stated; “jailed for 2 years after filming himself approaching and posting videos online.” This is a total lie, Ahmed did not film any of the women! This was not even a charge lodged against him. Richard Spillet is a liar and a disgrace to his profession!
Dirty creepy Richard Spillet is a scummy liar that attempts to make a pathetic living off demonising masculine men because Richard is a spineless simp beta cuck! Seedy sleaze-ball Spillet calls Addy a “sex offender” in his trash article on 22nd Oct 2019 for embarrassing joke newspaper Daily Mail Online!
Ahmed is not a sex offender – that is a proven fact under Scottish law as Addy was acquitted, cleared and proven innocent of all false allegations in the high court! What is perverted is writing shameless virtue-signalling crap in a male-feminist fashion to trick women into thinking you are an ally, when in reality you are trying to friend-zone your way into sleeping with them – sound familiar Richard?! Also making up fake sexually suggestive accusations of “filming women and posting videos online” should be a sexual offence and any journo hack doing so should be labelled a life-long sex offender – do you agree Richard Spillet?!
Creepy Spillet continued; “called himself Addy Agame in secretly filmed videos posted online….” He’s referring to YouTube but calls it “online” to be a sneaky rat that stirs up controversy. Ahmed was not charged with this because it is not a crime! It may be immoral to some, but who the hell are the Daily Mail to talk about morality to anyone, they’ve been caught with their pants down and exposed hundreds of thousands of times. Stop whining you alarmist idiot. This is no different from how media hypocrites like you and sleazy Myles Bonnar film people without their consent and post / broadcast it. What’s “horrific” is the Daily Mail don’t conceal the identities of the people they demonise for personal gain – these coaches at least did protect the identities of the females they interacted with. And how are others supposed to learn if there are no video examples?! Ultimately – this is not illegal under UK law. You seem to have more of a problem with the law, rather than an actual valid issue.
The dirty Daily Mail scum misleadingly use the word “schoolgirls” in their headline, despite all the lying females involved being above the adult age of consensual sex in the UK! The legal age of consensual sex is 16, do an article on that if it bothers you, it’s the law. 17, 18, 19 are “teenagers,” but they are still adults, your wording implies otherwise. It’s funny how social justice warriors suspiciously employ almost biblical moral high-grounds when judging others, but act hypocritically in secret. Their hidden-penis ethics are to push a desperate agenda not because of any actual value system. If 2 adults of any consensual sexual age decide to get together that’s up to them.
Geeky hack simp fan Spillet stated; “Addy Agame uploaded in a bid to instruct others how to pick-up women.” Looks like you could use the help Richard, you look like a run of the mill simp with bad posture and low confidence! What dating coaches like Addy taught clumsy social misfits is that they can learn to perceive things differently, to cut through illusions of the mind / PC society that they believe or fear, to stop seeing imaginary problems and to learn to focus on the reality of male-female dynamics. Too often clients who think like Bonnar react emotionally, get despondent and lose perspective. Their negative perceptions invade their minds and throw off their emotional compass, resulting in social anxiety. Dating is taught as a science and an art. Human brains evolved for an environment very different from the one we currently inhabit, resulting in people carrying biological baggage (as social justice ideologies clash with basic human instincts). Humans are still primed to detect threats / dangers that no longer exist, ie. stress of rejection or the fight-or-flight response experienced when talking to a female. Addy taught that men have a choice in how they respond to this situation; to not be led by primal feelings, to understand them and learn how to filer them in order to be attractive to the opposite sex (its not trickery, it’s science and art). Richard truly doesn’t get it and this, along with his bitterness led to his hate-campaign and sexually jealous lies about men who he perceives as superior.
Bitter Spillet hates men who have honed the ability to control, channel and understand primal signals because he can’t access that part of himself; Richard you are a slave to your impulses, instincts, social justice conditioning and need for approval – you’ve never even questioned why you are the way you are! If the BBC Social video or Panorama / Disclosure flop-umentary were even slightly accurate; they would have shown how Addy turned seduction into an education, skill-set and success with women. Many men from all backgrounds testify online on how they learned to control emotions, to have a positive outlook, to overcome anxiety / depression, to enjoy the present moment and to handle situations that disturb / limit others. Women benefit from this also, they can have healthy relationships (whether short-term or long-term) with men who have their sh*t together! Instead you falsely reported what your dark sordid agenda and limited mind made-up and twisted!
Addy taught his clients a series of exposure therapy exercises in varying levels of difficulty; from simple daunting approaches, until they did it so many times that it became as second nature as breathing. Making it natural and familiar, removing uncertainty, leading to confidence through experience. Fear is relieved by authority. Training is authority, it’s a release valve. With enough exposure, ordinary and innate fears are ironed out. Unfamiliarity is eliminated, which in turn increases tolerance to stress / anxiety / uncertainty. Richard should apply this to areas of his life, he might learn something more valuable than his egoistic armchair analysing!
Rancid Richard continued in this fashion stating; “been jailed after leaving young women mentally scarred.” OK Rich you’re doing that thing again where you make idiotic claims that are lies and leave it open to negative misinterpretation. Again “mentally scarred” after having a light chat consisting of passing polite remarks, because that’s all it was, but you conveniently left that out you journalist dirt-bag! Also 3 top judges agreed that Ahmed was innocent and that “he left no one mentally scarred,” as well as proving the 5 moron women making false allegations (of feeling uncomfortable despite giving positive feedback, before BBC Social made a hit-piece) as lying perjurers! Plus Spillet took the quote “mentally scarred” from the disgraced judge from Ahmed’s show-trial, the judge was disciplined and ridiculed by superior law chiefs for this corruption in dealing with Ahmed’s case! This is a common press tactic, putting quotes from idiots into inverted commas to name-call the people they write about, isn’t that right Richard you “predator.”
Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To –https://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/
Sicko perv Spillet does what most creepy leftist hacks do, write “targeting” and leave it open for negative, out-of-context, misinterpretation! “Targeting” for a conversation and potential date – well, that would mean every one who practices any type of dating (online or otherwise) are “targeting” one another – what an absolute classless pathetic reptile you are Spillet!
2 Year Sentence Is Reversed And His Lawyers Seek Compensation For His Wrongful Imprisonment
Taken Off The Offenders Register Due To; No Crime Taking Place, Incompetent Brainwashed Judge And Jury, And Press Corruption!
Whistle-Blower Exposed For Creating Witch-Hunt Because She Sexually Assaulted And Racially Abused Him!
Judge Who “Hit Out” (At Addy Agame) Is Disciplined, Punished And Rebuked By His Superiors As Addy Wins Appeal To Have Wrongful Conviction Overturned Due To Miscarriage Of Justice Resulting From Media-Puppet Judge’s Conduct
Fake News Hack Simp Creep Richard Spillet Humiliated And Exposed As Dishonest Liar And Incapable Journalist Moron
False Accusers Proven To Be Liars And To Be Faking “Mental Scarring” As Nothing Happened But Passing Polite Remarks
Richard Spillet is a typical modern-day simp reporter, jumping on demonising narratives to increase page views for disgraced news outlet The Daily Mail. Spillet is an airhead, just go on his Twitter (if you can bear it) and you’ll see him moaning about the usual social justice virtue signalling garbage leftist idiots cry about to score social points. Richard Spillet is your usual “woke” socialised idiot that splutters from the usual social justice script, despite scientific evidence proving otherwise! SJW Richard doesn’t care about facts, it’s all about virtue-signalling the latest activism trend for discriminatory morons like him.
The Daily Mail doesn’t report truth or have any originality at all – even the journalists are nameless, faceless cowards! One particular coward Richard Spillet wrote articles about Adnan Ahmed’s wrongful conviction / show-trial by the media and the complete miscarriage of justice he experienced (Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful conviction and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020). Richard is most likely a low-life bitter media hack, too spineless to reveal his actual identity, in pathetic fear that Red Pill groups will expose him for the seedy scumbag liar that he is. Men’s rights are human rights; hence why we represent the truth without succumbing to what mainstream media propaganda wants to brain-wash the masses to think.
The obvious problem with leftist SJW reporters and press is that they are trained to be deceitful and to sensationalise the truth by reporting inaccurate falsehoods that allow them to just about get away with telling lies because of how the misinformation is presented to simply imply something false as true. For a sneaky reporter it is a tactic used to be a creepy stalker and to attack others, whilst keeping their filthy laundry private!
The Daily Mail is a newspaper set-up for coward reporters to spam their fake news (whilst pretending it’s by another journalist). Scummy journalists basically just spam the same lies and inaccuracies in as many pages as possible in order to make it look like different people are talking about the same thing. This (they think) gives their stories weight as it tricks the public into believing a story because it looks like it is coming from various sources! Read Ryan Holiday’s book “Trust me, I’m lying” for a full understanding of how the media manipulate the public and destroy reputations without facing any repercussions.
Yep, we have another woke, radical male-feminist and self-proclaimed man-hater. There seems to be a direct correlation between male-feminist journalists that write garbage and that are borderline sociopaths. Que bad haircut, even worse dress-sense and below average looks and we have our latest male-feminist hate-pusher.
Rancid Richard Spillet doesn’t have a personality or an original thought in his head. He is the epitome of a constructed fake person attempting to tick certain socially acceptable boxes because he is an approval chasing loser with low self-esteem. He comes across as a child desperately wanting people to like him, which in turn makes people dislike him!
Horrendous Spillet writes for scummy virtue signalling fake news rag The Daily Mail. Amongst creepy Richard’s articles about man-hating and petty gossip for The Daily Mail Online is a sea of radical male-feminist / simp / man-hating / woke brainwashing drivel! Don’t read The Daily Mail, it’s written by bitter idiots for bitter idiots. It will only serve to ruin balanced feminine women and grounded masculine men. The Daily Mail is propaganda for idiots too stupid and conditioned to see through the disgusting male-feminist narrative!
EPISODE 1- ”Mainstream Media Demonisation Of Addy Agame” – https://youtu.be/EUbs7CozXyI
EPISODE 2 – ”The BBC’s Manipulation / Defamation Of Street Attraction” – https://youtu.be/fTxL7T_Kh1w
EPISODE 3 – ”Infield Videos & False Allegations” – https://youtu.be/ztKtdE33vFU
EPISODE 4 – ”History, Society, Politics & Feminazis” – https://youtu.be/BLJK1TKK5TQ
The Daily Mail online are morons who lie to sensationalise nonsense in order to sell copies of their pathetic newspaper, as well as influence unsuspecting members of the public. These idiots don’t fact check at all, as is evident via their stupid hit-piece article by cowardly “court reporter” Richard Spillet on October 22nd, 2019 regarding Addy Agame.
Turns out Addy was right all along as all false allegations were dropped, all charges were reversed, and all wrongful convictions were overturned. Looks like the scummy Daily Mail got it totally wrong as usual! The fake news slime-balls even called Addy a “pick-up artist.” Again misinformation, as Adnan Ahmed has said on many occasions, “I am not a pick-up artist, I’m a dating and life coach, we help people using scientific self-help – not tricks, techniques, lines and tactics.” Addy’s innocence was so clear cut that despite the underhanded tactics the sleazy Scottish press employed, he was found not guilty and defeated them!
Spineless creep journo Richard Spillet has a slimy bitter bratty writing manner that reflects his poncey geek appearance. Sleazy reporter Richard Spillet lacked the back-bone to make his wasted education count for anything and ended up writing for fake news rag, The Daily Mail. Creepy sleaze Richard Spillet is a charmless bore, this is evident via his lame tweets about monotonous drivel. Male-feminist perv losers like Spillet will forever be mad at alpha males who go out and win in life!
Richard is unattractive, overweight, has below average looks and a horrible personality. This horrible evil deviant mutant specialises in fraud journalism. Clown bum Richard is a professional seedy stalker, whose job entails hounding people and desperately begging for stories for minimum wage. Vulture Richard Spillet invents entire scenarios, casts of characters and reams of dialogue in his Daily Mail article about wrongfully convicted dating coach Addy Agame.
Shady Richard Spillet makes a measly living out of corrupting an already self-indulgent / predominately white leftist media field that fakes diversity and equality. In reality he is just an idiot low-IQ slime-bag that writes for garbage tabloids like the Daily Mail
Dog-hack Richard Spillet is at again. The overweight, try-hard, bitter joke of a reporter wrote a crappy article in October 2019 celebrating Ahmed’s wrongful conviction / imprisonment – which has now been completely reversed and quashed! Richard Spillet’s track record of corny and disgusting articles that he spews out as some sort of alarmist warped trash is evident from his past work. Sickening clown Richard doesn’t care about helping people, the chubby journo only cares about pushing fake news down the throats of anyone unfortunate enough to come across his crazed ramblings. Spillet gives off the air of a deranged person with “woke” perspectives gathered from confused social media posts and from the sinister shallow masks of his gaping insecurities / inferiority complex.
Fraudster Richard mentions Addy Agame in order to dirty his name further by associating him with issues that have nothing to do with him and that are not even issues in the first place. This is a disgusting abuse of journalistic responsibility, ridiculously predatory reporting and sham news – well we expect nothing less from Richard to make up a pointless story just to try to hurt someone’s reputation, at least Ahmed punished slimy Spillet by winning his appeal to prove his innocence and exposed Richard’s pathetic poisonous tactics!
Ahmed’s wrongful conviction being quashed basically proves the Daily Mail online wrong and Addy right – the cry babies don’t seem to be handling it too well. The Daily Mail pathetically tried to demonise Ahmed by saying “filmed videos for YouTube approaching women,” which he didn’t, he didn’t “film himself,” plus it’s not illegal to do so, it’s a common press tactic.
The Daily Mail are no strangers to making totally false allegations, getting sued for making them and having to pay out large sums of money to cover their mistakes. The crass publication recently apologised and paid a substantial sum of damages to University student Farah Kouttineh for her defamation through false allegations made against her stating she was the leader of a terrorist group. The anti-Muslim Islamophobic Daily Mail were forced to admit their allegations were entirely false, additional to forking out compensation for their wrong doing. They only wrote a small correction paragraph apologising after attempting to ruin the innocent student’s life and reputation. All she did was create a “freedom of assembly rally.”
The Daily Mail’s pattern of racism towards brown people is evident. They also recently had to apologise to a Palestinian aid group charity as well as pay them £150,000 in compensation because they published false terror and extremism allegations against them. The charity denied these claims and took the newspaper to court to prove their innocence and won! They also arranged a successful protest titled, “we hate the Daily Mail,” quite rightly so. The racially prejudiced newspaper’s hate propaganda doesn’t stop there. The Daily Mail made false allegations that the charity supported a hate festival in Gaza where kids acted out the murder of Jewish people. A disgusting accusation made by a disgusting publication.
The tabloid press in Scotland is an absolute shambles. There is no impartial neutral news, what there is instead is bias hate fuelled discriminatory trash published by the likes of constantly slammed newspapers. The Daily Mail has been made to apologise so many times (for spreading lies and fake news) it’s a wonder that they have any money left at all!
Prince Harry is suing the vile weirdo’s at The Daily Mail for hacking his phone and stealing his voice messages, as is Meghan (his wife) for selectively printing a private letter to her father in order for The Mail to sell papers. Prince Harry filed against The Daily Mail in the high court of justice for “illegal interception of voicemail messages 4 days after his wife Meghan Markle filed a claim against them for “intrusive and unlawful publication of a private letter.”
The Dirty Mail is untrustworthy and bogus. They also recently had to grovel and apologise as well as make a “substantial” donation in a “libel” settlement to a property tycoon because the liars at the Daily Mail wrongly claimed he had bought affordable homes at a discount price in an unethical way, calling the innocent man insulting names in the process. Metro News is owned by the dirt-bag newspaper, The Daily Mail, The Metro also displays the same disgusting fake news behaviour! The Daily Mail have been sued countless times, by countless people including for racial, anti-semitic and general fake news controversy! These dishonest, disgusting propaganda hate-mongers can’t be trusted to tell the truth and should be boycotted by the public.
Sleazy scumbag Richard Spillet stated; “Ahmed found guilty of acting in threatening and abusive manner.” In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, complete madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict was appealed and overturned in September 2020 as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintained his innocence, all 18 of the fake charges were dropped due to all allegations being false! Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct – that is the official legal outcome of this bizarre Daily Mail witch-hunt! Addy won; the media, the trolls and his false accusers were defeated by him!
The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, the initial Sheriff court case was not justice, it was a farce! It was the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation in order to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the kangaroo-court show-trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation, which he is in the process of doing!
The toilet paper news outlet made up fake charges of “filming and posting.” Typical tabloid press style trash. Ahmed faced no charges of “filming or posting” anyone, he was wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace. He won his appeal to overturn all false allegations and will sue the hounds at The Daily Mail Online for targeting him with their lies and filth!
These creeps have the cheek to accuse Addy Agame (an innocent man, proven not guilty and totally vindicated in the highest court in the country) of “filming and posting” – really! This is an absolute lie, Addy was not found guilty of “filming or posting” anyone, there were no charges of “filming or posting” even lodged against him.
How does it feel to the scumbags at The Daily Mail to know they were disgustingly wrong and that Ahmed fought them all they way and embarrassed them by winning; maybe that’s why they’re so desperate to still demonise him, well cry a river you reptiles because you were well and truly defeated!
Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden, a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.
Following are links to Addy’s actual statement to the press in January 2019 and the actual details of his appeal victory.
BBC Social Reporter Myles Bonnar Set Up Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/bbc-social-reporter-myles-bonnar-set-up-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame/
Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame Wins Appeal To Overturn Wrongful Conviction / Sentence Due To Miscarriage Of Justice And No Actual Crime To Answer To –http://redpillrights.com/adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame-wins-appeal-to-overturn-wrongful-conviction-sentence-due-to-miscarriage-of-justice-and-no-actual-crime-to-answer-to/
Bitter bum Richard continued; “he approached 5 girls between 2016 and 2018.” Pervy Richard is trying to falsely imply they were all schoolgirls, this is from the sordid mind of a suspect hack with seedy fantasies – and is a complete lie! Well turns out they were lying because Ahmed was acquitted of all charges due to no crime to answer to, he should have them imprisoned for perjury!
The Daily Mail are just butt-hurt because Ahmed proved them wrong, exposed them as liars and is now suing them! The Daily Mail online are scumbags, that make a living from spreading lies, fake news and defaming innocent people.
- Chloe From Lenzie Discuses Her Rendezvous With Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/chloe-from-lenzie-discuses-her-rendezvous-with-addy-agame/
- Tia From Glasgow Talks About Dating Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/tia-from-glasgow-talks-about-dating-addy-agame/
- Aisha From Saudi Arabia Describes Her Holiday Romance With Adnan Ahmed (aka Addy Agame) –http://redpillrights.com/aisha-from-saudi-arabia-describes-her-holiday-romance-with-adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame/
- Jill From Sheffield Gives Honest Feedback On Her Positive Experience With Addy Agame –http://redpillrights.com/jill-from-sheffield-gives-honest-feedback-on-her-positive-experience-with-addy-agame/
- Christine From China Discusses Meeting And Dating Addy Agame Truthfully-http://redpillrights.com/christine-from-china-discusses-meeting-and-dating-addy-agame-truthfully/
- Canadian Karen Describes Her “Lovely” Chance Meeting With Addy Agame In Uddingston –http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Football Referee In Australia With His Dating Life –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-football-referee-in-australia-with-his-dating-life/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Personal Trainer In London With His Dating Life –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-personal-trainer-in-london-with-his-dating-life/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Joiner In Edinburgh –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-joiner-in-edinburgh/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps IT Specialist In London –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-it-specialist-in-london/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Adnan Ahmed a.k.a Addy Agame Helps Video Editor In Spain –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-video-editor-in-spain/
- Glasgow Dating Coach Addy Agame Helps Marketing Expert In Glasgow –http://redpillrights.com/glasgow-dating-coach-adnan-ahmed-a-k-a-addy-agame-helps-marketing-expert-in-glasgow/
Scummy toerag Spillet continued; “the court heard Ahmed approached 2 schoolgirls. They were aged 16 and 17 at the time.” The “schoolgirls” are above the legal age of consent in the UK, 17 and 16. The alleged conversations are said by the two witnesses to have took place around 10am approximately, school had already started. The witnesses stated, “they were in there last year (6th year) of high school in 2016,” to the court. This is several months before a college or university course would begin should students at the late stage of high school wish to continue further education. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Richard continued; “he asked the older one if she wanted to meet her for coffee.” Dirtybag Richard outright lied stating; “asked if she was at school, if she was married.” Again 17 is above legal age of consent in the UK and this allegation has not been proven. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
What the reporter conveniently left out was that the witness also said, “it was around 10am, not the usual time people go to school and the lane is attached to two main roads on either side, along with two small open grass fields at either side.” The witness also said that, “this is the common route to the train station that most people coming from that direction would take.” The Daily Mail left out the fact that before this quote the witness told the jury, “he introduced himself then I told him I was at school, he made general conversation, we spoke for under three minutes and parted ways.” This is vital information!
In regard to the second witness The Daily Mail left out that the incident is said by the witness to have taken place again around 10am after school had already began an hour previously, in the same lane attached to two main roads that is the main route to the train station which commuters take. Both these witnesses admit to being linked and both stated that they are good friends. What Richard again conveniently left out was that the witness told the court; “the school is right next to the train station and that the pair parted ways in under 3 minutes in different directions towards their separate destinations!” Mr Ahmed’s defence team lodged an eyewitness in his defence who can confirm there was no “intimidation” involved. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Spillet also conveniently left out the testimony Adnan Ahmed gave to the court himself, Addy gave a real honest account of events stating; “it was around 10am, we were both walking on the main route to the train station, it is not a secluded lane, it’s a open main route to the train, I was walking in front of her, waved and signalled for her to take her headphones out, then said – hey you look pretty enough to go for coffee with, that is if your boyfriend is cool with it. She smiled and said, I don’t have a boyfriend. I then said I’m catching a train to the city centre. I thought she was doing the same as she wasn’t wearing a school uniform and it was outside school hours, I assumed she was 19 or 20. She then said – I’m going to school; which shocked me, I immediately asked how old are you? She said 17, I then said – hope you’re enjoying school and shook her hand to say bye, her ring struck my hand when we shook hands, I said – you hit me with your wedding ring as a parting joke, I did not ask her about her being married! The conversation lasted under a minute, I did not ask her for her number or to go for a coffee. I saw her many times around that area for 3 years and we never spoke again, she also confirmed this to the police.”
Click the following link to read about a testimonial by a female who dated Addy, who met him in the same area around the same time further proving his innocence –http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/
Regarding the second incident, Addy told the court; “it was around the same time and place, again 10 am, on my way to the city, no school uniform, soon as she said she was 16 I left, this girl confirmed to the court I didn’t ask for a number, she confirmed I didn’t ask her out, it was less than a minute of chat. She also said in court she saw me many times after that in the area and we never spoke again. These incidents are said to have happened in 2016 and no one came forward then. only in 2019 after how I was portrayed in the social media hate campaign (referring to BBC Social hate video against him) there was a sudden change in perspective by these girls to say passing comments were a crime that caused them discomfort. I could have asked someone for the time, after the January 2019 media uproar, they would have reported it. They both know each other well and colluded on social media. They are not being truthful! There was nothing sinister or rehearsed or pre-planned as is being suggested, it was spontaneous and quick.”
What Richard left out is Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong also said of these incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In our civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual, and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. This is the main route to the train station in Uddingston, not a secluded lane, it has fields of grass either side and the school happens to be right next to the train station. All sides have said it was during the day outside school hours. For talking sake, even if both these ladies had gone on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!”
The creeps at The Daily Mail grasped at straws by quoting the disgraced and rebuked judge, they stated, “Sheriff Lindsay Wood sent Ahmed to prison for 2 years and put him on the sex offenders register for 10 years… found there was a significant sexual aspect to the offences” Well merely months later Ahmed appealed this corrupt judge’s wrong decision and reversed the wrongful verdict, proving his innocence fully, Ahmed was removed from the register because he committed no sexual offences or crimes at all!
The moron Sheriff was wrong and is now viewed as a complete embarrassment to his profession as there was “no sexual aspect whatsoever,” look it up in the Scottish Law books, Lindsay Wood gets a grilling and is completely put in his place as being a dunce of a judge by his legal superiors!
So there were no offences as no convictions exist, no crime took place – are The Daily Mail Online dumb or are they gas-lighting and defaming an innocent man?! One thing’s for sure, they are fake news dirt-bags making false accusations because Ahmed was proven innocent in a court of law and ”all 5 women” were proven to be lying perjurers, so no ”offences” took place apart from by the women who lied under oath!
Reasons For Appeal;
- The trial judge caused a miscarriage of justice via his bias and discriminatory misconduct, especially when he elected to cross examine the accused at the end of the defence’s case
- The judge erred in repelling the ‘no case (crime) to answer submissions‘ made under Scottish law for all the charges the accused was wrongfully convicted of, causing a miscarriage of justice
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial based on the manner the police sought out complainers
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial because the Scottish press influenced the jury / public negatively both before and during the trial, causing a miscarriage of justice
- It was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial because the social worker initially allocated, and the trial judge were influenced by press propaganda during the trial causing a miscarriage of justice
- The social workers report was prejudicial and relied on opinion from the press rather than impartiality from a professional standpoint
- There was NO sexual element / aggravation / motivation – the accused was running a dating business for a monetary purpose not for sexual gratification
- There was NO actual sexual offense committed and NO actual sexual convictions, hence notification requirements were the wrong outcome, causing a miscarriage of justice
Scotland is in an extremely regressive, backwards, violent and ugly era of criminal justice. Legal precedents and crazy laws are being made up on the spot without political clearance. How can a sheriff / judge justify wrongfully convicting a man of something that is not a crime by simply labelling it ‘breach of the peace’ or ‘threatening / abusive behaviour?’ Even so, none of the convictions were sexual offences, putting a person on the sex offenders register for 10 years despite that person not even being convicted of a sexual offence is a disgrace! Simply stating there may have been that motivation is a farcical miscarriage of justice and total lunacy – Sheriff Lindsay Wood was playing up to the press in order to be quoted so he could gain accolade and praise. He himself should face legal action for using a court of law in such a manner. Wood is a man who enabled the media’s prejudicial imperative by default in his legislative actions, judgement and ruling, reflexively and emotionally driven, without genuine judicial insight. Simply put the man is an incompetent imbecile.
If someone hasn’t committed any sexual offences at all, no register should be required. Ahmed’s wrongful conviction was “section 38 breach of the peace.” There was no sexual element, it was chatting! A Sheriff should not be influenced by other cases or the media, they have a duty to be impartial and to do the right thing by the law! The law should always overrule the media; however, it seems to be the opposite way around in Scotland. This insanity occurring meant any man chatting up any woman in Scotland (whether it be during the day or in a nightclub) will be at risk of being put on the sex offenders register, even if no sexual offence has occurred! Luckily Ahmed’s victory ensured that chatting up women in Scotland is now 100% legal!
3 of the highest judges in Scotland agreed with Ahmed and stated the evidence did not indicate Ahmed did anything wrong! Ahmed was totally correct, he also never called himself a “victim.” despite the sleazy media trying oh so hard to stop him; he beat the fake charges and the fake news media in one swift motion – wow, what a man!
The rancid hack continued to quote the now disgraced clown Sheriff, stating; “schoolgirls were shamefully targeted by you in a quiet lane and 3 other women were considerably younger than you, the Sheriff told Ahmed.” All of which is a lie! The reality is this Sheriff has a history of kissing up to the scummy Scottish media’s butt-cheeks and saw this as an opportunity to do so again, but he was caught out by 3 higher ranked judges and punished for it – every thing he stated was reversed. There was no one that was “shamefully targeted,” there was no “quiet lane” and even if 3 other women were “considerably younger” than Ahmed, that is not a crime. Just because Sheriff Wood is attracted to over-the-hill grandmas doesn’t mean every other man should be. You don’t see George Clooney or Leonardo DiCaprio or Drake standing trial for being attracted to young, hot models – the fact is this Sheriff was a male-feminist idiot trying to enforce dumb social justice nonsense as actual law! He was rightly caught out and exposed for it by his superiors and now his actual job is in question because no one in the Scottish legal system respects his decisions or authority! 3 of the highest judges in Scotland agreed that Addy Agame is innocent.
Creepy Richard Spillet continued to quote the amateur judge; “he added: why on earth would you consider it appropriate to touch a complete stranger on the cheek and try to kiss them. The public will be wise to such behaviour towards women by you and others like you.” Yeah, wrong again idiot. This didn’t happen – the prosecutor, the defence, the jury and even you laughed at this lying false accuser in court when she gave evidence because of how outlandishly far-fetched it was! There are 4 contradictory accounts on record that prove this false accuser lied, Ahmed had an eye witness that said she lied, Addy himself said she lied – it didn’t happen!
And the public are not wise to anything but the facts, which are “Adnan Ahmed was totally acquitted, found innocent and given a not guilty verdict by 3 intelligent highly ranked judges because there was no crime to answer to and this idiot Sheriff who ran the trial caused a complete miscarriage of justice due to his SJW views and insane conduct.”
Here are some more legal facts that brilliant senior judge Lord Turnbull stated; “there was nothing in the appellant’s behaviour as spoken by complainers which was overly threatening or which could be construed as threatening. There was nothing in the appellant’s conduct spoken by complainers which constituted threatening behaviour, witness described a compliment. Accordingly, the Sheriff erred in failing to give affect to no case to answer submissions presented on the appellants behalf in respect to these charges also. The exercise the Sheriff was engaged in had already lacked any element of clarification, the Sheriff appeared to be in the process of arguing with the appellant. Since the appeal against conviction is upheld on both grounds in all charges, the appeal against sentence flies off.”
Seedy simp Richard Spillet continued to quote his simp daddy Sheriff; “he praised victims for giving evidence, adding; the mental scarring won’t leave in a hurry….they will be fortified that by giving evidence you will be held to account.” Firstly there were no victims because there was no crime, they were proven to be liars and Ahmed was found not guilty. Secondly, the lack of mental intellect of the Sheriff’s statement will not leave – ever, because no one was “mentally scarred” by a passing conversation / remarks, as all false accusers were proven to be lying perjurers because Ahmed was acquitted and found innocent in the high court! Thirdly, the false accusing witches were “fortified” as full-blown lying, racist, #MeToo, Karen, white women that made false allegations whilst giving evidence against a brown man because of his skin colour and to get pathetic attention via a media induced scandal!
Lastly, if you mean Adnan Ahmed would emerge victorious and defeat everyone involved in his attempted demise by “held to account” then ok, but the ironic fact is Sheriff Wood was the one “held to account” by higher legal authorities for being a useless judge that is unable to do his job or serve justice via the actual law! Addy won, you lost, hope your idiotic press rant was worth your career being ended pal!
Richard Spillet went onto quote the disgraced media-influenced rebuked judge, stating: “Sheriff Wood said Ahmed had a lack of remorse.” Well, that’s because Ahmed did nothing wrong and proved it in a high court in front of 3 real judges, not a donkey Sheriff who was trying to be a hero for the slimy Scottish press in a kangaroo-court show-trial! Richard continued; “he told him: you gave evidence and said the victims were lying or mistaken; but the jury thought otherwise. It was obvious when they gave evidence how they were affected.” Eh, no! Firstly – there were no “victims” as no crime was committed (that’s official now in the Scottish law books and legal records). Secondly, Ahmed “gave evidence” the accusers were “lying or mistaken” and was proven to be telling the truth in the high court (another L for you Sheriff Wood). Thirdly, the jury could think what they want – Ahmed got a “not guilty” verdict for all charges in the high court (plus the jury were not impartial as they were brain-washed by the scumbags in the Scottish media). Lastly, it wasn’t “obvious how they were affected” as this was a witch-hunt created by the media, there was no crime in the first place – what’s next the media will hype eating vegetables as misogynistic and a trial will be held hosting a bunch of idiots saying a man eating a carrot made them feel uncomfortable?! Get a grip on reality!
The idiots at The Daily Mail continued to quote the shamed Sheriff trying to gain clout by co-signing social justice nonsense, they stated (quoting the shamed Sheriff); “you have acquired notoriety and an unenviable reputation, the public will be wise to such inappropriate behaviour by you and others like you.” Turns out you were wrong again Sheriff. Ahmed’s reputation is that he was acquitted, vindicated, found not guilty, proved his innocence and was right all along – while Sheriff Wood is now a laughing stock in Scottish Legal circles, here is what his superiors had to say about his “unenviable reputation” –
The shamed sheriff was criticised by 3 high court judges for conducting a “cross-examination” of a defendant and telling his representative to “sit down”.
Counsel for the appellant, Claire Mitchell QC, said that Sheriff Lindsay Wood’s questions “would have led the independent observer to reach the view that the sheriff had formed an adverse view of his credibility”.
The judges said the evidence did not indicate that Mr Ahmed was guilty of threatening behaviour.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “It does not seem to us that a polite conversational request or compliment can be construed as threatening merely because it is uninvited or unwelcome.”
Sheriff Wood was also criticised by the judges for his “cross-examination”.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “The trial sheriff engaged in an exercise which could only be described as cross-examination.
“The informed and impartial observer would readily have concluded that the sheriff had formed an adverse view on the credibility of the appellant’s evidence.
“The result was a miscarriage of justice and the appeal against conviction on each charge must be upheld on this ground.”
The judges also found that Sheriff Wood’s behaviour in telling advocate Donna Armstrong to sit down was “unacceptable”.
Lord Turnbull wrote: “In the present case counsel was correct to object to the sheriff’s questioning when she did.
“It is unacceptable for a judicial office holder to address a responsible practitioner by telling her to sit down.
“Such behaviour carries the risk of demeaning the standing of the judiciary in the eyes of both the legal profession and of the public.”
And yes Addy has gained positive notoriety in men’s rights political circles in which he is working and helping other men in similar circumstances who have been wronged by biased criminal and family courts. Ahmed is speaking at many public men’s rights events as well as suing the state and media for compensation. Turns out his behaviour wasn’t “inappropriate” and that is now official under Scottish law!
Sleazy Richard sensationalised more stating; “convicted of approaching several women,” no Spillet it was 5 liars who were proven to be perjurers, Ahmed was proven innocent – get that through your hollow head you idiot hack moron!
Corny liars at The Daily Mail selectively falsified more stating; “court heard woman aged 21, Ahmed approached in street made comments about appearance, touched her cheek and tried to kiss her, leading to her pushing him away.” The woman was also asked why it took her 3 years to report it (in 2019) she told the court she didn’t feel there was a crime. The woman also told the court she had anxiety and mental health issues. She also said, “I looked a lot better 3 years ago, I was thinner, I didn’t have tattoos on my face,” the court heard. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
This is inaccurate as the woman told the court it was over an hour later, she actually said after the initial approach in Buchanan Galleries she went shopping in various stores, called her grandmother for 45 minutes and headed to Argos in Stockwell street in Glasgow a further 35 minutes later approximately. The reporter then biasedly stated; “he tried to pull me close to him so he could kiss me, so I pushed him away.” The Daily Mail left out that it was pointed out to jurors that this recollection of events contradicted her police statement, in which she did not say she was “pulled close to him.” The witness responded by saying the police lied. The witness told the court “I did not make physical contact with the man when I pushed him,” however in her police report she said she did, this was also pointed out to the jury by Ahmed’s lawyer. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
The court heard, in her police statement she said the man “touched her face and tried to kiss her,” when the woman was cross examined about this contradiction in court, she said she didn’t say so at first as she didn’t want to interrupt the questioning (despite being asked numerous times) then suddenly claimed both “the pull and face touch” took place. When the contradictory police statement and court statement was pointed out to the woman in front of the jurors, she sat down from a standing position in the witness box! The Daily Mail left out that the woman also said she was messaged by the man on social media, she told jurors this happened despite her giving a fake name to the man which was not linked to any of her social media accounts as she said she did not tell him any details of mutual friends. She also told the court the man wrote his details on a receipt during the initial meeting but was still able to contact her despite not having any of her contact details and not even knowing her name! The Daily Mail continued; “she walked away from him and stood with strangers to be somewhere safe.” The reporter failed to report that these alleged witnesses were not presented in court and that when the woman was asked if anyone saw this, she said no despite people being around her. (Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer)
Adnan Ahmed’s excellent lawyer Donna Armstrong described this witness to the court as “she is unreliable, on record she changed her story 3 times, you can’t trust the testimony she has given.” Ahmed also took the stand to testify regarding this “unreliable” witness, Ahmed stated, “she’s lying, we met briefly on Buchanan Street, then 2 hours later on Stockwell street. I was with my friend David, he’s an eyewitness. I did not try to kiss her; she gave me her number and Snapchat. She changed her story over and over. In court she said I touched her back and not face, in her police statement she said I touched her face with no mention of touching her back. In court she said she didn’t push me physically, in her police statement she said she did.” The “unreliable” woman also said she came forward in 2019 because of the BBC Social video.”
The scum at The Daily Mail Online continued – “approached 2 other women, all offences between 2016 and 2019.” There were no offences as no convictions exist, no crime took place – are The Daily Mail dumb or are they gas-lighting and defaming an innocent man?! One thing’s for sure, they are fake news dirt-bags making false accusations because Ahmed was proven innocent in a court of law and the ”2 other women” were proven to be lying perjurers, so no ”offences” took place apart from by the women who lied under oath!
Pathetic geek desperado Richard continued; ”Ahmed disputed his actions were unlawful…accused victims of misconstruing him. His lawyer told the court he had not intended to cause fear or alarm.” Ahmed and his lawyer were 100% correct, 3 of the highest judges in Scotland agreed and acquitted Ahmed accordingly, clearing him of all false accusations from the phony ambulance / attention / fame chasing fake victims!
This dirty geek’s writing is almost as bad as his crap dress sense. Henry’s choice of words to sensationalise lies is “victims,” there were no victims, there were no actual crimes recognised under UK Law, there has to be a crime to be a “victim.” Fake “victims” who are glory-hungry idiots, jump on a fake #metoo bandwagon (saying they were simply chatted up) actually take away from real victims who actually have to face the reality of real crimes. The only “victims” in connection to the Daily Mail are the people they victimise through their vile trash hate articles.
Sordid perv Spillet continued with the sham sensationalism by further quoting the ridiculed and corrected Sheriff, stating; “the courts will always try to keep abreast of developing criminal trends which cause public concern and outrage and will take steps to tackle these.'” No Sheriff, your roundabout way to disguise your clout-chasing to appease a corrupt Scottish press who manufactured a scandal out of nothing about a dating coach (because he debunked feminist dating tactics as a farce) was exposed – there was no “criminal trend” except your irresponsible behaviour as a law official, hope it was worth destroying your reputation and career over. And shut up you idiot journo, there was no “outrage” and there were no “crimes” – Ahmed was found “not guilty” by 3 judges on the basis that his unfortunate circumstances were a “miscarriage of justice” and the incidents were legally labelled “no crime to answer to.”
Check out the following links to the failed protest (under 10 people) constructed by feminist morons who work for BBC The Social (who caused this miscarriage of lies), as well as Addy’s response to proving his innocent;
Mentally Ill Feminist Mandy Jones Staged Failed Rally Against Red Pill Dating Coach Addy Agame – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjxiLbXQ8SA
EPISODE 5 – ”Addy Agame Proven Innocent And Acquitted Of All Charges” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpdrQYa8u7A
The wretched lying reporter stated; “Ahmed had been previously jailed 7 times.” This is a total lie, check the prison records, Ahmed had only previously been imprisoned twice. Is this how amateur these clowns are that they make stupid idiotic mistakes due to a lack of fact-checking or are they just fake news liars that make-up falsehoods – it’s actually both!
The dumb numb skull continued; “the court heard Ahmed had previous convictions for drink-driving and a firearms charge.” Adnan’s previous record is bad. However, he plead guilty to those offences straight away because he was guilty of those crimes. But he was not guilty of the false allegations related to his legitimate dating business, hence why he took this farce all the way to a trial maintaining his innocence, then to the appeal court and proved his innocence! Adnan has not committed any offences since 2013, had never been on trial before, had worked with the police and had never been placed on a fully committed remand or been indicted in the past.
Although his previous is bad, it does not include anything sexual ever! The alcohol offences he had in his past he has fully rehabilitated from and is willing to be tested at random to prove this. The firearm offences were a taser that was not functional and a fake replica pistol (which could not harm anyone). For all his offences together he received a total of 35 months custodial sentence.
Adnan worked as a criminal justice practitioner for Turning Point until the time of his remand. He was also moving away from the dating field and taking DWLF in a new direction focusing on human rights / men’s rights. His job was supporting ex-cons and drug addicts to reform and integrate them into society. He planned to expand his company into representing men who had been wrongfully accused of crimes they hadn’t committed. He had no idea that he would be in a very similar situation.
Adnan was planning to study criminology in his 4thyear at University. In his 1styear he gained an HNC in Social Services (at the City of Glasgow College). In his 2ndyear he gained an HND in Additional Support Needs (at Glasgow Clyde College). At the time of his arrest he was half-way through his 3rdyear doing a BA in Learning Difficulties /Disabilities (between Fife College and Abertay University). His 4thyear would have been a BA (Hons) in Criminology (at Abertay University in Dundee). His place on the course was terminated as was his employment because of the media scandal. Adnan also has a previous BA in Business Studies (From Glasgow Caledonian University).
Horrid Richard Spillet continued; “police began an investigation after his behaviour was revealed by BBC The Social.” Nothing was revealed except that the BBC are corrupt liars getting sued for defamation by Ahmed after he proved his innocence and proved them to be lying scumbags!
You idiots should at least learn to lie convincingly if that’s how you’re going to report! The BBC flop-umentary they refer to is by creep Myles Bonnar, a low status creep trying to make a name for himself, by literally being a lying snitch. Cowardly racist Myles Bonnar has disappeared into nothingness again after selling himself out for fame (he has no actual skills / talent) by trying to destroy innocent men’s lives because he’s a spineless weasel who women find repulsive.
BBC The Social hounded the Glasgow dating coach for months, he reached out to them and responded with a detailed explanation of his business model and background to his client base as well as the scientific reasoning behind this method of face-to-face daytime speed dating, which was in large ignored. Instead, they used choice sentences to turn up the controversy in order to create a story and demonise an innocent man. The police didn’t act because of online videos, they were aware of them for years, they crumbled because of media pressure because Police Scotland is a Mickey Mouse force of hick villagers.
In all reality it was media rats like Daily Mail that lost the public and taxpayers £100,000 plus in costs because they caused the fake hype around Addy Agame’s “no crime to answer” case. A corrupt judge fell for it, as well as some less than intelligent police officers. However when Adnan Ahmed took his case to the highest court in Scotland – 3 of the top judges in the country saw it for the “trial by media” rubbish it was and quashed all the false convictions!
It’s totally bizarre and shockingly worrying that a country’s police force can’t withstand pressure from online trolls and can be manipulated so easily by faceless crazies on the internet. Yes, Scotland is a very small country, but that does not excuse the stupid backward policing tactics used for this matter. There should never have been an arrest in the first place. The police were aware of Ahmed’s dating business 3 years prior to BBC The Social’s hate fuelled video falsely demonising him. They spoke to Mr Ahmed about it on a number of occasions in casual conversation. Both male and female officers approved of it. There are phone calls and written police reports to confirm this.
Police Scotland are supposed to investigate matters neutrally and without prejudice. Instead they contributed to the media mayhem by making comments defaming a man who is ”not guilty” of an actual crime, but was charged, indicted and remanded regardless. The police tried to fish for a conviction to cover their mistakes and to not face legal action themselves.
The most important fact is justice was done and Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame won his appeal to overturn the wrongful convictions and sentence due to a miscarriage of justice and no actual crime to answer to in September 2020!