Wacko’s At BBC News Report Inaccurate Misinformation (Yet Again) Regarding; “YouTube Terminates Addy AGame And Street Attraction Channels
The Idiots At The BBC Said; “YouTube Terminated The Channels Addy AGame And Street Attraction,” There Was No Channel Ever Called “Addy AGame” This Is The Level Of Amateur Journalism The BBC Display!
BBC News boasted; “BBC News’ investigation into global seduction industry was published and YouTube removed over a 100 videos for violating it’s rules on nudity and sexual conduct.” This so called investigation was a total prejudicial one sided propaganda attack – not an investigation, (by weasel reporter Myles Bonnar to advance his failed career).
YouTube removed videos because of pressure from the BBC, in order to avoid bad publicity, not because these videos violated any YouTube rules on nudity or sexual conduct. Thousands of these channels still exist and the dating businesses are still functioning. Ahmed’s DWLF channel had been down since January 2019 through his own direction, not because it was deleted. None of Addy AGame’s videos violated any of YouTube policies!
Despicable reporters at BBC News continued; “the videos were linked to channels DWLF Game and Street Attraction. They included what the men say are secret recordings of women having sex.” For the record – Ahmed has never said this ever! This is a tactical lie told by the BBC to try to defame Ahmed by associating him with Street Attraction and vice versa!
BBC News continued; “Street Attraction had insisted they had done nothing wrong.” That’s because they haven’t, and that was the end of it – no police investigation, no court cases, no more media, no hate campaign – because in England people don’t care, their media are actually concerned with real issues. However in Scotland, the small minded backward inbred media made a circus of a non issue and are trying to influence a court of law to convict and what to convict for – this is madness and a disgrace to Scotland. It just shows how far behind England Scotland’s media actually are, the difference is astonishing! Street Attraction videos were more “controversial” than Addy AGame’s (both are innocent of any wrongdoing) yet Addy is remanded in custody and going to court, whereas globally no one else faces any legal action. This shouldn’t even be entered into a court of law, it’s a waste of tax payers money!
BBC News continued with their bias propaganda stating; “Ahmed was convicted of threatening and abusive behaviour.” In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a bias jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by BBC News and the Scottish Media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, peoples perspective was skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate his, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict will be appealed and overturned in the next few months as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintains his innocence, 13 charges were dropped before the bias jury got a chance to deliberate on them. Adnan Ahmed did no receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct!
The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased/testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, this is not justice, it’s a farce!
It is the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation!
The reptilian rats at BBC News continued; “police began an investigation after his behaviour was revealed by BBC The Social.” BBC The Social hounded Glasgow dating coach for months, he reacted out to them and responded with a detailed explanation of his business model and background to his client base as well as the scientific reasoning behind this method of face to face daytime speed dating, which was in large ignored. Instead they used choice sentences to turn up the controversy in order to create a story and demonise an innocent man. The police didn’t act because of online videos, they were aware of them for years, they crumbled because of media pressure because Police Scotland is a Micky Mouse force of hick villagers.
The dead-beat clowns at BBC News continued; “secretly filmed himself approaching in Glasgow and Eastern Europe.” Ahmed was not charged with this because it is not a crime! It may be immoral to some, but who the hell are BBC News to talk about morality to anyone, they’ve been caught with their pants down and arse exposed hundreds of thousands of times. Do a quick Google check on the snakes at BBC News, you’ll find how they abuse and mistreat O.A.Ps, Prince Harry, Addy AGame, Alex Ferguson, Politicians, etc, etc, to name a few, the list is endless – not to mention the countless public and private apologises they’ve had to made for their disgusting conduct!
The BBC then quoted well-respected London dating coach Eddie Hitchens from Street Attraction; “everything was completely consensual, we actually help men, we help prevent rape culture to help prevent them getting involved in anything illegal or non-consensual.” Despite this true and honourable statement from Mr Hitchens, the BBC Panorama program reporter and beta-male creep (Mules Bonnar) still selectively edited out of context quotes to demonise Hitchens and his colleague Richard Hood – in order to sway public opinion towards negativity.
Following is the full statement Street Attraction gave in response;
The BBC got YouTube to delete our channel, to silence us so that we wouldn’t be able to respond to their sham ‘documentary’, so we’ve had to do a written response on our website.
The BBC ‘documentary’ about Street Attraction is full of deliberate manipulation, conflation, misinterpretation and fake narratives. No wonder intelligent people don’t believe the mainstream media anymore.
The documentary contains no actual real reporting, it’s merely a paparazzi click bait hit piece. It uses sneaky but obvious editing tricks to paint us in the worst possible light. The undercover reporter Myles Bonnar used a script and leading questions in order to get short quick audio/video snippets of us to paint us as villains. These snippets of us are used out of context, misrepresented, deliberately leaving out other things we said, omitting the full explanation of concepts and methods discussed. Such editing trickery can be employed to make anyone look and sound bad.
It goes without saying but just to clarify to the BBC liars out there: We have never advocated or taught any men to have sexual relations with minors.
If I was a grown man and went to a bootcamp specifically to meet women and they started teaching me to meet kids, I would sure as hell complain about it and tell someone. We’ve always taught men to first find out a woman’s age before proceeding any further with conversation. To first establish age, before flirting or sexualising the conversation. We have never advocated or taught any of our students to harm women in any way.
The BBC have absurd ideas on gender norms, sex and relations between men and women. A war against heterosexual men, a smear campaign against normal, natural consensual relations between men and women. A sick attempt to redefine consensual sex so that every man is on the hook for rape.
No matter how our words or suggestions may be misinterpreted by the BBC paparazzi, we’ve done our best to help people, to improve lives. The result of giving free advice over a period of years is that we’ve been contacted for help by doctors, surgeons, university professors, police officers, police detectives, airline pilots, lawyers, people with physical and mental disabilities, even top scientists have contacted us for help in the dating field. For the most part these are just men looking to no longer be lonely, they want to actively cultivate relationships.
If we’ve ever said anything inappropriate or out of turn to a man seeking support, no one has ever told us; instead we get letters of thanks, words of gratitude and success stories from men once lonely, or even suicidal who are now in healthy relationships or are even married.
Some of these men are more than twice our age, and we’d trust them to at least verbally challenge us if we were being inappropriate. If the public need to judge us, we’ve put out many hours and over a hundred thousand written words on the subject of dating and relationships already.
Man in 21st Britain century is soft. We don’t have to fight for our lives or hunt for our food. So soft in fact that most men cannot even speak to members of the fairer sex they are attracted to without downing their own body weight in tequila first!
Learning ‘Daygame’ (being able to meet and interact with women in daytime situations in a polite and calibrated manner) is about reclaiming one’s own masculinity first and foremost by admitting one’s social and emotional intelligence skills need work and then going out and cultivating said attributes by speaking to people in real life, rather than sitting at home crafting disingenuous profiles on Tinder or Plenty of Fish.
In a world of fake Tinder profiles and amongst a sea of unhappy internet daters spread across all genders the ability to meet women face-to-face in spontaneous daytime scenarios remains the most authentic and genuine way there is to date… and I’m sure most women when asked about their preferred way of meeting a guy they like would also say during the daytime, face to face and sober…
Daygame ultimately from the male perspective is about striving to be a better man by developing understanding and empathy for how women think and act which in turn leads to happier relationships on both sides of the gender spectrum.