May 29, 2020

|

by: dexter

|

Tags: Addyagame, adnanahmed, davidfurtelle, feministman, innocent

|

Categories: Uncategorized

We Hunted A Mammoth Male-Feminist (With Man-Boobs) By The Name Of David Furtelle! This Hypocrite Chose To Defame Addy Agame In The Hope His Feminazi Masters Would Reward Him Sexually

Creepy Judice/ Hypocrite David Furtelle Resorts To Harassing And Threatening Women Who Stand Up For Men’s Rights, Whilst Being A Disposable Lap-Dog Doing Feminist’s Donkey-Work Demonising Masculine Men 

 

David Furtelle is the worst kind of toxic beta male. He sacrifices himself, his self-respect and his masculinity to serve radical feminist pigs in the desperate hope they will sleep with him. He is the mocked stereotype of a spineless male-feminist; fat, man-boobs, late 40’s/early 50’s, no wife or girlfriend, probably a virgin, hooked on the internet and a friend-zone slave to his feminazi masters! All fat-boy Furtelle gets in exchange is a pat on his fat back for doing all the donkey-work for his feminazi mothers.

The fact of the matter is chubby Dave’s shitty misandrist site; “We Hunted the Mammoth” looks cheap and unprofessional. The obese slime ball loser doesn’t even realise he’s collateral damage and a pawn for the toxic regime of feminazi supremacy. Punk-ass David doesn’t really like women, if he did, he wouldn’t disrespect women like Cassie Jaye who stand for truth and men’s rights. Flabby Furtelle uses feminism as an identity, a place to belong, a hope of maybe getting laid and for attention!

Sexually suppressed deviant David harassed, stalked, threatened and abused the lovely Cassie Jaye; just because she made a masterpiece movie “The Red Pill,” which exposed modern day 3rd wave feminism for the sham it is! Cassie Jaye took to social media and called out misandrist David Furtelle, labelling him “a misogynist, a blatant liar, a slanderer and not a credible source!” Red pilled heroin Cassie exposed Furtelle, stating he carried out a “disgusting attack via a smear campaign” harassing, threatening and bullying her!

Fat failure Furtelle doesn’t represent women, he’s using feminism for his own sordid and low agenda. If dirt-bag David actually cared about women he wouldn’t have attacked the fantastic film-maker Cassie Jaye in the abusive/ aggressive manner he did. Disgusting Dave went as far as making false accusations against Cassie, stating she was funded by “men’s rights activists” – which is false. Fat phoney Furtelle even made up that Miss Jaye’s “Cannes Film Festival Award is not real,” he lied, it is 100% genuine!

David is a triple chinned mess, wears spectacles, looks unwashed and is around 300 lbs overweight. This blob is a walking heart attack waiting to happen, that is if the diabetes doesn’t kill him first. Cuckold virgin Furtelle even demonised Dr. Jordan Peterson (who is doing great work for our world). Tubby donkey Dave also attacked “The National Parents Organisation” for running ads to stop domestic violence against men! We get it Dave, you are jealous of real masculine men because you are a blobby, fat, soft, beta mess that will never reproduce because you don’t know what women want sexually!

Big ole cow Furtelle defamed Addy Agame after the superstar dating coach’s wrongful conviction. Chubby pig Dave started his lazy “We Hunted the Mammoth” article by stating; “Scottish pick-up artist Addy Agame jailed for 2 years for harassing and threatening women.” This is another blatant lie! Well, we hunted a man-child whale by the name of David Furtelle – tracked, mocked and exposed him for the coward he is. The toilet water blog site made up fake charges of “harassing and threatening girls.” Typical tabloid trash. Ahmed faced no charges of “harassing and threatening” anyone, he was wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace. He will appeal and sue the hounds in the Scottish press for harassing him with their lies and filth!

Adnan Ahmed has always maintained he is not a pick-up artist; he has always said he is a dating/ life coach. It is a sad state of affairs when people are unable to talk to each other face to face, confining society further into dating apps and social media. In this era, it is more normal to troll pictures and profiles online, messaging desperately and projecting a false persona to lure others in; whereas starting a random conversation with someone you find attractive face to face during the day is considered not only abnormal, but also criminal. There is more danger involved in meeting someone online than there is in meeting them in person. Plus, face to face dating is a much more human and much less time-consuming process, that is if Police Scotland don’t arrest you first.

It’s hypocritical that flabby failure Furtelle would falsely accuse anyone of “harassing and threatening women” when he so blatantly did so to Cassie Jaye without any provocation! In reality Ahmed was wrongfully convicted by a biased jury who were influenced by an online social media campaign and horrible selective press reporting during every turn of his trial (by Scottish media scum). Even though it was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspectives were  skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in an online/ media hate campaign.” Ahmed was actually wrongfully convicted of section 38 breach of the peace which is equivalent to raising one’s voice too loud outdoors, madness! Here’s how the jury process works in Scotland, there is no screening for racist, feminist, prejudice or psychiatric deficiencies (unlike the USA). 15 members of the public are selected at random and simply told, “don’t go on social media or media” without any enforcement or checks conducted during the trial. Ahmed’s jury was made up of 9 females and 6 males (some of which were programmed by the media to hate him, some pudgy beta males and some angry overweight feminists), the wrongful non-majority “guilty” verdict will be appealed and overturned in the next few months as no crime was actually committed! Ahmed maintains his innocence; 13 charges were dropped before the biased jury got a chance to deliberate on them. Adnan Ahmed did not receive a fair trial and is not guilty of any criminal conduct!

The jury and accusers are asked to take an “oath to God” to ensure an unbiased testimony, without individuals even being screened to see if they even believe in God (in an age of rampant atheist beliefs). It’s a ridiculous board-game style set-up, this is not justice, it’s a farce ! It was the aim of the clowns in the Scottish press to dehumanise Adnan Ahmed, objectify him, troll him and discredit his reputation to write scandalised, sensationalised lies as news stories. They did not write about his girlfriend and his mother being present to support him during the trial, as well as various male and female well-wishers and supporters dropping in and out during the proceedings. They did not report whole testimonials, only select words to demonise Ahmed further. The press even reported incidents Ahmed was found “not guilty” of after the trial finished. This is further grounds for him to sue for defamation!

Skid mark Furtelle stated; “Ahmed sentenced to two years behind bars while he tried to pick up women on streets of Glasgow.”  You are an idiot Dave. Addy Agame was remanded for 9 months awaiting court, he was already “behind bars,” he was wrongfully remanded since January 2019 you half-wit.

Man-boobed mammoth Dave continued; “Addy best known for filming unfortunate targets as he approached them and putting the videos on YouTube.” Shut up David, all your known for is eating your feminist master’s excrement as soon as it drops in the toilet, then spewing it all over the internet like a subordinate slave!

We need more people in our community with a genuine interest in making our global society a better place, without having an agenda. Adnan Ahmed from Glasgow is such a person. Despite the Scottish media negatively portraying him and his dating business DWLF game via their sensationalised ambush journalism, Adnan Ahmed (known as Addy Agame in the dating industry) is a good man and a solid professional.

Adnan’s main job is a criminal justice practitioner. His role is mainly concerned with rehabilitating people who have been in prison, or have addiction/ mental health issues and those that are homeless. Adnan has helped thousands of people across Scotland especially over the last 5 years. His job involved him travelling across Scotland to help these groups re-integrate back into society.

Ahmed worked with Turning Point Scotland. Professional reports show that he introduced and accompanied numerous clients with alcohol and drug addiction issues to cocaine anonymous and narcotics anonymous, on an almost daily basis. Ahmed also helped people with mental health issues across services that allowed them to do a complete turnaround with their conditions and live productive lives. Adnan worked and provided after-care for these groups for a number of years.

Adnan Ahmed also helped countless homeless people to gain housing which cut down crime and victims of crimes in Scotland, and in turn, throughout the UK. He also worked closely with individuals who were looking at possible prison sentences but were given community orders instead and put in his care, to find employment and replace a destructive lifestyle with a positive recovery-based life. No one that Adnan ever worked with has went on to re-offend. Instead they’ve become very essential and productive members of their communities.

The Scottish mainstream media didn’t mention any of Adnan’s positive work for Scottish society in their defamation of him because these news outlets followed a predetermined narrative against him, as part of their “MeToo” agenda, in order to sell units and gain popularity. Ahmed has a mother, a fiancé, a daughter – none of whom have ever complained of any mistreatment of women. All of his ex-partners are the same. However, the Scottish media reported on him as if he was a lone wolf and a danger to all women.

Radical feminist MSPs/ groups and online social justice warriors saw the media scandal demonising him as an opportunity to use the “MeToo” angle to gain significance and justify their causes, without looking at the facts about this innocent man. Their strategy of attacking, rumour spreading and gas lighting against him resulted in his remand in custody (since Jan 2019) awaiting a trial for the false accusations against him. At the same time all these groups gained free publicity by attaching themselves to the negative media attention his dating business received.

The actual result of all this is that the streets are less safe, people in need are not receiving the care and support he provided, an innocent man and his family are dealing with a wrongful remand; while the people who spread hatred and separatism gained popularity and fame. We need justice for Adnan Ahmed, he is an innocent man!

As far as “unfortunate targets” go, as fruitcake Furtelle put it, following are links to testimonials from females who have actually dated Addy as a result of daygame;

http://redpillrights.com/tia-from-glasgow-talks-about-dating-addy-agame/

http://redpillrights.com/chloe-from-lenzie-discuses-her-rendezvous-with-addy-agame/

http://redpillrights.com/canadian-karen-describes-her-lovely-chance-meeting-with-addy-agame-in-uddingston/

http://redpillrights.com/jill-from-sheffield-gives-honest-feedback-on-her-positive-experience-with-addy-agame/

http://redpillrights.com/christine-from-china-discusses-meeting-and-dating-addy-agame-truthfully/

http://redpillrights.com/aisha-from-saudi-arabia-describes-her-holiday-romance-with-adnan-ahmed-aka-addy-agame/

Prehistoric elephant Furtelle continued; “he was arrested after his seduction techniques were featured on the BBC.” BBC The Social hounded the Glasgow dating coach for months, he reached out to them and responded with a detailed explanation of his business model and background to his client base as well as the scientific reasoning behind this method of face to face daytime speed dating, which was in large ignored. Instead they used choice sentences to turn up the controversy in order to create a story and demonise an innocent man.

Addy gave a statement at the trial also telling the court; “no one involved (the women) thought anything untoward was going on until their perception was changed by how I was portrayed in the online and media smear campaign in January 2019 (referring to BBC Social’s cyber-hate video). All of a sudden, a few warped people said I spoke to them like it was not just a quick chat. I could have asked someone the time and they would have reported it as being uncomfortable or intimidating.” Many legal experts also agreed and re-iterated this throughout the trial.

Thunder thighs Furtelle continued; “some of his more sophisticated techniques included following girls less than half his age down isolated lanes and grabbing women trying to kiss them according to testimony at his trial.” Wide-load hippo David is a lying scumbag! If one observes Addy’s videos it’s clear that there is no “following” or “targeting” of women. They either stop to speak to Addy or they walk with him, both of their own free will. This is another predictable gas lighting tactic by feminazi scum-bags, who use words like “targeting” instead of “approaching” and “following” instead of “approaching.”

Following is actual testimony from Ahmed’s sham show trial and actual facts the press hid (identities remain anonymous for legal reasons);  The alleged conversations are said by the two witnesses to have taken place around 10am approximately, school had already started. The witnesses stated, “they were in their last year (6th year) of high school in 2016,” to the court. This is several months before a college or university course would begin should students at the late stage of high school wish to continue further education.

The media continued; “one witness, who was 17 at the time, said the man told her she looked pretty and asked her if she was married.” Again 17 is above legal age of consent in the UK and this allegation has not been proven. Additionally, to call someone pretty or ask their marital status, is not a criminal offence! The media continued; “Adnan Ahmed denies 18 charges including sexual assault and behaving in a threatening and abusive manner.” This is true, Mr Ahmed is adamant he is not guilty of any of the charges. The media also said; “alleged to have occurred in Glasgow and Uddingston,” however this specific allegation was not alleged to have occurred in Glasgow. The media called the first witness an; “alleged victim now aged 20,” The media also said; “the witness told jurors an Asian man named Addy approached her in a lane on her way to school.” What the media conveniently left out was that the witness also said, “it was around 10am, not the usual time people go to school and the lane is attached to two main roads on either side, along with two small open grass fields at either side.” The witness also said that, “this is the common route to the train station that most people coming from that direction would take.”

The media quoted the witness as saying; “he asked me if I was at school and what I was doing at school.” The media left out the fact that before this quote the witness told the jury, “he introduced himself then I told him I was at school, he made general conversation, we spoke for under three minutes and parted ways.” This is vital information!

The media quoted the witness alleging, “he was asking if I had a boyfriend and I said no.” This is not a crime and has not been proven in court. The media continued; “the woman said she got to the end of the lane before Addy grabbed her hand,” this is not accurate, it has been paraphrased by the media. The witness told the prosecutor, “he took my hand it was consensual,” when the prosecutor asked her about when consent ended, the witness said; “when I took my hand away.” The media continued; “she said – he asked me if I was married, as I was wearing a ring, I said no and walked away.” This has not been proven in court and is not an offence under Scottish Law.

The media again quoted; “he then asked for my number and wanted to know if I wanted to go for a coffee,” the bias order of quoting is not accurate in the media’s reporting as they quoted the witness as saying, “I walked away.” The media then stated; “the woman then walked quickly towards school, told friends and teachers about the incident.” However no “friends” or “teachers” came to court to confirm this. In the woman’s police statement, she said she saw Mr Ahmed several times after the 2016 incident in the same area, but they never spoke again! The 2016 incident was reported to the police in January 2019 after the media made a video defaming Ahmed’s dating business.

The media went onto to quote a second witness stating; “who was 16 at the time is now 19, said an Asian man approached her on the lane, he said hi I’m Addy what’s your name and started asking general questions and chatting.” Again, this is not a recognised crime under Scottish Law. 16 is the legal age of consent in Scotland. The media left out that the incident is said by the witness to have taken place again around 10am after school had already begun an hour previously, in the same lane attached to two main roads that is the main route to the train station which commuters take. Both these witnesses admit to being linked and both stated that they are good friends.

The media continued quoting the allegations made by the witness; “I was surprised as I didn’t know anyone was behind me, I didn’t go into much detail, I didn’t know what to do in the situation, he spoke about my school subjects.” This allegation has not been proven in court and is not a recognised crime under Scottish Law. The media continued; “the girl said she felt intimidated by Addy and said she couldn’t reply to him.” This is inaccurate, the witness told the court she “openly spoke to Addy to be polite.” However, neither of these statements have been proven in court. The media continued their bias selective reporting by stating; “she said, I wanted to go to school as I was quite shaken up and wanted to walk on my own.” What the media again conveniently left out was that the witness told the court; “the school is right next to the train station and that the pair parted ways in under 3 minutes in different directions towards their separate destinations!” Mr Ahmed’s defence team have lodged an eye witness in his defence who can confirm there was no “intimidation” involved.

The media then used their most biased selective reporting of an incident (during the whole trial) leaving out huge chunks of vital information revealed in court, they said; “a 21 year old woman sobbed in court when she told jurors a man named Addy tried to kiss her in July 2016.” The media labelled what appeared to be seconds of tears as “sobbing,” the woman then talked as normal in front of the jury. The woman was also asked why it took her 3 years to report it (in 2019) she told the court she didn’t feel there was a crime. The woman also told the court she had anxiety and mental health issues. She also said, “I looked a lot better 3 years ago, I was thinner, I didn’t have tattoos on my face,” the court heard. The media continued; “she said the pair met in Buchanan Galleries and he told her she looked gorgeous and Italian.” This has not been proven in court and is not a recognised crime in Scotland!

The media then selectively stated;” the scared 18-year-old walked away but was approached again an hour later outside an Argos door.” This is inaccurate as the woman told the court it was over an hour later, she actually said after the initial approach in Buchanan Galleries she went shopping in various stores, called her grandmother for 45 minutes and headed to Argos on Stockwell street in Glasgow a further 35 minutes later approximately. The media then biasedly stated; “he tried to pull me close to him so he could kiss me, so I pushed him away.” The media left out that it was pointed out to jurors that this recollection of events contradicted her police statement, in which she did not say she was “pulled close to him.”  The witness responded by saying the police lied. The witness then told the court “she did not make physical contact with the man,” despite saying earlier that she pushed him.

The court heard,  in her police statement she said the man “touched her face and tried to kiss her,” when the woman was cross examined about this contradiction of not saying so in court she said she didn’t say so at first as she didn’t want to interrupt the questioning (despite being asked numerous times) then claimed, “the pull and face touch” both took place. When the contradictory police statement and court statement was pointed out to the woman in front of the jurors, she sat down from a standing position in the witness box!

The media left out that the woman also thought she was messaged by the man on social media, she told jurors this happened despite her giving a fake name to the man which was not linked to any of her social media accounts as she said she did not tell him any details of mutual friends. She also told the court the man wrote his details on a receipt during the initial meeting, but was still able to contact her despite not having any of her contact details and not even knowing her name! The media continued; “she walked away from him and stood with strangers to be somewhere safe.” The media failed to report that these alleged witnesses were not presented in court and that when the woman was asked if anyone saw this, she said no despite people being around her.

Note – Adnan Ahmed was found not guilty and acquitted of sexual assault for this charge due to the complainer being a lying perjurer.

Ahmed’s brilliant advocate Donna Armstrong said of these Uddingston incidents; “the witnesses admit the path to the train station can be walked in under 60 seconds. In our civilised society these girls are considered adults not children, you’ve seen my client talk to girls on video, it is consensual and the women involved gave positive responses, this is evidence of how his interactions are. This is the main route to the train station in Uddingston, not a secluded lane, it has fields of grass either side and the school happens to be right next to the train station. All sides have said it was during the day outside school hours. For talking sake, even if both these ladies had gone on a date with him, this would be perfectly legal, this is not a crime, I implore you to find him not guilty!”

Adnan Ahmed’s excellent lawyer Donna Armstrong described another witness to the court as “she is unreliable, on record she changed her story 3 times, you can’t trust the testimony she has given. This is not a crime; my client is giving an honest testimony. Being confident is not a crime. You the jury must have felt somewhat uncomfortable and intimidated when selected to be jurors for this case, that doesn’t equate to a crime either. This is not the fault of my client; these are emotions felt by all people. This is not a court of morality, it’s a court of law, you may not like my client but that doesn’t mean he’s guilty. He did not intimidate anyone.”

It was clearly stated in court; “this is not a crime; being confident is not a crime, having a conversation is not a crime, witness is unreliable, asking someone out is not a crime, if you have any inclination of reasonable doubt – he’s innocent, people’s perspective were skewed by how Ahmed was portrayed in a online/ media hate campaign.”

Cowardly beta-male troll Furtelle continued; “he also posted videos about how to overcome so-called last-minute resistance to sex.” Furtelle must be having his man-period, as the sloth seems to be bleeding B.S. from out of his backside! His claim is an absolute lie. The video Dave refers to shows Ahmed saying, “we do not condone rape culture or forcing anyone sexually or otherwise.” Ahmed actually refers to “last minute resistance” as “making women comfortable and creating the right mood for adult relations because too many guys either don’t know what to do or are too thirsty to get laid and forget to have fun.”

We have a quote from Adnan Ahmed aka Addy Agame’s video about LMR on YouTube, Addy said; “we do not condone rape, never force yourself on anyone, hold yourself in high regard and allow space for women to come onto you. If she leaves so be it, no means no, move onto someone who’s into you, don’t waste your time on time wasters.”

Male-feminist, beach whale, sicko Furtelle finished his horrid blog by leaving a link to a mainstream UK newspaper, and a thanks to the feminazi human garbage that sent him the link. We’ll leave you with links to Cassie Jaye’s and Addy Agame’s side of their real stories, respectively.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDxKBuSkoxY

www.addyagame.com

And oh yeah Dave, F you and F all your readers!

 

Check out our next blog post here: http://redpillrights.com/the-deception-game-by-bitch-boy-myles-bonnar-the-man-child-who-made-a-bbc-flop-unmentary-defaming-dating-coaches-in-order-to-kick-start-his-failed-career-as-a-reporter/