Secret Scotland WordPress Site Set Up By Sleazy Scottish Reporters To Spread Misinformation About Addy Agame
Firstly, when it comes to the show-trial and ridiculous false charges (of chatting) against Addy Agame, there is no secret – so the whole concept of the ”Secret Scotland” site is stupid. What more could we expect from the sleazy coward Scottish media, just scour through their site for more examples of their utter stupidity! The moron who set-up the “Secret Scotland” wordpress site did so to spread misinformation.
The clown starts with the heading “Charges And Identity Revealed…Details Of Case Made Public…Subject Addy Agame.” Yeah, shut up idiot – Addy’s identity and “case” were revealed before the police even got involved. The Scottish media are toxic transparent idiots!
None of the bogus charges against Addy related to his “online videos” as many imbeciles in the Scottish media have reported. Addy also stated in many videos he is not a pick-up artist.
EPISODE 1- ”Mainstream Media Demonisation Of Addy Agame” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/PQrKJMRFnwDG/
EPISODE 2 – ”The BBC’s Manipulation / Defamation Of Street Attraction” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/gEkoZIz0Qu9R/
EPISODE 3 – ”Infield Videos & False Allegations” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZBv0ZtYd55Yc/
EPISODE 4 – ”History, Society, Politics & Feminazis” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/za6X02BuTtR7/
The clown journo predictably joined the media circus defaming Adnan Ahmed, falsely reporting fake charges against him. Ahmed is innocent and did not commit sexual assault, he did not commit breach of the peace. Ahmed was set-up by the media, namely by BBC The Social’s racist journalist Myles Bonnar in particular. The video made by BBC The Social is what prompted police to start a pointless investigation.
Ahmed was never charged with “sexual offences,” this is a lie told by the”Secret Scotland” site. The reporter at “Secret Scotland” wrote that Ahmed made no plea, he plead Not Guilty. Media vultures want to create misery and fear; then spread it and feed off it. Adnan Ahmed is innocent; he did not commit sexual assault; he did not commit breach of the peace and he did not behave in a threatening and abusive manner.
The reporter at “Secret Scotland” lists “sexual assault” without explaining it. There was NO sexual assault, an alibi with video evidence was presented to the court showing Adnan Ahmed was elsewhere at the exact time and date of the false allegation, yet he was still remanded in custody due to the media hype surrounding his legitimate dating business. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER) Following is the actual indictment against Adnan Ahmed who is innocent and has not committed any crimes.
Adnan Ahmed was charged with 14 counts of “section 38, breach of the peace,” for simply talking to people during the day, most of whom gave him their number. Two of these charges weren’t even people, one was a video of Ahmed chatting to women who were “unknown” to the prosecutor and who did not even report or complain about an incident to the authorities. The other one was also “unknown” to the prosecutor. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THESE CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)
How can these charges even be considered, or worst still put on an indictment? Furthermore, how can the accused defend them? There was no complaint! In reality, they were put on the indictment against Ahmed to run a trial, in order to convict him on legal technicalities by convincing a jury he is of bad character, using his bad-boy image in the media to do so.
The fake sexual assault charges consist of one female saying Ahmed squeezed her leg and another saying Ahmed touched her face. Both of these allegations are said to have happened in broad daylight, on busy city centre streets, fully clothed and the allegations are from over 3 years ago. These individuals didn’t make these accusations until there was a media scandal regarding Adnan Ahmed’s dating business in 2019, before that no accusations were ever made or reported. The accusers even appeared in the news and on social media when the media scandal regarding Ahmed’s dating business initially happened. They did not make these claims in the press or online. In fact, their initial online/press statements actually contradict their later police statements. The police had to find these individuals to file a report, they made no police report of their own accord, they only talked online and in the media. The police did so to build a case against Ahmed. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF BOTH SEXUAL ASSAULT CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)
Furthermore, Ahmed was not charged with any of this when he was arrested then remanded in January 2019. The police/procurator fiscal added this to his indictment in April 2019, in order to have a document of charges to justify a trial and prosecution. There is a 3rd charge of sexual assault which is a false accusation by a female Ahmed had never even met before. It is alleged to have taken place on 5th November 2018. Ahmed was not there, there is video evidence of him being somewhere else at the exact date and time. Ahmed appears in a time stamped video filmed by his girlfriend at the exact date and time of the false accusation. The accuser blatantly lied to the police and contradicted her police statement on Instagram. Ahmed’s girlfriend took screenshots of this and sent the evidence to the police along with the alibi video proving Ahmed wasn’t there. Despite this, police and prosecutors chose to ignore the evidence. Ahmed’s girlfriend was a defence witness and had to go to court to testify to this, rather than the charge being dropped. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF THIS CHARGE ALSO, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ ON THE BASIS THAT THE ACCUSER WAS A LYING PERJURER)
The authorities would have had to release Adnan Ahmed on bail if they had dropped the charge, which they could have done in January 2019. Instead they added it to the indictment despite Ahmed’s girlfriend’s police statement and alibi evidence. If they didn’t include these charges, they would not be able to indict Ahmed – as the other charges are too small to do so. Additionally, they could still convict Ahmed of this on a technicality through a jury process because of a Scottish Law called Moorov/ Collaboration – even though Ahmed has never ever met the accuser before. Corroboration is when 2 or more independent parties make a similar complaint.
However, in Ahmed’s case no one who has made an accusation is an independent source, as everyone spoke to each other on social media through the Twitter feed of the BBC The Social video defaming Ahmed’s dating business. Evidence of this was forwarded to Adnan Ahmed’s lawyer.. Hence corroboration/Moorov Law does not apply as there was clearly collusion between all the accusing parties. All accusers also started all their police statements with “I saw the BBC Social video on Twitter….”
Furthermore, the three alleged sexual assault charges we have just explained are written as “or alternatively, section 38 breach of the peace” on Ahmed’s indictment document. Meaning, the mild nature of the false allegations is not even considered concrete “sexual assault,” they are “breach of the peace” charges trumped up to the bigger charge as an alternative option in order to justify the uncertain element of the bigger charge. This is not justice, it is ridiculous. (Note – ADNAN AHMED WAS FOUND ‘INNOCENT’ OF ALL 3 SEXUAL ASSAULT CHARGES, HE WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY’ IN SEPTEMBER 2019)
Adnan Ahmed denies all charges. “Secret Scotland” knowingly lied blatantly and still splashed “sexual assault” all over the site (again with no details or explanation of what was involved) in order to pressure prosecutors into convicting Addy. Adnan Ahmed is innocent; he is a victim of ambush journalism and a corrupt media set-up. Never before has a court of law in Scotland dealt with a case like this.
Adnan Ahmed has never been prosecuted of any sexual offences ever! Addy has NEVER been convicted of any sexual offences at all! We repeat he was NOT convicted of sexual offences; he was NOT convicted of sexual assault. In fact, Ahmed did not even face these charges in a court of law, they were thrown out before that stage because he is innocent and the false allegations against him were absolute lies!
Check out our next blog post; http://redpillrights.com/gay-rapist-reynhard-sinaga-gets-life-sentence-for-159-offences-against-48-men-sexist-organisation-rape-crises-fail-to-acknowledge-mens-difficulties-in-reporting-being-raped/
0